Interoceptive training impacts the neural circuit of the anterior insula cortex.

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3241682/v1

Download PDF

Article

Interoceptive training impacts the neural circuit of the anterior insula cortex.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3241682/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 23 May, 2024

Read the published version in Translational Psychiatry →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Interoception is the perception of afferent information that arises from anywhere and everywhere within the body. Recently, interoceptive accuracy could be enhanced by cognitive training. Given that the anterior insula cortex (AIC) is a key node of interoception, we hypothesized that resting functional connectivity (RSFC) from AIC was involved in an effect of interoceptive training. To address this issue, we conducted a longitudinal intervention study using interoceptive training and obtained RSFC using fMRI before and after the intervention. A heartbeat perception task evaluated interoceptive accuracy. Twenty-two healthy volunteers (15 females, age 19.9 ± 2.0 years) participated. After the intervention, interoceptive accuracy was enhanced, and anxiety levels and somatic symptoms were reduced. Also, RSFC from AIC to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), superior marginal gyrus (SMG), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and brain stem, including nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) were enhanced, and those from AIC to the visual cortex (VC) were decreased according to enhanced interoceptive accuracy. The neural circuit of AIC, ACC, and NTS is involved in the bottom-up process of interoception. The neural circuit of AIC, DLPFC, and SMG is involved in the top-down process of interoception, which was thought to represent the cognitive control of emotion. The findings provided a better understanding of neural underpinnings of the effect of interoceptive training on somatic symptoms and anxiety levels by enhancing both bottom-up and top-down processes of interoception, which has a potential contribution to the structure of psychotherapies based on the neural mechanism of psychosomatics. Trial registration number: UMIN000037548.

https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042812

Biological sciences/Neuroscience

Biological sciences/Psychology/Human behaviour

interoception

resting state functional connectivity

the anterior insula cortex

biofeedback

anterior cingulate cortex

nucleus tractus solitarius

Interoception is the perception of afferent information that arises from any point within the body ^{1, 2}. Interoception refers to the sensation of physiological states inside the body, such as breathing, heartbeat, and movement of the intestinal tract, and is considered a necessary function for maintaining homeostasis ^{1, 2}. Interoceptive signals are concentrated in the insular cortex of the brain, and through projection to the amygdala, it is believed to play a central role in various emotional experiences ³.

Interoceptive dysfunction has been observed in various stress-related diseases ⁴. Abnormalities in interoception are known to be correlated with anxiety tendencies and are also assumed to be associated with the physical symptoms of stress-related diseases. Past studies suggested patients with panic disorder was hypersensitive to body signal ^5–7, as well as irritable bowel syndrome ⁸. On the other hand, eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia nervosa showed opposite types of sensitivity to the cue of hunger ^{9, 10}. Also, patients with somatic symptom disorders impaired their interoception ¹¹. Therefore, both hypo- and hyper-sensitivity of interoception seemed problematic.

The anterior insula cortex (AIC) is one of the most important nodes of interoception involved in the salience network (SN)^{12, 13}. Neuroimaging findings suggest that the AIC is an important structure for encoding and representing interoceptive information ^{2, 3, 14–16}. Neural activation in the AIC while paying attention to their interoceptive signal was well established ^{17, 18}. Given that the interoceptive nervous system consists of the AIC, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) was proposed ^{2, 19}.

Recently, interoceptive accuracy was able to be enhanced by a cognitive training task ^20–22 using biofeedback technique which was modified from heartbeat discrimination task ^23–25. Firstly, Garfinkel et al. developed a cognitive training task to enhance interoceptive accuracy by modifying the heartbeat discrimination task ²⁰, which was used in the abovementioned studies ^{21, 22} as well as the current study. The effects of interoceptive training were demonstrated as a reduction of anxiety levels in both healthy and autistic individuals ^{21, 22}. This training effect in healthy participants led to somatic symptoms and reduced rational decision-making ²¹. These training effects were replicable and trustworthy, but their neural underpinnings remained unclear. Given that the AIC is the key node of interoception, we hypothesized that interoceptive training modifies brain circuits with the AIC. To address this issue, we measured resting-state brain activity before and after interoceptive training to examine the effects of interoceptive training and changes in brain circuits with the AIC. We expected that brain circuits of interoception, including the AIC and the SN, would be enhanced as a training effect.

