Materials
A protein assay kit, protein extraction kit, glucose assay kit (glucose oxidase method), and total cholesterol (TC), total triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT) kits were purchased from the Jiancheng Institute of Biotechnology (Nanjing, China). An insulin kit was purchased from Cusabio Technology Co. Ltd. (Wuhan, China). A Western Bright ECL kit, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), antibiotics, Lipofectamine 3000, foetal bovine serum, and trypsin were purchased from Solarbio Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were purchased from Millipore Co., Ltd. (Massachusetts, USA). A luciferase assay kit and luciferase reporter vector were purchased from Promega Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma) cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Maryland, USA). HFD chow (D16492) containing 36.4% carbohydrates, 25.6% fat, 20% protein, 1% cholesterol and 0.1% bile acid was purchased from SYSE Co., Ltd. (Changzhou China). Recombinant mouse low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) protein (ab206024) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Primary antibodies against precursor sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (pSREBP1; 1:1000, PA005992) and phospho-SREBP1 (1;1000, PA050140) were purchased from Cusabio Technology Co. Ltd. (Wuhan, China). A primary antibody against precursor sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (pSREBP2; 1:1000, ab30682) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). A primary antibody against phospho-SREBP2 (Ser455) (pSREBP2; 1:1000, PA5-106042) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Massachusetts, USA). Primary antibodies against acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACC; 1:1,000, bs2745R), fatty acid synthase (FASN; 1:1000, bs1498R), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase (HMGCR, 1:100 bsm-52822R), and mature SREBP1 (mSREBP1; 1:1000, bs1402R) were purchased from Bioss Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). Primary antibodies against β-actin (1:1,000, K200058M) and secondary antibodies were purchased from Solarbio Co., Ltd. Primary antibodies against sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) (1:1000, ab30682) and LDLR (ab30532) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). A primary antibody against phospho-SREBP2 (Ser455) (1:500, PA5-64716) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Massachusetts, USA).
Preparation of oroxin A
Oroxin A (more than 96% pure; Fig. S1, Table S1, and Table S2) was isolated from O. indicum following the method of our previous research (Sun et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2018). In short, the seed extract of O. indicum was dissolved in ethanol, applied to a reversed-phase column (ODS-C18) and eluted with 20–80% acetonitrile to obtain four fractions. Fraction 2 was concentrated and injected into the prepacked ODS column again to obtain pure oroxin A.
ELISA and docking experiments
Protein binding assay
Based on previous studies, we used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure the binding efficiency of LDLR-oroxin A (Li et al., 2017). Oroxin A at a range of concentrations was coated onto a polystyrene plate, which was then incubated at 4°C overnight and blocked with 1% gelatine for 2 h. After these steps, recombinant LDLR protein (50 µL/well, 20 µg/mL) was added, and incubation was performed for 1 h. Then, the HRP-labelled goat anti-mouse IgG antibody was added for incubation to detect LDLR. It is worth noting that the plate needed to be washed three times with PBS after each step. Finally, the samples were visualized. After adding H2O2 and o-phenylenediamine for colour development, the reaction was stopped by adding 2 mM sulfuric acid, and the absorbance at 492 nm was measured within the specified time.
Docking experiment
Docking was carried out according to a previous research method (Sun et al., 2018). In brief, the ligand-binding domain structure of the LDLR protein was prepared according to a previous method (Sun et al., 2018), which was derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 3SO6, www.rcsb.org). The Schrodinger Maestro 9.4 package was then used to predict the binding effect of the LDLR protein ligand binding domain on oroxin A. In particular, we generated a docking grid (36 × 36 × 36 Å) and selected five optimal conformations according to empirical glide G scores (kcal/mol).
In vitro experiments
Cell culture
HepG2 cells were cultured in tissue culture flasks by adding DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics and were incubated at 5% humidified CO2 and 37°C. The culture media was routinely changed every 2 days, and the cells were passaged by trypsinization before reaching confluence. The cell model was established by inducing cells to increase excess fat accumulation with 1 mM oleic acid as described in our previous method.
