Andren H. Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: a landscape perspective. Ecology. Ecological Society of America; 1992 Jun;73(3):794–804.
Batary P, Baladi A. Evidence of an Edge Effect on Avian Nest Success. Conserv. Biol. Blackwell Science Inc; 2004 Apr;18(2):389–400.
Bates JD, Davies KW. Effects of conifer treatments on soil nutrient availability and plant composition in sagebrush steppe. For. Ecol. Manage. [Internet]. 2017;400:631–44. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112717308253
Berryman F, Pynsent P, Cubillo J. The effect of windowing in Fourier transform profilometry applied to noisy images. Opt. Lasers Eng. [Internet]. 2004;41(6):815–25. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816603000617
Bombaci S, Pejchar L. Consequences of pinyon and juniper woodland reduction for wildlife in North America. For. Ecol. Manage. [Internet]. 2016;365:34–50. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716000190
Brosh T, Adam S. Analysis of nesting data at Ramat Hanadiv. Internal Report 2001-2010. 2012.
Browning DM, Archer SR, Asner GP, McClaran MP, Wessman CA. Woody plants in grasslands: Post-encroachment stand dynamics. Ecol. Appl. 2008;18(4):928–44.
Castro-Caro JC, Carpio AJ, Tortosa FS. Herbaceous ground cover reduces nest predation in olive groves. Bird Study. 2014 Oct;61(4):537–43.
Chalfoun AD, Thompson FR, Ratnaswamy MJ. Nest Predators and Fragmentation: a Review and Meta-Analysis. Conserv. Biol. Blackwell Science Inc; 2002 Apr;16(2):306–18.
Champely S, Ekstrom C, Dalgaard P, Gill J, Weibelzahl S, Anandkumar A, et al. Package “pwr” (1.2-2). 2018;1–22. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/pwr.pdf
Coates PS, Prochazka BG, Ricca MA, Gustafson K Ben, Ziegler P, Casazza ML. Pinyon and Juniper Encroachment into Sagebrush Ecosystems Impacts Distribution and Survival of Greater Sage-Grouse. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. [Internet]. 2017;70(1):25–38. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742416300811
Davies KW, Bates JD. Restoring big sagebrush after controlling encroaching western juniper with fire: aspect and subspecies effects. Restor. Ecol. [Internet]. 2017;25(1):33–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12375
DeGregorio B a, Weatherhead PJ, Sperry JH. Power lines, roads, and avian nest survival: effects on predator identity and predation intensity. Ecol. Evol. 2014 May;4(9):1589–600.
Dogra KS, Sood SK, Dobhal PK, Sharma S. Alien plant invasion and their impact on indigenous species diversity at global scale : A review. 2010;2(September):175–86.
Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. [Internet]. The Author(s); 2016 Aug 23;7:12485. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12485
Elbroch M, Marks E (Eleanor M, Boretos CD. Bird tracks & sign : a guide to North American species. Stackpole Books; 2001.
Fuller RJ, Gregory RD, Gibbons DW, Marchant JH, Wilson JD, Baillie SR, et al. Population Declines and Range Contractions among Lowland Farmland Birds in Britain. Conserv. Biol. Blackwell Science Inc; 1995 Dec;9(6):1425–41.
Gates JE, Gysel LW. Avian Nest Dispersion and Fledging Success in Field-Forest Ecotones. Ecology. Ecological Society of America; 1978 Aug;59(5):871–83.
Glasser TA, Hadar L. Grazing management aimed at producing landscape mosaics to restore and enhance biodiversity in Mediterranean ecosystems. Options Méditerranéennes. Ser. A Mediterr. Semin. 2014;(109):437–52.
Hadar L. The native flora in Ramat-Hanadiv. In: Perevolotsky A, editor. Manag. Conserv. Mediterr. Ecosyst. Ramat Hanadiv as a Parable. 1st ed. Ramat Hanadiv; 1989. p. 6–8.
Herranz J, Yanes M, Suárez F. Does photo-monitoring affect nest predation? J. F. Ornithol. Association of Field Ornithologists; 2002 Jan;73(1):97–101.
Holmes RT, Schultz JC. Food availability for forest birds: effects of prey distribution and abundance on bird foraging. Can. J. Zool. NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada ; 1988 Mar;66(3):720–8.
Howlett JS, Stutchbury BJ. Nest Concealment and Predation in Hooded Warblers: Experimental Removal of Nest Cover. Auk. 1996 Jan;113(1):1–9.
van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.; 2015 Aug 19;525:100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910
Krannitz PG. Abundance and diversityof shrub-steppe birds in encroachment of ponderosa pine IN RELATION TO ENCROACHMENT OF PONDEROSA PINE. Wilson J. Ornithol. Wilson Ornithological Society; 2007 Dec;119(4):655–64.