In psychosomatic clinical practice, psychotherapy directly addresses the interoception for stress-related disorders. Interoception has been attracting attention as a therapeutic target in psychotherapy. Yoga and mindfulness in psychosomatic medicine aim to control attention to and evaluation of the interoception ²⁶. Treatments of panic disorder, an anxiety disorder with physical symptoms, and irritable bowel syndrome, a typical psychosomatic disorder, are also conducted to transform the interoception ^{27, 28}. So, interoception is a promising biomarker as a target for treating somatic symptoms in stress-related disorders. Developing the method to modify interoception and unveil its mechanism is beneficial for psychosomatic medicine.

Participants

Twenty-two healthy volunteers (15 females, age 19.9 ± 2.0 years) participated, including graduate and undergraduate students. Fourteen of them were also included in our previous investigation about the effects of interoceptive training on decision-making ²¹. All participants have no history of psychiatric disorders. When conducting regression analysis, the strategy is that a sample size 10 times larger than the number of variables being treated is sufficient ²⁹. In this case, since we have only one IA score as a dependent variable, the idea is that 10 or more cases should be sufficient. Given this, we suppose that the sample size is sufficient for our study.

Written informed consent was obtained from each subject. The experiment protocol was approved by the ethical committee at the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (A2018-013). This protocol has been registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp), No. UMIN000037548.

Procedure

The interoceptive training programs were similar to our previous investigation ²¹, developed in-house using matlab2012a. The interoceptive training program installed on a personal computer was provided to each participant. Participants were asked to undergo at least four time training in one week because four time training enhanced interoceptive accuracy in the past study ^{20, 22}. Training on each day lasted about 40 min, but the total time depended on the self-pacing intervals between trials. All participants underwent psychological and behavioral assessments before (Pre) and after (Post) one-week period.

Interoceptive training task

The interoceptive training task was also similar to our previous investigation ²¹, which was developed by modifying a heartbeat discrimination task ^23–25. In this task, subjects were presented with a series of tones generated either corresponding to their heartbeat (synchronous condition) or a delay (asynchronous condition). Each trial consisted of 10 tones presented at 440 Hz with 100 ms duration, triggered by the participant's heartbeat, which was monitored by a pulse meter attached to an index finger. Under the synchronous condition, tones were generated at the beginning of the rising edge of the pressure wave. Under the asynchronous condition, a delay of 300 ms was inserted. Following Garfinkel et al.'s study ^{20, 30}, we added immediate correct or incorrect feedback for participants at the end of each trial to be able to update their heartbeat perception. The task consisted of 80 trials in a one-day session.

Psychological assessments

Interoceptive accuracy

Interoceptive accuracy was estimated using the heartbeat perception task ³¹. Subjects were asked to count their heartbeat three times in certain periods without taking a pulse, while their actual heartbeat was recorded by a pulse meter. Using both heartbeat data, we can calculate Interoceptive accuracy (IA) scores in the following formula.

IA score =1/3 ∑ཛ1-(|Recorded count-Counted count|/ Recorded count)ཝ.

State-Trait Anxiety

Anxiety symptom was evaluated by using State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ^{32, 33}. This self-reported questionnaire consists of 20 items to measure anxiety state and traits using normal and reversed four-point Linkert scales. Greater scores indicate greater anxiety.

Social anxiety

The anxiety traits of the participants were assessed in the following questionnaires: the Social Anxiety Disorder Scale (SADS) ³⁴. SADS is a Japanese questionnaire that assesses social anxiety traits on four subscales: social fear, avoidance, somatic symptoms and daily life interference.

Neuroticism

To assess the neuroticism of the subjects, all subjects were asked to complete a 60-item Japanese version (5-point scale) of the NEO-FFI ^{35 36}. The neuroticism traits were previously described as follows³⁷: neuroticism, the tendency to experience negative emotions and psychological distress in response to stressors.

