Figure 1 shows the typical FESEM images of the as-prepared MoO3 samples. Specifically, hierarchical flower-like samples were observed by high resolution SEM images of Fig. 1a-c, which are the samples of MoO3-400, MoO3-500, and MoO3-600, respectively. As a whole, the profile of the three samples are almost same, the microspheres, which the average diameter is less than 1 µm, are constructed by numerous plate-like nanosheets, and the edge thicknesses are about 19 nm. These irregular nanospheres are interconnected each other, facilitating electron transport and ethanol diffusion. After annealing, the hierarchical flower-like morphology was vanished. On the contrary, a lot of nanosheets were synthesized with increased thickness. Interestingly, the nanosheet thickness of sample MoO3-600 become larger than that of MoO3-400 and MoO3-500, due to the growth of the MoO3 crystalline grain at high temperature. In addition, it can be clearly observed that the voids enclosed by numerous primary ultrathin nanosheets with clear texture. Concretely, the diameter of nanoflowers derived from MoO3 calcined in 400 ºC is about 0.3 µm, the sample calcined in 500 ºC is about 0.5 µm, the sample calcined in 600 ºC is about 4 µm. Figure 1d-f show the nanostructures of MoO3 annealed between 700 and 900 ºC. Compared with the samples annealed at lower temperature, the MoO3 annealed between 700 and 900 ºC exhibit the morphology of nanosheets, which represent higher crystallization. What’s more, the thickness of nanosheets is rising with the increase of annealing temperature. The thickness of nanosheets derived from the sample annealed at 700 ºC is 0.031 µm, the sample annealed at 800 ºC is 0.145 µm, and the sample annealed at 900 ºC is 1.690 µm. In terms of crystal growth, almost every point on the unpolished surface of a crystal can be filled with atoms to become the point where the crystal grows. The nanoflowers we obtained above, which has rougher surface than nanosheets, each point on the surface can be filled by atoms so as to becoming smooth and flush through supplying energy by calcining in high temperature. Certainly, as for the smooth surfaces, their consistent growth needs to be thermally activated [32]. Consequently, the samples obtained with 700–900 ºC can grow thicker with the annealing temperature increasing due to the more power and thermal provided.
To the best of our knowledge, the crystallinity, electronic structure and phase stability were strongly influenced by the calcination temperature and composition of the metal oxide semiconductor materials, especially the nanocomposites. Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of MoO3 samples which were calcined at different temperature. Evidently, the diffraction peaks of all the samples are consistent with the orthorhombic MoO3 (JCPDS 05-0508). The intensity peaks at 2θ = 12.8, 25.7, and 39.1 corresponding to (020), (110), (040), (021), and (060) planes, respectively. This indicates that the sample grows with intense preferential orientation of (110). No other diffraction peaks are observed, which confirm that MoO3 samples with relatively high crystal purity. Interestingly, the peak intensity increases with the annealing temperature from 400 to 900 ºC, which attributes to the good crystalline at high calcined temperature. On the other hand, the intensities of the peaks were gradually increased with the increase of annealing temperature. It indicates that the crystallinity of the samples was significantly improved via increasing annealing temperature. For example, the intensity of the peak (040) of MoO3-900 is more than three times as compared with that of MoO3-400.
On the basis of the above analysis, the chemical ingredient and the valence state of the elements in the MoO3-600 nanosheets were analyzed via XPS. The corresponding results are shown in Fig. 2b and c. The Mo spectrum in Fig. 2b displays two ?? peaks located at 232.7and 235.8 eV, ascribe to Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2, respectively, indicating that the chemical state of Mo element is present as Mo6+ in MoO3-600. Further, the energy separation of two peaks is 3.2 eV, which indicates the successful fabrication of MoO3 [30]. The peak of O 1s can be deconvoluted into two independent oxygen species at 529.8 and 531.4 eV (Fig. 2c). The peak at 529.8 eV in the O 1s curve can be attributed to the oxygen ions in the crystal lattice that is lattice oxygen Olattice (O2−) and surface adsorbed oxygen Oads. (e.g., O−) [33]. While the other peak at 531.4 eV were assigned to the oxygen ions species such as O−, O2−, and O2−. Compared to the lattice oxygen, the absorbed Ox− are active to ethanol, so they play a key role in enhancing the sensing performance [34, 35].
