Demographic Variables In Ad Patients
A total of 173 patients were enrolled in this study, among which 55 cases (31.79%) carried APOE ε4, 34 cases (61.83%) were female, the mean age was 65.49 ± 9.00 years, and the median disease duration was 24.00 (12.00, 48.00) years in the APOE ε4 carrier group. Demographic variables including gender, age, age of onset, disease duration, education level, smoking, drinking, BMI, etc, were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 1).
Table 1
Demographic variables of the APOE ε4- and APOE ε4 + groups
| APOE ε4- group (n = 118) | APOE ε4 + group (n = 55) | p |
Female [n (%)] | 68.00 (57.63) | 34.00 (61.82) | 0.602 |
Age (years, mean ± SD) | 62.71 ± 9.05 | 65.49 ± 9.00 | 0.062 |
Age of onset [years, median (quartile)] | 59.00 (53.00, 64.75) | 64.00 (53.50, 70.00) | 0.075 |
Disease duration | 25.00 (13.50, 49.00) | 24.00 (12.00, 48.00) | 0.460 |
Education level | | | 0.311 |
Primary school and below [n (%)] | 25 (21.19) | 11 (20.00) | |
Middle and high school [n (%)] | 55 (46.61) | 21 (38.18) | |
Bachelor’s degree and above [n (%)] | 38 (32.20) | 13 (23.64) | |
Smoking [n (%)] | 31 (26.27) | 15 (27.27) | 0.853 |
Drinking [n (%)] | 28 (23.73) | 14 (25.45) | 0.832 |
BMI [median (quartile)] | 23.89 (21.91, 25.87) | 23.10 (21.60, 25.16) | 0.252 |
History | | | |
Hypertension [n (%)] | 39 (33.05) | 13 (23.63) | 0.215 |
Hyperlipidemia [n (%)] | 15 (12.71) | 13 (23.63) | 0.142 |
Myocardial infarction [n (%)] | 2 (1.69) | 0 (0.00) | 1.000 |
Atrial fibrillation [n (%)] | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.82) | 0.308 |
Diabetes mellitus [n (%)] | 15 (12.71) | 6 (10.91) | 0.769 |
Hyperhomocysteinemia [n (%)] | 3 (2.54) | 0 (0.00) | 0.553 |
Cerebrovascular disease [n (%)] | 17 (14.41) | 5 (9.10) | 0.357 |
Thyroid disease [n (%)] | 8 (6.78) | 4 (7.27) | 0.968 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [n (%)] | 2 (1.69) | 0 (0.00) | 1.000 |
Asthma [n (%)] | 3 (2.54) | 2 (3.64) | 0.411 |
Insomnia [n (%)] | 16 (13.56) | 3 (5.45) | 0.074 |
Sleep apnea syndrome [n (%)] | 4 (4.24) | 1 (1.82) | 0.588 |
Depression [n (%)] | 8 (6.78) | 3 (5.45) | 0.564 |
Other mental disorder [n (%)] | 3 (2.54) | 0 (0.00) | 0.223 |
Notes: Data were presented as number (percentage), means ± SD, or median (quartile). APOE ε4-, the APOE ε4 non-carriers; APOE ε4+, the APOE ε4 carriers. Abbreviation: APOE, apolipoprotein E; SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index. |
Association ofAPOEε4 with cognitive function
Cognitive function was compared between the APOE ε4 carrier and the APOE ε4 non-carrier groups in Table 2. Multiple linear regression analyses further illustrated the association between APOE ε4 and cognitive function after adjusting for age, gender, age of onset, disease duration and education level (Supplementary Table 1). In terms of global cognitive function, APOE ε4 predicted lower score of MoCA scale [β, -2.31; 95% CI (-4.58, -0.05); P = 0.046]. Additionally, APOE ε4 was also associated with multiple cognitive domains. As far as memory, APOE ε4 was associated with lower scores of AVLT N1-3 [β, -2.35; 95% CI (-4.51, -0.18); P = 0.034], AVLT N1-5 [β, -4.20; 95% CI (-8.14, -0.25); P = 0.037], AVLT N6 [β, -1.01; 95% CI (-1.94, -0.08); P = 0.034] and AVLT N7 [β, -2.62; 95% CI (-5.02, -0.21); P = 0.033]. In terms of language, APOE ε4 was correlated with lower score of AFT [β, -2.06; 95% CI (-4.04, -0.09); P = 0.040]. With regard to attention/executive function, the APOE ε4 carrier group spend longer time on TMT-A [β, 0.45; 95% CI (0.21, 0.88); P = 0.040]. There was no association between APOE ε4 and language and visuospatial ability.
