The World Health Organization has an ambitious plan to eliminate hepatitis viruses as a public health treat in 2030 [1]. Despite this, screening for HBV and HCV among apparently healthy pregnant women in Ethiopia is poor. Globally, more than 95% of hepatitis infected persons do not aware of their infection[1]. This number is substantial in developing countries where there is no routine screening for hepatitis. To eliminate hepatitis virus’s early detection, prevention of transmission and initiation of treatment is very crucial. Screening of apparently healthy pregnant women is key for the prevention of vertical transmission. Thus, this study has a paramount significance and calls for Amhara regional health officials and even to the country level to work on screening for HBV and HCV among pregnant women routinely in public health institutions and integrate into the PMTCT of HIV.
This is the first large-scale study that examined seroprevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV antibody and associated factors among pregnant women in the Amhara region, Ethiopia. Our study revealed that 4.6% of pregnant women were infected with HBV. This finding is in line with the WHO intermediate classification of HBsAg prevalence, which is 2–7% [23]. Moreover, it is similar to other studies conducted previously in Bahir Dar 4.4%, Arba Minch 4.3%, Dessie 4.9%, and Egypt 5%, South Africa 4.5% [17, 24–27].
However, our findings are higher than those of studies done in the east Wolega zone 2.4%, Dawuro 3.5%, Addis Ababa 3%, Eritrea 3.2%, Germany 0.48%, Turkey 2.1%, and China 3.2% [28–34]. On the other hand, our findings are lower than those studies done in Dire Dewa 8.4%, Mekele 8%, Hawasa 7.8%, Yirgalem 7.2%, Gambella 7.9%, Harar 6.9%, Tigray 5.5%, Gambia 9.2%, Tazania 8.03%, Cameroon 6.6%, and Ghana 12.9% [16, 18, 35–43]. There is a variation among the prevalence’s of our study with the studies that were conducted around the globe. The differences might be due to differences in cultural practices, socioeconomic status, availability of medical services, vaccination status, and diagnostic test kit employed in the study.
The overall seroprevalence of anti-HCV antibody in the present study was found to be 1.6%. This finding is in agreement with the WHO intermediate criteria. According to WHO classification criteria graded as low, the HCV seroprevalence is < 1.5%, intermediate 1.5%-3.5%, and high > 3.5% [12]. This finding is comparable to a study conducted in southern Ethiopia 1.8% [44]. However, our result is higher than Tazania 0.3% [45] and Bahir Dar 0.6% [17]. In contrast, our finding is lower than studies done in East Wolega 8.1% and Egypt 6.1% [29, 46]. On the other hand, anti-HCV antibody seroprevalence was 8.9% in Debre Markos Hospital, which is unexpectedly highest. This finding calls further study in Debre Markos Hospital and around the area in the community to further explore risk factors for a high prevalence of HCV. Variations in seroprevalence in Ethiopia and elsewhere might be due to the diagnostic test kit employed, awareness of transmission of HCV, exposure to risk factors, and geographic location.
Studies have documented that there was co-infection of HBV and HCV among pregnant women, similar to our findings [37, 44]. In contrast to this finding, no co-infection of these viruses was detected in studies conducted in Ethiopia and elsewhere [17, 29, 45].
Of the sociodemographic characteristics, younger age, and unmarried pregnant women had a significant association with HBsAg prevalence (Table 3). This might be due to, at younger age sexual activity being higher compared than in age groups of 25 years and above. This finding agrees with other studies in Gambella, Addis Ababa in Ethiopia [4, 41]. In contrast, studies have reported a high prevalence of HBsAg in pregnant women with increasing age [4]. Moreover, the probability of getting HBV infection in unmarried women is higher than that in their counterparts. This in line with a study conducted in Ethiopia [18]. This might be due to in Ethiopia, unmarried pregnant women have the possibility of having more than one sexual partner to get job opportunities and to get money as compared to married pregnant women. To the contrary of this study, a high positive HBsAg more likely in married pregnant women than in single and divorced [36]. The observed differences could be due to the sample size of the study participant, geographic location difference, and culture of population living in.
Among the various risk factors assessed, having multiple sexual partners, HIV, sharing toothbrush, family history of HBV, history of tattooing, and previous history of blood transfusion were significantly associated with HBV infection (Table 3). Pregnant women with multiple sexual partners had 3 times (AOR3.2; 95% CI: 1.3–7.6%) more likely to develop HBV infection than their counterparts. This finding is similar to other studies [17, 24, 40–43]. Blood transfusion has been recognized as a major risk factor for transmission of HBV throughout the world. Pregnant women with a history of blood transfusion previously had almost 8 times (AOR 7.6, 95% CI 2.9–16.9) more likely to develop HBV infection than compared to pregnant women with no history of blood transfusion. This is similar to previous studies done elsewhere [17, 18, 34]. However, inconsistent with other studies [40–42]. In fact, in Ethiopia, blood and blood products have been screened for HBV, HCV, HIV, syphilis, and malaria since 2001 [6]. However, in our country, screening for HBV from blood and blood products using ELISA may not detect the virus in the window period and occult hepatitis, which needs molecular techniques for accurate detection of the virus. Evidence showed that a study done in Taiwan, among 10,727 seronegative blood donations, 12 HBV DNA was detected [47]. Therefore, it is advisable to evaluate HBsAg ELISA against molecular techniques.
