Materials and Reagents
All the oligonucleotides used in this study were custom-synthesized by Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Low molecular weight chitosan (LMWC > 90% deacetylation) with number-average molecular weight of 5000 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP, purity > 98%) was purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Sulfo-Cyanine7 carboxylic acid (Cy7) was obtained from Xi’an ruixi Biological Technology Co., Ltd (Xi’an, China). 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium-bromide (MTT), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12), Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS) and phosphate buffer solutions (PBS, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) were purchased from Gibco (Gaithersburg, USA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, purity > 95%), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), vitamin C (VC), citrinin (CTN), aristolochic acid Ⅰ (AAⅠ), cis-diammineplatinum dichloride (CDDP), quercetin (Que), puerarin (PUE) and other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Reagent, Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Trizol RNA isolation reagent, LysoTracker® Green, MitoTracker® Green, and Hoechst 33342 were purchased from Invitrogen Company (Carlsbad, CA, USA). A stock solution (1 mM) of CDIA was prepared by dissolving an appropriate amount of CDIA in chromatogram class DMSO. The HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR, HiScript II One Step qRT-PCR SYBR Green Kit, 180 kDa Prestained Protein Marker, One-Step PAGE Gel Fast Preparation Kit (10%) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit were purchased from Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Enhanced BCA Protein Assay Kit, Total Superoxide Dismutase Assay Kit with WST-8 and Lipid Peroxidation MDA Assay Kit were purchased from Beyotime Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Serum creatinine (sCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) assay kits were obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Biotech Co., Ltd (Nanjing, China). All the organic solvents were of analytical grade or the best grade available. All aqueous solutions were prepared in ultra-pure water obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (18 M Ω cm).
Apparatus
The compound was characterized by 1H NMR and mass spectra. 1H NMR spectrum was measured on a Bruker DRX600 spectrometer and referenced to the residual proton signals of the solvent. Absorption spectra were recorded on an UV-2550 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Company, Japan). Fluorescence spectra were measured on an F-7000 spectrofluorometer (Hitachi, Japan). HPLC spectrum was measured with a 1260 Infinity II spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, USA). Mass spectrum was measured with a InfinityLab LC/MSD Series spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, USA). All pH measurements were carried out with a Sartorius PB-10 (Sartorius scientific instruments, Beijing, China) containing a composite glass electrode. The morphology of the nanoprobe was characterized at a HITACHI HT7700 transmission electron microscope (TEM) operated at 120 kV. The particle size and size distribution were obtained by dynamic light scattering (DLS) at 25°C by means of a 90 Plus/BI-MAS equipment (Brookhaven, USA). Zeta potential measurement was performed at 25°C on a Malvern Zetasizer-Nano Z instrument. MTT assay was performed using a microplate reader (Infinite M200 Pro, Tecan). Confocal fluorescence imaging of cells was performed on a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM800, Zeiss, Germany) and processed using the ZEN imaging software. Flow cytometric assay was performed using MACSQuant Analyzer 10 (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). PCR reactions were performed on the Quant Studio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). In vivo fluorescence imaging experiments were performed on a live animal imaging system (Tanon ABL X6, China). The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining images were acquired on a digital pathology slice scanner using NanoZoomer 2.0 RS (Hamamatsu, China). The photoacoustic (PA) signal of diseases areas were measured by Visualsonic Vevo 2100 LAZER system.
Measurement of Fluorescence Quantum Yields
The fluorescence quantum yields were measured using Cy7 in DMSO (ΦF = 0.3) as the standard and calculated with the following equation,
Φ F (x) = ΦF (std) (\(\frac{{{A}}_{{s}{t}{d}}}{{{A}}_{{x}}})\) (\(\frac{{{I}}_{{x}}}{{{I}}_{{s}{t}{d}}})\) (\(\frac{{{\eta }}_{{x}}}{{{\eta }}_{{s}{t}{d}}})\)2
where subscript x designates CDIA, subscript std designates Cy7, A stands for the absorbance at excitation wavelength, I stands for the integrated fluorescence intensity, and η stands for the refractive index of the solvent in the measurement.
