The Effects of Nozzle Diameter and Length on the Resulting Strand Properties for Shotcrete 3D Printing

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3142213/v1

Additive Manufacturing in Construction (AMC) enables new design methods and strategies within the construction industry. In particular, Shotcrete 3D Printing (SC3DP) offers a high degree of design freedom by enabling the deposition of concrete at variable layer orientation based on a wet-mix shotcrete process. However, the mechanical properties and geometry of the printed layers are dependent on the material and process parameters used. In this context, the effects of air and concrete flow rates, path planning parameters, and material parameters have been investigated in previous research. The here presented study investigates the influence of the nozzle geometry on the resulting strand properties, e.g. strand geometry, layer bond strength, and compressive strength, to evaluate nozzle diameter and length as control parameters for the SC3DP process. Experimental investigations were performed with fixed nozzle diameters between 10 and 30 mm and nozzle lengths ranging from 100 to 200 mm. The results show a significant influence of the nozzle diameter on the resulting strand geometry as well as the mechanical properties. Finally, concepts for a nozzle with a controllable outlet diameter were developed and evaluated.

additive manufacturing in construction

AMC

Shotcrete 3D Printing

SC3DP

nozzle geometry

In order to address major challenges in construction, such as a low level of automation, a shortage of skilled labour, or high carbon emissions, research and industrial developments are focusing on automation approaches. Especially Additive Manufacturing in Construction (AMC) opens up possibilities for innovative design methods and building strategies for architects and civil engineers [1–3]. Hence, different additive manufacturing techniques are investigated, such as particle bed binding [4], material extrusion [5], or material jetting [6]. A growing area of research focuses on the identification of suitable printing materials and process parameters for the production of geometrically precise components with sufficient properties, such as mechanical performance and durability.

Shotcrete 3D Printing (SC3DP) is an Additive Manufacturing (AM) technique based on a wet-mix shotcrete process. It is classified as a material jetting process [7] and is characterised by the deposition of material under the addition of pressurised air at the printing nozzle. Due to high application rates and a good layer bond strength, SC3DP offers great potential for the efficient production of large structural concrete elements [8]. By applying the material at a defined nozzle-to-strand-distance, SC3DP allows for an angled material deposition in overhangs (Fig. 1a). A wide range of process parameters are used within SC3DP to influence the geometry of the applied layers (see Fig. 1b). Small adjustments to the process parameters (e.g. concrete volume flow or air volume flow), material parameters (e.g. accelerator dosage), or path planning (e.g. nozzle-to-strand-distance) affect both the resulting layer geometry and the quality of the printed object (e.g. layer bond strength). Therefore, in-depth research into the material-process-interaction is required to improve and establish material and process-related limits.

Figure 1. (a) Shotcrete 3D printed overhang (Credit: ITE TU BS), (b) Material- and process-parameters within Shotcrete 3D Printing (modified from [9]).

Predicting and controlling the strand geometry is a key task in AM to translate the dimensions previously defined in the 3D digital model into the printing process. For example, for the extrusion of very stiff and unsheared material, the resulting geometry of the deposited strands depends in particular on the nozzle geometry [2]. In the extrusion of more flowable concrete, where the material is sheared before leaving the nozzle, the concrete spreads out depending on the material rheology (e.g. yield stress), forming the final layer geometry [2]. In general, nozzle speed, nozzle distance, and concrete volume flow must be coordinated to avoid under- or over-extrusion [5].

In SC3DP, the concrete is pumped to the nozzle in a dense stream and, unlike in extrusion or other AM processes, subsequently torn up into a jet using compressed air. When the concrete jet reaches the ground, the concrete builds up into a strand of material. This characteristic allows for greater nozzle distances and increases the robustness of the process with regard to under-extrusion. Within shotcrete-based AM, three main strategies for affecting the strand geometry have been investigated so far:

Process parameters
Material parameters
External tools

Process parameters in shotcrete-based AM include concrete and air volume flow, as well as path planning parameters such as nozzle-to-strand-distance and traverse speed. It was found, that increasing the air volume flow results in a slight increase in width and a slight decrease in the height of the sprayed layers. Furthermore, Böhler et al. showed an increase in layer bond strength and concrete density with an increase in air volume flow. At high air pressures (3 to 5 bar) the formation of flatter and wider layers is visible [10,11]. However, at low air pressures (0.5 to 1 bar) Liu et al. observed no significant effect on the strand geometry [12].