Table 2
Cognitive function of the APOE ε4- and APOE ε4 + groups
| APOE ε4- group (n = 118) | APOE ε4 + group (n = 55) | p |
Cognitive function | | | |
Global cognitive function | | | |
MMSE [points, median (quartile)] | 20.50 (13.00, 25.00) | 18.00 (10.00, 22.00) | 0.042* |
MoCA (points, mean ± SD) | 14.44 ± 6.53 | 11.69 ± 6.32 | 0.015* |
Individual cognitive domain function | | | |
Memory | | | |
AVLT N1-3 (points, mean ± SD) | 10.55 ± 5.84 | 8.86 ± 5.93 | 0.012* |
AVLT N4 [points, median (quartile)] | 0.00 (0.00, 3.00) | 0.00 (0.00, 1.00) | 0.027* |
AVLT N5 [points, median (quartile)] | 0.00 (0.00, 4.00) | 0.00 (0.00, 1.00) | 0.073 |
AVLT N1-5 [points, median (quartile)] | 12.00 (8.00, 20.00) | 8.50 (3.00, 14.25) | 0.003** |
AVLT N6 [points, median (quartile)] | 0.00 (0.00, 3.00) | 0.00 (0.00, 0.75) | 0.013* |
AVLT N7 [points, median (quartile)] | 9.00 (6.00, 12.00) | 8.00 (0.25, 10.75) | 0.074 |
RCFT-delayed [points, median (quartile)] | 0.00 (0.00, 10.00) | 0.00 (0.00, 5.00) | 0.467 |
Language | | | |
AFT (points, mean ± SD) | 11.79 ± 5.81 | 9.73 ± 6.10 | 0.011* |
VFT-H [points, median (quartile)] | 9.00 (6.00, 15.00) | 8.50 (5.00, 12.00) | 0.044* |
VFT-alternating fluency (points, mean ± SD) | 7.59 ± 5.34 | 6.38 ± 5.15 | 0.046* |
BNT [points, median (quartile)] | 21.00 (18.00, 26.00) | 21.00 (15.00, 24.00) | 0.209 |
Visuospatial ability | | | |
RCFT-imitation [points, median (quartile)] | 26.00 (1.00, 33.00) | 20.25 (0.00, 32.25) | 0.622 |
Attention / Executive function | | | |
TMT-A [points, median (quartile)] | 25.00 (22.00, 25.00) | 25.00 (20.25, 25.00) | 0.683 |
TMT-A (time) [minutes, median (quartile)] | 1.88 (1.05, 3.70) | 2.55 (1.45, 4.00) | 0.034* |
TMT-B [points, median (quartile)] | 21.00 (5.50, 25.00) | 15.00 (6.00, 24.00) | 0.184 |
TMT-B (time) [minutes, median (quartile)] | 2.99 (1.18, 4.00) | 4.00 (2.90, 4.00) | 0.023* |
SCWT-A [points, median (quartile)] | 50.00 (49.00, 50.00) | 50.00 (48.00, 50.00) | 0.262 |
SCWT-A (time) [minutes, median (quartile)] | 0.67 (0.48, 0.94) | 0.79 (0.50, 1.06) | 0.263 |
SCWT-B [points, median (quartile)] | 50.00 (47.25, 50.00) | 50.00 (46.00, 50.00) | 0.523 |
SCWT-B (time) [minutes, median (quartile)] | 0.88 (0.62, 1.20) | 0.93 (0.74, 1.51) | 0.461 |
SCWT-C [points, median (quartile)] | 47.00 (37.00, 49.00) | 43.00 (26.00, 47.50) | 0.177 |
SCWT-C (time) [minutes, median (quartile)] | 1.55 (0.91, 2.11) | 1.74 (0.98, 2.52) | 0.515 |
SDMT [points, median (quartile)] | 20.00 (0.75, 31.75) | 15.00 (0.00, 26.50) | 0.318 |
Notes: Data were presented as means ± SD or median (quartile). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. APOE ε4-, the APOE ε4 non-carriers; APOE ε4+, the APOE ε4 carriers. Abbreviation: APOE, apolipoprotein E; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; AVLT, Animal Fluency Test, AFT; Auditory Verbal Learning Test; VFT, Verbal Fluency Test; BNT, Boston Naming Test; RCFT, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; TMT, Trail Making Test; SCWT, Stroop Color and Word Test; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test. |
Association of APOE ε4 with the levels of neurotrophic factors in CSF
The levels of neurotrophic factors in CSF between the APOE ε4 carrier and non-carrier groups were compared (Fig. 1). NGF level in the APOE ε4 carrier group was significantly lower than that in the APOE ε4 non-carrier group (P = 0.016).