In order to investigate the optimum working temperature of different MoO3 samples annealed at various temperature from 50 to 350 ºC to 10 ppm of ethanol, as shown in Fig. 3. Evidently, all the sensor’s response increase firstly before 200 ºC, and then decrease drastically with the increase of operation temperature further. Among them, the MoO3-600 sensor exhibits the maximum response of 8.06 towards 100 ppm ethanol at 200 ºC, which is three times higher than those of MoO3-400 and MoO3-900, respectively. Compared with the MoO3-600, the response values of MoO3-400, MoO3-500, MoO3-700, MoO3-800 and MoO3-900 are 3.18, 5.34, 5.81 and 4.50 at 200 ℃, respectively. All in all, among all the sensors, the response of MoO3-600 based sensor increases faster than that of others devices such as MoO3-400, MoO3-500, MoO3-700, MoO3-800 and MoO3-900. These demonstrate that the nanostructure and annealing temperature of MoO3 have a considerable effect on the device’s response, and inclination of response increases significantly and then gradually decreases. A suitable working temperature is indispensable in that ample thermal energy is a necessary prerequisite to overcome the chemical barrier of gas and the activation barrier of surface reaction. Besides, when the working temperature is further increased, the gas desorption rate is higher than adsorption rate, which is unfavorable to the response.
Figure 4a gives the dynamic response and recovery characteristics of the MoO3-600 based sensor to different alcohol concentrations from 5 to 500 ppm CH3CH2OH at 200 ºC. Obviously, as the ethanol concentration increases, the response of the MoO3-600 sensor climbs continually, thereafter, the response approaches the saturation value when the CH3CH2OH concentration overpass 500 ppm, see Fig. 4b. The similar results have been reported by other literature [35, 36]. It can be explained that more ethanol molecules can be physically or chemically adsorbed on the MoO3-600 nanosheets, and speeding up the surface reaction rate with the chemisorbed oxygen species such as O− and O2− [30, 36]. Additionally, according to the sensing mechanism of MoO3, the increase of crystallization has an irreplaceable influence on its sensing properties [30, 36]. On the other hand, the limit of detection (LoD) of ethanol was evaluated by the method of linear extrapolation, specifically, the response sensitivity is a function of ethanol concentration (the inset of Fig. 4b). The detailed calculating formula of the LoD is: LoD = 3 × (Standard Deviation/Slope), from which the ultra-low ethanol detection concentration is 125 ppb for the MoO3 sensor. Figure 4c shows a typical repeatability performance of the MoO3 based sensor toward 100 ppm ethanol at 200 ºC, which exhibits its superb stability and repeatability. Moreover, the response time (τres) and recovery time (τrecov) are examined and the results indicate that the MoO3-600 sensor exhibits a very quick response and recovery properties to ethanol (Fig. 4d). Figure 4d gives the τres and τrecov of the MoO3-600 sensor toward 100 ppm ethanol, which are 7 s and 26 s, respectively.
From the aspect of practical applications, selectivity is another very important characteristics of the gas sensor. Herein, the sensing properties of MoO3 nanosheets sensor to other various VOCs, for example, benzene, isopropanol, chloroform, acetic acid, methanol and acetone were evaluated. The selective property of the MoO3-600 sensor towards 100 ppm of the above gas at 200 ºC is shown in Fig. 5a. Clearly, the maximum gas response value of MoO3 toward 100 ppm alcohol is 8.06, which is evidently larger than those of other gases. Specifically, the responses to benzene, isopropanol, chloroform, acetic acid, methanol and acetone are 0.23, 1.47, 1.47, 1.57, 1.74 and 2.31, respectively. Therefore, the sensitivity of the MoO3-600 towards ethanol is much higher than that of other VOCs, indicating that it has an excellent selectivity to ethanol.
The sensing mechanism of the MoO3-600 to ethanol can be illustrated by surface conduction modulation model. According to the literature [16, 22], the adsorption and desorption of target gas molecules from the surface of the MoO3-600 could regulate the electrical resistance of gas sensor. When the MoO3-600 is exposed to fresh air, the oxygen molecules (O2) will capture conductive band electrons (e-1) to form chemisorbed oxygen ions species (O- and O2-). This process will form a depletion layer on its surface region of sensing material, which causes the device resistance increase. When the MoO3-600 sensor was exposed to ethanol gas, the ethanol molecules can react with the oxygen species O- and O2-, resulting in the release of trapped electrons back to the conduction band, thereby significantly reducing the sensor resistance. This reaction processes can be expressed as Equations (1) and (2) [37, 38]:
CH3CH2OH(gas) + 6O2−(ads) → 2CO2(gas) + 3H2O(gas) + 12e− (1)
CH3CH2OH(gas) + 6O−(ads) → 2CO2(gas) + 3H2O(gas) + 6e− (2)