In the recent literature there are only 9 papers that are identifying LUSA as a special clinical entity and as a type of early PPH that requires different diagnostic and therapeutic approach to resolving PPH. It is interesting that old obstetric manuals have pointed out the problem of LUSA as well as very logical transvaginal approach to resolving it (tamponade of uterus and vagina according to Dührssen and Mange) [2, 5]. It should be mentioned that Losickaja has applied stitch of the posterior lip of the cervix in the year 1965. as a method for resolving uterine atony [7], while Hebisch-Huch have established successful method of mechanical ligation of cervical braches of the uterine artery that are simultaneously contracted through the cervicohypotalamic reflex [13]. Balak and Kafali have reported their experience about haemostatic cervical suturing that controls site of the hemorrhage on the cervical lips and on the lower uterine segment, and was proven to be effective even in the cases of LUSA [14, 15]. Habek has recently presented his own compressive surgical technique of perpendicular inverted cervical sutures that was very effective in 9 cases of LUSA where it was used as a primary surgical method for preventing further development of PPH and obstetric hemorrhagic shock and eventually preserving fertility [9].
Introducing TXA into the algorithms of treating PPH has significantly lower maternal morbidity in the sense of the development of obstetric shock, coagulopathy and need for massive transfusions [16]. TXA was first introduced in Croatia in the year 2009 and algorithm for prophylactic use of TXA and treatment for early PPH was presented in our Clinic. In our textbook (Obstetric operations, Habek and cooworks) that was published in the year 2009 we have described different transvaginal surgical procedures applied for patients with uterine atony especially with LUSA: haemostatic ligation procedures (Losickaja, Hebitsch-Huch), tamponade (Menge, balloon/gauze (impregnated in carboprost or TXA) tamponade, Bakri balloon, Sengestaken-Blakemore tube). We believe that traction of the uterus towards vagina has certain impact that resembles so called Pringel maneuver by obstruction of circulation and decreasing the amount of haemorrhage. All of the mentioned methods are relatively simple and applicable especially because they are being performed vaginally [3].
Known risk factors for LUSA are: prolonged and precipitated delivery, polyhydramnios, fetal malpresentation or malposition (deflection of the fetal head), multiparity, low-lying placenta, VBAC, assisted reproduction, hysteroscopy, rarely LUSA may be caused by cervical and myometrial lacerations [2, 3, 5–7, 9–15]. In our research there were no significant maternal or fetal risk factors for developing LUSA, except of labor induction and labor stimulation. Induction of labor was present in 27,27% of cases, and 22,73% of labor were stimulated due to preterm rupture of membranes, what accounts for 50% of known peripartal risk factors. According to our results, induction or stimulation of labor was identified as an isolated risk factor for developing LUSA.
In recent papers, surgical treatment of LUSA was described by means of different methods like: curettage, embolisation, vaginal packing, bilateral cervix apex clamping, transvaginal cervicouterine artery ligation, double balloon tamponade, obstruction of vascularisation by means of uterine traction towards vagina, “holding the cervix” technique, “fishing for the balloon shaft” and perpendicular compressive cervical stitches and finally hysterectomy [6, 9, 10–23]. Panda et al. [6] in 2009. published very appreciable paper about clinical entity known as primary LUSA that should be clearly distinguished from corporeal uterine atony. 10 out of 16 described cases of LUSA were treated by curettage; uterine packing was applied in 3 cases, uterine artery embolisation as well in 3 cases and hysterectomy was performed in 1 patient. 8 patients (50%) required blood transfusion.
We would like to emphasize, that we have obtained similar results in our research; blood transfusion was administrated in 47,72% of patients, while only 1 patient required massive transfusion, as already noted.
In more than 40% of cases we have successfully applied one or two combined ligation techniques (Hebitsch-Huch, Losickaja), followed by Habek modified compressive technique or compressive methods with balloon or gauze tamponade. We did not use curettage because we thought that we would damage the already damaged dilated surface of the cervix, we were guided by the philosophy of obstruction of circulation with ligatures and tamponade with therapy with uterotonics and tranexamic acid, to establish the missing mechanism of thrombo- and myotamponade.
Kafali and coworkers [15] have presented efficacy of applied haemostatic sutures in 3 cases of uncontrolled bleeding from the lower uterine segment. They have applied and compressed 2 longitudinal stitches through anterior and posterior cervical lip and obtained adequate hemostasis. Kavak has published 7 cases of LUSA, 5 out of 7 patients delivered by cesarean section; in all presented cases compressive method known as double cervical ripening balloon [17] while Seror et al. [11] reported successful use of Sengstaken Blakemore tube in the serial of 17 patients. In the year 2018 technique known as Matsubara-Takahashi was first introduced for achieving hemostasis in patients with placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) disorder and PPH. Matsubara-Takahashi technique was described as a cervix-holding technique (MT-holding) for achieving hemostasis for PPH in 50% of patients with PAS disorders and MT method had an overall success rate of 75% for PPH, comparable to other uterus sparing procedures [19]. Noninvasive procedure of bilateral cervix apex clamping (BCAC) first described by Jiang [21] was shown to be effective in cases of refractory PPH. In the total number of 13 359 vaginal deliveries, BCAC was performed in 44 cases (0,33%) with efficacy of 93,2%. Recent studies have shown good hemostasis accomplishment in the treatment of LUSA with the use of Chitosan gauze [12, 22]. Dueckelmann and coworkers [12] have presented results of their comparative study in the treatment of women with PPH with either uterine packing with chitosan covered gauze compared to balloon tamponade. The major reason for PPF was LUSA. In the group of patients treated with balloon tamponade postpartum hysterectomy was performed in 3 patients, while in the group of patients treated with uterine packing covered with Chitosan gauze there was no need for such a procedure. Therefore, authors according to their results, suggest the use of uterine packing covered with Chitosan gauze in the cases of LUSA, placenta previa bed bleeding and/or coagulopathy.
Transvaginal approach for surgical treatment of LUSA is accessible, feasible, successful and life saving. It can be easily performed in inpatient and outpatient care settings followed by administration of uterotonics, uterostiptics and TXA and fluid replacement. All of the above mentioned methods are of great importance in the prevention and treatment of severe PPH, obstetric hemorrhagic shock, development of coagulopathy, multiorgan failure, postpartum hysterectomy and finally vital for fertility preservation.