AD patients were further divided into the APOE ε4-/-, APOE ε4+/- and APOE ε4+/+ groups, and found that NGF level in the APOE ε4+/- group was markedly lower than that in the APOE ε4-/- group (P = 0.042). Furthermore, NGF level in the APOE ε4+/+ group was lowest than that in other groups (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Multiple linear regression analyses illustrated that APOE ε4 was associated with lower NGF level in CSF after adjusting for age, gender, age of onset, disease duration, education level and BMI [β, -1.98; 95% CI (-3.78, -0.19); P = 0.031] (Table 3).
Table 3
Association between APOE ε4 and neurotrophic factors in CSF in AD patients
| Unadjusted | Adjusted |
| β (95%CI) | p | β (95%CI) | p |
BDNF (pg/ml) | -0.09 (-14.60, 14.43) | 0.991 | -7.25 (-24.56, 10.05) | 0.408 |
GDNF (pg/ml) | 2.28 (-2.65, 7.21) | 0.363 | 3.38 (-3.36, 10.12) | 0.322 |
NGF (pg/ml) | -1.87 (-3.39, -0.35) | 0.016* | -1.98 (-3.78, -0.19) | 0.031* |
Notes: Age, gender, age of onset, disease duration, education level and BMI were adjusted. *p < 0.05. Abbreviation: APOE, apolipoprotein E; APOE ε4-, the APOE ε4 non-carriers; APOE ε4+, the APOE ε4 carriers; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; GDNF, glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; NGF, nerve growth factor. |
Association Between Ngf Level In Csf And Cognitive Function
Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted in order to explore the association of NGF level in CSF and cognitive function in AD patients (Fig. 2). In terms of overall cognitive function, NGF level was significantly and positively associated with score of MMSE scale [β, 0.33; 95% CI (0.01, 0.66); P = 0.046]. As far as the function of individual cognitive domain, NGF level was significantly and positively associated with scores of RCFT-delayed [β, 0.52; 95% CI (0.15, 0.89); P = 0.007], AFT [β, 0.35; 95% CI (0.107, 0.585); P = 0.005] and VFT-alternating fluency [β, 0.28; 95% CI (0.05, 0.52); P = 0.018], which reflected language function. Furthermore, NGF level was significantly and negatively associated with TMT-A (time) [β, -0.08; 95% CI (-0.14, -0.02); P = 0.008] and positively associated with SCWT-B score [β, 0.72; 95% CI (0.06, 1.37); P = 0.033], which reflected attention/executive function.
Association between NGF level in CSF and cognitive function was further conducted in patients carrying APOE ε4 (Supplementary Table 2). In individual cognitive domains, as far as memory, NGF level was significantly and positively associated with the scores of AVLT N1-3 [β, 0.50; 95% CI (0.11, 0.89); P = 0.015], AVLT N4 [β, 0.20; 95% CI (0.05, 0.34); P = 0.010], AVLT N1-5 [β, 0.63; 95% CI (0.03, 1.24); P = 0.042] and RCFT-delayed [β, 1.29; 95% CI (0.37, 2.22); P = 0.010]. With regard to language, NGF level was significantly and positively associated with the score of VFT-alternating fluency [β, 0.41; 95% CI (0.02, 0.79); P = 0.041]. NGF level was not associated with visuospatial ability, attention/executive function.
Mediation analyses among APOE ε4, NGF level and cognitive function
Mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the sequential associations among APOE ε4, NGF level in CSF, and cognitive function in AD patients (Fig. 3). Results showed that NGF level in CSF significantly mediated the associations between APOE ε4 and AFT [β, -0.45; 95% CI (-0.96, -0.07); P < 0.001] (Fig. 3A) as well as TMT-A (time) [β, 0.15; 95% CI (0.01, 0.33); P < 0.001] (Fig. 3B). There was no marked mediation effect of NGF level in CSF on the associations between APOE ε4 and functions of other cognitive domains.