Cell culture
One normal human pancreatic ductal epithelial cell line HPNE (Shanghai Fuheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and two PC cell lines Mia-PACA2, and PANC-1 (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA; www.atcc. org) were sourced from ATCC. These cells were cultured with high glaucous Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Hyclone Life Technologies) medium supplemented with 10% Fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco Life Technologies), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100g/mL streptomycin (Gibco Life Technologies). Subsequently, the cells were maintained at 37℃ in 5% CO2 in a humidified condition, and the medium was changed every 2 days.
Cytotoxicity and cell proliferation assay
Cytotoxicity assay was detected, using Cell Counting kit‑8 (CCK‑8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells under logarithmic phase were seeded (1×104 cells/well) in 96-well plates with FBS-free medium for 24 h. These cells were treated with the various concentrations of Robinin (500 nM, 1 µM, 5 µM or 10 µM/ml) at 37℃ for 24 h after pre-hungry. Following 24 h treatment, all the media in the well were discarded and 10 µl CCK‑8 solution was added at 37˚C incubation for 2 h. The colorimetric absorbance was recorded at 450 nm, using a microplate reader (Bio‑Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).
Cells proliferation assay of cell lines were seeded at appropriate density in 96-well plates for assessment, using CCK-8 kit. Subsequently, the proliferation assay in Mia PaCa2 and PANC-1 was determined following treatment of Robinin (1 µM/ml) for 24, 48 and 72 h. After all exposure, 10 µl CCK8 was added in each well and incubated for 1.5 h. CU-T12-9 was selectively added to reverse the effect of Robinin. Finally, the colorimetric absorbance was also recorded at 450 nm to draw the proliferation curve.
Wound healing assay
Mia-PACA2 and PANC-1 were incubated till 100% confluence and the cell monolayer was scratched with a 200 µl pipette tip. The scratched area was photographed by phase‑contrast microscopy (magnification, x4). Cells were added with fresh DMEM or DMEM combined with Robinin (1 µM/ml) for 24 h. CU-T12-9 was selectively added to reverse the effect of Robinin. Following different treatments, the distance of cell migration was recorded by phase‑contrast microscopy (magnification, x4) and measured by Image J.
RNA isolation, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from indicated cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For qRT-PCR, 2 µg of total RNA was treated with DNase Ⅰ and reverse transcribed using an MMLV system (Promega, USA). RT-PCR was performed using an ABI 7900 RT-PCR system with SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (ABI, USA) and U6 RNA as the internal reference control. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1. For miRNA detection, stem-loop reverse transcription reactions were performed, and the 2−∆∆Ct method was used to calculate the relative abundance of RNA genes compared with U6 expression. Details of primers are listed in Table.1. The expression of TLR2, α-SMA, snail, IL-6 and TNF-α in HPNE, Mia-PACA2and PANC-1was tested by RT-qPCR.
Western blot
For mechanistic determination, the PI3k-AKT signaling pathway was evaluated, using western blot. Mia-PACA2 and PANC-1 with appropriate density were seeded in 6-well plates and were treated with Robinin (1 µM/ml) for 2 days. CU-T12-9 was selectively added to reverse the effect of Robinin. Total protein samples were isolated from these cells, using RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and protease inhibitors (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The protein samples were immediately stored at -80°C until use after quantity of protein was measured using BCA protein kit (Beyotime, Inc.).
Protein samples (10 µg) were separated via SDS‑PAGE with 10% of separation gel and 5% stacking gel, and then proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (PVDF membrane, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA). Protein transferred PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and incubated with primary antibodies, including Beta actin monoclonal antibody (β-actin, 1:20000, Proteintech, Inc.cat No 66009-1-Ig), TLR2 polyclonal antibody (1:2000, Proteintech, Inc.cat No 17236-1-AP), PI3 Kinase p85 Alpha Monoclonal antibody(1:10000, Proteintech, Inc. cat No 60225-1-Ig), AKT rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:5000, Proteintech, Inc. cat No 10176-2-AP), phospho-AKT(Ser473) polyclonal antibody (1:5000, Proteintech, Inc.cat No 28731-1-AP), IL-6 Polyclonal antibody (1:1000, Proteintech, Inc. cat No 21865-1-AP), TNF alpha monoclonal antibody (1:3000, Proteintech, Inc. cat No 60291-1-Ig), smooth muscle actin Polyclonal antibody (α-SMA, 1:3000, Proteintech, Inc. cat No 14395-1-AP) ,and rabbit anti-SNAIL polyclonal antibody (1:1000, Bioss Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China) on the shaker at 4℃ overnight. The PVDF membranes with targeted protein were incubated with HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse/rabbit antibodies (1:1000, Beyotime, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (Beyotime, Inc.) and the density of protein bands were captured by a GS-700 Imaging Densitometer (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) and analyzed by Image J.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS V17.0 software (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Numerical data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons among multiple groups were performed by one‑way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with least-significant difference (LSD) post‑hoc test. The results are indicated as P values, where *P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The normal distribution test was conducted to check whether the numerical variables were normally distributed.