Our study demonstrates the impaired suppressive function of PD-1 + TFR cells in SLE. PD-1 expression levels in these cells were positively correlated with both disease activity and disease-specific autoantibody production as well as decreased expression of CTLA4 and Foxp3. Moreover, in vitro IL-2 treatment was capable of restoring this lost effector function.
TFH and TFR cells have been proposed to play a critical role in SLE as defects within TFR cells could prevent suppression of TFH cells that stimulate production of possibly autoreactive antibodies. Studies regarding circulating TFR cell numbers in SLE patients have generated controversial results (8, 9, 13) but we observed no quantitative differences within our cohort. Instead, our results identified impaired suppression of TFH cells in SLE-TFR cells.
PD-1 expression is difficult to interpret in TFR cells but, in TFH cells, PD-1 has been reported as an active state marker (14, 15). Although our study found no statistically significant difference in TFH cell PD-1 expression between SLEs and HCs, SLE patients are reported to have PD-1hi active TFH cells (5). Moreover, since high PD-1 expression in Treg cells indicates a dysfunctional or ‘exhausted’ state (16, 17), the high expression of PD-1 in SLE-TFR cells we found was similarly related to impaired regulatory functions. This is in line with murine experiments in which Sage et al. reported that PD-1 signaling mediates the generation of TFR cells (18).
In SLE patients, Treg cell functions are reported to decline (19), with Foxp3 expression consistently decreased, possibly due to IL-2 deficiency or other mechanisms. As Hao et al. have reported the conversion of TFH cells to TFR cells by IL-2 (13), our study, which showed the recovery of Foxp3 and other regulatory molecules in TFR cells by in vitro IL-2 supplementation, was in line with these findings.
Certain limitations must be acknowledged. As we have described in the Supplementary Tables, almost all SLE patients were receiving glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants at the time of sample collection, possibly affecting TFH and TFR frequencies and phenotypes. Additionally, it has been recently reported that different subsets of immune cells exist in the inflammatory locus versus the peripheral blood (20). Analyses using peripheral blood, such as the present study, may thus not be able to fully explain the pathogenetic mechanisms of SLE.
Taken together, since we have confirmed the dysfunction of PD-1 + TFR cell suppression in SLE and found IL-2 to be restorative, low-dose IL-2 treatment could provide potential therapeutic benefits for SLE. Furthermore, assessing PD-1 expression molecularly rather than with only cell frequency is important for predicting TFR cell activation and humoral immune responses in SLE.