Human studies
All participants provided written consent before enrollment. All studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and all procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. We studied two cohorts, in cohort one (Demographic information in Table 1 and previously published),30,31 we isolated monocytes for in vitro bulk RNA sequencing analysis as we have previously published.31 Briefly, heparinized blood (40 mL) was obtained from volunteers, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using a Ficoll-gradient protocol. Monocytes were further isolated from these cells by magnetic labeling and negative selection using the Miltenyi monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec 130-091-151) and cultured in 12-well plates at 1 × 106/mL density in either control RPMI media (150 mMol/L Na+) or media containing 190 mMol/L Na+. RPMI media 1640 (Gibco) was supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% pen/strep, 1% HEPES, and 2-Mercaptoethanol (0.05 mM). Isolated monocytes were treated with normal and high salt in vitro, and bulk RNA sequencing was performed.
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the participants for Cohort 1.
|
(n = 11)
|
Age, y
|
34.7 ± 11.8
|
Female sex, n (%)
|
11 (100)
|
Black, n (%)
|
1 (9)
|
SBP, mmHg
|
110.9 ± 16.7
|
DBP, mmHg
|
69.0 ± 6.8
|
HTN, %
|
9
|
BMI, kg/m2
|
28.6 ± 17.5
|
Mean ± SD. BMI denotes body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HTN, hypertension; and SBP, systolic blood pressure. |
In cohort two, we performed single-cell Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-Seq) to profile transcriptomes in immune cells in hypertensive patients and phenotyped for salt-sensitivity of blood pressure employing an established protocol of rapid salt load and depletion as depicted in Fig. 2A (Demographic information in Table 2, also previously published).30
Table 2
Demographics of participants for salt-sensitivity phenotyping in cohort 2.
|
B
|
SL
|
SD
|
SBP (mmHg)
|
137.7 ± 3.1
|
141.3 ± 2.9
|
138.7 ± 2.9
|
DBP (mmHg)
|
85 ± 2.2
|
86.1 ± 2.3
|
87.0 ± 2.4
|
MAP (mmHg)
|
104.7 ± 2.1
|
105.6 ± 2.2
|
104.7 ± 2.1
|
Urinary Na+ Excretion (mmol/day)
|
150.4 ± 13.7
|
350.8 ± 27.9
|
73.5 ± 13.9
|
Urinary K+Excretion (mmol/day)
|
59.2 ± 7.7
|
67.7 ± 7.8
|
40.4 ± 2.9
|
Urinary Na+ /K+Ratio
|
2.9 ± 0.3
|
6.8 ± 1.6
|
1.9 ± 0.3
|
PRA (ng/L)
|
9.3 ± 3.1
|
9.6 ± 2.5
|
16.7 ± 5.4
|
Aldosterone (ng/dL)
|
12.1 ± 2.2
|
7.7 ± 1.8
|
13.1 ± 2.1
|
Plasma EET (pmol/ml)
|
|
|
|
8–9
|
5.2 ± 0.4
|
5.8 ± 0.48
|
5.7 ± 0.5
|
11–12
|
4.0 ± 0.5
|
4.8 ± 0.6
|
3.6 ± 0.3
|
14–15
|
7.9 ± 1.2
|
7.4 ± 0.7
|
6.4 ± 0.5
|
Total
|
17.1 ± 2.0
|
18.0 ± 1.3
|
15.7 ± 1.1
|
Urine EET (pmol/24h)
|
|
|
|
8–9
|
62.0 ± 14.6
|
72.8 ± 22.4
|
63.0 ± 14.0
|
11–12
|
56.6 ± 9.1
|
100.3 ± 27.5
|
67.5 ± 13.0
|
14–15
|
224.1 ± 78.9
|
368.4 ± 128.2
|
192.4 ± 51.9
|
Total
|
342.7 ± 97.6
|
541.6 ± 165.0
|
322.9 ± 71.8
|
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
We included patients between 18 and 65 of age either with systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg or on antihypertensive treatment. Patients were excluded if they had diabetes mellitus, confirmed, or suspected renal, renovascular, or endocrine causes of secondary hypertension, with infectious or inflammatory disease (i.e., active infection or connective tissue disorder), have active cancer, history of an acute cardiovascular event within six months of the study, on treatment to increase BP (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, adrenergic agonists for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, chronic use of decongestants or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) or alter the immune response (e.g., direct immunomodulators, immunosuppressants, glucocorticoids), and if they were pregnant. We collected demographic and clinical data directly from the participants and by clinical chart view.
