1.Wadden, T. A., et al., Four-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with long-term success. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2011. 19(10): p. 1987–98.
2.Hollis, J. F., et al., Weight loss during the intensive intervention phase of the weight-loss maintenance trial. Am J Prev Med, 2008. 35(2): p. 118–26.
3.Knowler, W. C., et al., Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(6): p. 393–403.
4.Lin, P. H., et al., The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern and the current Dietary Reference Intakes recommendations. J Am Diet Assoc, 2007. 107(9): p. 1541–51.
5.Wing, R. R., et al., Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2011. 34(7): p. 1481–6.
6.Wadden, T. A., et al., Lifestyle modification for obesity: new developments in diet, physical activity, and behavior therapy. Circulation, 2012. 125(9): p. 1157–70.
7.Appel, L. J., et al., Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial. JAMA, 2003. 289(16): p. 2083–93.
8.Glasgow, R. E., E. Lichtenstein, and A. C. Marcus, Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health, 2003. 93(8): p. 1261–7.
9.Chen, Z. A., K. Roy, and C. A. Gotway Crawford, Obesity prevention: the impact of local health departments. Health Serv Res, 2013. 48(2 Pt 1): p. 603–27.
10.Pomeranz, J. L., The Unique Authority of State and Local Health Departments to Address Obesity. American Journal of Public Health, 2011. 101(7): p. 1192–1197.
11.Cousins, J. M., et al., The role of state health departments in supporting community-based obesity prevention. Prev Chronic Dis, 2011. 8(4): p. A87.
12.Zhang, X., et al., Obesity Prevention and Diabetes Screening at Local Health Departments. American Journal of Public Health, 2010. 100(8): p. 1434–1441.
13.National Association of County and City Health Officials, Operational Definition of a Functional Local Health Department. 2005, National Association of County and City Health Officials: Washington, DC.
14.Bopp, M., R. P. Saunders, and D. Lattimore, The Tug-of-War: Fidelity Versus Adaptation Throughout the Health Promotion Program Life Cycle. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 2013. 34(3): p. 193–207.
15.Cohen, D. J., et al., Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-based research into practice. Am J Prev Med, 2008. 35(5 Suppl): p. S381–9.
16.Steckler, A. B. and L. Linnan, Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. 1st ed. 2002, San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass. xxviii, 400 p.
17.Bellg, A. J., et al., Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol, 2004. 23(5): p. 443–51.
18.Dusenbury, L., et al., A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res, 2003. 18(2): p. 237–56.
19.Dobson, D. and T. J. Cook, Avoiding Type III Error in Program Evaluation: Results from a Field Experiment. Vol. 3. 1980. 269–276.
20.The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care, 2002. 25(12): p. 2165–71.
21.Svetkey, L. P., et al., Premier: a clinical trial of comprehensive lifestyle modification for blood pressure control: rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Ann Epidemiol, 2003. 13(6): p. 462–71.
22.Samuel-Hodge, C. D., et al., Randomized trial of a behavioral weight loss intervention for low-income women: the Weight Wise Program. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2009. 17(10): p. 1891–9.
23.Green, L. W. and R. E. Glasgow, Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof, 2006. 29(1): p. 126–53.
24.Kraschnewski, J. L., et al., Optimized probability sampling of study sites to improve generalizability in a multisite intervention trial. Prev Chronic Dis, 2010. 7(1): p. A10.
25.Samuel-Hodge, C. D., et al., Translation of a behavioral weight loss intervention for mid-life, low-income women in local health departments. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2013.
26.Samuel-Hodge, C. D., et al., Rationale, design, and sample characteristics of a practical randomized trial to assess a weight loss intervention for low-income women: the Weight-Wise II Program. Contemp Clin Trials, 2012. 33(1): p. 93–103.
27.Shrout, P. E. and J. L. Fleiss, Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 1979. 86(2): p. 420–428.
28.Rohrbach, L. A., et al., Type II translation: transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings. Eval Health Prof, 2006. 29(3): p. 302–33.
29.Stirman, S. W., et al., Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci, 2013. 8: p. 65.
30.Glascoff, M. A., et al., A profile of public health educators in North Carolina’s local health departments. J Public Health Manag Pract, 2005. 11(6): p. 528–36.
31.Brownson, R. C., et al., Evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity: what contributes to dissemination by state health departments. Am J Prev Med, 2007. 33(1 Suppl): p. S66–73; quiz S74–8.
32.Folta, S. C., et al., The StrongWomen-Healthy Hearts program in Pennsylvania: RE-AIM analysis. Transl Behav Med, 2015. 5(1): p. 94–102.
33.Toobert, D. J., et al., Adapting and RE-AIMing a heart disease prevention program for older women with diabetes. Transl Behav Med, 2012. 2(2): p. 180–7.
34.Damschroder, L. J., et al., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 2009. 4: p. 50.