Docking Studies
Docking of Ligands with protein using Hex and Maestro Schrödinger software
Initial screening of the ligands with the DPP IV complex was done using the Hex software. Energy obtained for the ligands was recorded, and it was compared with standard Metformin hydrochloride. Fig. 3 depicts docking of 2 – vinyl quinoline with the protein 2RIP.
Table 1. Docking Score from Hex
S. No
|
Name of the compound
|
Energy(kcal mol-1)
|
1
|
Metformin Hydrochloride-1
|
-128.51
|
1a
|
Metformin Hydrochloride-2
|
-128.51
|
2
|
2-Vinylquinoline
|
-143.07
|
2a
|
2-Vinylquinoline-1
|
-143.07
|
2b
|
2-Vinylquinoline-2
|
-143.07
|
3
|
8- Bromo-2-vinylquinoline
|
-155.81
|
4
|
6-Methoxy-8-nitro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-178.02
|
5
|
7-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-152.50
|
5a
|
7-Chloro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-152.50
|
6
|
6,7-Difluoro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-163.06
|
7
|
8-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-155.81
|
7a
|
8-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-155.81
|
8
|
4-Methyl-2-vinylquinoline
|
-152.02
|
9
|
3-Vinylquinoline
|
-138.87
|
9a
|
3-Vinylquinoline-1
|
-138.87
|
10
|
2-Methoxy-3-vinylquinoline
|
-172.47
|
11
|
2-Chloro-7-methyl-3-vinylquinoline
|
-159.91
|
12
|
4-Vinylquinoline
|
-152.02
|
13
|
6-Bromo-4-vinylquinoline
|
-159.64
|
14
|
6-Methoxy-4-vinylquinoline
|
-151.44
|
15
|
5-Vinylquinoline
|
-142.65
|
16
|
8-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-162.85
|
17
|
8-Bromo-5-vinylquinoline
|
-162.85
|
18
|
8-Nitro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-160.86
|
19
|
3-Methoxy-5-vinylquinoline
|
-148.84
|
20
|
2-Chloro-7-methyl-5-vinylquinoline
|
-159.04
|
21
|
2-Bromo-7-methyl-5-vinylquinoline
|
-159.04
|
22
|
2-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-152.34
|
22a
|
2-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-152.34
|
23
|
7-Vinylquinoline
|
-138.87
|
23a
|
7-Vinylquinoline
|
-138.87
|
24
|
8-Vinylquinoline
|
-142.71
|
25
|
5-Bromo-8-vinylquinoline
|
-154.62
|
26
|
2-Ethyl-3-methyl-8-vinylquinoline
|
-167.44
|
Table 1 shows the docking energy of ligands and standard metformin hydrochloride from Hex. It is to be noted that lower the energy in kcal mol -1, higher will be the docking score for ligands with protein. From the Table 2, 3-vinylquinoline and 7-vinylquinoline isomers possess energy -138.87 kcal mol-1 which is lower and comparable with the standard Metformin hydrochloride having energy -128. 51 kcal mol-1. As there are several limitations for the Hex software, the results obtained from Hex is compared with a commercial software Maestro Schrödinger.
The ligands are docked with the protein in Maestro Schrödinger with Gride based Ligand docking energies (GLIDE). The active site chosen for this particular study is the A: 34 Q (800). Gride is generated for this active site, and the docking is executed. Maestro Schrödinger software is very efficient in determining the ligand's isomers, and docking is done for each isomer. The isomers of the ligands are listed as a,b,c with the ligand name. The docking score of ligands from Schrödinger software is given in Table 2.
Table 2. Docking score obtained from Schrödinger software
1
|
Metformin Hydrochloride-1
|
-4.141
|
1a
|
Metformin Hydrochloride-2
|
-2.203
|
2
|
2-Vinylquinoline
|
-6.504
|
2a
|
2-Vinylquinoline-1
|
-5.767
|
2b
|
2-Vinylquinoline-2
|
-3.659
|
3
|
8-Bromo-2-vinylquinoline
|
-5.587
|
4
|
6-Methoxy-8-nitro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-5.368
|
5
|
7-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-4.926
|
5a
|
7-Chloro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-4.67
|
6
|
6,7-Difluoro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-4.724
|
7
|
8-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-4.092
|
7a
|
8-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-3.378
|
8
|
4-Methyl-2-vinylquinoline
|
-4.044
|
9
|
3-Vinylquinoline
|
-3.916
|
9a
|
3-Vinylquinoline-1
|
-3.538
|
10
|
2-Methoxy-3-vinylquinoline
|
-4.941
|
11
|
2-Chloro-7-methyl-3-vinylquinoline
|
-3.997
|
12
|
4-Vinylquinoline
|
-6.364
|
13
|
6-Bromo-4-vinylquinoline
|
-4.778
|
14
|
6-Methoxy-4-vinylquinoline
|
-3.67
|
15
|
5-Vinylquinoline
|
-4.542
|
16
|
8-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.908
|
17
|
8-Bromo-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.842
|
18
|
8-Nitro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-5.601
|
19
|
3-Methoxy-5-vinylquinoline
|
-4.291
|
20
|
2-Chloro-7-methyl-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.527
|
21
|
2-Bromo-7-methyl-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.39
|
22
|
2-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-4.022
|
22a
|
2-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.752
|
23
|
7-Vinylquinoline
|
-4.002
|
23a
|
7-Vinylquinoline
|
-3.357
|
24
|
8-Vinylquinoline
|
-4.744
|
25
|
5-Bromo-8-vinylquinoline
|
-4.305
|
26
|
2-Ethyl-3-methyl-8-vinylquinoline
|
-4.036
|
1
|
Metformin Hydrochloride-1
|
-4.141
|
Table 3. Glide score and Glide energy obtained from Schrödinger software
S. No
|
Name of the compound
|
Glide score
(kcal mol-1)
|
Glide energy(kcal mol-1)
|
1
|
Metformin Hydrochloride-1
|
-4.167
|
-14.795
|
1a
|
Metformin Hydrochloride-2
|
-4.07
|
-20.159
|
2
|
2-Vinylquinoline
|
-6.531
|
-23.067
|
2a
|
2-Vinylquinoline-1
|
-5.772
|
-19.505
|
2b
|
2-Vinylquinoline-2
|
-5.508
|
-25.426
|
3
|
8-Bromo-2-vinylquinoline
|
-5.587
|
-27.405
|
4
|
6-Methoxy-8-nitro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-5.37
|
-24.45
|
5
|
7-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-4.926
|
-23.023
|
5a
|
7-Chloro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-4.682
|
-19.068
|
6
|
6,7-Difluoro-2-vinylquinoline
|
-4.724
|
-23.952
|
7
|
8-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-5.236
|
-27.548
|
7a
|
8-Chloro- 2- vinylquinoline
|
-3.471
|
-21.279
|
8
|
4-Methyl-2-vinylquinoline
|
-4.063
|
-21.706
|
9
|
3-Vinylquinoline
|
-3.933
|
-21.273
|
9a
|
3-Vinylquinoline-1
|
-5.65
|
-28.376
|
10
|
2-Methoxy-3-vinylquinoline
|
-4.943
|
-22.109
|
11
|
2-Chloro-7-methyl-3-vinylquinoline
|
-3.997
|
-19.517
|
12
|
4-Vinylquinoline
|
-6.366
|
-23.442
|
13
|
6-Bromo-4-vinylquinoline
|
-4.779
|
-22.594
|
14
|
6-Methoxy-4-vinylquinoline
|
-3.67
|
-20.519
|
15
|
5-Vinylquinoline
|
-4.542
|
-21.692
|
16
|
8-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.908
|
-23.406
|
17
|
8-Bromo-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.842
|
-27.366
|
18
|
8-Nitro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-5.606
|
-20.981
|
19
|
3-Methoxy-5-vinylquinoline
|
-4.291
|
-21.275
|
20
|
2-Chloro-7-methyl-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.527
|
-22.815
|
21
|
2-Bromo-7-methyl-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.39
|
-22.745
|
22
|
2-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-4.022
|
-22.455
|
22a
|
2-Chloro-5-vinylquinoline
|
-3.752
|
-26.786
|
23
|
7-Vinylquinoline
|
-4.025
|
-22.014
|
23a
|
7-Vinylquinoline
|
-5.257
|
-28.41
|
24
|
8-Vinylquinoline
|
-4.744
|
-28.861
|
25
|
5-Bromo-8-vinylquinoline
|
-4.307
|
-19.488
|
26
|
2-Ethyl-3-methyl-8-vinylquinoline
|
-4.036
|
-22.469
|
Among 26 vinyl quinoline derivatives, 2-vinylquinoline exhibits the highest docking score of -6.504 where the docking score of Metformin hydrochloride is -4.141. This clearly shows the efficiency of the vinylquinoline as the potent DPP IV inhibitor. Glide score obtained for the vinylquinoline ligands is listed in Table 3. Compared with the standard Metformin hydrochloride, the Glide score obtained for the vinylquinoline derivatives is high and appreciable. Glide score for 2-vinylquinolines is more compared to that of the other vinylquinoline derivatives. This ensures the capability of the ligand as an anti-diabetic drug. All the ligands and their respective isomers show an appreciable glide score compared to the standard Metformin hydrochloride administered as an anti-diabetic drug. Table 3 also shows the ligands' glide energy after docking with the DPP IV complex with an inhibitor. From this table, it is clear that the glide energy is appreciable for all the docked ligands. Some difference in the glide energy value can be seen for isomers.