Bulk-RNA sequencing and bioinformatics
High-quality RNA was isolated from the samples using RNeasy Midi Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quality control of the RNA samples was performed by Vanderbilt Technologies for Advanced Genomics (VANTAGE) core ensuring high RNA Integrity Number (RIN) value. Polyadenylated RNA sequencing was performed at the VANTAGE core using the Illumina Tru-Seq RNA sample prep kit. Pair-end sequencing was done on the Illumina HiSeq2500. Using the R package, the FASTQ data files from the paired-end sequencing analysis were aligned with TopHat 2 for each sample against the human GRCh38 reference genome assembly. Quality control for the RNA-Seq was performed during the following stages: 1) RNA quality; 2) raw read data (FASTQ); 3) alignment; 4) gene expression. Quality control for the raw data and alignment was conducted using QC3, and the MultiRankSeq method was used for expression analysis. False discovery rate (FDR < 0.05) was used to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. Expression heatmaps were created using the online available tool Heatmapper (http://www.heatmapper.ca/expression/). Volcano plots were created using the online tool VolcaNoseR (https://huygens.science.uva.nl/VolcaNoseR/). The fold change for the volcano plot was ≥ 1.1. Enrichment pathway analysis was performed based on the Reactome database using the online tool Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/#). Color wheels were created using Excel.
We got 47,757 transcripts after sequence alignment to the mouse genome. From this, 39,898 transcripts were removed which were either pseudogenes or transcripts with 0 values leaving 7,859 genes for further analysis. Among these 7,859 genes, 6,560 genes were scored as differentially expressed (DE) genes with adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05 and fold change ≥ 1.1. Among the DE genes 3,010 genes were up-regulated (Supplemental Table X), whereas 3,550 genes were downregulated (Supplemental Table Y). We performed enrichment pathway analysis with the up-regulated and down-regulated DE genes separately based on the Reactome database using the online tool Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/#). The significant pathways obtained from this pathway analysis are enlisted in Supplemental Table A (up-regulated pathways) and Supplemental Table B (down-regulated pathways). Based on this pathway analysis we calculated the contribution of these pathways in 10 major cellular biological processes: (1) inflammation, (2) stress, (3) cell cycle, replication, transcription, and epigenetics, (4) growth and development (5) cell-cell interaction and motility, (6) transporters, (7) metabolism, (8) proteasomal degradation, (9) protein synthesis and modification and (10) extracellular matrix remodeling pathways (Fig. 1B).
Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-Seq)
Cell hashing and CITE-Seq analysis was performed as previously described.30PBMCs were isolated as described by the manufacturer’s protocol (Fisher Scientific, Cat# 14-959-51D) in BD Vacutainer® CPT™ Mononuclear Cell Preparation tubes. Briefly, PBMCs were stained with antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates and sample-specific hashtags were included to allow for sample multiplexing. The complex was fed into the microfluidic system along with custom beads conjugated with poly dT and nucleotide sequences designed to capture the hgRNA barcodes. Oil was included to create a small vesicle of a single bead and a single cell with an antibody-oligonucleotide complex bound to it. The cell was lysed, and intracellular cDNA and Antibody Derived Tags (ADTs) were formed using reverse transcription of the mRNA to cDNA in the VANTAGE facility.
10x Genomics Cell Ranger 6.0.2 was used to quantify genes. In-house scripts were used to demultiplex sample-specific hashtags, and the hashtag abundance cutoff of positive cells was determined by modified R package cutoff[https://github.com/shengqh/cutoff]. Each cell was classified as singlet with specific hashtag, doublet or negative and genotype-based demultiplex result from Souporcell were integrated with this hashtag-based demultiplex result.32 Clustering analysis was performed using Seurat33 with resolution 1.0. and the cell type of each cluster was classified based on cell activity database33,34 and manually refined according to cell-specific marker genes. We used edgeR35 to identify differential expressions across conditions and the WebGestaltR36 package was used to perform Genome Ontology and KEGG pathway over-representation analysis on differentially expressed genes. We performed gene enrichment analysis using the GSEA37 package.