Somatic symptoms

A modified somatic perception questionnaire (MSPQ) ³⁸ assessed somatic symptoms in daily life. This questionnaire consists of 22 items to evaluate how subjects feel during the past week about somatic symptoms, including heart rate increase, pulse in the neck, butterflies in the stomach, pain or ache in the stomach, difficulty in swallowing, mouth becoming dry, and so on. Subjects were asked to check four-point Linkert scales. Greater scores indicate greater sensitivity to somatic perception.

MRI data acquisition

MRI images were acquired using a 3-T MR scanner with a 32-channel phased array head coil (MAGNETOM Verio Dot, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) and structural MRI data were obtained from each participant using the following MRI acquisition protocol. rsfMRI data were acquired with gradient-echo echo planar imaging (GE-EPI) for 10 min, during which participants were asked to clear their minds and to focus on a central fixation cross. We administered the Stanford sleepiness scale ³⁹ to guarantee the wakefulness of participants during scanning. Acquisition parameters of GE-EPI were repetition time (TR) = 2500 ms, echo time (TE) = 30 ms, flip angle (FA) = 80°, voxel size = 3.3 × 3.3 × 3.2 mm³ (with a 0.8-mm gap), 40 axial slices, and 240 volumes. Structural MRI was acquired using a three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence: TR = 1900 ms, TE = 2.52 ms, inversion time (TI) = 900 ms, FA = 90°, 192 sagittal slices, and voxel size = 0.98 × 0.98 × 1 mm³.

Data analyses

Data from one participant who did not perform intervention tasks because of a personal reason was omitted. Behavioral data from another participant were not available because of an unexpected technical error in the tablet PC. Post-intervention MRI data from 2 participants were not obtained because of an unexpected MRI machine failure. Also, scores of interoceptive accuracy, an independent value for the MRI analyses in the present study, from one participant were omitted because of an outlier that was more or less than two standard deviations. Thus, the analysis included longitudinal MRI and psychological data from 17 participants.

Psychological data analyses

Psychological and behavioral data were analyzed using statistical software, IBM SPSS Statistics v.25. To detect significant longitudinal changes from before and after the training, paired t-tests were conducted on indices of interoceptive accuracy and scores of anxiety symptoms and somatic symptoms. Statistical thresholds were set at p = 0.05 one-tailed, based on our hypotheses that indices of interoceptive accuracy and anxiety and somatic symptoms would decrease after training. Statistical thresholds were set at p = 0.05 one-tailed, based on our hypotheses that according to the improvement of interoceptive accuracy.

MRI data analyses

T1w anatomical data were preprocessed using N4 inhomogeneity correction ⁴⁰. rsfMRI data were analyzed using CONN ⁴¹ with SPM12. Preprocessing includes slice-timing correction, realignment, coregistration, segmentation, normalization, and smoothing with an 8 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) isotropic Gaussian kernel, denoising (using white matter, CSF, and realignment parameters), and motion scrubbing. Then, the time-series data were band-pass filtered (0.01-0.1Hz).

Seed to Voxel maps was created as resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) from rsfMRT data. Right (47, 14, 9) and left (-44,13,1) anterior insula were set as seed ROIs. These coordinates of bilateral insula were defined by default in the CONN software. Delta images of the seed-to-voxel maps (Post – Pre) were calculated for each subject. Multiple regression analyses for the delta images using change ratio of IA scores. The statistical threshold was set at p < 0.001 and corrected to p < 0.05 for multiple comparisons using cluster size.

Table 1 shows psychological changes from before to after the interoceptive training. Significant changes in scores of interoceptive accuracy, which is a direct training effect. Negative traits such as trait anxiety scores, social anxiety scores, and neuroticism are improved after the training. Somatic symptoms are also improved after training, similar to our previous findings.

