Admission Process
A total of 86 patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock during the study period were included in the screening according to the sepsis-3 diagnostic criteria. Thirty-eight patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria: 20 patients admitted to the ICU after enterostomy, 10 patients with previous cardiac insufficiency, 6 patients with severe arrhythmias or severe regurgitation of valves, and 2 patients whose patients refused to participate in the study. Finally, 48 patients were enrolled in the study, with 25 patients in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group and 23 patients in the septic cardiomyopathy group according to the grouping basis. The enrollment process is detailed in Figure1.
Baseline data characteristics and comparison of each indicator
Of the 48 patients included in the analysis, the mean age was 66.46 years, with 68.8% of the patients being male. Pulmonary infections were the main infection source
in the patients, with a total of 22 cases (45.8%). Hypertension was the most common among the combined underlying conditions, with a total of 21 cases (43.8%). Mechanical ventilation and CRRT were used after admission in 32 and 19 patients each, accounting for 66.7% and 39.6%, respectively. The patient 28-day morbidity and mortality rate was 31.3% (15/48), with a median ICU length of stay of 12 days (IQR 6-21) and a median total length of stay of 19 days (IQR 12-26). There was no statistical significance between the septic cardiomyopathy and non-septic cardiomyopathy groups including age, BMI, SOFA score, and APACHE II score (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant laboratory indices including cTnI, BNP, PCT, and IL-6 between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in the percentage of men, number of smokers, number of alcohol drinkers, CVP and Lac levels between the two groups (P < 0.05), and all of them were higher in the septic cardiomyopathy group than in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group (Table1).
Table1. of baseline characteristics of enrolled patients
BMI: body mass index; SOFA score: sequential organ failure score; APACHE II score: acute physiological and chronic health score; CVP: central venous pressure; Lac: lactate; cTnI: troponin I; BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; PCT: calcitoninogen; IL-6: interleukin-6; ICU: intensive care unit
Iron metabolism levels in patients with septic cardiomyopathy at different time periods
As shown in Figure2, there was a statistically significant decrease in serum ferritin levels between the two groups from day 1 to day 3 after enrollment, and the ferritin levels were higher in both septic cardiomyopathy groups than in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group. In both groups, the day 1 ferritin levels were 1189 ng/ml (IQR 560-5991) and 643 ng/ml (IQR 329-1175), respectively (P=0.021), and the day 3 ferritin levels were 791 ng/ml (IQR 533.75-1317.25) and 456 ng/ml (IQR 329- 967) (P=0.05). After day 7 of enrollment, ferritin levels were 659 ng/ml (IQR 459-1316) in the septic cardiomyopathy group and 428 ng/ml (IQR 296- 705.50) in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group, with no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.056). In addition to this, soluble transferrin receptors on day 7 of enrollment were also statistically different (P=0.040) between the two groups of patients (2.25±0.94 mg/l in the septic cardiomyopathy group and 3.25±1.35 mg/l in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group) (Table2). Other iron metabolism levels including serum iron, transferrin, transferrin saturation, and total iron binding capacity on days 1, 3, and 7 were not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Value of iron metabolism levels for early diagnosis of septic cardiomyopathy
We performed ROC analysis of iron metabolism at different time periods in the septic cardiomyopathy group of patients and showed that ferritin levels on days 1 and 3 had predictive value for early identification of septic cardiomyopathy, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.694 (P=0.021) and 0.689 (P=0.050), respectively (Table3, Figure3). We also combined ferritin levels on days 1 and 3 to predict the risk of disease, and the results showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.673 (P =0.073). The sensitivity of predicting the risk of septic cardiomyopathy was 47.83% and the specificity was 84% according to the Jorden index, using day 1 ferritin 1413 ng/ml as the cut-off point.