The increase in concrete volume flow results naturally in an increase in specimen cross-sectional area due to a higher material feed rate. Böhler et al. observed a significant increase in specimen height with a slight increase in its width as well as a slight decrease in layer bond strength while keeping all other parameters constant [10].

In terms of nozzle traverse speed (Fig. 2a), a decrease in height with a slight decrease in width is observed at increased traverse speeds [9]. This could be a result of a lower amount of material volume per running meter.

By increasing the nozzle-to-strand-distance (Fig. 2b), an increase in width and a decrease in height is achieved [9]. By increasing the nozzle-to-strand-distance, the particles in the shotcrete jet spread in a wider area and therefore increasing the sample width. Due to a constant material flow rate the specimen hight decreases.

As another possible path planning strategy, Kloft et al. suggested the concept of a rotating nozzle movement (Fig. 2c) [8]. This approach can be used to produce wider strands of material.

Figure 2. Affecting SC3D-printed layer geometry through adjustments of (a) Traverse speed v; (b) Nozzle-to-strand-distance d and (c) Rotational movements (modified from [8]).

The effect of material parameters was investigated primarily for the utilization of shotcrete accelerator. The accelerator is added at the nozzle to increase the structural build-up of the material for higher vertical build rates [9–11,13]. Furthermore, the addition of accelerator has a significant effect on the resulting geometry of the deposited layers. Increasing the accelerator dosage results in higher and narrower layers. However, high accelerator dosages show negative effects on the interlocking and bonding between the layers. This is particularly relevant during breaks in the printing process, as the risk of cold joints between layers is increased, which would significantly reduce structural integrity. In addition to the acceleration of the material hardening, the initial concrete composition is varied and therefore influences the materials rheological properties, which in turn affects the resulting layer geometry. [14]

External tools such as guided trowels or slip-forms are further used to affect the geometry of 3D-printed parts. This technique is primarily used to smoothen the surface of the print and is already applied during the extrusion [15] as well as spraying techniques. To control the strand width, trowels can be placed on both sides of the strand. Depending on the desired layer geometry the distance between the trowels is varied by an actuated linear axis [16]. In contrast to the previously described approaches, external tools only affect the strand geometry if enough material is deposited, which results in a less reliable approach for creating wider strands without modifications to the process and its parameters (e.g. concrete volume flow or traverse speed).

Each of the presented strategies must be evaluated regarding both the geometrical effect as well the influence on the resulting strand properties, such as the mechanical performance in order to qualify the process for industrial applications. A controlled variation in combination with sophisticated planning strategies will lead to high component qualities regarding geometry and material properties.

3.1. Scope

As described in Chap. 2, several parameters can be adjusted to influence the strand geometry in SC3DP. Additionally, the nozzle geometry itself has the potential to be used as a control parameter for SC3DP. Furthermore, an automated variation of the nozzle geometry during the printing process could be used to directly influence the strand geometry and mechanical strand properties. Therefore, the present study aims to answer the following research questions

How does a variation in nozzle outlet diameter (d_o) and nozzle length (L) affect the geometry and mechanical properties of deposited strands?
How can the nozzle geometry be adapted during the be the printing process in order to utilize the aforementioned influences?

3.2. Design and Manufacturing of Nozzles

To systematically investigate the effect of nozzle geometry in SC3DP, different variations of nozzle designs were analysed. The nozzle outlet diameter d_o is varied between 10 mm and 30 mm. Here, the smallest outlet diameter is limited by the increasing risk of clogging during the printing process. The nozzle inlet diameter d_i is kept constant at 25 mm due to the connection to the upstream nozzle holder. This results in three different basic nozzle types:

tapered to the nozzle outlet(d_o = 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm),
straight (d_o = 25 mm) and
widened to the nozzle outlet (d_o = 30 mm).

In addition, three different nozzle lengths L (100 mm, 150 mm, 200 mm) were investigated for an outlet diameter of 20 mm. An overview of all nozzles tested is shown in Table 1.

All nozzles were additively manufactured by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM). Polyethylene terephthalate modified with glycol (PETG) was chosen due to its high resistance towards water. To improve the interchangeability of the nozzles within the experimental investigations, a quick coupler was designed and manufactured. The coupler is mounted to the SC3DP end effector via clamping. The coupler is connected to the interchangeable nozzles with a threaded connection (M42). The experimental setup as well as a schematic of the changeable nozzle are presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3. (a) Experimental setup connected to a robot during the process; (b) Schematic of nozzle with relevant parameters: nozzle length (L), nozzle inlet diameter (d_i), nozzle outlet diameter (d_o) and angle of nozzle (α).