Preparation of Analyte Solutions
•OH: Hydroxyl radical was generated by Fenton reaction. To generate •OH, various amounts of Fenton reagent (Fe2+/H2O2 = 1/6, molar ratio) were added into DMF/0.1 mM H2SO4 = 1/1 (v/v).[40] 1O2: Singlet oxygen was generated in situ by addition of the H2O2 stock into a solution containing 10 eq of HClO. ONOO−: A mixture of sodium nitrite (0.6 M) and hydrogen peroxide (0.7 M) was acidified with hydrochloric acid (0.6 M), and sodium hydroxide (1.5 M) was added within 1–2 s to make the solution alkaline. The excess hydrogen peroxide was removed by passing the solution through a short column of manganese dioxide. The peroxynitrite concentration was estimated by using an extinction coefficient of 1670 M− 1•cm− 1 at 302 nm. CONOO− = Abs302 nm /1.67 (mM).[66]NO: Nitric oxide was used from a stock solution prepared by sodium nitroprusside. ClO−: hypochlorite was delivered from commercial aqueous solution. TBHP: Tert-Butyl hydroperoxide was delivered from commercial aqueous solution. H2O2: Hydrogen peroxide was delivered from commercial aqueous solution. O2•−: Superoxide solution was prepared by adding KO2 to dry dimethylsulfoxide and stirring vigorously for 10 min. T4: Freshly prepared thyroxine solution (5 mM) was added directly. T3: Freshly prepared triiodothyronine solution (5 mM) was added directly. TEMPO: Freshly prepared stock solution of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (100 mM) was added directly. Thiourea: Freshly prepared thiourea (100 mM) was added directly. GSH: Glutathione (100 mM) was added directly. NAC: N-Acetylcysteine (100 mM) was added directly.
Synthesis of CDIA@LMWC NP
0.25 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) containing 5 mg of CDIA was added to 4.25 mL of LMWC solution (5 mg of LMWC) to obtain a mixed solution. 2 mL 1.25 mg/mL TPP solution was added dropwise into the above mixture solution while stirring at 1000 rpm. The conjugation reaction was maintained for 1 h, and then the product was then purified by continuous dialysis (molar weight cutoff, MWCO 10000) against deionized water for 48 h. The final product was freeze-dried and kept in desiccators for use.
Synthesis of FITC-LMWC
5 mg of FITC was dissolved in 500 µL DMSO and added to 50 mg LMWC immersed in 5 mL deionized water. After 16 h of incubation at room temperature in the dark, the mixture was dialyzed (MWCO 1000) for 48 h at room temperature in the dark, followed by lyophilization.
Synthesis of FITC-LMWC NP
FITC-LMWC NP was synthesized by using an ionic crosslinking method.[67] In brief, 5 mg FITC-LMWC was dissolved in 5 mL 1% acetic acid solution, 2 mL 1.25 mg/mL TPP solution was added dropwise into FITC-LMWC solution while stirring at 1000 rpm. The conjugation reaction was maintained for 30 min, and the product was then purified by successive dialysis (MWCO 10000) against deionized water for 48 h. Then the product solution was adjusted to 7.4. The final product was freeze-dried and kept in desiccators for use. The amount of FITC conjugated on FITC-LMWC NP was determined by absorption at 490 nm according to a previous method.[68]
Fluorescence Measurement of FITC-LMWC NP
FITC-LMWC NP was diluted with deionized water to obtain final concentrations: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 µg/mL. The solution was excited at 490 nm and the emission wavelengths were collected from 500 to 700 nm. The fluorescence spectra was measured on Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer and both excitation and emission slits were set to 5.0 nm. The standard curve of fluorescence intensity was recorded at λex/λem = 490/518 nm using a spectrofluorometer.
Characterization of Nanoparticles
TEM measurement was performed with a JEOL JEM-200CX TEM at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The samples were prepared by dropping 10 µL of 10 µM CDIA onto copper grids, and dried for 3 min. Then the residual solution was blotted off using filter paper. Dynamic light scattering and zeta potential measurements of LMWC NP, FITC-LMWC NP and CDIA@LMWC NP were performed at 25°C on Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer and Malvern Zeta sizer-Nano Z instrument. The samples were dispersed in double distilled water and the pH value of the solution was adjusted to 7.4 before the analysis.
Determination of EE and LC
To determine the encapsulation efficiency (EE) of CDIA@LMWC NP, a dialysis method has been used.[69] 10 mL freshly prepared CDIA@LMWC NP containing 7.14 mg CDIA was placed in a dialysis bag (MWCO 5000), immersed in 90 mL phosphate buffer solution and shaken at 500 rpm using a magnetic stirrer. 5 mL dialysis sample solution was collected and the concentration of probe was measured by the UV-Vis-NIR absorption method. The EE of CDIA was calculated as: EE (%) = (W1 − W2)/W1×100, where W1 and W2 were the weights of added CDIA and unloaded CDIA, respectively. The loading content (LC) of CDIA was calculated as: LC (%) = (W1 − W2)/Wt×100, where W1 and W2 were the weights of added CDIA and unloaded CDIA, respectively, and Wt was the weight of LMWC NP. The determinations were performed at least five times for each calculation.