Table 1

Psychological measures before (Pre) and after (Post) training
Psychological measures	Pre (n = 17)	Post (n = 17)
Interoceptive accuracy (IA)	0.63 ± 0.17	0.79 ± 0.14	p < 0.01**
Somatic symptoms(MSPQ)	5.8 ± 4.2	4.4 ± 3.3	p < 0.05*
Trait anxiety(STAI)	28.6 ± 11.1	27.3 ± 10.2	p < 0.05*
State anxiety (STAI)	20.1 ± 8.9	19.1 ± 10.1	p = 0.13
Social anxiety(SAD)	37.8 ± 22.9	33.7 ± 23.0	p < 0.05*
Neuroticism(NEO-FFI)	28.8 ± 10.7	26.4 ± 11.0	p < 0.005***
* p < 0.05, p < 0.01, * p < 0.005, one-tailed paired t-test
Abbreviations: IA; interoceptive accuracy, MSPQ; modified somatic perception questionnaire, STAI; state-trait anxiety inventory, SAD; social anxiety disorder, NEO-FFI; NEO-five factory inventory.

Significant positive correlations were observed between the change ratio of IA and increased resting state functional connectivity from the left AIC to left DLPFC (Fig. 1A) and the Right SMG (Fig. 1B), suggesting resting functional connectivity from the AIC to the cognitive control network (CCN) was enhanced according to the training effects.

Significant positive correlations were observed between the change ratio of IA and increased resting state functional connectivity from the right AIC to left DLPFC (Fig. 2A) and the left dorsal ACC (Fig. 2B), suggesting resting functional connectivity from the AIC to the CCN, as well as the SN, were enhanced according to the training effects.

A significant positive correlation was observed between the change ratio of IA and increased resting state functional connectivity from the right AIC to the brain stem, including NTS (Fig. 3), a key node of the vagal nerve.

A significant negative correlation was observed between the change ratio of IA and increased resting state functional connectivity from the right AIC to a cluster including the visual cortex (VC) (Fig. 4).

After the one-week interoceptive training, 1) interoceptive accuracy was enhanced, and 2) somatic symptoms & anxiety levels were reduced. In line with the effect of interoceptive training, 3) RSFC between AIC and dACC/NTS and DLPFC/SMG were enhanced; instead, 4) RSFC between AIC and VC was reduced. The results suggest that neural circuits from AIC to the SN and the cognitive control network (CCN), which are corresponding to bottom-up and top-down processes of interoception, respectively, were involved in the effect of interoceptive training.

Enhanced interoceptive accuracy after training represented a direct training effect, which was a replication of our previous findings ²¹. Also, how the interoceptive training reduced the somatic symptoms and anxiety levels could be explained by a concept of multiple elements of interoception ⁴². These effects were also a replication of the previous findings ^20–22. Our previous article ²¹ discussed the exact reasons for the abovementioned interpretations. This notion supports the idea that interoceptive sensitivity was helpful as a biomarker for stress-related disorders ⁴³.

The increased “bottom-up” pathway of interoception was represented by an effect of interoceptive training on elevated interoceptive accuracy, involved in the neural bases of effects of psychotherapies like yoga and mindfulness. The enhanced functional connectivity from the AIC to the SN and node of the vagal nerve represented the enhanced bottom-up process of interoception due to the training. The AIC and the dorsal ACC are vital nodes of the SN ^{2, 12, 19}, and NTS is a crucial node of vagal nerve ^{44, 45} which is a gateway of interoceptive inputs from the body. All of them are the main “bottom-up” pathway of interoception ²⁶, enhanced by psychotherapies related to interoceptive training like yoga and mindfulness. After the mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness training, the RSFC from AIC to the SN ⁴⁶ and its activations ⁴⁷ were strengthened rather than control groups. Therefore, interoceptive training is supposed to benefit subjects with hypo-sensitivity of interoception by enhancing the “bottom-up” pathway of interoception.