Participants with a history of tattooing on their body parts (AOR 2, 95%CI:1.1–3.7) had more chance of being infected with HBV than pregnant women who did not have tattooing on their body parts. This is in line with studies done in Addis Ababa and Arba Minch, Ethiopia [4, 24]. However, this is contrary to other studies [39, 40]. The observed differences might be due to variations in sample size of study participants, safety precaution, and culture.
Moreover, study participants with a family history of HBV infection (AOR 3.5,95% CI:1.7–3.7) had more likely to be infected with HBV than compared to their counterparts. This is similar to the study done in Tigray, Ethiopia [43]. In contrast, this is inconsistent with other studies [24, 40]. The variations might be due to differences, sample size, and awareness of study participants regarding transmission methods. In Ethiopia, there is a belief that hepatitis disease is not transmitted from person to person; rather, it is Bat’s disease or ``Yewef Beshita`` in Amharic language [6].
In relation to HIV, pregnant women who had HIV in their blood two times (AOR 2.5, 95% CI,1-5.9) more likely develop HBV as compared to HIV-negative pregnant women. HIV is significantly associated with HBV infection. This finding is similar to studies done in Ethiopia and other African countries [4, 18, 36]. This is explained by HBV and HIV shared routes of transmission. HIV and HBV not only share routes of transmission but also, they have reverse transcriptase in a common, target for reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Viral hepatitis is a growing cause of mortality among people living with HIV. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), an estimated 10% of HIV-infected individuals are co-infected with HBV [48]. The co-infection rate of HBV and HIV in Ethiopia is a common phenomenon, which leads to increased morbidity and mortality than mono infection of both viruses. HIV negatively impacts the HBV life cycle by increasing persistent HBV infection, having a higher HBV viral load, lower rates of HBeAg loss, increased cirrhosis ,and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [49]. Moreover, HIV-HBV co-infected pregnant women are twice as likely to test positive for HBeAg, three times more likely to have detectable HBV DNA, and have higher HBV DNA serum concentrations as compared to those who are HBV mono-infected, thereby greatly increasing the risk of MTCT [50].
Moreover, in Ethiopia, a systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the HIV prevalence among pregnant women was 5.7%. This review also reported that HIV in the Amhara region, among pregnant women, was 9.5% [19]. Despite the recommendation of many international and national HIV guidelines to test HBV among HIV-positive pregnant women before ART initiation, screening uptake is generally poor in Ethiopia. Therefore, screening for HBV among HIV-positive pregnant women is very essential for the mother and the child for prevention of vertical transmission.
Interestingly, pregnant women who had shared their tooth brushes almost 4.5 times (AOR 4.5, 95% CI 1.1–18) more likely at risk of getting HBV infection compared to their counterparts. This might be due to during tooth brushing there may be gum bleeding and may transmit HBV from an infected person to a susceptible person. HBV is highly contagious and a hundred times more infectious than HIV and waits more time outside the blood than HIV. It is a tricky enveloped virus transmitted even on surfaces and acts as a non-enveloped virus during transmission [6].
In this study, only 20 (1.8%) pregnant women were vaccinated for HBV prevention. This figure is less than the vaccination status of pregnant women in Gambia 41.3% [35]. This is due to HBV vaccination in Ethiopia is started lately in 2007 [51]. This is an indication that more efforts were required to vaccinate adults born before 2007 in Ethiopia. Since 1991, the WHO recommended universal HBV vaccination of children and high-risk groups to reduce new infections and prevent progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [52]. Universal vaccination is exemplary in Taiwan, together with catch-up vaccination and maternal screening, which decreases the prevalence of HBsAg from 9.8% in 1984 to 0.3% in 2009 in children younger than 15 years [53]. Likewise, in 2009, the WHO recommended a birth dose vaccine for infants within 24 h of birth [10]. However, studies have shown that birth dose vaccination may not prevent those infants born from HBeAg-positive pregnant women and have a high viral load of HBV DNA [8, 27]. Combined treatment with HBV immunoglobulin and birth dose vaccine highly recommended and prevents 85–95% vertical transmission [52]. However, hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin is expensive and not readily available at most health institutions in Ethiopia. The authors recommended that giving birth dose vaccines within 24 h of the birth of infants is essential to prevent MTCT and integrate into HIV PMTCT in Ethiopia. Yet it is not a routine practice of provision of the birth dose vaccines in Ethiopian health institutions.
Therefore, the findings of this study will provide insights for policy makers to implement routine practice of screening of HBV and HCV in pregnant women and immunization of infants for HBV and integration into PMTCT of HIV. However, this study has some limitations. The molecular DNA test is better for diagnosing occult hepatitis has not done in this study, which may underestimate the prevalence of HBV among pregnant women.