In vitro Oil red O staining
HepG2 cells were inoculated in 10-cm culture dishes and cultured to 70%-80% confluence for the experiment. After starvation for 12 h, HepG2 cells were treated with either DMSO or oroxin A (5 µM or 50 µM) in combination with 1 mM oleic acid and incubated for 24 h, while the control cells were not treated with any treatment. HepG2 cells were subsequently fixed with 1 ml of 2% formaldehyde stained with Oil red O according to a previous description (Li et al., 2021). Finally, the stained samples were observed at an appropriate magnification of 40 x.
Cellular TC and TG assays
The cytotoxicity of oroxin A was determined in our previous research (Sun et al., 2018). We determined whether the adipose HepG2 cell model was successfully established by measuring the cellular TC and TG levels. After successful model establishment, the cells in the treatment group were given different concentrations (5 µM and 50 µM) of oroxin A, while the negative control cells were treated with DMSO. After treatment for 24 h, we determined the cellular TC and TG levels with a commercial kit. Each treatment was repeated 6 times.
SREBP transcriptional activity assay
SREBP transcriptional activity in the cell model was assessed as described in our previously reported methods (Sun et al., 2020). Furthermore, we cotreated cells with different concentrations (0 µM, 5 µM, 50 µM) of oroxin A and 1 mM oleic acid for 24 h and then assessed the action of oroxin A on the transcriptional activity of SREBP.
In vitro immunoblot analysis
After treating fatty HepG2 cells with DMSO or oroxin A (5 µM or 50 µM) for 24 h (cell treatments with pAMPK, phospho-SREBP1, and phospho-SREBP2 were performed for 1 h, 1 h, and 6 h, respectively), we collected the cells and extracted the proteins using a protein extraction kit according to the instructions. We then separated protein samples by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), which was used to detect mSREBP1, mSREBP2, AMPK, pAMPK and β-actin levels. We separated pSREBP1, phospho-SREBP, pSREBP2, phospho-SREBP2, ACC, FASN and HMGCR by 8% SDS‒PAGE. Then, immunoblot analysis of the protein samples was performed as per our previously described method. Each treatment was repeated 3 times.
AMPK phosphorylation inhibition assay
Experiments were performed after starvation treatment of the fatty HepG2 cells for 12 h. The cells were given DMSO or 10 µM compound C (dorsomorphin). After 1 h of treatment, the cells were then given DMSO or oroxin A. Then, the cellular TC and TG levels and SREBP transcriptional activity were determined as described for previous experiments.
In vitro immunofluorescence staining
An in vitro immunofluorescence staining experiment was performed with minor modifications according to a previously reported method (Donaldson, 2015). The cells were treated with different concentrations (0 µM, 5 µM, and 50 µM) of oroxin A for 24 h for subsequent immunofluorescence staining in vitro. The fixed HepG2 cells were cultured for 10 minutes with BSA/FBS to block nonspecific sites of antibodies and then with PBS, pH 7.4, containing a 1% concentration of the SREBP1 or SREBP2 antibody. Then, the cells were washed with 1 ml PBS/FBS three times to remove unbound antibodies and incubated for 5 min each time. Then, the fixed HepG2 cells were incubated with 1% fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies. After adding the secondary antibody, the fixed HepG2 cells were covered with culture dishes and cultured away from light for 60 min at room temperature. Then, the cells were washed with 1 ml PBS/FBS to remove unbound antibodies three times and incubated for 5 min each time. Finally, we stained the nuclei with 4',6-diaminophenylindole (DAPI) and blocked the cells with neutral gel to observe the fluorescent signal using an Olympus IX81 microscope. When SREBP1 or SREBP2 underwent nuclear translocation, the FITC fluorescence signal could be observed in DAPI-stained nuclei to quantify SREBP1 or SREBP2.
In vivo experiments
Animal experiments
Male Sprague‒Dawley rats (180–220 g) were purchased from the Shandong Laboratory Animal Center (Jinan, China) (permission number SCXK 2014-0007). The current study protocol followed international ethical guidelines, and all animal handling procedures were performed in a standard laboratory and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shandong University of Technology (YLX20210801).
Experiment 1
Eight rats fed a standard diet served as the negative control group (NC). A model of lipid metabolism disorder was established in rats induced by HFD feeding. The remaining 32 rats fed a high-fat diet were randomized into four groups (n = 8): (I) high-fat diet group (HFD); (II) Essentiale Forte N treatment group (EN, positive control, 196.3 mg/kg); (III) low-dose oroxin A treatment group (LA, 50 mg/kg); and (IV) high-dose oroxin A treatment group (HA, 200 mg/kg). In addition, both the CON and HFD groups were randomly administered vehicle (0.5% CMC-Na) by gavage every day for 3 months.
