Response rate
The survey targeted staff in charge of SRH for WHO Africa in 47 countries. A total of seventeen (17) countries participated in the web-based survey representing a response rate of 38% which was considered adequate for reporting.
Integration of FP/Contraceptive use
The countries were asked to report on integration of SRHS in the continuity plan for essential health services on the national COVID-19 response. Out of the 15 (88%) countries. 2((12%) countries reported not to have integrated SRH services on the national COVID-19 response and EHS continuity plan. Countries offered different packages of Essential Health Service (EHS), with only 12 countries offering full package of EHS that included FP/contraception and CAC, including PAC. Table 1 presents summary countries that have integrated FP, CAC, and PAC in their EHS package.
Table 1
Elements of SRH in essential Health Services package
Country
|
Family planning/contraception
|
Family planning/contraception(FP) and Post Abortion Care
|
Family planning/contraception(FP) and Post Abortion Care, Comprehensive abortion care)
|
Benin
|
|
|
YES
|
Burkina Faso
|
|
|
YES
|
Burundi
|
|
|
YES
|
Cameroon
|
|
|
YES
|
Central African Republic
|
|
|
YES
|
Democratic Republic of Congo
|
|
|
YES
|
Ghana
|
|
|
YES
|
Guinea
|
|
YES
|
|
Madagascar
|
|
YES
|
|
Mali
|
|
|
YES
|
Nigeria
|
YES
|
|
|
Rwanda
|
|
|
YES
|
Senegal
|
|
|
YES
|
South Africa
|
|
|
YES
|
South Sudan
|
|
|
YES
|
United Republic of Tanzania
|
|
|
YES
|
Zimbabwe
|
|
|
YES
|
Ongoing awareness and communication messages on FP, CAC and PAC
The questionnaire had a question asking countries to respond to ongoing awareness campaigns or communication messages about during the COVID -19 pandemic. Of the countries that participated in the survey, 88.2% acknowledged that they had ongoing awareness campaigns and communication messages about FP, CAC and PAC during COVID-19 pandemic. Majority (76%) of the countries had key messages that focused on where and how to access SRH services, and importance of services was reported as reported in Figure 1. Among the countries that had key messages, major target audiences were the entire community (64.7%), health care providers (52.9%), adolescent and youths 47.1%), and women groups/associations (41.2%) as shown in Figure 2. Figure 3, summarises the most commonly used communication channel. They included the radio (76.5%) and TV (70.6%). Other channels were banners text messages, web and social media and WhasApp all at 5.8%.
Utilization of Family planning services during COVID
Table 2 provides a summary of FP/contraception services and commodities in countries since the start of COVID-19 pandemic. From the survey findings, almost half, (59%) of the countries reported a reduction in the use of FP since the beginning of the pandemic. Among these countries 12 (71%) countries reported a reduction in uptake of Family Planning commodities while 8 (47%) countries reported stock out of Family Planning commodities with most countries reporting implants and IUDs as the major stock outs. Figure 4 presents comparison of number of FP clients seen during COVID-19 pandemic (January –May, 2020) before COVID-19 pandemic (January –May 2019). All the countries reported a decrease in uptake of FP commodities by clients except in Madagascar and United Republic of Tanzania
Table 2
FP/Contraception services and commodities During COVID-19 pandemic
Responses
|
Reduction in the use of family planning services
n (%)
|
Reduction in uptake of family planning commodities
n (%)
|
Stock out of family planning commodities
n (%)
|
Yes
|
9 (59)
|
12 (71)
|
8 (47)
|
No
|
6 (35)
|
5 (29)
|
7 (41)
|
No response
|
2 (12)
|
0 (0)
|
2 (12)
|
Total
|
17
|
17
|
17
|
Figure 5 reports the proportion of countries that reported reduction in the uptake of FP commodities and stock outs. Implants and IUDs were reported to have the highest reduction in the uptake at 47.1% followed by injectables (41.2%) during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, commodities that were reported to have stock outs included injectables (23.5%) and implants (17.6%). IUDs, pills condoms and LAM were reported to have experience stock outs by 5.9% of the participating countries.
Self-care interventions for SRH
Majority of the countries (76%) reported to have implemented self-care interventions for FP/contraception or safe abortion. The most common self-care interventions implemented in 47% of the countries during the COVID pandemic included self- provision of pills and subcutaneous depo medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) self-administration, followed by HIV self-testing (29%). Figure 6 summarises the self-care intervention that were reported to have been implemented.