The enhanced "top-down" pathway of interoception was represented by an effect of interoceptive training on reduced anxiety levels and somatic symptoms, which also potentially contributed to understanding the mechanism of psychotherapies like mindfulness-based cognitive therapies (MBCT). DLPFC/SMG were principal parts of the CCN ⁴⁸, which was also labeled as lateral frontoparietal network ⁴⁹ or central executive network ⁵⁰. Enhanced activities in the CCN were neural representations of the therapeutic effects of psychotherapies ⁵¹. Namely, the neural circuit of AIC and DLPFC is thought to represent the central control process of emotional regulation ⁵² by monitoring and manipulating emotional representations in the working memory ⁵³. On the other hand, the neural circuit of AIC and the parietal cortex contributes to emotional regulation by using attention control ⁵⁴. These cognitive processes include a "top-down" pathway of attention to interoception ^{16, 54, 55}. This pathway was also enhanced by psychotherapies related to interoceptive training. The brain circuit, including AIC and the CCN, was enhanced after the MBCT ⁵⁶. Accordingly, interoceptive training is expected to benefit subjects with hyper-sensitivity to interoception by enhancing the "top-down” pathway of interoception, as well.

The interoceptive training let participants attentional resources from exteroception to interoception. The visual network is involved in paying attention to the outside of the body, corresponding to exteroception. A significant negative correlation was observed between the change ratio of IA and increased RSFC from the right AIC to the VC. A previous study demonstrated that interoceptive attention is associated with reduced coupling between AIC and VC ¹⁶, suggesting interoceptive training trains interoceptive perceptions while at the same time changing the brain circuitry for exteroceptive perceptions. The findings corresponded to the notion that interoceptive and exteroceptive perceptions are shared in an attentional resource ¹⁹. Given that, an imbalance in interoceptive-exteroceptive processing, hyper-sensitivity of interoception, and hypo-sensitivity of exteroception induced many of the symptoms of depression ^{57, 58}, the interoceptive training is also supposed to be effective in depressive individuals by enhancing the “top-down” pathway of interoception.

There are a few limitations to this study. First, our interpretation of training effects was inconclusive because of the study's single-arm design. To establish a training effect, appropriate control groups are needed. Second, although the heartbeat perception task, as well as the heartbeat discrimination task, which was modified to the interoceptive training task, have been well established for assessment of interoceptive accuracy labeled as the “bottom-up” pathway of interoception ^{59 60}, some of the top-down factors, such as knowledge or expectations of one's pulse rate, confounds on the task performance. Consequently, our interoceptive training task enhanced not only the "bottom-up" but also the "top-down" pathway. Third, because our participants were healthy volunteers, further studies are needed involving stress-related disorder patients with hypo- and/or hypersensitivity to interoception to evaluate the beneficial effect of the interoceptive training.

Our results suggested that the interoceptive training enhanced the interoceptive accuracy and improved anxiety and somatic symptoms, represented by the enhanced neural circuits of the AIC to the SN and the CCN, respectively. The findings provided a better understanding of neural underpinnings of the effect of interoceptive training on somatic symptoms and anxiety levels by enhancing both bottom-up and top-down processes of interoception, which has a potential contribution to the structure of psychotherapies based on the neural mechanism of psychosomatics. Interoception is a promising biomarker of somatic symptoms in stress-related disorders. Developing the method to modify interoception and unveil its mechanism is beneficial for psychosomatic medicine.

Author contributions

ASu, YT, and ASe participated in the design of this study. ASu, RK, and ASe conducted the experiment. ASe conducted the statistical analyses. ASe wrote and compiled the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The Authors declare no conflict of interest

Data availability

Data from participants who agreed to the public distribution of data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Sarah Garfinkel for giving us significant advice to set up the interoceptive training task. A Sekiguchi was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) and (C) (18K07459, 19H01047), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area ‘Willdynamics’ (17H06064) from the MEXT, as well as grants from the Japanese MHLW (H29-nanbyo-ippan), the Agency for Medical Research and Development (19dm0307104), and the Takeda Science Foundation. These funding sources had no further role in study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit the paper for publication. ARAYA co ltd programmed the interoceptive training task.

