3.1: X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis.
Using the XRD method and the associated XRD patterns, the crystalline nature of the green-produced Ag-NPs was substantiated. Figure 2 showed the XRD patterns of Ag-NPs synthesized from the reduction of Ag+ using leaf extract of Artocarpus heterophyllus at three different concentrations of silver nitrate solution. The diffraction peaks attained around the 2θ values of 38.05°, 44.33°, 64.38°, and 77.33° were matched to the planes of (111), (200), (220), and (311), correspondingly demonstrating the face-centred cubic (fcc) silver in accordance to the reference standard JCPDS Card No. 87–0720 [24]. In some cases, the diffraction peaks were shifted slightly from the standard patterns, which may be due to the surface encapsulation of Ag-NPs [25]. The XRD patterns also showed that the relative intensity of the (111) diffraction peaks in Fig. 2 is higher than the other peaks. This result indicated that the synthesized Ag-NPs in our work were enriched in (111) facets. It is noteworthy that no unwanted peak was visualized in our synthesized Ag-NPs. This phenomenon indicates the formation of almost pure Ag-NPs. The structural parameters calculated from the XRD patterns for all three types of particles are summarized in Table 1. The crystallite size of Ag-NPs has been estimated using the Debye–Scherrer approximation: D=𝑘𝜆/𝛽𝐶𝑜𝑠𝜃 where “D is the average crystalline size, k is a geometric factor (0.9), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray radiation source, and β is the FWHM (full-width at half maximum) of the XRD peak at the angle of diffraction (θ)” [25]. The calculated average crystallite sizes of Sample-1 Ag-NPs, Sample-2 Ag-NPs, and Sample-3 Ag-NPs were found to be 20.34 nm, 16.99 nm, and 18.88 nm, respectively.
Table 1: The structural parameters of three different concentrated silver nitrate solutions-mediated synthesized Ag NPs were obtained from the XRD analysis.
Silver nanoparticles
|
Plane
(h k l)
|
FWHM
(deg.)
|
Crystallite Size, D
(nm)
|
average
Crystallite Size(nm)
|
Sample-1
|
111
|
0.4088
|
21.47
|
20.34
|
200
|
0.4826
|
18.56
|
220
|
0.4351
|
22.54
|
311
|
0.5654
|
18.80
|
Sample-2
|
111
|
0.3882
|
22.61
|
16.99
|
200
|
0.8501
|
10.54
|
220
|
0.4993
|
19.64
|
311
|
0.7005
|
15.17
|
|
|
|
Sample 3
|
111
|
0.3953
|
22.20
|
18.88
|
200
|
0.7747
|
11.56
|
220
|
0.4501
|
21.79
|
311
|
0.5327
|
19.95
|
|
|
|
Table 2: Cytotoxicity of three different concentrated silver nitrate mediated synthesized Ag-NPs obtained from cell viability assay
Sample ID
|
Survival of HeLa Cells (%)
|
Remarks
|
Control
|
100%
|
Cytotoxicity was observed on the HeLa cell line
|
1
|
<5%
|
2
|
<5%
|
3
|
10%-20%
|
Table 3: FT-IR spectra peaks position of Artocarpus heterophyllus leaf aqueous extract mediated synthesized Ag-NPs of sample-1, sample-2, and sample-3 with corresponding functional group
Sample number
|
Peaks position
Wave number (cm-1)
|
Functional groups
|
References
|
Sample-1
|
1098 cm-1, 1626 cm-1, and 3433 cm-1
|
stretching vibration bands of-C–O–C-, –C=O, and –OH respectively
|
[26, 27]
|
sample-2
|
1077 cm-1, 1612 cm-1, and 3440 cm-1
|
sample-3
|
1084 cm-1, 1625 cm-1, and 3438 cm-1
|
Sample-1
|
Weaker peaks appeared at 1366 cm-1, 2386 cm-1, and 2933 cm-1
|
specifying the stretching vibration bands of -C–N of the amine, -C=C-, and-C–H, respectively
|
[28, 29]
|
sample-2,
|
Weaker peaks appeared at1358 cm-1, 2367 cm-1, and 2933 cm-1
|
sample-3
|
Weaker peaks appeared at 1410 cm-1, 2378 cm-1, and 2927 cm-1 for
|
3.2: EDX analysis
Strong indications of silver atoms were seen in the EDX profile. The existence of Ag NPs was shown by the prominent signal peak in the EDX spectrum at 3.25 KeV, which was characteristic of the absorption of silver Nano crystallites [24]. It is interesting to note that other components, including C, Cl, N, and O, were also found. The organic molecules from the extract that were absorbed on the surface of Ag NPs and played a critical role in Ag NPs reduction and stability were most likely connected with C and O [25].