3.3. Specimen Preparation

The tests were performed at the Digital Building Fabrication Laboratory (DBFL). The DBFL is a research facility funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) for investigations on Digital Fabrication for construction processes. The facility consists of two independently movable gantry portals. One portal is mounted with an industrial robot (Stäubli TX200, Pfäffikon, Switzerland) resulting in 9 degrees of freedom (DOF) for processes such as SC3DP, while the other has a milling device mounted for supporting processes such as surface finishing with 5 DOF [6].

For the manufacturing of the specimens, a polymer-modified mortar with a maximum grain size of 2 mm (MC-Bauchemie GmbH Co., Bottrop, Germany) was used. The composition of the mortar is shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Mix composition of polymer-modified shotcrete mortar.
Material	Content	Unit
Ordinary portland cement (OPC)	500	kg/m³
Pozzolan	160	kg/m³
Silica fume	25	kg/m³
Sand	1180	kg/m³
Pulverized additives and micro fibres	33	kg/m³

The mortar was mixed in batches of 75 kg of dry material and 11.4 litres of water using a pug mill mixer (Werner-Mader WM-Jetmix 125, Erbach, Germany). The mixing time was kept constant at 4 minutes. The material was then pumped through a 25 m hose (diameter = 35 mm) to the spray nozzle using a screw pump (Werner-Mader WM Variojet FU, Erbach, Germany). For each nozzle, 1.1 m long straight specimens consisting of 14 layers were manufactured. The process parameters chosen for the experimental investigations are shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Process parameters for specimen production.
Parameter	Value	Unit
Concrete volume flow	0.4	m³/h
Air volume flow	40	m³/h
Traverse speed	4500	mm/min
Nozzle-to-strand distance	200	mm
Number of layers	14	[-]

All specimens were stored in the DBFL workspace (at approximately 20°C room temperature) for one day, covered with plastic foil. Thereafter the specimens were placed for 27 days in a climate-controlled room at 20°C and 65% rel. humidity. The nozzle-to-strand-distance, defined as the distance from the outlet of the nozzle to the substrate, was kept constant at 200 mm (see Fig. 4).

3.4. Methods

The effects of nozzle outlet diameter d_o and nozzle length L were investigated regarding their influence on the jet (3.4.1), the strand geometry (3.4.2) and the mechanical hardened state properties (3.4.3). The following chapter shows the different inspection and evaluation methods used to analyse and process the results of the investigations.

3.4.1. Visual Inspection of Shotcrete Jet

A DSRL-camera is used for the visual inspection of the shotcrete jet. The jet angle and intensity are qualitatively evaluated by examining single frames of a recording.

3.4.2. Investigations on Strand Geometry

In order to examine the strand geometry, the 360° endless rotational 2D laser-scanner presented by Lachmayer [11] is used. After printing, the laser scanner is mounted to the robot to scan the surface of all specimens. The raw data obtained by the 2D-laser scanner is split into point clouds containing only the data of one specimen. Each point cloud is individually levelled using the mean value of the lowest 10% of measured z-Values to identify the building surface as zero level.

The methodology of the analysis is presented in Fig. 5. For the investigation of the geometry, only the middle section of each strand ± 200 mm is examined (Fig. 5a), as SC3DP printed specimen significantly on both sides [11].

To calculate the width and height of each specimen, the related data set is split in four areas (Fig. 5a & b) and reduced by excluding points close to the building surface. Due to a perpendicular orientation of the scanner to the printing direction and the build surface, the vast amount of measured points are either located close to the build surface (z = 0 ± 10 mm) or on top of the specimen (z > 80% of z-maximum value), while the sides contain a low amount of points. For the investigation of width and height, only the data points of the top surface are relevant (see Fig. 5c).

Figure 5. Methodology for the evaluation of the strand geometry showing (a) Test specimen for evaluation in top view; (b) Areas for evaluation of height and width; (c) Side view of area 4 with sorted data points; (d) Reduction of data from area 4 to top surface and calculated height and width.