Table2. Comparison of iron metabolism levels between the two groups of patients at different time points
Indicator
|
Sepsis cardiomyopathy group
|
Non-septic cardiomyopathy group
|
P-value
|
|
n=23
|
n=25
|
|
D1 SI (umol/l)
|
7.74(3.60,17.67)
|
5.43(4.15,7.97)
|
0.231
|
D1 SF (ng/ml)
|
1189(560,5991)
|
643(329,1175)
|
0.021
|
D1 TRF (mg/L)
|
3.72(2.93,4.27)
|
3.61(2.99,4.55)
|
0.992
|
D1 TSAT
|
0.26(0.14,0.62)
|
0.24(0.12,0.42)
|
0.464
|
D1 TIBC (umol/l)
|
29.70(23.37,34.11)
|
28.82(23.84,36.32)
|
0.992
|
D1 sTfR (mg/l)
|
2.47±1.34
|
3.15±1.35
|
0.084
|
|
n=18
|
n=19
|
|
D3 SI (umol/l)
|
8.04(5.64,10.47)
|
8.71(5.40,12.65)
|
0.715
|
D3 SF (ng/ml)
|
791.00(533.75,1317.25)
|
456(321,967)
|
0.05
|
D3 TRF (mg/L)
|
3.62(3.19,3.90)
|
3.90(3.37,4.72)
|
0.197
|
D3 TSAT
|
0.27(0.21,0.32)
|
0.24(0.15,0.50)
|
0.843
|
D3 TIBC (umol/l)
|
28.89(25.45,31.14)
|
31.16(26.93,37.64)
|
0.197
|
D3 sTfR (mg/l)
|
2.39±0.98
|
2.54±1.12
|
0.678
|
|
n=13
|
n=12
|
|
D7 SI (umol/l)
|
7.73(5.65,10.85)
|
7.66(4.89,9.65)
|
0.744
|
D7 SF (ng/ml)
|
659.00(459.00,1316.00)
|
428.00(296.00,705.50)
|
0.056
|
D7 TRF (mg/L)
|
3.88±0.79
|
3.54±1.3
|
0.436
|
D7 TSAT
|
0.28(0.20,0.33)
|
0.27(0.15,0.44)
|
0.744
|
D7 TIBC (umol/l)
|
30.97±6.28
|
28.28±10.38
|
0.436
|
D7 sTfR (mg/l)
|
2.25±0.94
|
3.25±1.35
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SI: serum iron; SF: serum ferritin; TRF: transferrin; TSAT: transferrin saturation; TIBC: total iron binding capacity; sTfR: soluble transferrin receptor
Table3. The value of iron metabolism at different time periods for the diagnosis of septic cardiomyopathy
Indicator
|
AUC
|
95%CI
|
Cut-off value
|
Sensitivity (%)
|
Specificity (%)
|
D1 SF
|
0.694
|
0.545 - 0.843
|
1413
|
47.83
|
84
|
D3 SF
|
0.689
|
0.516 - 0.861
|
475.5
|
88.89
|
52.63
|
D1+D3 SF
|
0.673
|
0.496 - 0.849
|
0.347
|
94.44
|
42.11
|
SF: serum ferritin; AUC: area under the subject's working characteristic curve; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval
Gut microbiota
Gut microbiota richness and Alpha diversity
By sequencing the stool samples of all patients included in the analysis, a total of 3422 OUTs were observed in all samples. 303 unique OUTs were found in the septic cardiomyopathy group, while 2298 OUTs were found in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group, with 821 OTUs common to both groups. Venn diagram results indicated that patients in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group had a higher gut microbiota were more abundant (Figure4).
We analyzed and compared the richness indices of the intestinal microbiota of the two groups of patients, including the ACE index (Figure5A) and Chao1 index (Figure5B), and the results showed that there was a significant difference in the richness of the intestinal microbiota between the two groups (P < 0.01). The abundance was significantly higher in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group than in the septic cardiomyopathy group in both groups, indicating that the gut microbiota species species
were significantly reduced in the septic cardiomyopathy group. We also analyzed and compared the Alpha diversity indices of the gut microbiota between the two groups of patients, including Shannon's index (Figure5C) and Simpson's index (Figure5D), where the Simpson's index presentation form we used Simpson's Index of Diversity (1 - D), and the results suggested that the Alpha diversity was not statistically different between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). We further assessed the time-related changes in gut microbiota Alpha diversity in both groups. As shown in Figure5D, there was no significant change in the Simpson index of gut microbiota on day 1 compared with day 3 in the septic cardiomyopathy group, but the Simpson index of gut microbiota on day 7 in the septic cardiomyopathy group showed a decrease and was statistically different (P < 0.05). It illustrates that the gut microbiota Alpha diversity decreased with time in patients in the septic cardiomyopathy group. However, the gut microbiota Alpha diversity index of patients in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group did not change significantly with increasing time, and the results suggest that the diversity of the gut microbiota of patients in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group was at a standstill during this 7-day period.
Beta diversity of gut microbiota
We performed PCoA analysis based on Unweighted Unifrac distance and selected the combination of principal coordinates with the highest contribution for graphing to compare Beta diversity between patients in the septic cardiomyopathy and non-septic cardiomyopathy groups. As shown in Figure6, there was a significant difference in Beta diversity between the two groups of patients (P < 0.001), indicating that the gut microbiota structure in the septic cardiomyopathy group was significantly different from that in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group.
