Animals
Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (female, 21 days old, 50–60 g) were obtained from Experimental Animal Center of Guangxi Medical University. Rats were housed in SPF environment at 24 °C with 12:12 h light–dark cycle. They were provided with free access to water and food. This research was performed according with the guidelines for the use of laboratory animals and approved by the institutional research animal committee of Guilin Medical College.Approval Number: GLMC201803009.
Experiment design
The rats were randomly divided into 7 groups (n=6). For PCOS induction, injectable sesame oil was used to dissolve DHEA. Then rats received a daily hypodermic injection of DHEA solution with a dose of 0.2 ml (6 mg/100 g) at nape of the neck for 21 consecutive days, fed with high fat diet. Naïve rats were adopted as controls. Additionally, some rats also orally treated with three levels of Rhamnocitrin (5mg/kg/day;10mg/kg/day;20mg/kg/day,p.o;Carbosynth,UK) daily during treatment period. For PPARγ inhibitor treatment, rats were injected intraperitoneally with T0070907 (10 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) once daily. For PPARγ agonist treatment, rats were treated with GW1929 (15 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich) by oral gavage once daily. Estrous cycle and body weight of rats were recorded, during process and treatment. At day 21, rats were killed, and the blood and ovaries of rats were collected. After that, fat around the ovaries was removed and the ovaries were weighed.
Serum hormone measurement
The rat orbital veins blood was received administration. After separated from blood samples, serum was stored under −80°C. The Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2) and total testosterone (T) in serum were evaluated with ELISA following the guideline. Testing kits for FSH, LH, E2 and T were obtained from Elabscience (Elabscience, USA). Experiments were carried out in triplicate and repeated three times.
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining
After fixed with 10% neutral-buffered formalin, ovaries were embedded in paraffin. After that, they were sectioned into 3 μm thick slices. Hematoxylin and eosin were utilized to stain paraffin slices and optical microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) was applied to confirm pathological structural variations of rat ovaries.
Sirius Red and Masson staining
After fixed with 10% neutral-buffered formalin, ovaries were embedded in paraffin. Subsequently, they were sectioned into slices (3 μm). They were then stained with Sirius red or Masson staining to reveal ovarian fibrosis and confirm inhibitory impact of Rhamnocitrin on fibrosis. For Masson staining, tissue slides were then incubated at 37°C for 2 h with Bouin solution, which contained acetic acid (5 mL), 10% formalin solution (25 mL) and saturated picric acid (75 mL). After that, according to the manufacturer’s direction, slides were stained using Masson Trichrome Staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and collagen fibers were stained in blue. For Sirius red staining, tissue sections were administered for 20 min with Picro-Sirius red stain solution kit (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and washed for 1 min with tap water in accordance with the manufacturer’s guideline. The muscle, blood vessels and epithelium appeared yellowish while collagen fibers were stained in red. These stained specimens were visualized under light microscope (Leica Microsystems).
Determination of the Estrus Cycle Stage
Toluidine blue stain was utilized to determine variations of vaginal exfoliative cytology in rats. After was soaked in physiological saline, aseptic cotton swab was put on vaginal wall of rats and smeared clockwise. Cotton swab was taken out and smeared on slide in same direction. Afterwards, cells on slide were fixed for 15 min with 4% paraformaldehyde. Toluidine blue (Servicebio, MA) was applied to stain vaginal smear following instruction. Microscope imaging system (Nikon, Japan) was used to visualize the images.
Western blot
Ovarian tissues were milled separately with RIPA lysis buffer. After protein collection from each specimen, protein concentration detection was carried out with BCA protein assay kit (Biovision, Milpitas, CA, USA) according with the instruction. The electrophoretic separation is run using SDS-PAGE gels (TakaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). Protein (50 μg) were separated with 10% SDS-PAGE prior to transfer onto PVDF membranes. After that, they were blocked at room temperature in 5% bovine serum albumin for 2 h. Subsequently, they were incubated with primary (12h at 4°C) before treatment with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Primary antibodies: anti-PPARγ (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-TGF‐β1 (1:250; Santa Cruz), anti-Smad2/3 (1:200; Santa Cruz), anti-p‐Smad2/3 (1:500, Santa Cruz), anti-α-SMA (1:300; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), anti-Collagen1 (1:500, Santa Cruz), anti-MMP‐2 (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-MMP‐9 (1:1000; Abcam), anti-TIMP1(1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-GAPDH (1:1000, Cell Signaling). Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Abcam) was used to develop the blots. GAPDH was adopted as internal control. Protein expression quantitative analysis was performed with ImageJ software 1.8.0.
Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was collected with Trizol Reagent (Takara) according with the guideline. cDNA was generated with RNA (1 μg) with Prime Script TM RT Reagent kit (Takara) followed by amplified by RT-PCR with the following cycling conditions: 15 minutes for reverse transcription at 37°C, 5 seconds for inactivating reverse transcriptase at 85°C, followed by cold-storage at 4°C. cDNA was amplified by Brilliant II Fast SYBR green QPCR master mix (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) with ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using the following cycle: 30 seconds for pre-denaturation at 95°C, 5 seconds for PCR amplification at 95°C (45 cycles), and 30 seconds for primer annealing at 60°C. Primer was produced from Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). GAPDH expression was applied as control. The relative level analysis was achieved by the comparative CT method (2-ΔΔCT). The primers were showed in Table 1.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analyses were evaluated with SPSS 21.0 software. All data are shown as means ± SEM. Difference betweeen two goups was compared using Student's t test. Results for multiple comparisons was implemented by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. The criterion of statistical significance was set as P value less than 0.05.