Experiment 2
Eight rats fed a standard diet served as the negative control group (NC2). Disordered lipid metabolism was induced in the rats by HFD feeding. The remaining 48 rats fed a high-fat diet were randomized into six groups (n = 8): (I) high-fat diet group (HFD2); (II) high-dose oroxin A treatment group (HA2, 200 mg/kg); (III) low-dose atorvastatin treatment group (AT(10), 10 mg/kg/d); (IV) high-dose atorvastatin treatment group (AT(30), 30 mg/kg/d); (V) low-dose atorvastatin and oroxin A combination treatment group (AT (10) + HA); and (VI) high-dose atorvastatin and oroxin A combination treatment group (AT (30) + HA). Furthermore, both the CON and HFD groups were randomly administered vehicle (0.5% CMC-Na) by gavage every day for 3 months.
Physiological and biochemical properties
In the last week of the animal experiments, food intake was assayed. All rats were euthanized by isoflurane inhalation. In addition, we recorded the premortem weight of each group of rats and collected blood samples and liver samples for processing and preservation for further analysis. The plasma levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial glucose (2h-PG), fasting insulin (FINS), TC, TG, LDLC, HDLC, ALT, and AST were assayed according to the commercial kit instructions. Additionally, TC, TG, SOD, MDA, and GPx levels in the hepatic tissues were also analysed using commercial kits according to the instructions.
In vivo immunoblot analysis
For in vivo immunoblot analyses, protein samples were excised from the hepatic tissues of all groups of rats in Experiment 1, and the abundance of phospho-SREBP1, pSREBP1, mSREBP1, phospho-SREBP2, SREBP2, AMPK, pAMPK, ACC, FASN, HMGCR, and β-actin was analysed as mentioned above.
Histological analysis
Some liver tissue samples of rats in each group in Experiment 1 were excised and fixed in formalin solution and embedded in paraffin to make 3 µm paraffin sections. The sections were then stained with haematoxylin-eosin or Oil red O and observed at an appropriate magnification of 40×.
In vivo immunofluorescence staining
In vivo immunofluorescence staining was performed with minor modifications as described previously. (Liu et al., 2021). The washes mentioned in the following steps were performed using PBS for three minutes at a time. The steps were as follows: 1) dewaxing and hydration: after baking at 65°C for 1 h, the antigens were dewaxed twice using xylene immersion for 10 minutes each time, followed by hydration in 100%, 100%, 95%, 85% and 75% ethanol for 2 minutes, washing in distilled water 2 times for 3 minutes each time, and washing in PBS for 3 minutes; 2) repair of antigens: high-pressure heat treatment with EDTA repair solution for 2.5 minutes, and after natural cooling, washed 3 times; 3) closure of endogenous peroxidase: adding 3% hydrogen peroxide and cultured for 10 minutes at room temperature, and then washed 3 times; 4) closure: animal serum was added and sealed at 37°C for 10 minutes; 5) primary antibody incubation: after removal of the blocking solution, anti-SREBP1/anti-SREBP2 antibodies (1:100) were added and cultured overnight at 4°C, then washed 3 times; 6) secondary antibody incubation: after incubating with FITC-labelled secondary antibody (30 minutes at 37°C) at 4°C for 1 h, washed 3 times; 7) dehydration: dehydrated in 75%, 85%, 95% and 100% ethanol for 2 minutes, followed by two immersions in xylene for 2 minutes each; 8) staining and sealing: the nuclei were stained with DAPI, sealed with neutral gel and observed under the microscope (Olympus IX81). When SREBP1 or SREBP2 underwent nuclear translocation, the FITC fluorescence signal could be observed in DAPI-stained nuclei to quantify SREBP1 or SREBP2.
Statistical analyses
SPSS 17.0 was used for statistical analysis, and both in vitro and in vivo experimental results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The level of significant differences (*P < 0.05) was analysed by one-way ANOVA, and the least significant difference (LSD) test was used for multiple comparisons. In addition, different letters (a, b, c) in the corresponding graphs or tables indicate statistically significant differences.