The width of each area is determined by calculating the distance between the far most left and right point of the top surface. These points are determined by calculating y_min for the left side and y_max for the right side (see Fig. 5d). To determine the specimen height of an area, the 95% quantile of all z-values inside the top surface are calculated. By doing so, the influence of potential outliers is reduced. In order to calculate the width and height of the entire specimen, the mean value of all four areas is calculated.

3.4.3. Investigations on Mechanical Properties

For mechanical testing, samples are sawn from the core of the manufactured strands, see Fig. 6a. Sawing is performed in the hardened state within 7 days before testing. All mechanical tests are carried out 28 days after manufacturing. Three prisms (160 x 40 x 40 mm³) are sawn for the 3-point bending test according to DIN EN 196-1 [17]. All specimens are tested parallel to the layer orientation with a centrally located interface (Fig. 6b). This allows to evaluate the bond strength between the applied layers. In accordance with DIN EN 196-1 [17], compressive strength tests are performed on the end pieces of the sampled prisms, also perpendicular to the layer orientation (Fig. 6c).

Figure 6. Mechanical testing of the manufactured specimens: (a) Location of sampling in the specimen cross-section, (b) Test setup for 3-point bending tests, (c) Test setup for compressive strength tests.

3.5. Results and Discussion

This chapter presents and discusses the results of the experiments. Similar to Chap. 3.4, the results are divided into four sections. First, the effect of varying nozzle geometry on the shotcrete jet is discussed (Section 3.5.1), followed by the changes in resulting strand geometry (Section 3.5.2). The discussion is concluded with an analysis of the mechanical properties, i.e. flexural strength and compressive strength (Section 3.5.3).

3.5.1. Visual Inspection of Shotcrete Jet and Resulting Strand Surface

The results of the visual inspection are summarised in Fig. 7. The spray angle is similar for all nozzle outlet diameters. Regarding the jet velocity, a strong increase is observed as the outlet diameter decreases. Additionally, a more uniform and finer distribution of agglomerates is noticeable.

These results correspond to the basics of fluid mechanics and the continuity equation. While a constant air flow rate was used for the experiments and the nozzle angle α was smaller than 3°, the same mass-flow of air-agglomerate mixture inside the nozzle can be assumed [18]. While the nozzle inlet diameter is equal to the outlet diameter, the mass-flow rate remains constant. By decreasing the outlet diameter, the area of the nozzle outlet decreases resulting in an increased velocity of the mass-flow. Therefore, an increased jet velocity from a straight nozzle (d_o = 25 mm) to a tapered nozzle with a nozzle outlet diameter of d_o = 10 mm is observed. Furthermore, finer agglomerates within the shotcrete jet at a smaller outlet diameter might be related to the higher jet velocity. As the concrete enters the nozzle, it blocks the airflow. For smaller nozzle outlets, the pressure inside the nozzle increases faster, causing larger concrete agglomerates to accelerate and fragment into smaller particles, as the acceleration force is greater than the cohesion in larger particle agglomerations. Splitting reduces the mass and surface area of the particle agglomerates, thereby increasing the external forces needed for splitting.

For a variation in nozzle length, no visually noticeable change neither in spray pattern nor in velocity of the jet are observed, although a longer nozzle could reduce the particle energy due to friction on the nozzle walls.

3.5.2. Investigations on Strand Geometry

The results of the investigations on the influences of the variation of nozzle outlet diameter and nozzle length on strand width and strand height are presented in the following section. A summary is shown in Table 4.

In general, a smaller nozzle outlet diameter leads to wider and lower strands, while for bigger diameters the height increases and the width decreases, see Fig. 8. For further analysis, the results are plotted and approximated with an analytical model. A quadratic approximation shows high coefficients of determination for both the strand width (R² = 0.98) and the strand height (R² = 0.99). Therefore, a strong influence of the nozzle outlet diameter on the strand geometry can be assumed. This might result from a higher impact velocity of the jet with decreasing outlet diameter. With a higher velocity, the sprayed concrete is pushed to the side, resulting in wider strands with smaller layer heights (Fig. 8a).