In Vitro Release of CDIA
The in vitro release profile of CDIA release from CDIA@LMWC NP was carried out at pH 7.4, 6.8, 5.0, and 4.0 using a dialysis method with free CDIA solution at the same concentration as a control. 1 mL of 1 mg/mL CDIA@LMWC NP was placed in a dialysis bag (MWCO 5000), immersed in 50 mL PBS and incubated at 37°C in a shaking platform at 500 rpm. At predetermined intervals, 1 mL dissolution sample was collected and replaced with the same volume of release medium. The concentration of CDIA released from CDIA@LMWC NP was measured by the UV absorption method as mentioned.
General Procedure for UV-Vis-NIR Absorption Spectra Measurement
All the UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra measurements were performed in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). To build a standard curve of CDIA content, different final concentrations (0, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20 µM) of CDIA was added into PBS buffer. The absorbance at 650 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer. To build a standard curve of FITC content, different final concentrations (0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 µg/mL) of FITC was added into PBS buffer. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer. For •OH detection, 10 µM CDIA was added into different concentration of freshly prepared •OH (0–50 µM, prepared by Fenton reaction). After rapidly mixing the solution and incubating at 37°C for 30 min in a thermostat, a 3 mL portion of the reaction solution was transferred to a 10 × 10 mm quartz cell for in vitro detection.
General Procedure for Fluorescence Spectra Measurement
CDIA was dissolved in DMSO to make a 5 mM stock solution, which was diluted to the required concentration of testing solution for measurement. Fluorescence spectra was recorded with λex/em = 650/720 nm and both excitation and emission slit widths were set to 5.0 nm. Meanwhile, a blank solution without •OH (control) was prepared and measured under the same condition for comparison. For •OH response detection, 50 µL 200 µM CDIA was dissolved in 450 µL PBS, and the solution was incubated with 500 µL Fenton reagent at various concentrations (0 − 200 µM) at 37°C for 30 min. The fluorescence spectra of CDIA were recorded using a spectrofluorometer with the excitation wavelength at 650 nm and the emission wavelengths from 675 to 875 nm.
For CDIA selectivity detection, different kinds of analyte solutions were incubated with 10 µM CDIA solution at 37°C for 30 min, respectively, and then recorded using a spectrofluorometer. All the experiments were repeated at least five times.
For fluorescence kinetics measurement, 10 µM CDIA was added into Fenton reagent at various concentrations (0, 10, 30, 50, 100 µM) at 37°C, respectively. The fluorescence intensity was examined with increasing time (0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20, 22.5, 25, 27.5, 30 minutes). Then the fluorescence was excited at 650 nm and measured at 720 nm. All the experiments were repeated at least five times.
Cell Culture
AML-12 cells, H9c2 cells, HUVEC cells, MCF-7 cells and HK-2 cells were obtained from KeyGEN Biotech Co., Ltd (Nanjing, China). AML-12, H9c2, HUVEC and MCF-7 cells were routinely grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin. HK-2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's nutrient mixture F12 (DMEM/F12) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin. The above cells were grown in a 100% humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. The medium was replenished every day and the cells were subcultured after reaching confluence.
Cytotoxicity Assay
To investigate the cytotoxicity of CDIA, standard MTT tests were performed in AML-12, H9c2, HUVEC, MCF-7 and HK-2 cells. HepG2 cells growing in log phase were seeded into 96-well plates at a seeding density of 1 × 104 cells per well in 200 µL complete medium and allowed to attach for 24 h. After rinsing with PBS, HepG2 cells were incubated with 200 µL culture media containing serial concentrations of CDIA (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 µg/mL) for 24 h. Then 20 µL of MTT (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well and followed by incubated for 4 h under the respective conditions. After 4 h, the supernatants containing unreacted MTT were discarded carefully, and 150 µL DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the produced blue formazan. The absorbance was recorded at 570 nm using a microplate reader after 10 min of shaking. Cell viability was determined by the following formula: Cell viability (%) = 100 × (OD1-OD2)/(OD3-OD2), where OD1, OD2, and OD3 were OD value of treatment group, OD value of blank group, and OD value of control group, respectively. All the experiments were repeated at least five times. The similar cytotoxicity assay was applied to nanoparticles (LMWC NP, FITC-LMWC NP and CDIA@LMWC NP) of concentrations from 0 to 2 mg/mL to HK-2 AML-12, H9c2, MCF-7 and HK-2 cells, respectively.