Supply of SRH commodities for Comprehensive abortion care (CAC) and Safe abortion services during COVID 19
The trend in uptake of CAC amid COVID-19 did not experience any change in 11(61%) of the 17 countries. However, 3 (18.8%) of the countries reported a decrease, and only 1 (6%) reported an increase in CAC services during the period under review as shown in Table 3. Medical abortion drugs (misoprostol and mifepristone) were available in health facilities in 13 (76%) countries. In the 4 countries where the drugs were not available in health facilities, various reasons that contributed for non-availability include; abortion completely forbidden in the country, drugs not in health facilities but available in the pharmacies, controlled drugs which are not available for medical abortion, available but for induction of labor and for post-partum haemorrhage, and abortion drugs not included on the essential medicines list. Only Madagascar reported that designated health facilities for CAC/PAC are not currently operational and this was due to lack of trained healthcare workers.
Table 3
Trend in CAC/PAC during COVID-19 pandemic by country
Country
|
Increasing
|
Decreasing
|
No change
|
Benin
|
|
|
YES
|
Burkina Faso
|
|
|
YES
|
Burundi
|
|
|
YES
|
Cameroon
|
|
|
YES
|
Central African Republic
|
|
|
YES
|
Democratic Republic of Congo
|
|
|
YES
|
Ghana
|
|
YES
|
|
Guinea
|
|
YES
|
|
Madagascar
|
YES
|
|
|
Mali
|
|
|
YES
|
Nigeria
|
|
|
YES
|
Rwanda
|
|
|
YES
|
Senegal
|
|
|
YES
|
South Africa
|
YES
|
|
|
South Sudan
|
|
|
YES
|
United Republic of Tanzania
|
|
|
YES
|
Zimbabwe
|
|
|
YES
|
Key challenges to provision of FP/contraception and CAC/PAC services during COVID-19 pandemic
Figure 7 reports key challenges reported by countries for the provision of FP/Contraception and CAC/PAC services during COVID-19 pandemic. The key challenge identified in most countries (70.6%) was the fear of patients/clients to seek SRHS at designated health facilities that they might contract COVID-19. More than half (52.9%) of the countries reported that the population lacked information on the continuity of SRH services as essential health services.
A follow up question further asked the countries to state if they had any challenges in funding of FP/Contraception, CAC/PAC services. 61% of the countries reported that they experienced challenges in funding the services while 39% reported no challenges in funding. The SRHS largely depended on funding. They were also asked to state if their countries had any challenges on data collection and 16 (94%) countries reported on data challenges. Out of the 16 countries (31%) stated that lack of trained health workers while (25 %) stated that heavy workloads contributed inadequate FP/Contraception and CAC/PAC services data collection. 19% reported that health care workers were re-purposed to support COVID-19 response resulting to weak data collection for SRHS.
Support needed by countries for FP/contraception and CAC/PAC services during COVID-19 pandemic
Countries were asked to identify and provide specific support they needed from WHO and her partners. Figure 8 summarizes the various support required by the participating countries in the survey during the COVID-19. Majority of the countries, 13 (72%) reported the need for emergency contraceptive supplies and PPEs, 10(56%) required financial support, resource mobilization and funding, 8(44%) reported the need for training, capacity building, and mentorship. While 6(33%) accounted for support supervision, technical support & information, communication on continuity of services & advocacy.
Out of the 17 countries that participated in the survey, United Republic of Tanzania expressed the highest need for support, followed by Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon and Nigeria. Proposals for the specific measures to maintaining continuity of FP/CAC varied from one country to another though others remained similar amid COVID-19. Nigeria, Benin and Guinea reported more measures compared to other countries.
Recommendations for improving continuity of care for FP, CAC, and PAC services
Several recommendations were presented for the improvement of continuity of care among the participating countries. The recommendation included strengthening training and supervision of healthcare providers, improving services provision at community level; advocating for funding; improving policy to allow engagement of various stakeholders in the provision of services; Alternative approaches to service delivery; Promotion of self-care interventions for SRH; Availability of FP products; Protection of Health worker; Sharing of country experiences; and Improving information and communication on essential SRH services for population