DHI Promotes the Proliferation of RSC96 Cells
The effects of DHI on the proliferation of RSC96 cells were examined using a CCK-8 assay. Since DHI is used every 12 hours in the human body, to observe the sustained effect of DHI on RSC96 cells, we selected 12 hours and 36 hours as observation points. It can be seen from Figure 1 that after 12 hours of DHI treatment, the proliferation ability of RSC96 cells was higher than that of the control group, but the effect of 0.2% and 0.5% DHI had no statistical significance, and the effect of DHI functioning for 36 hours was similar. Therefore, it is likely that 1% and 2% DHI promoted the proliferation of RSC96 cells.
DHI Promotes the Migration of RSC96 Cells
We further used Transwell assay to observe the effect of DHI on the migration of RSC96 cells. We chose 12 hours as the endpoint of migration and observed the number of migrated cells that were stained purple with crystal violet. As shown in Figure 2, different concentrations of DHI significantly promoted migration in a dose-dependent manner, however, there was no significant difference between 1% and 2% concentrations of DHI. Combined with the effect of DHI on cell proliferation and migration, we chose 1% DHI concentration in subsequent experiments.
PI3K/Akt Pathway Is Involved in the Effect of DHI on RSC96 Cells
Previous studies have shown that PI3K/Akt pathway is closely related to the proliferation and migration of cells. To verify whether PI3K/Akt pathway plays a role in the proliferation and migration of RSC96 cells induced by DHI, we detected the key signal proteins, including PI3K, and AKT. We found that the expression of p-PI3K and p-AKT increased significantly after treatment with DHI, while the expression of PI3K, AKT, and GAPDH remained unchanged (Figure 3). From this experiment, it was suggested that the PI3K/AKT pathway is involved in the effect of DHI on RSC96 cells.
DHI Increases the Expression of CXCL12 and GDNF in RSC96 Cells
CXCL12 is a common chemokine and is closely related to the migration of Schwann cells in our previous study, whereas GDNF is a neurotrophic factor closely associated with nerve injury and repair. To detect the effect of DHI on the secretion of these two factors in RSC96 cells, Western blot, RT-PCR, and ELISA experiments were used to detect the expression of CXCL12 and GDNF in RSC96 cells. As shown in Figure 4A, after DHI treatment for 24 hours, the expression of CXCL12 and GDNF protein was promoted by DHI in a concentration-dependent manner. RT-PCR experiments (Figure 4C, 4D) showed that DHI increased the mRNA expression of CXCL12 and GDNF in RSC96 cells, and ELISA experiments (Figure 4E, 4F) showed that the secretion of CXCL12 and GDNF increased in RSC96 cells.
The Enhanced Expression of CXCL12 in RSC96 Cells Induced by DHI Depends on PI3K/AKT Pathway
Western Blot, RT-PCR, and ELISA experiments were used to investigate the relationship between CXCL12 and GDNF expressed by RSC96 cells and the PI3K/AKT pathway. According to Figure 5A, DHI-promoted CXCL12 expression was inhibited by LY294002, a PI3K protein inhibitor, while GDNF expression was not affected. Besides, the mRNA and secretory expression of CXCL12 also decreased after LY294002, while the mRNA and secretory expression of GNDF did not change significantly (Figure 5C, 5D). In a word, these results indicated that DHI induced CXCL12 expression in RSC96 cells through the PI3K/AKT pathway.
DHI Promotes the Proliferation and Migration of RSC96 Cells Through PI3K/AKT Pathway
Previous studies have found that DHI promotes the expression of PI3K/AKT and CXCL12 in RSC96 cells. To find out whether the changes of PI3K/AKT/CXCL12 induced by DHI are related to the proliferation and migration of RSC96 cells, CCK-8 and Transwell experiments were conducted with LY294002 and CXCL12 antibody combined with DHI, respectively. The results showed that the migration of RSC 96 cells was not significantly affected by LY294002 and CXCL12 antibody alone, but was significantly increased after using DHI. This increased effect was weakened after application of LY294002 and CXCL12 antibodies, thus the migration of RSC96 cells was decreased, however, it was still higher than that of the control group (Figure 6A). Similar results were also found in the CCK8 assay of RSC96 cell viability (Figure 6C). The increased cell proliferation viability caused by DHI was weakened after the addition of LY294002 and CXCL12 antibodies, while the application of LY294002 and CXCL12 antibodies alone had no significant effect on cell proliferation. These results demonstrated that DHI promoted the proliferation and migration of RSC96 cells through PI3K/AKT pathway.
DHI Improves the Neurological Function Scores of Facial Nerve-injured Rats
In order to verify the effect of DHI on the repair of facial nerve injury in vivo, different concentration of DHI were injected into rats after facial nerve injury, and facial nerve function scores were performed on the 1st, 7th, 14th, and 28th days. Our results showed that the sham-operated rats were always normal and the scores were always 10 points. According to Figure 7A, facial nerve scores improved to varying degrees in all groups except the sham-operated group. There was no statistical difference among these groups on the 7th day (Figure 7B), however, the score gradually increased and showed statistical significance on the 14th day, and the scores were further increased on the 28th day (Figure 7C, 7D). Facial nerve scores increased with increasing doses of DHI, although no statistical difference was shown at high, medium, and low doses. This indicated that DHI can improve the functional recovery of the facial nerve in a dose-depended manner. In order to observe a more significant therapeutic effect of DHI, we used the data of high-concentration DHI in subsequent results presentation.
DHI Increases the Expression of CXCL12 and GDNF in Facial Nerve-injured Rats
Cell experiments have confirmed that DHI promotes the production of more CXCL12 and GDNF in RSC96 cells. To further verify this result in vivo, the ELISA assay was used to detecting the expression of CXCL12 and GDNF on the 1st, 7th, 14th, and 28th days after facial nerve injury. The results (Figure 8A, 8B) showed that the expression of CXCL12 and GDNF in the sham operation group was maintained at a stable level. The expression of CXCL12 in the FNI group increased after the operation, peaked at about 2 weeks, and then returned to the initial level at about 4 weeks. GDNF continued to increase at 1 day after the operation, and remained at a high level at 4 weeks, however, the increased level slowed down later. In the H+DHI group, the expression levels of CXCL12 and GDNF continued to increase during DHI treatment, and the expression levels were significantly higher than those in the FNI group. This indicated that DHI can also promote the production of CXCL12 and GDNF in facial nerve tissue in vivo.
DHI Increases the Expression of S-100 in Injured Facial Nerve
To detect the state of Schwann cells after facial nerve injury, the immunofluorescence staining test was used to stain the nerve tissue 28 days after the operation. According to results (Figure 9), we found that the S-100 expression in the sham group was uniformly around the nerve fiber bundles, while that in the FNI group was significantly reduced and did not wrap around the nerve fibers. In the H+DHI group, the expression of S-100 was significantly up-regulated compared with that in the FNI group, and the expression was more uniform around the nerve fiber bundles. These results suggested that DHI promoted the re-enfolding of Schwann cells after facial nerve injury and functional recovery.