Lahti DC. The “edge effect on nest predation” hypothesis after twenty years. Biol. Conserv. Elsevier; 2001 Jun;99(3):365–74.
LaManna JA, Hemenway AB, Boccadori V, Martin TE. Bird species turnover is related to changing predation risk along a vegetation gradient. Ecology [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015 Jun 1;96(6):1670–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1333.1
Lavi A, Perevolotsky A, Kigel J, Noy-Meir I. Invasion of Pinus halepensis from plantations into adjacent natural habitats. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2005;8(1):85.
Livingston AC, Varner JM, Jules ES, Kane JM, Arguello LA. Prescribed fire and conifer removal promote positive understorey vegetation responses in oak woodlands. J. Appl. Ecol. [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2016 Oct 1;53(5):1604–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12703
Martin TE. Habitat and Area Effects on Forest Bird Assemblages: Is Nest Predation an Influence? Ecology. 1988 Feb;69(1):74.
Martin TE, Scott J, Menge C. Nest Predation Increases with Parental Activity: Separating Nest Site and Parental Activity Effects. Proc. Biol. Sci. [Internet]. The Royal Society; 2000;267(1459):2287–93. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2665824
Masoero G, Maurino L, Rolando A, Chamberlain D. The effect of treeline proximity on predation pressure: an experiment with artificial nests along elevational gradients in the European Alps. Bird Study. Taylor & Francis; 2016 Aug;1–11.
McCollin D. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography (Cop.). [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 1998 Jun 1;21(3):247–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00562.x
Murcia C. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. Elsevier Current Trends; 1995 Feb;10(2):58–62.
Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2015 Apr;520(7545):45–50.
Osem Y, Lavi A, Rosenfeld A. Colonization of Pinus halepensis in Mediterranean habitats: Consequences of afforestation, grazing and fire. Biol. Invasions. 2011;13:485–98.
Paul Shaw IN. Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology -. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
Piper SD, Catterall CP. Effects of edge type and nest height on predation of artificial nests within subtropical Australian eucalypt forests. For. Ecol. Manage. [Internet]. 2004;203(1):361–72. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112704005730
Podder P, Zaman Khan T, Haque Khan M, Muktadir Rahman M. Comparative Performance Analysis of Hamming, Hanning and Blackman Window. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2014;96(18):1–7.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
Rabinowitch A. Arboreal plant communities of the Mediterranean ecosystems in Israel. Rotem. 1985;18:5–12.
Richardson D, Rundel P, Price R, Liston A, Strauss S, Millar C, et al. Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. David M. Richardson, editor. Cambridge university press; 2000.
Richardson DM, Rejmánek M. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Divers. Distrib. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2004 Sep;10(5–6):321–31.
Ricklefs RE. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson. Contrib. to Zool. 1969;9(9):1–48.
Schaefer T. Video monitoring of shrub-nests reveals nest predators: Capsule Jays Garrulus glandarius are the most common predators, but carnivorous mammals and some other species also predate nests. Bird Study. 2004 Jul;51(2):170–7.
Schirmel J, Bundschuh M, Entling MH, Kowarik I, Buchholz S. Impacts of invasive plants on resident animals across ecosystems, taxa, and feeding types: a global assessment. Glob. Chang. Biol. [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2016 Feb 1;22(2):594–603. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13093
Schmidt KA. Foraging Theory as a Conceptual Framework for Studying Nest Predation. Oikos. 1999 Apr;85(1):151.
Shirihai H, Gargallo G, Helbig AJ, Harris A, Kirwan GM, Svensson L. Sylvia warblers. Princeton University Press; 2001.
Shochat E, Abramsky Z, Pinshow B. Breeding bird species diversity in the Negev: effects of scrub fragmentation by planted forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 2002 Apr;38(5):1135–47.
Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright S, Warton D, Wang MY, Rcpp I, et al. Package ‘mvabund.’ Cran R. 2018;
Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright ST, Warton DI. mvabund– an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol. Evol. [Internet]. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012;3(3):471–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00190.x
Wegge P, Ingul H, Pollen VO, Halvorsrud E, Sivkov A V., Hjeljord O. Comparing predation on forest grouse nests by avian and mammalian predators in two contrasting boreal forest landscapes by the use of artificial nests. Ornis Fenn. 2012;89(3):145–56.
Whelan CJ. FOLIAGE STRUCTURE INFLUENCES FORAGING OF INSECTIVOROUS FOREST BIRDS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY. Ecology. Ecological Society of America; 2001 Jan;82(1):219–31.
Wickramarachi P. Effects of windowing on the spectral content of a signal. Sound Vib. 2003;37(1):10–1.
Yom-Tov Y. The Effect of Food and Predation on Breeding Density and Success, Clutch Size and Laying Date of the Crow (Corvus corone l.). J. Anim. Ecol. 1974;43(2):479–98.