Table 4

Results of the nozzle geometry on the strand width and height.
	Nozzle abbreviation	Strand Height [mm]	Strand Width [mm]	Strand Area [mm²]
Nozzle outlet diameter	n_200_10	145.3	160.5	23314.2
	n_200_15	189.9	128.0	24307.9
	n_200_20	231.5	110.0	25461.8
	n_200_25	246.0	108.5	26685.3
	n_200_30	264.6	101.2	26791.1
	R²	0.99 (quadratic)	0.98 (quadratic)	0.98 (linear)
Nozzle length	n_100_20	221.4	105.9	23449.4
	n_150_20	236.6	106.7	25234.5
	n_200_20	231.5	110.0	25461.8
	R²	0.42 (linear)	0.88 (linear)	0.83 (linear)

To determine the amount of deposited material, the cross-section area of each strand is evaluated (see Fig. 8b). The area is calculated by approximating the strand shape as a rectangle with straight edges as presented in Fig. 5c. While the nozzle outlet diameter increases, the cross-section area increases proportionally. A linear correlation of around 220 mm² (cross-section area) per mm (nozzle outlet diameter) is observed. For the widening nozzle (d_200_30) only a minor increase of 44 mm² /mm in comparison to the straight nozzle (d_200_25) is noted. Similar to the observed results for the strand width and height, this might result from a higher impact velocity of agglomerate-air mixture with a decreasing outlet diameter. A higher velocity increases the rebound of the sprayed material which leads to a decrease in the strand cross-section.

Figure 8. Results on strand width and height for different (a) Nozzle outlet diameters and (b) Calculated cross-section areas.

The high influence of the jet velocity is further visible in the shape of the strand top surface. As seen in Fig. 9, the shape of the surface changes from concave at a small outlet diameter to convex at a big diameter. Because of the smaller outlet diameter and therefore higher impact energy of the aggregate, the material in already applied layers is deformed, resulting in lower layer heights and wider strands.

For a variation of nozzle lengths, only a minor influence of the parameter on strand width and height is observed. As the length increases from 100 mm to 200 mm, the strand width slightly increased from 105.9 mm to 110.0 mm with a linear correlation factor of 0.88. For the height R² = 0.42 changing from 221.4 mm at L = 100 mm to 231.5 mm at L = 200 mm (Fig. 10a and Table 4). The cross-section increases from 23449.4 mm² for L = 100 mm to 25461.8 mm² for L = 200 mm with R² = 0.83 (Fig. 10b). These observations might be a result of a reduced jet energy due to an increased friction in longer nozzles.

Figure 10. Results on a) strand width and height for different Nozzle lengths and (b) Calculated cross-section areas.

3.5.3. Investigations on Mechanical Properties

Figure 11 shows the results of the mechanical tests for the investigated nozzle outlet diameters. The highest flexural strengths of 5.80 N/mm² and 5.89 N/mm² were obtained for the tapered nozzles at small nozzle diameters (10 and 15 mm). An increase in d_o to 20 mm resulted in a 23% reduction in flexural strength to 4.53 N/mm² compared to d_o = 15 mm. A further increase in outlet diameter to a straight nozzle (d_o = 25 mm) resulted in a further reduction in flexural strength to 4.08 N/mm², representing the lowest average flexural strength. The observed decrease in layer bonding with increasing outlet diameter could be related to the decrease in sprayed concrete jet velocity. It can be assumed, that the material applied with a small outlet diameter experienced greater compaction. Contrary to the observed trend, the widening nozzle (d_o = 30 mm) shows an increase in flexural strength. This may be a result of to the application of the material in larger agglomerates combined with a lower jet velocity resulting in higher interface tortuosity between the applied layers, which was investigated as being beneficial for the resulting layer bond strength [13]. Although the use of a widening nozzle (d_o = 30 mm) results in advantageous mechanical properties, it should not be favoured for unrestricted use in SC3DP due to the low shotcrete velocity limiting the number of spray angles.

Figure 11b shows the results of the compressive strength tests for different outlet diameters. The highest compressive strength is 64.0 N/mm² for d_o = 15 mm and the lowest result is 57.3 N/mm² for d_o = 30 mm. This can be attributed to the lower material compaction with decreasing jet velocity. However, considering the standard deviations, no significant trend can be identified.

Figure 11. Results of a) 3-point bending tests and b) Compressive strength tests for different nozzle outlet diameters d_o.