Animals and Blood Pressure Monitoring
All animal procedures were approved by Vanderbilt University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and the mice were housed and cared for in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, US Department of Health and Human Services. We purchased C57BL/6J TgCD11ccre (CD11cCre+/+) mice from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA), approximately 10–12 weeks (about 3 months) of age. JAK2fl/fl mice were developed and generously gifted by Dr. Andrea Krempler. JAK2fl/fl mice on the FVB background38 were backcrossed for over 10 generations to the C57BL/6 background. JAK2 was deleted in CD11c+ cells by crossing TgCre/CD11c with JAK2fl/fl mice (JAK2CD11cKO). To induce salt-sensitivity of blood pressure in otherwise salt-resistant C57BL/6J mice39, mice were randomly selected to initially receive G-nitro-L-Arginine-Methyl Ester (L-NAME, 0.5 mg/mL) in drinking water for 2 weeks followed by a washout period when mice were given regular water and chow ad libitum before they fed a 4% high-salt diet (Envigo, cat # TD.03095) for 3 weeks. Blood pressure was monitored using both noninvasive tail-cuff and invasively using state-of-the-art radiotelemetry. After the radiotelemetry surgery, mice were allowed to recover for 10 days before feeding them L-NAME and a high salt diet.
Metabolic Cage Studies
After the L-NAME and high salt regimen, mice were injected with saline (10% of their body weight) and placed in a metabolic cage for four hours. The urine was collected, volumes were measured, and both groups of mice were compared. At the end of the blood pressure monitoring period and metabolic cage experiment, mice were sacrificed using CO2 inhalation.
Isolation of Mouse Tissues
After euthanasia, we sprayed 70% ethanol on the chest of mice. The skin and chest wall were cut carefully to expose the heart. A small incision was made in the right atrium using a 23-gauge needle, and saline was injected into the apex of the left ventricle. We perfused mice until all organs had blanched. The spleen, kidney, and aorta were collected, digested, and used for further analyses.
Catecholamine Measurement
Before perfusing the mouse, we collected about 500 µl blood from the heart ventricle using a 1 ml syringe in Eppendorf tube with 10 µl EGTA-glutathione. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 2100 × g for 10 minutes at room temperature (RT). Plasma was aliquoted in Eppendorf tubes, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80°C. Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine were measured by HPLC via an electrochemical detection as previously published. Plasma is absorbed onto alumina at a pH of 8.6, eluted with dilute perchloric acid, and auto-injected onto a c18 reversed-phase column. An internal standard (dehydroxylbenzylamine; DHBA) was included with each extraction to monitor recovery, and standard curves for both epinephrine and norepinephrine are run. Results are quantitated through a chromatography data station.40,41 Catecholamines assays were performed by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Hormone Assay and Analytical Services Core.
Method to attach the Alexa Fluor 488 fluorophore to the D-11 Antibody
To conjugate the D-11 antibody (D11 ScFv) to the Alexa Fluor 488 fluorophore, we used the Alexa Fluor 488 Antibody labeling kit (Thermofisher, Cat# A-20118). We added 100 µL of D-11 antibody to the vial of Alexa Fluor 488 dye. The vial was inverted and incubated for 1 hour at RT in the dark. Next, a purification column was prepared. We added 750 µL of resin mix to the column and centrifuged at 1100 x g for 3 minutes. The D-11 and Alexa Fluor 488 vial was added dropwise to the top of the resin bed and the column was then centrifuged at 1100 x g for 5 minutes. The conjugated D-11 antibody was collected from the eluent. We used this D-11 Alexa Fluor 488 tagged-antibody to detect IsoLG protein adducts.
