3.2. Antibacterial activity of compounds 3a -j
Table 1 reveals the zones of inhibition (ZI) of compounds 3a-j at 20 mg/mL, the higher the ZI, the better the activity. At lower concentrations (10 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL, and 1.25 mg/mL) only two (N-(4-Nitrophenyl)-L-proline 3a and N-(4-Nitrophenyl)-L-valine3j) of the compounds were able to sufficiently inhibit the growth of the selected bacteria. Compounds 3a and 3j displayed the best antibacterial activity against all the bacterial strains screened except against Bacillus subtilis which was resistant to the test compounds. Interestingly, both compounds 3a and 3j had higher zones of inhibition than streptomycin against four out of the eight bacterial strains screened: Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis. And amongst the four bacteria, Compound 3a displayed the highest zone of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus. Furthermore, it was observed that 3a, 3d, 3i, and 3j with ZI of 12 mm, 16 mm, 18 mm, and 12 mm respectively were more potent against Proteus mirabilis and Streptococcus pneumoniae (ZI = 16, 16, 14, 18 mm respectively) than streptomycin (8 and 8 mm respectively). However, none of the compounds were able to inhibit the growth of Bacillus subtilis asides from the standard drug. The best activity across the N-aryl amino acid was observed against Proteus mirabilis and Streptococcus pneumoniae where four of the amino acids displayed higher zones of inhibition (> 8mm; > 16mm respectively) than streptomycin (ZI = 8 mm).
Table 1
Zones of Inhibition (ZI) of synthesised N-Aryl amino acids at 20 mg/mL
Bacterial strains | 3a R1 = NO2 n = 3 | 3b R1 = NO2 n = 4 | 3c R1 = CN n = 3 | 3d R1 = CHO n = 3 | 3e R1 = NO2 R2 = OH n = 3 | 3f R1 = CH3CO n = 3 | 3g R1 = NO2, thioproline n = 3 | 3h R1 = NO2 n = 0 | 3i R1 = NO2 n = 0 | 3j R1 = NO2 n = 0 | Strep |
a) Gram-positive | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bacillus subtilis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 40 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 16 | 10 | - | 16 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 14 | 18 | 10 |
Staphylococcus aureus | 22 | 10 | 16 | 12 | 14 | 12 | - | 12 | 10 | 20 | 16 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 8 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 14 | 12 | - | 10 | 12 | 18 | 30 |
b) Gram-negative | | | | | | | | | | | |
Enterobacter cloacae | 8 | 4 | - | 8 | 4 | 2 | - | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
Escherichia coli | 12 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 20 | 8 |
Proteus mirabilis | 12 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 18 | 8 |
Klebsiella oxytoca | 10 | 8 | - | 12 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 12 |
Streptomycin (Strep) - Standard drug.
Surprisingly, the only N-aryl amino acid with sulfur embedded within its ring 3g was not able to inhibit the growth of as many bacterial strains compared to other compounds despite the biological significance of sulfur-containing molecules. The aforementioned was only able to inhibit the growth of four bacteria with lower zones of inhibition compared to other N-aryl amino acids in the series (Table 1). The least activity was recorded against Enterobacter cloacae across all compounds tested. The activity of these compounds can be attributed to the presence of the electron-withdrawing group, amine functionality, N-alkyl chain substituents, rigid proline ring, and hydroxyl functional group, the majority of which are present within the structure of the standard drug - Streptomycin. The exceptional activities observed with compounds 3a and 3j can be attributed to the presence of the nitro functional group common to the two while 3c and 3d possess the cyano and the hydroxy functions (both of which are also present in Streptomycin) respectively (Fig. 1) (Atsushi, et al., 2020; Osinubi et al., 2020).
Having obtained results from the sensitivity test, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Table 2) of the most active compounds was determined with concentrations of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.25 mg/mL. It was observed that 3j displayed the best antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli at a concentration of 1.25 mg/mL while compounds 3a and 3c were both active at 2.5 mg/mL. Additionally, 3j was the most active against Klebsiella oxytoca at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL while other compounds were only active between 10–20 mg/mL, it is worthy to state that compound 3a sufficiently inhibited the growth of seven out of the eight bacteria screened with a MIC of 5 mg/mL, this observation correlates with the work of Odusami et al., 2019 who reported that N-(2-nitrophenyl) pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid displayed better antibacterial activity against all the gram-negative bacterial strains they tested except for K. oxytoca. As for the 4-Cyano substituted moiety, it is probable that the presence of the cyano group in N-(4-Cyanophenyl)-L-proline 3c enhanced its activity towards Escherichia coli (2.5 mg/mL) among other bacterial strains screened (Table 2) hence the reason for the significant activity.
Table 2
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (mg/mL) of synthesised compounds (3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, 3h, 3j)
Bacterial strains | 3a | 3b | 3c | 3d | 3e | 3f | 3h | 3j |
a) Gram-positive | | | | | | | | |
Bacillus subtilis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 5 | 20 | > 20 | 10 | > 20 | 20 | > 20 | 20 |
Staphylococcus aureus | 5 | 20 | 10 | > 20 | 10 | 10 | > 20 | 10 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 5 | > 20 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
b) Gram-negative | | | | | | | | |
Enterobacter cloacae | 5 | > 20 | > 20 | > 20 | > 20 | 20 | > 20 | 20 |
Escherichia coli | 2.5 | 5 | 2.5 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 1.25 |
Proteus mirabilis | 5 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 20 | > 20 | 5 |
Klebsiella oxytoca | 5 | 10 | > 20 | 20 | > 20 | 20 | 10 | 2.5 |
Of all the bacterial strains screened, the test compounds were observed to be most active against Escherichia coli because all the compounds 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, 3h, 3j inhibited its growth even at a concentration as low as 1.25 mg/mL (Table 2).
By comparison, it is sufficient to state that the N-aryl amino acid 3a N-(4-Nitrophenyl)-L-proline and 3j N-(4-Nitrophenyl)-L-valine (with lower inhibitory concentration and significant broad-spectrum antibacterial activity) seem better motifs in the search of compounds that can serve as drug leads for combating drug-resistant bacterial against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella oxytoca especially. These findings are also in consonance with the work of Odusami et al., 2019 who reported that N-(Nitrophenyl)cycloamino acids sufficiently inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis among other bacteria screened.