Microbial composition and characteristics
We compared the distribution of gut microbiota at different taxonomic levels between the two groups and showed significant differences in the distribution of gut microbiota at different levels between the two groups (Figure 7A-D). At the phylum level, the relative abundance of both Actinobacteria (P = 0.018) and an unknown_Bacteria (P = 0.024) was lower in the septic cardiomyopathy group than in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group (Figure7E). At the family level, the proportion of Aeromonadaceae was significantly lower in the septic cardiomyopathy group than in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group (P = 0.023) (Figure7F). At the genus level, patients in the septic cardiomyopathy group had significantly higher relative abundance of Citrobacter (P = 0.007) and lower relative abundance of Parasutterella (P = 0.043) compared with the non-septic cardiomyopathy group (Figure 7G). At the species level, the relative abundance of Corynebacterium_tuberculostearicum was significantly lower in the septic cardiomyopathy group compared with patients in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group (P = 0.014), whereas Bacteroides nordii (P = 0.037) and [Clostridium]_celerecrescens (P = 0.026) had significantly higher microbial abundance (Figure7H).
Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota
We studied the composition of the gut microbiota in both groups by LEfSe analysis and identified specific gut microbiota in the septic cardiomyopathy group (LDA score > 4, P < 0.05). As shown in Figure8B, the top two gut microbiota in the septic cardiomyopathy group were Enterobacter (LDA score = 4.2747, P = 0.003) and Klebsiella_quasipneumoniae (LDA score = 4.2747, P = 0.003). Thus, Enterobacter and Klebsiella_quasipneumoniae may be the specific intestinal microorganisms of septic cardiomyopathy.
Functional changes in microbiota between groups
We analyzed the different functional pathways between the septic cardiomyopathy and non-septic cardiomyopathy groups. 16S rDNA sequencing data were analyzed at level 3 by applying the Tax4Fun prediction function. Compared to stool samples from the non-septic cardiomyopathy group, changes in the abundance of intestinal microbiota in patients with septic cardiomyopathy were associated with pathways such as porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, lipopolysaccharide_biosynthesis_proteins and biotin_metabolism (Figure9).
Relationship between species-level abundance of gut microbiota and clinical indicators
We analyzed the relationship between the abundance of gut microbiota species levels and clinical indicators in patients with septic cardiomyopathy (Figure10). Through Spearman correlation analysis, we found that changes in the gut microbiota may be a potential cause of changes in clinical indicators.
Bacteroides_thetaiotaomicron was positively correlated with BNP, day 1 serum iron, and day 1 transferrin saturation (P < 0.05). Bacteroides_fragilis was negatively correlated with cTnI (P < 0.05). Prevotella_disiens and Prevotella_timonensis were negatively correlated with day 1 serum ferritin (P < 0.05). Bacteroides_vulgatus, Bacteroides_fragilis, and Prevotella_buccalis were negatively correlated with day 1 transferrin, day 1 total iron binding (P < 0.05).
Secondary observation indicators
In terms of clinical outcomes, as shown in Table4, the 28-day morbidity and mortality rate was 43.5% (10/23) for patients in the septic cardiomyopathy group and 20% (5/25) for patients in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.08). The median length of ICU stay and total length of stay were 13 days (IQR 6-26) and 15 days (IQR 10-27) in the septic cardiomyopathy group and 12 days (IQR 6-15) and 19 days (IQR 12-24) in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group, respectively, with a median difference of 1 day and 4 days between the two groups, but not statistically significant (P = 0.642 and P = 0.844). The number of patients on mechanical ventilation and CRRT was 15 (65.2%) and 11 (47.8%) in the septic cardiomyopathy group and 17 (68%) and 8 (32%) in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.838 and P = 0.263). The total 24-hour post-admission crystalloid volume was 3295.43±1327.35 ml in the septic cardiomyopathy group and 2649.8±1292.79 ml in the non-septic cardiomyopathy group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.095), and the total 24-hour post-admission colloid volume was 250 ml in the septic cardiomyopathy group (IQR 0-1100) and 250 ml in the non- septic cardiomyopathy group was 150 ml (IQR 0-325), with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.080).
24-hour vasoactive drug utilization
Analysis of vasoactive drug use between the two groups of patients showed no statistically significant differences in the use of norepinephrine, dopamine, epinephrine, or vasopressin between the two groups (P > 0.05). Further analysis of the intensity of vasoactive drugs between the two groups of patients revealed that there was also no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.236) (Table5).