Generation of single-cell suspensions from mouse organs
After harvesting, we placed the kidney in a dissociation tube containing 3 mL of kidney digestion solution (1 mg/mL of collagenous D, 0.1 mg of DNase, and 3 mL of PBS). The tube was then inserted into a semi-automated dissociator device for two minutes and then transferred to the incubator for continuous rotation in a 37°C for 20 minutes to digest. After digestion, we centrifuged the tubes at 400 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was aspirated, and the pellet was resuspended in a 36% Percoll solution (Sigma-Aldrich). The cell suspension was gently layered on a 72% Percoll solution in a different tube to create a density gradient to collect the immune cells. We centrifuged the tubes at 2400 rpm, acceleration 9, and deceleration 1 for 15 minutes at 4°C. The thin “junk layer” or “gooey material” was gently aspirated to remove debris. We collected the upper part of the gradient till the "buffy coat" was reached (it may appear off-white with a reddish tinge [red blood cells]) in a 15 mL conical tube and washed with 15 mL of PBS by centrifuging at 350 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was aspirated, and the pellet was used for staining for flow cytometry analysis.
We performed the same steps above for the aorta; however, the aorta was not processed using the automatic dissociator. Aortas were placed in a 1.5mL Eppendorf tube containing 1 mg/mL of collagenase A and B, 0.1 mg of DNase, and 1 mL of RPMI media, and was minced with scissors in the solution for 2 minutes. Aortas were incubated under continuous rotation for 30 minutes at 37°C.
The spleen was smashed through a 40 µm filter on a conical tube and washed with 15 mL cold PBS. The solution left in the conical tube was then centrifuged at 300 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C, the supernatant was aspirated. Then, the samples were washed with 10 mL of cold PBS and spun down again at 300 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C, and the pellets were used for surface staining.
Splenocyte Isolation and Western Blot
After euthanizing mice, we harvested spleens and placed them in dissociation buffer in gentle MACS™ C tubes (Miltenyi Biotec, Cat# 130 − 107 093–237). Spleens were then dissociated using a syringe plunger and spleen homogenates were passed through a 40 µm cell strainer and washed with Dulbecco’s PBS (dPBS) to create a single-cell suspension for further flow cytometric analysis. In other experiments, splenocytes in a single-cell suspension were plated in 24-well plates at a density of 1x106/mL in either normal salt RPMI (150 mM, Na+) or high salt RPMI (190 mM, Na+) for 48 hours. GibcoTM RPMI 1640 media (ThermoFisher, Cat# 11875119) was supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% pen/strep, 1% HEPES, and 2-Mercaptoethanol (0.05 mM). Protein was estimated with the BCA method, and Western blot samples were prepared as described previously.42
Flow Cytometry
The single cell suspensions from the kidney, aorta, and spleen were transferred into separate polystyrene FACS tubes and washed with 1 mL of cold PBS with centrifugation at 350 x g for 7 minutes at 4°C. We stained cells with Zombie NIR fixable stain (Biolegend, Cat# 423106) for 15 min at 4°C to identify live and dead cells. In the meantime, a master mix was prepared for all the antibodies used for the surface staining while protecting from light (1:100 ratio in MACS buffer). The information for the antibodies used is available in Table S1. After live-dead staining, the supernatant was aspirated, and 100 µL of the master mix was added into each FACS tube, vortexed, and incubated for 20 minutes at 4°C protected from light. After the incubation, we immediately added FIX & PERM medium A (Invitrogen, Cat# GAS001S100), vortexed, and incubated for an additional 20 min at RT protected from light. After incubation, we again washed samples with 1 mL DPBS by centrifuging at 350 x g for 7 minutes. Samples were stained for intracellular markers shown in Table S1. A master mix with intracellular antibodies was prepared in FIX & PERM medium B (Invitrogen, Cat# GAS002S100) in a 1:100 ratio. After surface staining and washing the samples, a 100 µL of the master mix was added into each FACS tube, vortexed, and incubated for 30 minutes at RT protected from light. vortexed, and incubated for an additional 20 min at RT. The supernatants were aspirated, 100 µL of MACS buffer was added to each tube, and samples were run using Cytek Aurora™. We used FlowJo 10.8.1 for flow cytometry data analysis.