To evaluate the cytotoxicity of CDDP, AAI, and CTN to HK-2 cells, HK-2 cells were dispersed in 96-well microtiter plates at 1 × 104 cells per well in a total volume of 200 µL. The plates were maintained in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 24 h. After the original medium has been discarded, all the drugs with 0.1% DMSO at final concentrations of 1 ~ 1000 µM was diluted in fresh medium, then the medium was added to the HK-2 cells respectively, and incubated for 24 h. The cell viability test methods were the same as above.
Confocal Fluorescence Imaging of •OH in Model Cells
Several different cell models were established: (i) PMA (phorbol myristate acetate) was applied to induce endogenous •OH. RAW264.7 mouse macrophages and HeLa cells were exposed to PMA (200 or 500 ng/mL) diluted with serum-free medium for 4 h at 37°C, respectively. (ii) Acetaminophen (APAP) is a component of many cold medications, which may cause liver injury and oxidative stress in liver with overdose. HepG2 cells were exposed to APAP (5 or 10 mM) diluted with serum-free medium for 24 h at 37°C. (iii) HK-2 cells were exposed to 75 µM CDDP diluted with serum-free medium for 24 h at 37°C. (iv) HK-2 cells were exposed to 44 µM AAI diluted with serum-free medium for 24 h at 37°C. (v) HK-2 cells were exposed to 30 µM CTN diluted with serum-free medium for 24 h at 37°C. After incubation, the above cells were stained with CDIA (10 µM for 30 min) or CDIA@LMWC NP (20 µg/mL for 2 h), and then incubated with 5 µg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 25 min, rinsed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) to perform fluorescence imaging with a CLSM at stationary parameters including the laser intensity, exposure time, and objective lens. Hoechst 33342 was excited at 405 nm with a violet laser diode and the emission was collected from 420 to 480 nm. CDIA or CDIA@LMWC NP was excited with a 640 nm helium − neon laser and emission was collected from 650 to 750 nm. All images were digitized and analyzed by a ZEN imaging software.
Confocal Fluorescence Imaging for Determination of Optimal Incubation Conditions
HK-2 cells were seed into 35-mm confocal dishes (Glass Bottom Dish) at a density of 1 × 104 per dish and incubated in complete medium at 37°C. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with fresh serum-free culture medium containing FITC-LMWC NP (0.5 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, 2 µg/mL, 5 µg/mL, 10 µg/mL, 20 µg/mL) and incubated at 37°C for 10 min, 40 min, 100 min and 130 min, respectively. Cell imaging was then carried out after washing cells three times with PBS buffer (pH 7.4) to remove any FITC-LMWC NP on the surface of cells. The fluorescence of cells was visualized using LSM800 with a Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.40 Oil DIC M27 lens (Zeiss) at stationary parameters including the laser intensity and exposure time. The fluorescence signal of cells incubated with FITC-LMWC NP was excited at 488 nm with an argon ion laser and the emission was collected from 500 to 650 nm.
Cellular Uptake Assay
The cellular uptake assay of FITC-LMWC NP was observed using confocal fluorescence imaging, HK-2 AML-12, H9c2, HUVEC, MCF-7 and HK-2 cells were seeded into 35-mm confocal dishes (Glass Bottom Dish) at a density of 1 × 104 per dish and incubated in complete medium for 24 h at 37°C. Then the above cells were exposed to 20 µg/mL FITC-LMWC NP diluted with serum-free medium for 100 min at 37°C, respectively. After incubation, the cells were stained with 1.0 µM Hoechst 33342 for 25 min, rinsed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) to perform fluorescence imaging with a LSM800 at stationary parameters including the laser intensity, exposure time, and objective lens. Hoechst 33342 was excited with a violet 405 nm laser diode and the emission was collected from 420 to 500 nm. FITC was excited at 488 nm with an argon ion laser and the emission was collected from 500 to 650 nm. All images were digitized and analyzed by a ZEN imaging software.