Fig. 4a and 4b shows the 2D and 3D interaction of the ligand 2-vinylquinoline with the protein 2RIP whereas Fig. 5a and 5b shows 2D and 3D interaction of Metformin hydrochloride with the protein 2RIP. The lead ligand shows π interaction with the amino acid moiety ARG. This gives the excellent docking score in GLIDE. Apart from the π interaction, some weak interaction such as Vander Waal forces is also seen in the 2D interaction of the vinyl quinolines with the protein. Thus the ligand possess appreciable glide score as that of standard Metformin Hydrochloride.
Among quinoline derivatives, 2-vinylquinolines exhibit an extensive range of pharmacological activities, as epitomized by anti-leishmanial agent chimanine, anticancer compound, integrase inhibitor FZ41, CysLT1 antagonist VUF 5017 and antimalarial agent UCF 501 [12]. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) is associated with several epidemic diseases like type I diabetes, tumour growth and obesity [16]. DPP-IV inactivates the action of incretins by scavenging the N-terminal dipeptides of incretins. It results in a decrease in insulin secretion and an increase in blood glucose level [17]. DPP- IV inhibitors shows an advantageous effect compared to classical anti-diabetic therapies when administered as a daily oral dose [18, 19].
It is also observed that there is no correlation between the glide energy values for the ligands obtained from the Schrödinger software and the Hex software. Thus the results made the users to go for the commercial software where freeware could be used for preliminary screening in in silico activity determination.
ADME properties
The properties of the ligands were analyzed to ensure the pharmacokinetic activities, and it is found to obeys Lipinski Rule of five [20]. Table s2. (Supporting Information) shows the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion predictions of the ligands and the standard Metformin hydrochloride. The log P o/w of ligands are between 0.7 – 4.0 where log S lies within -4.1 - -0.4. The values of logP o/w and log S for all ligands falls within the recommended range -2.0 - 6.5 and -6.5 – 0.5 respectively. This further confirms that chosen ligands obeyed Lipinski rule of five and possess good drug dissolution, oral availability and drug like property. The similar studies on nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds for anti-tumour activity against the Alkylglycerone phosphate synthase (AGPS) were carried out where the drug likeliness of the ligands were determined using ADME properties using Schrodinger software [20]. The results ensure the drug-like properties of the heterocyclic compounds belonging to the class of vinylquinoline. Upon further wet-lab studies and clinical trials, the class of vinylquinoline’s can be administrated as anti-diabetic agents.
Prediction of Toxicity
The toxicity of ligands predicted using Toxtree 3.1 software Table s3 (Supporting Information) shows three ligands 8- nitro-5-vinyl quinoline, 6- methoxy-8-nitro-2-vinyl quinoline and 2-nitro-5- vinyl quinoline possess low toxic risk as estimated by Kroes TTC decision tree method. Based on QSAR, all the 28 ligands are not potential carcinogens, but these three ligands possess no genotoxic carcinogenicity. Thus in silico method of toxicity prediction of ligands are possible by utilizing the Toxtree model. Further validation of the results by in vivo or in vitro method is warranted.