Immunohistochemistry and Masson’s Trichrome Staining
Both anti-F4/80 immunolabeling and Masson’s trichrome staining were performed and analyzed by a blinded observer. Kidneys were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, routinely processed and paraffin-embedded, then cut into five µm sections by the Translational Pathology Shared Resource core at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Renal immune cell infiltration was analyzed in kidney sections obtained from DCJAK2KO and DCJAK2WT mice after L-NAME/high salt (HS) regimen. All steps besides dehydration, clearing and cover-slipping were performed on the Leica Bond-Max IHC auto-stainer. Slides were deparaffinized and heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed using the Epitope Retrieval 2 solution for 10 minutes. Slides were incubated with a monoclonal rabbit anti-mouse F4/80 antibody at a 1:250 dilution for 60 minutes. The Bond Polymer Refine Detection system was used for visualization. Slides were then dehydrated, cleared, and cover-slipped. Mason’s trichrome staining was performed on the Gemini autostainer. The perivascular fibrosis index was assessed at the level of the arcuate arteries and their arteriolar branches throughout the renal cortices on a semiquantitative scale of 0–3.
Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization
The Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) was performed as per our established protocol published earlier.42 We employed RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Reagent Kit v2 (Cat# 323110 Advanced Cell Diagnostics [ACD] Bio-Techne, Newark, CA) and probes designed for CD11c, JAK2, ENAC-γ, and IL-6 were used. Briefly, we perfused kidneys with 10% neutral buffered formalin solution, dehydrated them in a graduated ethanol series, and embedded them in paraffin at the Vanderbilt Pathology Laboratory Services for further processing. Kidney sections were cut to a thickness of 5 mm and were placed on transparent slides. We deparaffinized kidney sections using Histo-Clear Solution, dehydrated them in absolute ethanol at RT, and then blocked endogenous peroxidase with RNAscope Hydrogen Peroxide. We retrieved the tissues by boiling them in the target retrieval solution (ACD Bio-Techne) between 100 and 104°C for 15 minutes and then treated them with Protease Plus at 40°C for 30 min. Target probes (Mm-ITGAX-C1, reference number 311501; Mm-SCNN1g-C2, reference number 422091 or Mm-IL-6-C2, reference number 315891; Mm-JAK2-C3, reference number 320269) were hybridized for 2 hours at 40°C, followed by a series of signal amplifications (amplifications 1–3), and, in between, washing with RNAscope Wash buffer (twice for 2minutes). We assigned ITGAX (CD11c), ENaC-γ (SCCN1G), and JAK2 mRNA probes to channels HRP–channel 1 (HRP- C1), HRP-C2, and HRP-C3, respectively. Similarly, for a second set of probes ENaC-γ (SCCN1G) was replaced with IL-6 mRNA probes and was assigned to channels HRP–channel 1 HRP-C3. The HRP-C1 signal was developed using RNAscope Multiplex FL v2 HRP-C1 with Opal 520 fluorophore (Cat# FP1487001KT, Akoya Biosciences), blocked with RNAscope Multiplex FL v2 HRP blocker, and washed with RNAscope Wash buffer in between. Similarly, HRP- C2 and HRP-C3 signals were developed using Opal 570 (Cat# FP1488001KT, Akoya Biosciences) and Opal 650 (Cat# FP1496001KT, Akoya Biosciences) fluorophores, respectively. We assigned HRP-C1, HRP-C2, and HRP-C3 to CD11c, ENaC-γ or IL-6, and JAK2 probes, respectively. We performed all hybridization steps at 40°C in a HybEZ Hybridization System (ACD Bio-Techne). After the completion of the RNAscope assay, tissue sections were counterstained with 49,6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI); incubated for 30 seconds at RT; mounted onto slides using VectaMount mounting medium (H-500; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA); and the slides were then dried, overnight, in the dark, at RT. We viewed and imaged the sections using confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 880) at Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Shared Resource (CISR) Core. We employed Fiji to analyze and process the images.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented here as the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). An unpaired student t-test was used to compare two groups. Two-way ANOVA was used for experiments with three or more conditions, followed by Bonferroni repeated measure post hoc test to compare the multiple groups. We used Spearman’s rank correlation to assess the associations of continuous variables of interest and trend lines and confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with linear regression. We used GraphPad Prism Version 9.5.1 for all statistical analyses in the manuscript.