The complex pathophysiology of NAFLD and the lack of understanding about the triggers leading to the onset of NASH complicates the development of therapeutic agents to treat this condition. Thus, NAFLD currently remains without approved pharmacological treatment. While diet and exercise are recommended to decrease BW and improve hepatic steatosis 7, there is keen interest to find novel approaches to complement NAFLD management. The underlying pathogenesis of NAFLD involves multiple detrimental “hits” in an organ crosstalk manner, including insulin resistance in WAT, increased influx of lipids in the liver and DNL, decreased lipid oxidation and export of VLDL. These ultimately cause inflammation, impairment in mitochondria dynamics, ER stress and apoptosis, which culminates in hepatic steatosis, inflammation and NASH 1,6. We show in this study that a small peptide derived from the egg ovotransferrin protein, namely IRW (isoleucine-arginine-tryptophan), prevented HFD-induced hepatic steatosis, in part by increasing the capacity for fatty acid oxidation via increased abundance of mitochondrial complexes, enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation and citrate synthase activity. We previously showed that IRW45 improved skeletal muscle insulin signaling and glucose tolerance in HFD-induced obese mice 20, therefore, IRW could be a novel therapy to manage metabolic conditions and prevent one of the first (insulin resistance) and later hits (mitochondrial dysfunction) involved in NAFLD progression.
IRW45 improved histological and biochemical parameters in the liver of obese, glucose intolerant mice. IRW45-treated mice had parallel decreases in hepatic TG content, hepatic LD size and LD-covered area compared to HFD, demonstrating an improvement in hepatic steatosis. On the other hand, rosiglitazone-treated animals had worsened hepatic TG accumulation and LD-covered area. Rosiglitazone, a PPARγ agonist, was included in our study as a positive control for insulin sensitization. Therefore, even though both IRW45 and rosiglitazone improved glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance in our previous experiments 20,24, only IRW45 prevented HFD-induced liver steatosis. Differently from its effects in humans, rosiglitazone treatment in mice induces hepatic lipid accumulation via PPARγ activation in the liver 25,26, which is consistent with our findings. Because we previously saw an increase in skeletal muscle PPARγ protein abundance in IRW45-treated animals 20, we wanted to further investigate the effects of IRW45 in the liver and if it would prevent hepatic steatosis differentiating it from the effects promoted by rosiglitazone.
Initially we thought that IRW45 might reduce lipid uptake by the liver, thereby preventing hepatic lipid accumulation, while increasing lipid accumulation in the WAT, as a safer storage depot to prevent metabolic complications 27,28. However, despite an increase in eWAT in the IRW45 and ROSI groups compared to HFD, absolute fat mass was not different between the IRW45 group compared to HFD at the end of the study. In fact, BW was marginally reduced in the IRW45 group. In addition, the ROSI group had no differences compared to HFD in terms of BW and fat mass. Moreover, individual adipocyte size did not change among the HFD-treated groups, nor did the adipogenesis markers. This suggests that lipid accumulation in WAT is similar among the groups and that IRW45 is probably not inducing adipogenesis to prevent hepatic lipid accumulation. It is worth noting that in the rWAT, adiponectin protein abundance was higher in the IRW45 group compared to HFD, which may contribute to IRW45’s beneficial effects, since adiponectin agonists are shown to improve NASH in rodents 29, and plasma adiponectin is inversely correlated hepatic lipid accumulation in humans 30.
We hypothesized that IRW would modulate hepatic lipid metabolism and mitochondrial content to prevent NAFLD. Although IRW elicited changes in lipid metabolism it seems that, contrary to our initial hypothesis, it was not due to decreased fatty acid uptake because both IRW45 and ROSI groups had upregulated hepatic expression of genes involved in lipid uptake (Cd36) and downregulated expression of genes involved in VLDL assembly (Mttp) and in the transport of fatty acids into the mitochondria (Cpt1a). In addition, gene expression of targets involved in DNL were downregulated or unchanged in the IRW45 group compared to HFD (Acaca and Fasn, respectively). However, total protein content of CPT1α, CD36 and ACC (encoded by Acaca) was similar among the groups, while FAS and MTP protein abundance showed a trend to be increased in the IRW45 group. Moreover, ACC phosphorylation (Ser79) was increased by IRW45. ACC is a rate-limiting enzyme in DNL and its inhibition by AMPKα-mediated phosphorylation of Ser79 is essential to decrease lipogenesis by reducing malonyl-CoA synthesis, thus decreasing hepatic lipid accumulation 31. Therefore, enhanced p-ACC in the IRW45 group suggests decreased lipogenesis in this group, which could contribute, in part, to the lower hepatic TG content and smaller LD. Despite a suggested increase in hepatic lipid uptake by the qPCR results, image analysis and protein results support the hypothesis of less lipid accumulation in the IRW45 group.
