Materials and Reagents
G-Rg5, deslanoside, and ATP were purchased from Vakic Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (purity >98%, Sichuan, China). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), glucose-free DMEM, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were obtained from Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA, fetal bovine serum (FBS) and PBS phosphate buffer were bought from Genview (Florida, USA), Tianhang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang, China), and Dingguo Changsheng Co., Ltd. (Nanchang, China), respectively. K2HPO4 and NaH2PO4 was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical reagent Co., Ltd. (Analytical level, Shanghai, China). LDH and Rat FFA ELISA kit were purchased from Nanjing Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China) and BIM (California, USA), respectively. CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS) was acquired from Promega Biological Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). RIPA lysate, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit, twelve alkyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) Kit, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (0.45 μm), skim milk, ECL kit, β-actin, RNA extraction, Servicebio®RT First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, and 2nd 2esis KitqPCR Master Mix (HighROX) were supplied by Servicebio Co., Ltd. (Wu Han, China). AMPKα and p-AMPKα were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Massachusetts, USA). GPX4 was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).
Culture of H9c2 Cardiomyocytes
Rat H9c2 cardiomyocytes were obtained from the Cell Resource Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. H9c2 cardiomyocytes were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS; v/v) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere (Smartor118, Hua Yi Ning Chuang Co., Ltd, Ningbo, China). The culture medium was replaced regularly.
Establishment of an H/R Model
The H/R model was established according to our previous method [36]. An orthogonal experiment was conducted to optimize the experimental conditions. Hypoxia time (6, 8, and 10 h), glucose content (0, 2, and 4 mg/mL), and FBS content (0, 10, and 20%) were used as experimental control factors. Cell activity and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) content were used as indices. According to the comprehensive score, lower cell vitality and higher LDH content were desirable. As shown in Table 1, the model had the lowest cell viability and the highest LDH release under 6 h hypoxia, 0 mg/mL glucose content, and 0% FBS. Therefore, cardiomyocytes in the H/R group were cultured in glucose-free DMEM with 0% FBS (v/v) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere, followed by 6 h of hypoxia (94% N2, 5% CO2, and 1% O2) and 4 h of reoxygenation (95% O2 and 5% CO2).
Table 1: Result of orthogonal experiment(M ± SD, n = 6).
Test number
|
Orthogonal experiment factors
|
Hypoxia time A (h)
|
Glucose content B (mg/mL)
|
FBS content C (%)
|
Experimental group
|
Cell viability (%)
|
LDH viability (U/L)
|
1
|
A1
|
B1
|
C1
|
A1B1C1 (6 h, 0 mg/mL, 0%)
|
52.7±9.92##
|
90.00±19.19##
|
2
|
A1
|
B2
|
C2
|
A1B2C2 (6 h, 2 mg/mL, 10%)
|
91.02±7.40
|
10.35±9.55##
|
3
|
A1
|
B3
|
C3
|
A1B3C3 (6 h, 4 mg/mL, 15%)
|
98.68±21.92
|
-97.54±26.87##
|
4
|
A2
|
B1
|
C2
|
A2B1C2 (8 h, 0 mg/mL, 10%)
|
93.18±4.80
|
10.62±18.00##
|
5
|
A2
|
B2
|
C3
|
A2B2C3 (8 h, 2 mg/mL, 15%)
|
68.83±3.21##
|
78.14±4.60##
|
6
|
A2
|
B3
|
C1
|
A2B3C1 (8 h, 4 mg/mL, 0%)
|
85.63±14.96#
|
-72.98±13.92##
|
7
|
A3
|
B1
|
C3
|
A3B1C3 (10 h, 0 mg/mL, 15%)
|
86.8±4.64#
|
-72.07±16.57##
|
8
|
A3
|
B2
|
C1
|
A3B2C1 (10 h, 2 mg/mL, 0%)
|
85.3±4.76#
|
-24.65±8.81##
|
9
|
A3
|
B3
|
C2
|
A3B3C2 (10 h, 4 mg/mL, 10%)
|
71.03±1.26##
|
54.80±9.79##
|
#P<0.05 vs. control group; ##P<0.01 vs. control group.
Determination of Cell Viability
Experimental Protocols
To determine the effect of G-Rg5 on H9c2 cardiomyocytes, we measured the viability of H/R-induced cardiomyocytes under different G-Rg5 conditions. Cardiomyocytes in the logarithmic phase were randomly divided into different groups. The control group was cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS (v/v). The H/R group was cultured under the experimental conditions used for the H/R model. The G-Rg5 treatment group (H/R+G-Rg5) was treated with 1, 3.33, 10, 33.3, or 100 μmol/L G-Rg5 for 12, 24, or 48
MTT Cell Viability Assay
Cell viability was determined using an MTS assay. After reoxygenation, 20 μL MTS was added to each well, mixed, and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The absorbance of each well was measured at a wavelength of 490 nm using a microplate reader. The cell viability was expressed as a percentage of the absorbance of the control group.
