Metformin was a synthetic derivative of guanidine, extracted from the extracts of Galega officinalis, and represented a worldwide milestone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (Serrao et al., 2017; Xia et al., 2018). Recently, emerging evidences demonstrated that metformin inhibited the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, protected against oxidative damage and directed macrophage polarization both in vitro and in vivo (Zhao et al., 2017; El-Bahy et al., 2018; Schuiveling et al., 2018). Interestingly, increasing evidences indicated that metformin could inhibit inflammation and promote tissue repair by promoting macrophage differentiation to M2 macrophage (Jung et al., 2021; Xian et al., 2021), and M2 macrophage played a crucial role in peripheral nerve regeneration after injury (Peluffo et al., 2015; Salehi et al., 2019). However, the correlations among metformin, M2 macrophage polarization, and peripheral nerve regeneration remained unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to find out whether metformin could switch macrophage into M2 subtype to boost the peripheral nerve regeneration. Throughout our research, we systematically evaluated the specific effects of metformin treatment in the process of peripheral nerve regeneration. The results demonstrated that administration of metformin could induce superior regenerative effects in the peripheral nerve injury model, which was proven by improved recovery of motor and sensory functions, as well as increased axon regeneration and myelination. In addition, we observed that metformin induced M2 macrophage polarization in vivo. As for in vitro, metformin promoted the M2 macrophage polarization involved in the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling pathway.
Earlier studies have extensively addressed the neuroprotective effects of metformin and revealed its positive therapeutic effects in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) (Wu et al., 2022), peripheral nerve injury (Liu et al., 2019), and cerebral ischemia (Jiang et al., 2014). Mary et al. found that metformin regulated autophagy by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and mitigated peripheral nerve damage in non-obese diabetic mice (MKR) (Haddad et al., 2022). Wang et al. found that metformin stabilized microtubule structure, regulated oxidative stress and mitochondria function by activating the Akt-mediated Nrf2/ARE pathway, and finally promoted axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury (Wang et al., 2020). However, few studies had focused on its immunomodulatory property about the macrophage reprogramming during the peripheral nerve regeneration. Therefore, our findings were novel in that we demonstrated that metformin enhanced the function recovery in PNIs animal models by regulating M2 macrophage polarization.
It is well known that periphery nerve regeneration requires the participation of macrophages, inducing M2 macrophage polarization to accelerate the regeneration of axons and myelin sheaths (Zigmond and Echevarria, 2019). Emerging research had illustrated that M2 macrophage could release the VEGF to induce the vascular regeneration at the location of peripheral nerve damage site, which was critical for nerve regeneration (Cattin et al., 2015). Some studies also highlighted that M2 macrophage could promote the Schwann cell maturity (Stratton et al., 2018). Above findings provided strong evidences for the essential role of macrophages in the process of peripheral nerve regeneration and suggested that targeting macrophages might be a promising strategy to improve the outcome of functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury.
Numbers of studies had also demonstrated that maintaining a certain number of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages was crucial for nerve repair, which was beneficial for the maturation and migration of Schwann cells and regeneration of axons (Peluffo et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2021). In this study, metformin was shown to facilitate the up-regulation of the number and proportion of M2 macrophages. In in vitro experiments, pre-treatment with LPS could stimulate the polarization of primary macrophage toward M1 phenotype, mimicking the activation of inflammation in the early stages of nerve injury, whereas metformin treatment reversed the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS and up-regulated the expression of the marker for M2 macrophages (CD206), but this effect was reversed with the addition of compound C (an AMPK inhibitor). Above experimental results indicated that metformin promoted the regeneration of axons and myelin sheaths through the polarization of macrophage to M2 type, connected with the activation of AMPK.
Macrophage polarization has been recognized as a component in the regulation of energy metabolism (Kumari et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020b). AMPK, the common target for Metformin, was essential for the cellular metabolism and growth. In previous studies, activated AMPK had been involved in tissue repair of a multitude of pathological processes, such as ulcerative colitis(Nasr et al., 2022), rheumatoid arthritis(Cai et al., 2022), and diabetic ulcers(Huang et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021b). Interestingly, the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling axis also had been illustrated in the literature to play a key role in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis and energy metabolism. Recent studies reported that the regulations of energy metabolism and innate immunity were linked through an antagonistic crosstalk between NF-κB and the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling pathway(Li et al., 2020a; Zhang et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2022). Ma et al. confirmed that SIRT1 could stimulate oxidative energy production by activating AMPK, PPAR-γ and PGC-1α simultaneously, while these factors were found to suppress NF-kB signaling and inflammation(Ma et al., 2018). Some authors also argued that inhibiting the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling pathway could induce chronic inflammation in metabolic diseases(Lee et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021b; Yang et al., 2022). Thus, we hypothesized that the regulatory function of metformin was associated with the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling pathway. In the context, to clarify the molecular mechanism how metformin induced M2 macrophage polarization during the wound healing process, we further investigated the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling axis. According to our results, metformin significantly elevated the p-AMPK/AMPK ratio, as well as the expression levels of PGC-α and PPAR-γ. By contrast, the p-AMPK/AMPK ratio, PGC-α and PPAR-γ in cells co-treated with metformin and compound C indicated that metformin activated the PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling by activating AMPK. Moreover, we observed that inhibiting the AMPK activity by compound C could reverse the regulatory function of metformin. As shown in our present study, metformin treatment promoted the alternative M2 macrophage polarization by inducing the activation of AMPK. Activating AMPK could upregulate the PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling pathway. Therefore, we supposed that the effect of metformin on wound healing might be related to the alteration of macrophage phenotype by regulating the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling axis. Notably, our findings revealed a novel molecular mechanism in that we demonstrated that Metformin enhanced the function recovery in PNIs animal models by regulating M2 macrophage polarization. Wang et al. also reported that MAR1 inhibited the inflammatory response in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages and hPBMCs through the SIRT1/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ pathway(Wang et al., 2021a). Based on previous research findings, we provided further evidence supporting that metformin was a promising therapeutic strategy for inducing M2 macrophage polarization by modulating the AMPK/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling pathway.