We then investigated other pathways that could be working to decrease hepatic lipid accumulation, despite increased uptake, in particular fatty acid oxidation. AMPKα is a known lipid metabolism regulator and its activation, besides leading to inhibition of lipogenesis, also induces fatty acid uptake. Via AMPKα-catalyzed phosphorylation of ACC, malonyl-CoA availability is decreased, which relieves inhibition of the rate-limiting enzyme shuttling fatty acid into the mitochondria, CPT1α. Therefore, more fatty acids can enter cells and be directed for β-oxidation as reviewed elsewhere 32. Here we showed that liver Cd36 expression was increased in IRW45 group, while protein amount although increased did not reach statistical significance, suggesting increased capacity for fatty acid uptake. Moreover, we previously found that in skeletal muscle of HFD-fed animals, IRW45 supplementation increased p-AMPKα, an effect not seen in WAT 20. In this study, hepatic p-AMPKα/AMPKα ratio did not change between IRW45 and HFD group, but it was increased compared to ROSI group. Interestingly, p-AMPKα/β-actin and AMPKα/β-actin were more than 50% higher in the IRW45 group compared to HFD, suggesting a greater initial capacity for AMPKα activation ( i.e., Vmax), which in turn increases the capacity for activating AMPKα-related targets. In fact, in another study, compared to HFD alone, IRW45 increased hepatic silent mating-type information regulation 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1) protein abundance, a protein known to interact with AMPKα 33. This effect was accompanied by increased nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) and forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) protein content in the liver and increased nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) concentration in the liver and in plasma 33, consistent with improved metabolic regulation and possibly enhanced mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in the IRW45-supplemented mice. This is supported by our finding that citrate synthase activity was increased in the IRW45 group, which is consistent with enhanced hepatic oxidative metabolism. The role of NAMPT and SIRT1 in NAFLD is already shown, for example, SIRT1 is decreased in models of HFD-induced NAFLD 34, while overexpression of SIRT1 prevents hepatic TG accumulation and inflammation 35,36. On the other hand, pharmacological inhibition of NAMPT worsens hepatic TG accumulation via SIRT1/AMPKα in an HFD-induced hepatic steatosis model 37. In addition, NAD+ deficiency induces hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis and apoptosis in HFD-fed mice, therefore contributing to the progression to NASH 38. Combined, this provides evidence that IRW45 may prevent HFD-induced hepatic steatosis by improving the function of the NAMPT/SIRT1/AMPKα pathway.
SIRT1 also interacts with AMPKα and induces PGC1α activation, which is a key factor in mitochondrial biogenesis 39. Mitochondrial dysfunction is implicated in NAFLD development and progression 40. Moreover, HFD decreases mitochondrial complexes (oxphos) and therefore, reduces capacity for fatty acid oxidation and increases lipid accumulation, processes involved in the progression of NAFLD 41,42. In addition, Ppargc1a overexpression in vitro and in vivo increases fatty acid oxidation, decreases hepatic TG accumulation and circulating TG concentration 43. Our observation of decreased Mttp gene expression, together with a trend for increased hepatic Ppargc1a mRNA and increased content of mitochondrial complexes in the IRW45 compared to HFD, is consistent with the literature. This indicates increased mitochondrial content in the IRW45 group and a higher capacity for fatty acid oxidation leading to reduced hepatic lipid accumulation, as observed.
Mitochondrial dynamics is another factor under debate in relation to NAFLD 44. Mitochondrial fission and fusion are essential mechanisms to prevent mitochondrial dysfunction and a balance between these processes maintains healthy mitochondrial function. The process of mitochondrial fusion is regulated mainly by mitofusin-1 and OPA1 and occurs when mitochondrial function is impaired, acting as a protective mechanism to prevent further damage and maintain mitochondrial homeostasis 45. Increased fusion leads to enlarged mitochondria, a characteristic seen in the liver of individuals with NAFLD 46,47 and liver-specific deletion of OPA1 prevents methionine-choline-deficient diet-induced hepatic damage and mitochondrial enlargement 48. Conversely, others found that HFD decreases mitofusin-1 49. Moreover, mitofusin-2 plays a key role in transferring lipid between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, and a role for decreased mitofusin-2 in NAFLD progression is suggested 50. We found decreased Mfn1 and a trend for decreased Opa1 gene expression in the liver of IRW45-treated animals compared to HFD, and no changes in terms of Mfn2 expression. These results are consistent with a compensatory effect occurring in the HFD group, whereby mitochondrial fusion is used as a mechanism to stem the increased lipid influx into the liver and prevent further HFD-mediated mitochondrial damage. Conversely, IRW45 treatment enhanced mitochondria content and function, as indicated by higher oxphos enzymes and citrate synthase activity, which accommodated the extra lipid influx and relieved the stress imposed by the HFD, feeding back to lower expression of Mfn1 and Opa1. This is also consistent with the increased lipid accumulation in the ROSI group, which could reflect more lipid storage via PPARγ activation as a protective mechanism against fat deposition in skeletal muscle. Fat accumulation without induction of mitochondria activity would not result in mitochondrial damage but would increase hepatic lipid deposition, as observed. Moreover, Vdac1 mRNA was upregulated in the HFD group. VDAC1 regulates many cellular processes including calcium transport, energy metabolism, apoptosis and inflammation (inducing cytokine release) 51. Therefore, enhanced expression of Vdac1 in the HFD group may indicate impaired mitochondrial homeostasis, including impaired mitophagy and inflammatory processes. However, future functional assays must be done to investigate mitochondrial membrane potential, permeability, biogenesis, morphological aspects and stability to fully elucidate the role of IRW in this context.
Interestingly, Cidea gene expression was drastically increased in the IRW45 and ROSI groups compared to HFD. Cell death-inducing DNA fragmentation factor-α-like effectors A (Cidea) is a lipid droplet-associated protein. Its expression is regulated by PGC1α 52 and its hepatic expression is elevated during NAFLD 53. PPARα agonists increase Cidea expression in the liver 54,55 and in WAT 56. Moreover, PPARγ-dependent hepatic steatosis increases Cidea expression independently of PPARα, whereas choline deficiency-induced steatosis (which is independent of PPARγ activation) does not 54. This suggests that both PPARα and PPARγ can directly enhance Cidea transcription and is consistent with the Cidea overexpression in the ROSI group because rosiglitazone is a potent PPARγ agonist. In the liver, Pparg2 gene expression had a strong trend (p = 0.06) to be lower in the IRW group compared to ROSI group, and our histological analysis is consistent with IRW45 not activating hepatic PPARγ. However, Cidea expression was more than 15-fold higher in the IRW45 group as well. Because PPARα upregulates Cidea transcription, it is possible that IRW45 is enhancing fatty acid oxidation via PPARα activation. This would explain, in part, the differences between IRW45 and ROSI groups. However, Ppara expression did not change among the groups and PPAR transcriptional activation was not investigated in this study. Although Cidea and Cidec/FSP27 are induced during liver steatosis, it was recently reported that Cidea expression is reduced during the progression from hepatic steatosis to NASH 53. Thus, it raises the possibility of HFD animals being in a more advanced stage of progression to NASH compared to IRW45 and ROSI.
We cannot ignore the effect of IRW45 in decreasing BW gain, which may indirectly improve NAFLD. As mentioned before, lifestyle changes improve NAFLD mainly through decreased BW 7. In this study, IRW45 decreased BW and fat mass (both by approximately 9%) of HFD-induced obese, glucose intolerant mice independently of changes in food intake, consistent with previous results using IRW45 20. Moreover, we consistently observed improvements in OGTT and fasting blood glucose concentration (20 and this study), demonstrating that IRW45-supplemented animals exhibit a healthier metabolic phenotype compared to HFD animals. In contrast, although rosiglitazone improved OGTT and fasting glucose, it promoted no changes in BW in this study, which is partially consistent with the well-known side-effect of thiazolidinedione to induce weight gain in humans 57–59, and consistent with the controversial effect of rosiglitazone on BW in studies using rodent models 26,60,61.
Our findings are, in part, consistent with a recent study published by Liu et al. 62. In their study, IRW supplementation for 3 weeks decreased blood glucose concentration, improved glucose tolerance and insulin resistance, without changes in plasma TG concentration 62. Moreover, IRW decreased the expression of inflammatory genes in the liver, together with downregulation of Dgat1 and Dgat2 gene expression, supporting the reduced liver TG seen in our study. However, the decrease in liver TG in their study was not statistically significant. Despite no changes in BW, relative eWAT and iWAT mass was reduced by IRW. The authors attributed many of the effects of IRW to changes in the gut microbiota 62. The differences seen between our studies may be due to the supplementation period, 8 weeks versus 3 weeks. Moreover, we used a dosage of approximately 45mg/Kg BW based on weekly food intake and BW, while they used a fixed dosage of 0.03 g/L of water. In addition, the authors did not specify the dosage based on BW and water intake nor provide the diet macronutrient content, making it difficult to compare the trials. Nevertheless, in both trials IRW reduces the metabolic complications of HFD, and together suggest that a longer period of supplementation may be required for IRW to promote significant changes in BW and liver TG accumulation.
This is the first study showing that IRW, a small peptide that improves skeletal muscle insulin signaling, is also protective against HFD-induced NAFLD. Although research is still needed to fully elucidate the complete mechanism of action of IRW in this respect, we present evidence that IRW supplementation improves NAFLD via both a enhancement in insulin signaling in skeletal muscle as previously reported 20, and a possible effect in the liver leading to increased capacity for fatty acid uptake and oxidation by preserving mitochondrial content and function. Together, these mechanisms would reduce the substrates for DNL and increase fatty acid oxidation to ameliorate HFD-induced NAFLD. It is worth mentioning that the effects observed after IRW supplementation are, in part, similar to the effects observed with thyroid receptor β-agonists, which have been used in clinical trials to treat NAFLD and promote increased hepatic fatty acid uptake and oxidation, enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis and energy expenditure, and modulation of cholesterol and bile acid metabolism, as reviewed 63. In addition, a recent study using another tripeptide named DT-109 (Gly-Gly-Leu) shows that daily gavage of DT-109 for 12 weeks (mice) and 5 months (nonhuman primates) improves NAFLD by inducing fatty acid oxidation, increasing antioxidant capacity through glutathione biosynthesis and modulating bile acid metabolism 64. The most effective dosage of DT-109 was 450 mg/Kg/day in mice 64, which is 10-fold higher than the IRW dosage used in our study.
Our study has some limitations, for example the transcriptional activation of PPARs was not investigated and we did not directly measure fatty acid flux or oxidation. In addition, our dietary model, although efficient in promoting hepatic steatosis, is not an established model of NASH and the interpretation of the results should be taken with care if translated in the context of NASH.
In conclusion, while both IRW45 and rosiglitazone improved glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in previous studies 20,24, our data indicate that IRW45 uniquely acts in the liver to protect against NAFLD by preserving mitochondrial content. This in turn enhances mitochondria oxidative capacity potentially leading to increased fatty acid oxidation, while decreasing lipogenesis, all of which prevent HFD-induced NAFLD (Fig. 8). On the other hand, the evidence for rosiglitazone is consistent with activation of hepatic PPARγ, which induces lipogenic pathways and lipid accumulation as a mechanism to protect against lipid-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and improve systemic insulin sensitivity. Therefore, while both IRW45 and ROSI improve whole body insulin sensitivity, IRW45 has a protective effect against hepatic steatosis while rosiglitazone worsens the HFD-induced lipid accumulation in the liver. The proposed mechanisms of the direct action of IRW in the liver to promote the observed effects are shown in Fig. 8.