The leaf extract solution also contained Cl [25–26]. Sample-1 and sample-3 had somewhat lower and greater concentrations, respectively. Only sample 2 was examined using EDS in this experiment. Since the three samples were all created using the same method, it seems sensible that they would have comparable components. By examining the sample-2 EDS result, it is simple to make predictions regarding sample-1 and sample-3.
3.3: SEM micrographs analysis:
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the surface morphology of the artificially produced silver nanoparticles (sample-2), and the results were shown in Fig. 4. The scanning electron micrograph of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) showed unmistakably that the artificially produced Ag NPs were aggregated into dispersed clusters. The size distribution of the Ag NPs that were produced was roughly 120 nm to 220 nm, and the average particle size was in the vicinity of 170 nm. The formation of the big particles that were seen most likely included the aggregation of several smaller particles [26].
The massive particles may be eradicated using the heat treatment method. Other researchers also reported a similar phenomenon [26–27]. The fact that there was lower agglomeration may be because there are capping agents present on the surface of the Ag NPs; this was demonstrated both by the EDX and the FT-IR tests. Several characteristics working together typically determine the nanoparticle size range and size distribution. An essential factor to consider for size management is the silver nitrate solution (AgNO3) concentration. On the other hand, the quantity of leaf extract solution used, and its concentration may both significantly impact the regulation of particle size. In this experiment, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) was only used to examine sample 2 since the concentration of samples 1 and 3 were, respectively, somewhat lower and higher. This lower and higher concentration might potentially increase or decrease the particle size. However, our primary objective was determining the cytotoxicity of concentration variation-mediated Ag NPs. The same method was used to generate all three samples, and the particle size distribution may be altered by adjusting the amount of AgNO3 in the mixture. Finally, by analysing the results of the SEM experiment performed on sample 2, it is possible to make an accurate prediction about the nanoparticle size of samples 1 and 2.
3.4: Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy
FT-IR spectra were recorded for three different samples of synthesized Ag-nanoparticles respectively, between wavenumbers of 400–4000 \({\text{c}\text{m}}^{-1}\), to recognize the conceivable biomolecules responsible for reducing Ag+ into Ag-NPs and their conjugation with the synthesized Ag-NPs that were shown in Fig. 5. In Table-3, Artocarpus heterophyllus leaf extract-mediated synthesized Ag-NPs, three strong peaks appeared for each sample which represent the stretching vibration bands of-C–O–C-, –C = O, and –OH, respectively [27, 28]. Moreover, Weaker peaks were also appeared which specified the stretching vibration bands of -C–N of the amine, -C = C-, and-C–H, respectively [29, 30].
These bands were similar to the bands of Artocarpus heterophyllus aqueous leaf extract [29]. The FT-IR spectra of the three different concentrated synthesized Ag-NPs indicate that similar functional groups are present in the leaf extract and all the synthesized Ag-NPs. However, the peaks were shifted slightly, and the peak intensities were found to be increased for Ag-NPs, suggesting the condensation of the biomolecules on the surface results in the encapsulation of Ag-NPs with bio-molecules.
3.5: Cytotoxicity of Ag-NPs against cancerous cell
The cell viability experiment assessed the cytotoxicity of the three different concentrated synthesized Ag-NPs. HeLa cell line, a human cervical carcinoma cell line, was taken as a model cell. The synthesized Ag-NPs were then exposed to the selected cell lines at a 100 mg/L concentration. The phase-contrast microscopic pictures of Ag-NPs persuaded cytomorphological variations, and growth inhibition of the cell lines with control and at three unlike concentrated synthesized Ag-NPs were shown in Fig. 6. From the investigation of the cytotoxicity assay, it was found that the synthesized Ag-NPs were toxic, which was evidenced by the change of cytomorphology, indicating the decrease in cell viability. The cytotoxicity of the sample-1 Ag-NPs. Sample-2 Ag-NPs and sample-3 Ag-NPs against carcinoma cells were slightly varied. In the present study, sample − 1, and sample-2 Ag-NPs were more toxic than sample-3 in table.2. Ag-NPs cytotoxicity has been widely studied. However, the specific processes by which Ag-NPs cause cell death are still largely unknown since cytotoxicity differs from cell to cell and NPs to NPs. Ag-NPs cytotoxicity has primarily been attributed to the disrupted antioxidant system and increased oxidative stress at the cellular level. Oxidative stress causes damage to the mitochondrial and plasma membranes, as well as to cellular proteins, lipids, and DNA, which ultimately results in cell death and electronic chain dysfunction. The cytotoxicity shown in the current investigation may result from cellular harm caused by oxidative stress [30]. Additionally, the interaction of the encapsulating chemicals with the carcinoma cell may cause sample 1 and sample 2s increased cytotoxicity. The nanoparticles' size may impact cell damage, and AgNO3 concentration is strongly correlated with nanoparticle size. Maybe tiny particle size is ideal for lower AgNO3 concentrations, and probably cancer cell destruction is better suited to small particle size.