In a group of middle-aged adults, the performance on a literacy test, even low enough to be considered illiterate per the literature (Apolinario et al., 2015), correlated with the HC-VMPFC connectivity. The association between low literacy levels and HC-VMPFC may suggest the role of even some literacy on cognitive reserve mechanisms. In contrast, we can speculate that the lack of association between episodic memory performance and hippocampal connectivity might reflect that this reserve is not enough to strengthen the role of hippocampal connectivity in memory abilities.
Cognitive reserve refers to distinct cognitive mechanisms, developed across the lifespan, that make a person more resilient or resistant to cognitive decline caused by brain damage (Stern et al., 2023). A higher level of cognitive reserve equips the brain to compensate through more efficient brain activation patterns that are more flexible and resilient to neurodegeneration or other forms of brain injury (Stern et al., 2023). Because higher cognitive reserve is associated with more tolerance to hippocampal atrophy (Murray et al., 2011), neurodegeneration (Hoenig et al., 2017; Wirth et al., 2014), and cerebrovascular (Fernandez-Cabello et al., 2016) pathologies, we believe that improving literacy levels might increase the HC-VMPFC connectivity and eventually prevent cognitive impairment in this population. Our finding may substantiate the hypothesis that improved hippocampal efficiency, reflected in stronger connections between the hippocampus and critical areas for memory processing such as the prefrontal cortex, may impact cognitive reserve even with some schooling. However, because our study was cross-sectional, we cannot demonstrate causality.
The TOFHLA test has been widely used to measure literacy level (Fan et al., 2021). Low literacy measured by the TOFHLA is associated with poor health outcomes (Apolinario et al., 2015; Fan et al., 2021). Although it is well established that the literate brain has different structural and functional properties (Dehaene & Cohen, 2007; Dehaene et al., 2015; Dehaene et al., 2010; Resende, Tovar-Moll, et al., 2018), the neural correlates of literacy measured by literacy tests, and not years of education, is less studied. A previous study showed that higher literacy skills measured by the REALM-SF test correlated with brain structural connectivity, but not with hippocampal volumes (Resende et al., 2022). Interestingly, we found that the very low literacy levels measured by the TOFHLA in our sample was significantly associated with the HC-VMPFC connectivity. We speculated that this finding may reflect how even low levels of literacy can relate to brain functioning, shedding light on a possible mechanism of cognitive reserve in this illiterate population.
In terms of episodic memory and brain connectivity, there is still a debate in the literature. The FCSRT is a traditional episodic memory test that has two versions (verbal and visual). The neural correlates of the verbal version have been more explored, while the visual version was less studied. Because the participants were illiterate, the visual version of the FCSRT was more appropriate. The few studies that explored the neural basis of the visual FCSRT test were conducted in persons with high educational level. One study with 14 participants compared the brain activation by the visual FCSRT between novel and repeated stimuli and showed that activations in left superior temporal and left prefrontal cortices were significantly associated with episodic memory (Diamond et al., 2007). Other brain areas activated through the FCSRT stimuli were the inferior parietal lobule, precuneus, hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus (McLaren et al., 2012) as well as the posterior cingulate cortex and the precuneus connections (Edde et al., 2020).
In our study, the lack of association between episodic memory measured by the visual version of the FCSRT and the HC-VMPFC connectivity might be explained by the fact that we did not use task-based functional MRI as the previous studies used, but resting state functional MRI, which might be less sensitive to cognitive-brain correlations (Rasero et al., 2018). Another possibility is that illiterates use less their HC-VMPFC connectivity for memory processing, which might suggest a low cognitive reserve in this group. The fact that we found a significant relationship between literacy levels and the HC-VMPFC connectivity may support this theory, because, as the literacy levels increase, the association becomes stronger. In terms of structural neural correlates of the visual version of the FCSRT, the hippocampal volumes (Slachevsky et al., 2018) and brain areas involving visual processing (Arighi et al., 2018) have been implicated. The verbal version of the FCSRT, however, has been more studied. The hippocampal gray matter volume, mainly the left, has been consistently associated with the verbal version of FCSRT (Arighi et al., 2018; Epelbaum et al., 2018; Ezzati et al., 2016; Frank et al., 2022) in persons with high educational level. This association seems to be more evident in patients with AD (Novellino et al., 2018; Quenon et al., 2016; Sánchez-Benavides et al., 2010) and bvFTD (Bertoux et al., 2018; Poos et al., 2021) than in controls. The very low educational level of our sample combined with the lack of participants with dementia may explain why we did not find an association between episodic memory and hippocampal volumes. Indeed, two previous studies showed that the relationship between episodic memory and hippocampal volumes was moderated by educational level (O'Shea et al., 2018; Resende, Rosen, et al., 2018).
Our study has strengths and limitations. It is one of the first studies to look at the associations between the FCSRT visual version and hippocampal functional connectivity and gray matter volumes. The main limitation is the fact that it is cross sectional; therefore, not suitable for demonstrating causality. However, considering the scarcity of studies in illiterate adult populations, we consider it is an important first step into demonstrating whether late life literacy-training might have an impact on cognitive reserve. Nearly all current data available on the cognitive reserve field relate to formal education received in early life, but whether formal education provided during adulthood increases cognitive reserve with downstream benefits on dementia risk it is not known. Even considering the most recent drop in youth illiteracy due to LMIC efforts to provide formal education to school-age children, generations of adults remain illiterate and at higher risk of developing cognitive impairment later in life. If literacy-training in adulthood also improves cognitive reserve, even the current generation of low-educated adults could have benefits, an extremely important issue in LMIC where adult illiteracy rates often exceed 50% (Caribbean et al., 2022).
Our next goal is to explore the effects of adult-literacy training in brain structural and functional connectivity as well as in cognitive abilities, to determine whether adult-literacy acquisition might have a beneficial effect on dementia prevention. Eventually, we will be able to inform public policies to increase educational attainment in adulthood with a substantial impact on lowering dementia burden worldwide.