In our research we focused on the formal intercultural learning approach offering a learning tool in a classroom activity of a Medical Higher Education institution. The intention of these SC was to help participants recognize their similarities and differences with others and thus facilitate connection on cognitive, socio-emotional and behavioral levels. The intention was also for students to reflect on the importance of listening for understanding and the development of intercultural skills throughout life, both within health-care professionals. Health care professionals are aware that listening can be the most effective form of intervention for some patients who are in need of trying to understand their situation. Medical education has specifically targeted good listening skills as being key to good medical practice and avoidance of complaint and litigation (Hesketh and Laidlaw 2000). Therefore, Listening is understood to be a key skill in health care (Arnold and Coran 2011).
This activity of SC was developed within the Ophthalmology subject, in the clinical-surgical cycle of the 5th year of the medical career. It was framed within this subject since in the teaching planning the need for all medical students to recognize the main preventable causes of blindness, its global distribution, and its impact on the SDGs had been highlighted. Likewise, within the general objectives of the subject, the need for students to exercise the development of soft skills during the development of the subject had been established, especially regarding critical and autonomous thinking, ethical-social criteria, collaborative work, effective communication and creativity. This activity was proposed within the curriculum of the subject Ophthalmology as a complementary training methodology, with the aim of implementing a tool developed by UNESCO for the development of intercultural skills in medical students. Although these skills are developed throughout life with various strategies, this proposal was presented as yet another acquisition tool within the curriculum with which students could reflect on the importance of listening for understanding and development of other intercultural skills, given the need to have “culturally competent” health personnel who can adapt and respond to the needs of a changing population, taking into account that cultural, religious, linguistic and gender diversity have been become a relevant issue on the world agenda.
This teaching planning or syllabus, which goes beyond technical knowledge about ophthalmology and also encompasses the need to train medical professionals with competencies as global citizens, was presented as an ideal environment for the development of these SC.
So, in this article, we present a study of SC conducted in June 2023 in a private Medical Higher Education institution in Buenos Aires, Argentina. 35 students participated divided in six small groups (five groups with 6 participants and one group with 5 participants). It was an in person non-mandatory activity for the students. Among this group of 26 women (74%) and 9 men (26%), 88% were Argentinean and 12% were foreigners with more than five years of residence in Argentina. The 100% of the participants came from the 20-27 age group.
SC activity
Following the protocol outlined in the Manual, we executed the SC activity over these six phases:
Introduction
We began asking the students the meaning of “Intercultural Competences”. They started to mention skills that they thought were linked to the concept, and we wrote them down on the board. Ideas such as the following arose: understanding, curiosity, tolerance, respect, empathy, understanding towards others, diversity, etc. After this we explained that to summarize many existing definitions, within this SC we consider that intercultural competencies are about improving human interactions across difference, whether within a society (differences due to age, gender, religion, socio-economic status, political affiliation, ethnicity, and so on) or across borders.
Therefore, we explained that SC is a strategy developed by UNESCO that is structured yet adaptable, allowing participants to practice intercultural competences (IC) and foster emotional connections. This strategy tends to be more transformative than traditional training because of the participants' emotional attachment. We also remarked that SC are not an intercultural workshop or training, and explained that when we finish this activity we will not be able to think that we are already interculturally competent. It is very important that SC is accepted as an experience and activity since IC is a lifelong process, so participating in this experience is a step on that journey. SC offer participants the opportunity to practice important cross-cultural skills (e.g. listening to understand) and improve some aspects of IC.
At this point we emphasized the importance of listening for understanding. Remarking that during the SC we were going to listen to understand, we were not going to listen to respond, to give an opinion or to judge. We also mentioned that this importance was going to be emphasized with a “talking piece” during the experience. We mentioned that SC operate on two presuppositions: 1) We are all interconnected through human rights; 2) Each person has inherent dignity and worth.
Then, we finished this introduction mentioning the objectives of the Story Circles related to the development of intercultural competences and communication through differences: show respect for others; practice listening for understanding; cultivate curiosity about similarities and differences with others; increase cultural self-awareness; develop empathy; participate in critical reflection on the own development of intercultural competences, as well as on the intercultural experience; and develop relationships with other culturally different people.
SC process and dynamic
During this second phase we explained that the SC were going to be carried out with groups of six or five members seated in a circle. We read the activity guides that are presented as Annex I, emphasizing the importance of confidentiality and respect. Also, as each person tells their story, the rest of the group should listen for understanding and not interrupt the story (by asking questions or commenting) until the whole story has been told. Uninterrupted speech is a way of showing respect for the interlocutor and encourages the listener to listen more carefully to what is being said.
We mentioned that SC guidelines include the following indications: maintain confidentiality; be yourself; speak from your own experience only; be genuine and authentic; keep the sharing simple, clear, and focused; uphold positive intent; and be comfortable in your own style (i.e., sit, stand, use gestures).
Here, as we have identified that certain elements such as "take pieces" can be useful for this listening comprehension purpose, we presented a tennis ball with the following indications: "Anyone who has the tennis ball in her/his field can play. Anyone who has the ball in her/his hand can speak." The proposal was very well received and fulfilled its function perfectly. Only the person with the tennis ball would speak.
In the following photo we can see how only the speaker with the tennis ball in his hand is the only one who speaks. There is also a situation of comfort in which the speaker decided to share the story in his own style by speaking standing up. This situation of comfort and safe environment is observed in another element, such as “mate”, a typical Argentine infusion drink that is shared among friends in situations of trust and closeness.
We asked all the students to turn off their mobile phones. They used only one device per SC (in "airplane mode") which was used as a time limit chronometer. We explained that SC is very structured in terms of time limits, so the purpose of time limits is to ensure equality for all participants and ensure that each person in the group has the same amount of allotted time. We determined that the person to the right of the narrator was going to be the timekeeper and showing the chronometer screen, was an appropriate non-verbal cue that time was running out.
First round
We began with sharing the first prompt to be answered. We chose a prompt presented in the Manual and made a modification. The original prompt was the following: “Please tell us your name and the story about your name. (What does it mean? How did you come to have this name?)”.
On the one hand, we believe that talking about the origin of the name might not be meaningful in our culture. On the other hand, these participants are classmates who have known each other for five years, some of them are very close friends; so we found it interesting to present some element that perhaps they did not know about the other. Hence, we modified the prompt to the following:
Prompt 1: Please, tell us your name and one of your nicknames about which you want to share your story. (Who gave it to you? Why? Do you want to share an anecdote about your nickname?).
We highlight here the importance of the model response that had been previously given by one of the facilitators. The facilitator told a story related to the origin of one of her nicknames given by her nephews that created an adequate emotional environment prior to students sharing their stories.
Then the participants presented in the rounds very emotional stories related to their affections in relation to their nicknames.
It was helpful to give participants a minute to think about their responses to the prompt and what stories they want to share so they could focus on listening for understanding during the experience. To encourage respectful and deep listening, participants were reminded again not to interrupt the classmate who held the tennis ball.
Each participant had two minutes to present their story. The participant to his/her right was in charge of keeping time. The round began with the participant whose birthday was closest to the date of this activity, and then the round continued clockwise. The two minutes were enough for the response of all the participants.
Second round
For the second round we used the following intercultural prompt from the Manual adapted to the experiences of health care professionals:
Prompt 2: What is a memorable experience you have had with a patient(s) who is different from you (age, religion, gender, socio-economic, culture, nationality, etc.), and what did you learn about yourself and/or the other person in that experience?
It is appropriate to clarify that although the participants are medical students, most of them have already had practical experience with patients. If they did not have that experience, they could share a story linked to a different person (even if it had not been a patient).
First, the medical facilitator and professor of the students shared a moving story about a situation with a deaf-mute patient. This story created an atmosphere of vulnerability and empathy that touched the students and served as a model for them to feel comfortable sharing their personal stories. She emphasized what she learned from herself and from the other person, demonstrating courage to share a personal story.
The purpose of this intercultural prompt is to have participants reflect on their own personal experiences with those who are different from them and share an experience so that the others in the group can begin to see from different perspectives, so the facilitators remarked that the experience should be about relationships through any kind of differences (religion, age generation, ethnics, origin, etc.).
The participants had one minute to reflect on the prompt individually before sharing, and then had three minutes to present their answer.
After that, The participants shared stories with significant moments of connection across differences. Some of them shared meaningful stories of doctor-patient bonding. The prompt worked successfully. The three-minute limit was enough, although some students asked if they could tell more details of their stories later. Moreover, at the end of the SC activity, some students shared their stories with other classmates who were not present in the same small group.
The flashback, as an additional activity, was added in this round. During this time, the participants engaged in a flashback in response to the stories that have been previously shared in order to demonstrate listening for understanding and respect for each other. During this flashback participants shared quickly (in 15 seconds or less) the most memorable point they heard from the second story shared.
For the flashback session, the group started with the first person who shared his/her story in round two, and the others went around the circle sharing with that person the most memorable point of his/her story. Then the group moved to the second person who shared his/her story, and the others did another round of flashbacks for that person, and so on until the flashbacks have been covered for each person in the circle. This activity was very quick, without any discussion. The feedbacks were short yet meaningful and emotional.
Follow-up discussion
After the flashbacks were finished, the small group began the follow-up discussion using the debriefing questions that are presented in the Manual. Here a group reflection took place. We included the questions indicated in the Manual with an asterisk, taking into account that they were very important since they address the intercultural competencies goals (Annex II.)
The discussion that followed was an oral group activity, and the facilitators assisted this process by voicing various questions and guiding participants to intervene. This phase lasted approximately 30 minutes and participants actively participated in the activity. Some participants were even mentioning some reflections from the stories they heard in each small group, and showed admiration for other classmates.
Questionnaire and end
After the follow-up discussion, the facilitators asked the participants to complete a written evaluation of the experience. This was the SC Feedback Questionnaire included in the Manual (Annex III), adapted for this specific activity. The facilitators then made closing remarks about the activity they have just experienced, the importance of IC and the relationships across differences, and stressed the importance of developing intercultural competencies for health care professionals. The importance of being attentive to the needs of a global world.
Finally, the facilitators thanked everyone for their participation and respectful approach to the process.