Cell culture
OVCAR3, SKOV3, HEY, A2780 and H08910 cells were acquired from Fudan University, shanghai cancer center. The cell lines were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin, and maintained in an incubator at 37°C containing 5% CO2.
TCGA analysis
The TCGA-OC cohort's transcriptome RNA-seq data and associated clinical parameters were retrieved from the National Cancer Institute's TCGA database. The cancerous and non-cancerous feature of expression of CCT2 were assessed from GEPIA databases. The K-M plot database (http://kmplot.com/analysis) was used to obtain follow-up information on patients with various cancers. The representative images of EOC tissue and adjacent tumor tissue were acquired from HPA database. Primary tumor samples in the TCGA-OC cohort were assigned a high or low score based on their CCT2 expression quartile. The R package "limma" was used to perform gene expression differentiation analysis, and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to further analyze DEGs.
Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction
Using the RNA isolation kit (Takara, Dalian, China), total RNAs were extracted from liver cancer cells in accordance with the manufacturer's protocols. In brief, the Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (Takara) was used to reverse-transcribe 600 ng of RNA in a 10μL reaction volume. Using a Bio-Rad CFX96 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and a Takara TB Green PCR Kit, a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed to detect target genes expression, which was determined using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a normalizing control. The primer used in this study are showed in Supplementary Table 1.
Western blot assay
On ice, proteins were extracted with RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Using 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, equal amounts of protein extracts were separated and transferred onto PVDF membranes (ImmobilonP, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The membranes were blocked for 20 minutes with Quick-Block Western Solution (Beyotime) before being incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The membranes were then incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with secondary antibody (Beyotime). Enhanced chemiluminescence was used to detect the protein bands (Beyotime). The antibodies used in this study were as follows: rabbit anti‐CCT2 (1:10000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rabbit anti‐Ecadherin (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), rabbit anti‐Ncadherin (1:1000; CST), rabbit anti‐snail (1:1000; CST), rabbit anti‐slug (1:1000; CST), rabbit anti‐snail (1:1000; CST),rabbit anti‐EpCAM (1:1000; CST), rabbit anti‐β-actin (1:5000; Proteintech), rabbit anti‐BIM1 (1:1000; CST), rabbit anti‐KIT (1:1000; CST), rabbit anti‐β-catenin (1:1000; CST), rabbit anti‐HSP105 (1:2000; Abcam), rabbit anti‐PP2A (1:500; Abcam), rabbit anti‐CCND1 (1:1000; CST), and rabbit anti‐myc (1:1000; CST)
siRNA, shRNA
Small interfering RNAs (siNC, siRNA targeting CCT2) were purchased from
GenePharma Company (Shanghai, China). Lentivirus vectors containing short hairpin
RNA against CCT2 (shCCT2) and the negative control (shScramble) were constructed
and generated by the Genechem Company (Shanghai, China). Puromycin (Clontech, USA) was added to select lentiviral transfected cells. The expression of indicated protein was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis. The sequences of siRNA or shRNA were listed in Supplementary table 1.
Sphere formation assay
EOC cells (1×103) were cultured in sphere medium containing DMEM/F12 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen), 20 ng/mL EGF (Sigma), 20 ng/mL basic FGF (Invitrogen), and 20 ng/mL HGF (Invitrogen) for two weeks. Under a microscope at 200 magnifications, spheroids were counted and representative fields were photographed.
Colony formation
Cells transfected with the indicated plasmids were plated in six well plates at a density of 500 cells per well and cultured for 14 days at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Following that, the cell colonies were washed twice with PBS, fixed with methanol for 30 minutes, and stained for 20 minutes with 0.5% crystal violet. Under a microscope, the colony numbers were counted.
Cell migration assay
To investigate the effect of CCT2 downregulation on cell migration, the shCCT2‐carrying cells were subjected to the wound healing assay. In brief, when the cells reached 90% confluency in plates under standard conditions, the scratched cell layers were made down the center of the well using sterile tips. Cell migration was assessed by measuring the distance between the two boundaries of the cellular area at 0 and 48 hours respectively.
Cell invasion assay
To assess the effect of CCT2 expression on cell invasion capacity, cell invasion assays were performed using Matrigel-coated chambers (pore size 8 μm; Corning Costar Corporation, Cambridge, MA). Briefly, 5×104 cells were placed in an upper chamber coated with Matrigel and supplemented with serum-free medium. The lower chamber was filled with medium containing 10% FBS. The cells were incubated for 48 h at 37°C, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with 0.5% crystal violet and finally counted by inverted microscopy.
Resistance analysis
Cells were counted and seeded at 1×104 cells per well in 96-well plates, and cultured for 12 to 24h. The same dosage of 400μg/mL 5-flurouracil or 24μg/mL cisplatin (MCE) was added to the scramble and shCCT2 EOC cells, respectively. The measurement of cell proliferation was performed via the Cell Counting Kit-8 Kit according to the manufacture’s protocol (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Three wells of each group were detected every day and incubated for 2h with the Cell Counting Kit-8 solution. The absorbance of the sample taken from each well was measured on a micro-plate reader (Bio-rad) at 450 nm. The results were plotted as the mean ± SD from three separate experiments with three replicates per experiment for each experimental condition.
Immunoprecipitation
The indicated plasmids were co-transfected into HEK293T cells. After 72 h, cells were lysed with IP lysis buffer (20mM Tris-HCL, pH7.4, 150mM NaCL, 1mM EDTA, and 1% NP-40) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, USA). Immunoprecipitation assays were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Pierce, Thermo, USA). The supernatant protein was immunoprecipitated with the indicated tagged antibodies and protein G agarose beads overnight at 4°C. Antibodies used in these experiments are listed below. The complex was washed with NaCl buffer and boiled with 1×SDS loading buffer.
Immunofluorescence assay
The indicated cells were fixed, permeabilized, and blocked. Then, the indicated primary antibodies, including E-cadherin, vimentin, HSP105 and β-catenin, were incubated with cells. The membranes and cells were treated with a secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase and a secondary antibody that was fluorescently tagged the next day after being rinsed three times with PBS.
Ubiquitination assay
SKOV3 cells were co-transfected with the indicated plasmids. The cells were given 10μM MG132 treatment for 6 hours after being incubated for 24 hours. The cells were then boiled for 10 minutes at 100°C while being lysed with IP lysis buffer. For IP using anti-β-catenin, the supernatants were collected, and RIPA lysis was then added to a cocktail of PMSF and protease inhibitors.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, CA) was used for the statistical analyses. The significance of differences between groups was evaluated using the Student t test and one‐way analysis of variance. The results from three independent experiments are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Values of P < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.