Figure 12a shows the effect of nozzle length on the resulting flexural strength. All tests were carried out with an outlet diameter of 20 mm and therefore with a tapered nozzle. By shortening the nozzle from 200 mm to 100 mm a 21% increase in flexural strength from 4.53 N/mm² to 5.50 N/mm² is achieved. This could be explained by lower frictional losses within the nozzle, and by the shorter distance of the pressurised air inlet to the substrate resulting in higher material compaction (see Fig. 4). However, for shorter nozzle lengths a higher variation within flexural strength results is observed. The measured compressive strength ranges from 57.4 N/mm² (L = 150 mm) to 62.55 N/mm² (L = 100 mm and L = 200 mm), see Fig. 12b. No clear effect of nozzle length on the resulting compressive strength can be observed.

Figure 12. Results of a) 3-point bending tests and b) Compressive strength tests for different nozzle lengths L.

Based on the previously presented results, the nozzle outlet diameter shows potential for an in-sito control of the strand geometry during SC3DP. Therefore, an adaptive SC3DP nozzle is developed to change the nozzle outlet diameter during the printing process. First, a literature and patent review are conducted to identify various solutions from other processes such as concrete or plastic extrusion (MEX), spray processes such as spray painting, or other mechanisms used to change circular hole diameters. The identified mechanisms are evaluated against previously defined requirements before the most promising ones are redesigned and tested for the SC3DP process.

4.1. Concepts from Patents and Literature Review

In extrusion processes, an adaptive nozzle system with a square geometry has already been examined. The nozzle diameter can be varied continuously until 25mm [20]. A similar design is presented by Lao [21]. Other designs, such as a variable scroll nozzles or an iris-diaphragm-shaped nozzles, which are actuated in a rotary motion are discussed in [22]. As another possibility, a vertical motion of different zones can be used, which allows for a discrete adaption of the outlet diameter [23]. A further solution is proposed as a segmented nozzle actuated by a lever [24]. Another concept for a star shaped nozzle design with flexible material as a basis is presented by Mossberg [25]. In addition to the designs and mechanisms previously mentioned, multi-nozzle devices are used, especially in MEX for plastics [26,27].

To develop an adaptive nozzle system for SC3DP these concepts are analysed and evaluated regarding the usability and applicability for the process. Special attention is given to the fact, that for SC3DP the material is accelerated by pressurised air in contrast to MEX. In order to realise the potential of this mechanism for complex printing shapes, a nozzle device with the capability of changing the outlet diameter continuously is preferred to a device with many nozzles of a constant outlet diameter or one nozzle with a mechanism for changing its outlet diameter in discrete steps. The result is an adoption of the scroll nozzle concept presented by [22] (see Fig. 13).

Figure 13. Flexible nozzle for SC3DP; (a) Side view and section view of nozzle prototype;

(b) Nozzle prototype with d_o = 25 mm; (c) Nozzle prototype with d_o = 10 mm.

By rotating the disc located at the nozzle outlet the cables tighten around the sheet metal, which narrows the outlet diameter. By rotating the disc counterclockwise, the cables are released and the nozzle opens up due to the elasticity of the 0.2 mm thick sheet metal (1.4310). This leads to a design for a flexible nozzle system with a length of 200 mm and a continuously changeable nozzle outlet diameter of 10 mm to 25 mm.

4.3. Experimental Validation

For the validation of the nozzle prototype, a 1 m long strand is printed with increasing the nozzle outlet diameter in three steps: 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm. The nozzle outlet diameter is changed manually by rotating the disc connected to sheet metal forming the nozzle outlet. As seen in Fig. 14a, a variation of the outlet diameter changes the spray characteristic similar to the results discussed in Chap. 3.4. By decreasing the nozzle diameter, an increase in the jet velocity (Chap. 3.4.1) and wider strands are achieved (Chap. 3.4.2). By increasing the nozzle outlet diameter from 10 mm to 20 mm, the strand width decreases by approximately 20% from 118.1 mm to 93.8 mm. Comparing this to the results presented in section 3.5.2, a decrease of 30% is observed with static nozzles with reduced outlet diameters from 10 mm to 20 mm (see Table 4).

Despite these potential shortcomings of this first prototype, this experimental validation proves the potential of a flexible nozzle system for changing the strand geometry during printing. Especially for building components with varying thickness a single nozzle system with a variable nozzle outlet diameter expands the potential of using shotcrete-based AM.