For competitive inhibition assay, HK-2 cells were seeded into 35-mm confocal dishes (Glass Bottom Dish) at a density of 1 × 104 per dish and incubated with 10 µg/mL FITC-LMWC NP diluted into serum-free medium in the absence or presence of 1 µM EDTA, 50 µg/mL LMWC, or 50 µg/mL glucosamine for 2 h at 37°C. Once uptake was terminated, the cells were rinsed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) to remove extracellular FITC-LMWC NP. The fluorescence of cells was visualized using LSM800 and fluorescence signal of cells incubated with FITC-LMWC NP was excited at 488 nm with an argon ion laser and the emission was collected from 500 to 650 nm. All images were analyzed by a ImageJ software.
Flow Cytometric Assay
For flow cytometric assay, cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates and incubated with different treatments at 37°C for different times to produce normoxic or hypoxic cells. After a certain time, the medium was replaced with cell culture medium containing CDIA (10 µM) or CDIA@LMWC NP (20 µg/mL). After incubation, the different treatment groups of cells were washed three times with PBS solution, trypsinized, harvested, rinsed with PBS and resuspended in 500 µL PBS medium, and subjected to flow cytometric assay using MACSQuant Analyzer 10. The data were analyzed with FCS Express V3.
Cellular ROS Detection
For detection of •OH production, HK-2 cells were dispersed in 96-well microtiter plates at 1 × 104 cells per well in a total volume of 200 µL. The plates were maintained in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 24 h. After rinsing with PBS three times, HK-2 cells were incubated with 200 µL of culture media containing serial concentrations (0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µM) of CDDP, AAI and CTN for 24 h at 37°C, respectively. After incubation, the HK-2 cells were treated with 10 µM commercial ROS probe dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) for 30 min, and then the fluorescence intensity was measured using a spectrofluorometer at λex/λem = 492/524 nm.
RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR
To study the protective effect of Pue on the HK-2 cells, 75 µM CDDP and 25 µM Pue or 50 µM Pue were administered, respectively. HK-2 cells were pretreated with 25 µM Pue or 50 µM Pue for 12 h before 75 µM CDDP administration. The total RNA was extracted from the HK-2 cells of each group to detect Sirt11, HO-1, Nrf2, Keap,1, and DJ-1 mRNA levels.
Total RNA was isolated from HK-2 cells using Trizol reagent, and cDNA was prepared using a HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR. Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using HiScript II One Step qRT-PCR SYBR Green Kit with 20 µL reaction mixtures. Primer names and sequences for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S6. PCR reactions were performed on the Quant Studio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System with the following program: step 1, 95°C for 3 min to activate the Taq polymerase; step 2, 95°C for 3 s to denaturize DNA; step 3, 60°C for 31 s for annealing/extension (39 cycles for steps 2 and 3). The relative mRNA levels were quantified by the 2−ΔΔCt method and all data were normalized to GAPDH (the internal control).
Western Blot Analysis
Immunoblotting analysis of proteins in HK-2 cells was performed by homogenizing frozen cells in the lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA), 1% Triton-X 100, and a protease inhibitor (pH 7.4). The supernatants of the mixture were obtained by centrifugation at 4°C (30 min, 16,000 × g), and their total protein concentrations were further determined using the Enhanced BCA Protein Assay Kit. Protein extracts were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE, 8–12% gels) and blotted onto PVDF membranes. After blocking with 5% fatfree milk, the membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight with the following primary antibodies: anti-Nrf2 (1:1000, A21176), anti-Keap1 (1:1000, A1820), anti-HO-1 (1:1000, A19062), anti-DJ-1 (1:1000, A19097), anti-Sirt1 (1:1000, A19667), and anti-GAPDH (1:1000, A19056) from ABclonal Biotech Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The bound antibodies were detected using horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated IgG (ABclonal) and visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagents. GAPDH was used as a loading control.
MDA and SOD Assays
To assess the OS level in HK-2 cells, the levels of SOD and MDA were tested with commercially available kits (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Briefly, HK-2 cells were homogenized in ice-cold 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), then the homogenates were filtered and centrifuged using a refrigerated centrifuge at 4°C (20 min, 16,000 × g). The obtained supernatants were used to determine the SOD enzyme activity and the lipid peroxidation level by measuring MDA content. The SOD enzyme activity was expressed as a unit of activity per milligram of protein and the MDA content was expressed as micromole per gram of protein.
