Strong EAG responses (༞0.488mV) were elicited by mixed components in both females and males (Fig. 2-C). The mean EAG responses of females was significantly higher than that of males for mixed components (t = 4.311, df = 4, P < 0.05).
Olfactometer assays
Y-tube olfactometer bioassays showed that the numbers of both females and males selecting D(+)-Camphor increased first and then decreased with the dose from 0.1 µg to 100 µg. D(+)-Camphor showed significantly stronger attraction to females than control at 100 µg dose (P = 0.035), but there was no significant difference for males (P = 0.189). D(+)-Camphor at 10 µg dose showed significantly stronger attraction to both females (P < 0.001) and males (P = 0.001) than control. Either females (P = 0.690) or males (P = 0.678) were not significantly attracted by D(+)-Camphor at 1 µg dose (Fig. 3-A).
In Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, the response rate of both females and males selecting Ocimene also increased first and then decreased with increasing dose. The tendency of both females (P = 0.006) and males (P = 0.008) to Ocimene at 10 µg dose showed significantly stronger than control. However, there was no significant difference in the response rate of females or males to 1 µg (P = 0.286, P = 0.230) and 100 µg (P = 0.076, P = 0.061) dose(Fig. 3-B).
Mixed components showed significantly stronger attraction to females (P = 0.002) and males (P = 0.001) than control at 10 µg dose. The response rate of males to mixed components than that of females (Fig. 3-C).
Field assays
Experiment 1– Effect of different kinds of traps on trapping effciency
There was a significant difference in the number of adults captured by different trapping devices baited with lures (D(+)-Camphor or isopropanol) (H = 21.138, df = 5, P = 0.001 < 0.05). The number of adults captured by trapping device B baited with D(+)-Camphor was significantly more than those of trapping device A and all isopropanol solvent control treatment (all of P was less than 0.0001, respectively, < 0.003, Bonferroni corrected significance level) (Fig. 4).
Trapping device B baited with D(+)-Camphor captured significantly more female adults than those of other treatments except the trapping device C (P = 0.001 in both comparisons, respectively, < 0.0033), while there was no significant difference in the number of male adults among all treatments (P > 0.0033, in all pairwise contrasts).
There were four females and three males were captured at trapping device B, and 1 females and 2 males were captured at trapping device C, but the differences were not statistically significant between the sexes of adults captured at trapping device B (χ2 = 0.032, P = 0.858) or trapping device C (χ2 = 0.139, P = 0.709) baited with D(+)-Camphor respectively. However, no adults were captured at trapping device A.
Experiment 2– Effect of the height of trapping device on trapping effciency
The results showed that there was a significant difference in the number of adults captured at different heights of trapping device B baited with lures (D(+)-Camphor or isopropanol) (H = 22.744, df = 5, P < 0.0001). Signifcantly more adults captured at high height of trapping device B baited with 5 mg D(+)-Camphor than those of all isopropanol solvent control treatment (P = 0.001 in both comparisons, respectively, < 0.003, Bonferroni corrected significance level) (Fig. 5).
Number of males captured by trapping device B baited with D(+)-Camphor at high height was significantly more than those of other treatments except for middle height (P = 0.001 < 0.003, in all pairwise contrasts), while there was no significant difference in the number of female adults among all treatments (P > 0.003).
A total of 9 females and 6 males were captured in experiment 2. Specifically, there were 3 females and 4 males were captured at high height, 4 females and 2 males were captured at middle heigh, and 2 females were captured at low heigh, but there was no sexual bias in adults captured at high height (χ2 = 0.032, P = 0.858), middle height (χ2 = 0.178, P = 0.673), or low height (χ2 = 1.333, P = 0.248).
Experiment 3– Effect of dose of host volatile components on trapping effciency
Significant difference was shown in the number of adults caught by different dose of all treatments (H = 34.458, df = 6, P < 0.0001). Trapping device B baited with 5 mg D(+)-Camphor captured significantly more adults than other treatments except 10 mg D(+)-Camphor (P = 0.001 in all pairwise contrasts, < 0.05/21 = 0.0023). No significant difference was detected between the number of adults caught by 10 mg and other treatments (P > 0.0023, in all pairwise contrasts) (Fig. 6).
There were 7 females and 6 males in total caught in this experiment, of which 5 females and 4 males were caught by 5 mg D(+)-Camphor, 2 females and 2 males were caught by 10 mg D(+)-Camphor. There was no sexual bias in the number of adults caught by 5 mg D(+)-Camphor (χ2 = 0.020, P = 0.887) or 10 mg D(+)-Camphor (χ2 = 0, P = 1). However, no adults were captured at different dose of Ocimene and solvent control treatment.
Experiment 4– Effect of combination of host volatile components on trapping effciency
The results of trapping for three months were analysed by Kruskal Wallis H test, which showed that significant difference existed in in the number of adults caught by major and minor host volatile components (H = 20.320, df = 3, P < 0.0001). Trapping device B baited with 5 mg D(+)-Camphor caught significantly more females and the total of both sexes than those with the isopropanol solvent control treatment or 5 mg Ocimene (P = 0.001 in both comparisons, respectively, < 0.05/6 = 0.0083, Bonferroni adjusted significant level). When combined with Ocimene, fewer adults were caught by trapping device B baited with 5 mg D(+)-Camphor + Ocimene than that of 5 mg D(+)-Camphor only, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.724 > 0.0083). Although the mixed component did not increase the number of captured adults, it was still significantly higher than those of Ocimene (P = 0.003 < 0.0083) or control group (P = 0.003 < 0.0083). No adults were captured by trapping device B baited with the single component of Ocimene, which was the same as the result of Experiment 3 (Fig. 7).
A total of 16 females and 10 males were caught in experiment 4. Trapping device B baited with 5 mg D(+)-Camphor attracted 9 females and 5 males, and trapping device B baited with 5 mg D(+)-Camphor + Ocimene attracted 7 females and 5 males. The number of females caught in both groups was more than that of males, but no significant difference between the sexes (χ2 = 0.152, P = 0.696, in 5 mg D(+)-Camphor; χ2 = 0.049, P = 0.825, in 5 mg D(+)-Camphor + Ocimene).