Determination of LDH Release
Experimental Protocols
We determined the optimal intervention conditions for G-Rg5 using time- and effect-dose experiments. The control group was cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS (v/v). The H/R group was cultured under the experimental conditions used for the H/R model. The H/R+G-Rg5 and H/R+desianoside groups were pretreated under optimal administration conditions. After reaching the intervention time, the H/R, H/R+G-Rg5, and H/R+desianoside groups were subjected to hypoxia and reoxygenation for 6 h and 4 h, respectively.
LDH Level Determination
After reoxygenation, 20 μL of the supernatant was collected from each well, and the operation was carried out according to the instructions of the LDH kit. The absorbance of each well was determined at 450 nm using a microplate reader. LDH content (U/L)=(test well-control well)/(standard well-blank well)×standard concentration×1000.
ATP Measurements using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
Liquid Chromatography
An Agilent 1260 system was used for liquid chromatography (Agilent Technologies, California, USA). The samples were separated on an Agilent ZORBAX SB-AQ liquid chromatographic column (4.6 mm×150 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase was a 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer solution with a pH of 6.3. Separations were performed at a temperature of 30°C, a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, injection volume of 20 μL, and detection wavelength of 258 nm.
Preparation of a Standard Solution
The ATP standard was dissolved in ultrapure water to prepare the reserve solution. The standard solution was diluted with ultrapure water to concentrations of 20, 15, 10, 5.0, 2.5, 1.0, and 0.5 μg/mL.
Sample Pretreatment
The experimental protocols were consistent with the “Experimental Protocols” subsection. We referred to published methods with minor revisions for sample treatment [37] as follows:
- The cell suspension was diluted to a concentration of 3×105 cells/ mL.
- 250 μL of precooled 0.4 mol/L HClO4 solution was added into 250 μL of cell suspension.
- The above mixture was vortexed for 20 s, chilled on ice for 10 min, and re-vortexed for 20 s, then centrifuged at 4°C with 12,000 rpm for 10 min using the high speed refrigerated centrifuge (Thermo Scientific SL 8R, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA).
- The supernatant was adjust pH to neutral with 1mol/L NaOH, and centrifuged at 4°C with 12,000 rpm for 10 min.
- A 0.22 μm microporous membrane was used for filtration. The above sample treatment was processed at 4°C.
- Store the supernatant at -80°C for subsequent analysis.
Determination of FFA Content
The experimental protocols were consistent with that described in the “Determination of LDH Release: Experimental Protocols” section.
- The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 5 min by the high speed refrigerated centrifuge and the supernatant was discarded.
- Cells resuspended to 1×106 cells/mL with PBS.
- Samples were then subjected to water bath sonication (The cell suspension was ultrasonically performed at 300W power. Each ultrasound was performed for 3-4 s, with a pause of 7-8 s, and the process was repeated for 10-15 times).
- Centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was taken.
- ELISA was performed according to the instructions.
- The absorbance at 450 nm was read with the microplate analyzer.
The FFA content in each group was calculated according to the standard curve.
RT-qPCR Analysis
RT-qPCR was performed to detect the expression of NR4A1. The total RNA of cells was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the Servicebio®RT First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. PCR amplification was performed using SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (HighROX). The β-actin transcript level (ACTB) was used to normalize NR4A1 expression levels, and the 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the expression of NR4A1.
Western Blotting
Approximately 250 μL of RIPA lysate was added to 106 cells, after which the sample was incubated on ice for 30 min and centrifuged at 12,000 ×g at 4°C for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected. The protein concentration was detected using a BCA kit. Equal amounts of protein samples were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk for 30 min at 20-25°C and incubated with primary antibodies against β-actin (1:3000), AMPKα (1:1000), p-AMPKα (1:1000), and GPX4 (1:1000) at 4°C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with an HRP-labeled secondary antibody (1:3000) for 30 min at 20-25°C. Enhanced ECL was used to visualize protein expression. The relative expression of the target protein was reported as the ratio of the target protein to actin.
Statistical Analysis
Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD). Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, California, USA). Differences for multi-groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVE). T-test were used to evaluate the statistical differences between the groups. There was statistical significance when P<0.05.