In the present study, the effects of nozzle outlet diameter and nozzle length on the resulting strand properties in SC3DP were investigated. In addition to the strand geometry (height, width), the influence on the hardened concrete properties, i.e. flexural strength, and compressive strength, were examined. The following results were obtained:

The variation of the nozzle outlet diameter has a large influence on the velocity of the spray jet. Here, an increasing jet velocity can be observed with decreasing outlet diameter.
The geometry of the produced strands is significantly affected by the nozzle outlet diameter. Decreasing the outlet diameters results in wider and flatter strands.
For tapered and straight nozzle geometries, the layer bond strength is negatively affected by increased outlet diameters. However, the widened nozzle geometry counteracted this trend, resulting in an increased layer bond strength.
Variations of the nozzle length in the investigated range (100–200 mm) shows no significant effect on the resulting strand properties.
A prototype for an automated flexible nozzle was designed to change the nozzle outlet diameter during printing. The experimental validation demonstrated its functionality. Experiments with a gradually reduced outlet diameter were performed showing similar behaviour regarding the influences on the layer geometry as the tested static nozzle outlet diameters.

The presented study shows that the specific control of the nozzle geometry is a well-suited process parameter for controlling component geometry and layer bonding in the SC3DP process. In order to better understand the observed effects of nozzle geometry on the resulting flexural strength, further research should include detailed investigations of the resulting material properties, i.e. material density, porosity and layer homogeneity in terms of aggregate distribution. Furthermore, knowledge of the effects of a varying nozzle outlet diameter in combination with other process parameters (air volume flow, concrete volume flow, etc.), material parameters (accelerator dosage) or path-planning approaches (nozzle-to-strand distance, traverse speed) is required to explore the full potential and limits of this new control parameter to increase the controllability of SC3DP.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.D., N.F., K.D. and D.L.; methodology, M.D., N.F., K.D. and D.L.; software, M.D. and N.F.; validation, M.D. and N.F.; formal analysis, M.D. and N.F.; investigation, M.D. and N.F.; Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools, K.D. and D.L.; data curation, M.D. and N.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D. and N.F.; writing—review and editing, M.D., N.F., K.D. and D.L.; visualization, M.D. and N.F.; supervision, K.D. and D.L.; project administration, K.D. and D.L.; funding acquisition, K.D. and D.L.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding: Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – TRR 277/1 2020 – Project number 414265976. The authors thank the DFG for the support within the CRC/ Transregio 277 - Additive Manufacturing Construction (Project A04).

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Bos, F.; Wolfs, R.; Ahmed, Z.; Salet, T. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2016, vol. 11, https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867.
Roussel, N. Rheological requirements for printable concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, vol. 112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005.
Buswell, R.A.; Bos, F.P.; Da Silva, W.R.L.; Hack, N.; Kloft, H.; Lowke, D.; Freund, N.; Fromm, A.; Dini, E.; Wangler, T.; et al. Digital Fabrication with Cement-Based Materials: Process Classification and Case Studies. In Digital Fabrication with Cement-Based Materials; Roussel, N., Lowke, D., Eds.: Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90535-4_2.
Lowke, D.; Mai, I.; Keita, E.; Perrot, A.; Weger, D.; Gehlen, C.; Herding, F.; Zuo, W.; Roussel, N. Material-process interactions in particle bed 3D printing and the underlying physics. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, vol. 156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106748.
Mechtcherine, V.; Bos, F.P.; Perrot, A.; da Silva, W.L.; Nerella, V.N.; Fataei, S.; Wolfs, R.; Sonebi, M.; Roussel, N. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing with cement-based materials – Production steps, processes, and their underlying physics: A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, vol. 132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106037.
Hack, N.; Kloft, H. Shotcrete 3D Printing Technology for the Fabrication of Slender Fully Reinforced Freeform Concrete Elements with High Surface Quality: A Real-Scale Demonstrator. In Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_107.
Buswell, R.A.; da Silva, W.L.; Bos, F.P.; Schipper, H.R.; Lowke, D.; Hack, N.; Kloft, H.; Mechtcherine, V.; Wangler, T.; Roussel, N. A process classification framework for defining and describing Digital Fabrication with Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, vol. 134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106068.
Kloft, H.; Krauss, H.-W.; Hack, N.; Herrmann, E.; Neudecker, S.; Varady, P.A.; Lowke, D. Influence of process parameters on the interlayer bond strength of concrete elements additive manufactured by Shotcrete 3D Printing (SC3DP). Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, vol. 134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106078.
Dreßler, I.; Freund, N.; Lowke, D. Control of Strand Properties produced with Shotcrete 3D Printing by Accelerator Dosage and Process Parameters. In Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_5.
Böhler, D.; Mai, I.; Freund, N.; Lachmayer, L.; Raatz, A.; Lowke, D. Influence of Material and Process Parameters on Hardened State Properties of Shotcrete 3D-Printed Elements. In Third RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06116-5_38.
Lachmayer, L.; Böhler, D.; Freund, N.; Mai, I.; Lowke, D.; Raatz, A. Modelling the influence of material and process parameters on Shotcrete 3D Printed strands - cross-section adjustment for automatic robotic manufacturing. Automation in Construction, 2023, vol. 145 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104626.
Lu, B.; Li, M.; Wong, T.N.; Qian, S. Effect of printing parameters on material distribution in spray-based 3D concrete printing (S-3DCP). Automation in Construction, 2021, vol. 124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103570.
Dreßler, I.; Freund, N.; Lowke, D. The Effect of Accelerator Dosage on Fresh Concrete Properties and on Interlayer Strength in Shotcrete 3D Printing. Materials Journal, Special Issue "Concrete 3D Printing and Digitally-Aided Fabrication", 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020374.
Nolte, N.; Heidmann-Ruhz, M.; Krauss, H.-W.; Budelmann, H.; Wolter, A. Entwicklung von Spritzbetonrezepturen mit steuerbaren Eigenschaften für die robotergestützte additive Fertigung von Betonbauteilen. Tagungsband der 12. Fachtagung in Alpbach, 2018, Available online: http://spritzbeton-tagung.com/downloads/vortraege/2018/08_Nolte_et_al_Spritz betonrezepturen_fuer_die_additive_Fertigung.pdf (in german).
Krause, M.; Otto, J.; Bulgakov, A.; Sayfeddine, D. Strategic Optimization of 3D-Concrete-Printing Using the Method of CONPrint3D®. In Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), 2018, https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2018/0002.
Petit, A.; Stucki, W.; Lullin, S.; Galé, B.; Zuliani, F. Econcrete Structure Manufacturing Apparatus and Method: European Patent Specification, 2021.
Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). DIN EN 196-1:2016-11: Methods of testing cement - Part 1: Determination of strength; German; Beuth Verlag GmbH, 2016. Available online: https://dx.doi.org/10.31030/2482416.
C. Su, Q. Zheng, and W. Zhao, “A Combined Experimental and Numerical Study of Shotcrete Jets and Related Wet Spray Nozzles,” Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 947–960, 2020, doi: 10.32604/fdmp.2020.09676.
Ginouse, N.; Jolin, M. Investigation of spray pattern in shotcrete applications. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, vol. 93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.061.
Xu, J.; Ding, L.; Cai, L.; Zhang, L.; Luo, H.; Qin, W. Volume-forming 3D concrete printing using a variable-size square nozzle. Automation in Construction, 2019, vol. 104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.008.
Lao, W.; Li, M.; Tjahjowidodo, T. Variable-geometry nozzle for surface quality enhancement in 3D concrete printing. Additive Manufacturing, 2021, vol. 37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101638.
Wan, Q.; Xu, Y.; Lu, C. A fundamental study of parameter adjustable additive manufacturing process based on FDM process. MATEC Web Conf., 2018, vol. 189, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818905001.
Shin, B.; Hong, T.; Park, C., Hong, S., Kim, M. Nozzle Having Variable Diameter for 3D Printer and Method for Controlling the Same, patent, 2015.
Fan, Y. Variable-caliber 3D printer nozzle, patent, 2019.
Moosberg, M.; Barbati, A.C. A system with a dynamic variable size nozzle orifice for three-dimensional printing: U.S. Patent Application, 2021.
Xiong, G.; Shen, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, F. Multi-nozzle 3D printer and method for controlling speed and precision of multi-nozzle 3D printer, patent, 2014.
Brooks, H.; Lupeanu, M.E.; Piorkowski, B. Research towards high speed extrusion freeforming. International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing, 2013, vol. 3, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2013.053686.
Verein deutscher Ingenieure (VDI). VDI 2221 Blatt 1:2019-11: Design of technical products and systems - Model of product design; Beuth Verlag GmbH, 2019.

The Effects of Nozzle Diameter and Length on the Resulting Strand Properties for Shotcrete 3D Printing

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Control of Strand Geometry within Shotcrete-Based Additive Manufacturing - State of the Art

3. Experimental Investigations: Control of Strand Geometry by Nozzle Geometry in SC3DP