Animal Model
ICR-Swiss male mice (20–25 g), 5–6 weeks of age, were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center and Institute of Comparative Medicine at Yangzhou University. The animals were bred in stainless steel metabolic cages with free access to food and double distilled water under standard conditions of humidity (50 ± 10%), temperature (25 ± 2°C) and light (12 h light/12 h dark cycle). All animal study protocols were designed in according to guidelines set by the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and approved by the Animal Ethical Experimentation Committee of China Pharmaceutical University. The mice were randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups (group I: mice were treat once with CDDP at a dosage of 18 mg/kg; group II: mice were treated twice with CDDP at a dosage of 9 mg/kg; group III: mice were treated thrice with CDDP at a dosage of 6 mg/kg; group IV: mice were treated with CDDP at a dosage of 3 mg/kg for six times.). The control groups were treated with PBS (0.2 ml) or NAC (10 mg kg− 1 day− 1 during the study, i.p. injection) or quercetin (Que, 10 mg kg− 1 day− 1 during the study, i.p. injection ) 3 days prior to CDDP administration.[70] NIR fluorescence and PA imaging were performed for 2 h after i.v. injection of 10 mg/kg CDIA@LMWC NP.
Hemolysis Assay
Hemolytic acitvity of CDIA was carried out according to the previous protocol.[71] Fresh mouse blood was diluted by physiological saline and centrifuged to isolate red blood cells (RBCs) from serum. Then RBCs were incubated with physiological saline (negative control), triton X-100 (10 g L− 1, positive control), or CDIA at concentrations of 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 µM at 37°C for 2 h. After incubation, RBCs were centrifuged at 3000 r.p.m. for 10 min and the supernatant of each sample was collected and transferred to a 96-well plate. The absorbance of hemoglobin at 540 nm was measured by using a microplate reader. Because CDIA had intrinsic absorption at 540 nm, the absorption of sample group (Asample) was deducted by the absoption of CDIA at 540 nm at the same concentration. The hemolysis ratio of RBCs was calculated as follows: Hemolysis (%) = (Asample – Anegative)/ (Apositive – Anegative) ×100%, where Asample, Anegative, Apositive were denoted as the absortion of samples (after deduction by the intrinsic absorption of CDIA), negative and positive control, respectively. The same operation was used for the hemolysis test of CDIA@LMWC NP.
In Vivo NIR Fluorescence Imaging in Living Mice
NIR fluorescence imaging were conducted for 2 h after i.v. injection of CDIA@LMWC NP. Fluorescence images of CDIA@LMWC NP were acquired using a live animal imaging system (Tanon ABL X6, China) with excitation at 650 ± 10 nm and emission at 720 ± 10 nm and an acquisition time of 0.1 s. NIR fluorescence intensities of kidneys in living mice were analyzed by the region of interest (ROI) analysis. Mice were euthanized after imaging at different timepoints post-treatment of cisplatin. Major organs were collected and placed into 4% paraformaldehyde for histological examination.
PA Imaging
PA imaging was performed using a LAZR Tight TM imaging enclosure coupled with a Vevo LAZR PA imaging system (Fujifilm VisualSonics) equipped with a MS-250 linear array transducer (21 MHz, 70% 6 dB two-way bandwidth, 256 elements) to detect ultrasound (US) signals and a tunable Nd: YAG laser system (OPOTEK, 680 − 970 nm, 20 Hz repetition rate, 5 ns pulse width, and 50 mJ pulse peak energy) to generate optical pulses. PA spectra were acquired using a transducer at a wavelength of 690 nm and with an acquisition rate of 5 frames/s. US/PA signals were processed and reconstructed in a work station. The energy supplied by each pulse of the tunable laser was 1.2 mJ/cm2, well below the standard set by the American National Standard Institute across the wavelength range. PA imaging in living mice were conducted for 2 h after i.v. injection of CDIA@LMWC NP with excitation at 690 nm.
Histology
The organs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), dehydrated in ethanol solution, and embedded in paraffin prior to 10 µm section. Histology samples were stained by hematoxylin and eosin under standard protocols. Images were acquired using a slide scanner (NanoZoomer 2.0 RS, Hamamatsu).
Blood Sample Analysis
The blood samples were collected at different time post treatment in the heparin capillaries through orbital venous of mice, and centrifuge for 20 min (4 ℃, 2000 rpm). The supernatant serum were collected and stored at − 80 ℃. BUN and sCr concentration were determined using commercial kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (5 mice were analyzed for each sample).
Data Analysis
Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation unless stated otherwise. Cell imaging data was analyzed and quantified with Image J and ZEN software. Statistical comparisons between groups were determined by t-test and more than three groups were determined by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons test. For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism.