3.1. Spectrophotometric Determination of Quercetin
The total phenolic content in the methanol was performed, and the quercetin calibration curve shows in Fig. 1. The result of total phenolic content was calculated from the regression equation of the standard plot (y = 0.004x + 0.014, R2 = 0.9746). According to the curve calibration, the concentration of the quercetin was 125 µg / ml.
3.2. Light-transmittance and UV-vis measurement
The colors of quercetin solutions and eucalyptus extract solutions at pH 1–12 are demonstrated in Fig. 2a, c. The color of the eucalyptus extracts solutions conversions from bright yellow to reddish brown and quercetin solutions. The color of the solution changes from bright yellow to light yellow with increasing pH values. Those color changes are due to the chemical structure transformation of quercetin21,22. Figure 2b, d shows the corresponding absorption UV-vis spectra change of the ELE and QUE solutions with pH changes. The structure of quercetin consists of three important parts: (i) the catechol structure in the B-ring; (ii) the 2,3-double bond, in conjugation with the 4-oxo function in the C-ring; and (iii) the 3- and 5-OH groups in the A-ring (Fig. 3)21. the color change is not a simple result of the deprotonation of the QUE hydroxyl groups. The appearance of peaks at a low wavelength related to chemical change involving the C-ring occurs, leading to a loss of electronic resonance between rings A and B. For quercetin solutions, maximum absorption appeared around 250 nm and 375 nm at pH = 6 due to π → π* transitions at rings A and B. Reciprocally, the mentioned peak transmit to 325 nm nm at pH = 11 and 12. Also, the intensity of the peak increased by increasing the pH of the under alkaline conditions.
Eucalyptus, which contains flavonoids (quercetin, rutin) and tannins (Ellagic acid), is a natural dye, yielding several yellowish-brown colorants. The major coloring component of Eucalyptus bark is quercetin. The presence of tannins and other flavonoids (rutin) may cause a difference in the color of the extract solution from the pure quercetin solution23–27. The comparison of pH changes on the prepared films shows that the film containing the extract shows a more obvious color change.
Investigation of light transmission of films shows good light transmission for films. The incorporation of QUE and ELE considerably reduced the light transmittance of the samples (Fig. 4a, b). The reduction may be due to QUE and ELE incorporated in the CG film and can seriously block the light transmittance, as seen in the FESEM images (Fig. 5). Previous research shows that the transparency of the packaging leads to consumer confidence because various food crises have caused consumers to pay more attention to their health. For this reason, transparent product packaging has become especially important to be a good answer for product visibility and consumer decisions28–32. Therefore, CG films contents above 0.3% of QUE or ELE are considered suitable for the monitoring chicken freshness application.
3.3. FTIR characterization
The FTIR spectra of ELE, QUE, and the prepared films (CG-QUE0.3 and CG-ELE0.3) are shown in Fig. 6a,b. In the FTIR spectrum of CG, the two peaks at 3400 cm− 1 and 2945 cm− 1 correspond respectively to the hydroxyl group and C-H stretching vibrations. The absorption bands at 1230 cm− 1 and 1047 cm− 1 correspond to O = S = O asymmetric stretching and a combination of C-O and C-OH modes33. On the other hand, the absorption band at 1017 cm− 1 is attributed to Glycosidic bonds. The absorption band at 930 cm− 1 indicates the presence of 3,6-anhydro-D-galactose 34. Moreover, glycerol’s C-O and C-OH vibrations bond appears in 1421 cm− 1 and 1114 cm− 1, respectively35. The intense absorption band at 1637 cm− 1 was allied to the absorbed water2.
In the FTIR spectrum of QUE (Fig. 6a), the stretching vibration of –OH and C = O were observed at 3320 and 1670 cm− 1. Stretching vibration of cyclobenzene peaks appeared at 1611 cm− 1, 1511 cm− 1, and 1458.8 cm− 1. N-H stretching vibration was observed at 3412 cm− 1 36.
The FTIR spectrum of the ELE (Fig. 6b) shows a typical absorption band around 3477 and 3415 cm− 1 corresponding to the –OH (related to phenolic compound) and N-H group. The presence peak at 2925 cm− 1 and 2853 cm− 1 is associated with the C-H vibration of aldehyde and alken, respectively. The sharp band at 1733 cm− 1 is consistent with C = O stretching vibrations. The absorption peaks at 1630 cm− 1 and 1568 cm− 1 are attributed to the presence of C = C in an aromatic ring. The band observed at 1110 cm− 1 and 1040 cm− 1 are due to the C–O stretching37.
In the FTIR diagram of CG-QUE0.3, all the specified peaks of CG and QUE can be viewed. But, the phenolic -OH stretching of QUE showed a low shift from 3412 cm− 1 to 3375 cm− 1, simultaneously, the C = C stretching in the benzene ring at 1611, 1511, 1457 cm− 1 shifted to 1605 cm− 1, 1454 cm− 1, 1411 cm− 1, which corroborated the existence of hydrogen bond between CG and QUE2. In the spectrum of CG-ELE0.3, -OH stretching low-shift from 3477 cm− 1 to 3412 cm− 1 due to the hydrogen bond between CG and ELE2.
3.4. Usage of films as a freshness representative for chicken
Food spoilage, which is directly related to human health, is caused by the activity of microorganisms. Using suitable materials for food packaging can delay this spoilage. The proteins in the meat are attacked by bacteria and various volatile nitrogenous compounds, which lead to a change in the pH value. As a result of food spoilage, amino compounds such as ammonia, dimethylammonium, and trimethylamine are produced, which can change the pH of the environment. Therefore, pH changes can be a good measure of the freshness of food and its health. Considering the pH sensing behavior of films, the CG-QUE0.3 and CG-ELE0.3 films were employed to monitor chicken freshness. The samples are shown in Fig. 4; CG-QUE 0.3 changed from red to orange on the 3 days, and CG-ELE 0.3 changed from green to yellow. The TVB-N of the chicken in the films is shown in Fig. 7.
As expected, in contrast to the control film, the film containing QUE and ELE changed color with time due to the spoilage of chicken meat and the change in volatile nitrogen compounds (Table 1). It can be deduced that the QUE and ELE combined CG film can be used as a representative for spoilage investigation of protein foods. The comparison of the film containing QUE and the ELE states that the film containing the extract had a greater effect in preventing chicken spoilage. This result can be very economical from the industrial and economic points of view because using pure QUE requires extraction and purification from plant extracts. In fact, the simplicity of making the film, the ease of preparing the extract, the clear color changes, and the beneficial effect of keeping chickens can be considered an advantage for industrial use.
Table 1. TVBN levels for chicken.
3.5. Antimicrobial Activities
The antibacterial activities of the QUE and ELE films were examined against three Gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and B. subtilis, as well as Gram-negative such as E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumonia. Results based on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) are presented in Table 2.
Table 2 MIC values of developed QUE and ELE film against the tested bacteria strains.
Microorganisms | Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 | Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 | Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 | Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027 | Klebsiella pneumonia ATCC 10031 |
Compounds |
Ciprofloxacin (µg/mL) | 0.195 | 0.195 | 0.195 | 0.012 | 0.195 | 0.006 |
CG-ELE0.3 | 22 | 16 | 82 | 17 | 14 | 4 |
CG-QUE0.3 | 45 | 27 | 90 | 37 | 26 | 8 |
In the case of K. pneumonia, CG-ELE0.3, and CG-QUE.03 exhibited promising inhibitory activities with MIC values of 4.0 and 8.0 µg/mL, respectively. The same trend was seen for films loaded with QUE and ELE against P. aeruginosa with MIC of 14.0 and 26.0 µg/mL. The designed films also demonstrated good inhibition against E. coli, S. epidermidis, and S. aureus. However, both films disclosed the least potency against B. subtilis. Overall it can be understood that the designed formulas were potent against tested bacteria. However, film CG-ELE0.3 exhibited slightly better growth inhibition at 4 to 82.0 µg/mL concentrations than film CG-QUE0.3, with 8.0–90.0 µg/mL MIC values. Also, it was understood that both designed films exhibited better MIC against Gram-negative bacteria than Gram-positive strains. The exception in this trend came back to S. epidermidis. Previous studies have shown that QUE inhibits different bacteria with MICs ranging from 80 to 260 µgr/mL. The results of this research on the bacterial activity of quercetin showed that its effect on bacteria leads to the destruction of the cell wall of bacteria and the modification of cell permeability, affecting the synthesis and expression of proteins, reducing the enzymatic activities and inhibiting nucleic acid synthesis. For example, it has been found that QUE can hinder the growth of S. aureus by damaging the cell wall and membrane of S. aureus, or it can cause cell death of E. coli by inhibiting the activity of ATP36,38−41.
Other researchers have shown that the antibacterial property of ELE is due to the presence of various compounds, such as flavonoids, with MICs ranging from 10.0 to 31.0 mg/L. Generally speaking, it is known that the antibacterial activity of ELE is due to their penetration into the phospholipid membrane of bacteria, which causes the release of intracellular contents. This phenomenon leads to a disturbance in the functioning of the bacterial cell, such as a disturbance of the transfer of electrons or the enzymatic activity 42–44. A comparison of the results obtained with previous research shows the remarkable antibacterial properties of the prepared films.
3.6. Mechanical properties
The mechanical behavior of films for food packaging is important during handling and must withstand external stresses45. The mechanical test results are shown in Table 3. According to the values of EB, The CG-QUE0.3 and CG-ELE0.3 films exhibited brittle behavior. Also, the tensile strength for CG-QUE0.3 and CG-ELE0.3 film was 14 ± 0.6 MPa and 13.2 ± 0.6 MPa, respectively, indicating the films’ weak tensile strength. These results can be related to the poor dispersion and aggregation of QUE and ELE in CG film. A similar effect has been reported from adding different materials to polymer substrates. Also, no significant difference was observed between the mechanical properties of CG-QUE0.3 and CG-ELE0.3 film. The obtained Young’s modulus values of TS and ED indicate that the film containing QUE has less flexibility.
Table 3 Mechanical test results of films.
Thin film | TS (MPa) | EB | Young’s modulus |
CG-QUE0.3 | 6 ± 0.1% | 14 ± 0.6 | 0.43 |
CG-ELE0.3 | 5 ± 0.1% | 13.2 ± 0.6 | 0.38 |