In study group, 8 patients underwent pleural blood patching for ≥ 1-cm pneumothorax due to CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. None of 8 patients who received pleural blood patching required chest tube placement. The pleural blood patching reduced the chest tube insertion rate from 23.1–11.1% in patients pneumothorax ≥ 1 cm, but not statistically significant. There were no adverse events due to pleural blood patching. The pleural blood patching might not increase adhesions and blood loss during surgery after CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy.
Temporal drainage or chest tube placement is required in 0.2–19% of patients who develop pneumothorax as an adverse event of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy [1–4]. Several procedures have been used in an attempt to reduce the occurrence of pneumothorax due to CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy and the need for chest tube placement, with varying degrees of success. Breath-holding after forced expiration before removing the biopsy needle was reported to almost halve the rate of overall pneumothorax, but could not reduce the rate of chest tube placement [7]. Rapid needle-out, patient-rollover to the biopsy-side-down position not only reduced the rate of overall pneumothorax, from 37–23%, but also the rate of pneumothorax necessitating chest tube placement, from 10–4% [6]. Percutaneous manual aspiration of pneumothorax performed immediately after CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy may prevent progressive pneumothorax and may lower the rate for chest tube placement to 3.2% [5].
Routine or selective pleural blood patching after CT-guided biopsies has also been reported. To investigate the effectiveness of this strategy, we divided the results of prospective studies on routine pleural blood patching into advantages and disadvantages. In terms of the advantages, Malone et al [13]. showed that pleural blood patching reduced the rate of pneumothorax requiring chest tube replacement from 18–9% in patients receiving CT-guided biopsy, while Lang et al [12]. reported a decrease in the rate of routine pleural blood patching from 47–9% in patients with deep lesions. Clayton et al [14]. registered 434 CT-guided biopsy cases over 6 years, and presented decrease in the rate of pneumothorax requiring chest tube replacement from 16–4%. Finally, Graffy et al [15]. retrospectively compared 472 patients with pleural blood patching after CT-guided biopsy and 352 patients without pleural blood patching, and showed pleural blood patching decrease the pneumothorax intervention rate including pleural blood patching from 24.1–8.9%. In contrast, two studies have shown that routine pleural blood patching was not effective for decreasing the rates of pneumothorax and chest tube insertion after CT-guided biopsy [16, 17]. Recently, Huo et al [20]. conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate how to reduce pneumothorax after CT-guided biopsy, and showed the pleural blood patching reduced chest tube insertion rate to approximately one third. In terms of selective pleural blood patching, Wagner et al [18]. reported in a retrospective study that, compared with simple aspiration, the rate of chest tube insertion and further interventions decreased from 53.3–13.6% (p = 0.03) for patients with significant pneumothorax after CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. This result motivated us to perform the present prospective study. But, the results of our study couldn’t reach statistically significant, further cases were warranted to confirm the result. From a different perspective, selective pleural blood patching was more cost-effective than routine pleural blood patching, so might be a choice for patients pneumothorax ≥ 1 cm after CT-guided.
The most common complication of pleural blood patching is empyema. Cagirici et al [19]. administered 50 ml autologous blood for blood patching to patients with persistent air-leak spontaneous pneumothorax, and empyema developed in 3 cases (9%). Based on their report, we planned to exclude patients with active infectious lung disease from the present study, but no cases were excluded as a result. However, empyema has not been reported as an adverse event in studies of pleural blood patching for pneumothorax due to CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy [12, 13, 16–18], possibly because of the small amounts of blood (< 15 ml) used in those studies. Therefore, in general, it is probably unnecessary to exclude patients with active infectious lung disease, but this should be examined in future studies.
Our study has several limitations. First and foremost ones were a single-center study and small number of patients with intervention. In addition, if we had also used the breath-holding after forced expiration before removing the biopsy needle [7] and/or rapid rotation of the patient to the biopsy-side-down position [6], we may have further reduced the rate of chest tube placement. The efficacy of these combined approaches warrants further study.