Cameron OG. Interoception: the inside story–a model for psychosomatic processes. Psychosomatic medicine 2001; 63(5): 697–710.
Craig AD. Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current opinion in neurobiology 2003; 13(4): 500–505.
Craig AD. How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature reviews Neuroscience 2009; 10(1): 59–70.
Khalsa SS, Adolphs R, Cameron OG, Critchley HD, Davenport PW, Feinstein JS et al. Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap. Biological psychiatry Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 2018; 3(6): 501–513.
Pohl R, Yeragani VK, Balon R, Rainey JM, Lycaki H, Ortiz A et al. Isoproterenol-induced panic attacks. Biological psychiatry 1988; 24(8): 891–902.
Stein MB, Asmundson GJ. Autonomic function in panic disorder: cardiorespiratory and plasma catecholamine responsivity to multiple challenges of the autonomic nervous system. Biological psychiatry 1994; 36(8): 548–558.
Gorman JM, Kent J, Martinez J, Browne S, Coplan J, Papp LA. Physiological changes during carbon dioxide inhalation in patients with panic disorder, major depression, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: evidence for a central fear mechanism. Archives of general psychiatry 2001; 58(2): 125–131.
Fukudo S. Stress and visceral pain: Focusing on irritable bowel syndrome. Pain 2013; 154: S63-S70.
Khalsa SS, Craske MG, Li W, Vangala S, Strober M, Feusner JD. Altered interoceptive awareness in anorexia nervosa: Effects of meal anticipation, consumption and bodily arousal. The International journal of eating disorders 2015; 48(7): 889–897.
Berner LA, Simmons AN, Wierenga CE, Bischoff-Grethe A, Paulus MP, Bailer UF et al. Altered interoceptive activation before, during, and after aversive breathing load in women remitted from anorexia nervosa. Psychological medicine 2018; 48(1): 142–154.
Dimsdale JE, Creed F, Escobar J, Sharpe M, Wulsin L, Barsky A et al. Somatic Symptom Disorder: An important change in DSM. J Psychosom Res 2013; 75(3): 223–228.
Chong JSX, Ng GJP, Lee SC, Zhou J. Salience network connectivity in the insula is associated with individual differences in interoceptive accuracy. Brain structure & function 2017; 222(4): 1635–1644.
Ueno D, Matsuoka T, Kato Y, Ayani N, Maeda S, Takeda M et al. Individual Differences in Interoceptive Accuracy Are Correlated With Salience Network Connectivity in Older Adults. Front Aging Neurosci 2020; 12: 592002.
Craig AD. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature reviews Neuroscience 2002; 3(8): 655–666.
Quadt L, Critchley HD, Garfinkel SN. The neurobiology of interoception in health and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; 1428(1): 112–128.
Wang X, Wu Q, Egan L, Gu X, Liu P, Gu H et al. Anterior insular cortex plays a critical role in interoceptive attention. Elife 2019; 8.
Critchley HD. The human cortex responds to an interoceptive challenge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004; 101(17): 6333–6334.
Stephani C, Fernandez-Baca Vaca G, Maciunas R, Koubeissi M, Lüders HO. Functional neuroanatomy of the insular lobe. Brain structure & function 2011; 216(2): 137–149.
Harshaw C. Interoceptive dysfunction: toward an integrated framework for understanding somatic and affective disturbance in depression. Psychological bulletin 2015; 141(2): 311–363.
Garfinkel SN, Mclanachan A, Critchley HD. Interoceptive training for anxiety management in autism: Alignning Dimension of Interoceptive Experience, ADIE (c). Psychosomatic medicine 2017; 79(4): A100.
Sugawara A, Terasawa Y, Katsunuma R, Sekiguchi A. Effects of interoceptive training on decision making, anxiety, and somatic symptoms. BioPsychoSocial medicine 2020; 14: 7.
Quadt L, Garfinkel SN, Mulcahy JS, Larsson DE, Silva M, Jones AM et al. Interoceptive training to target anxiety in autistic adults (ADIE): A single-center, superiority randomized controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 39: 101042.
Brener J, Jones JM. Interoceptive discrimination in intact humans: detection of cardiac activity. Physiology & behavior 1974; 13(6): 763–767.
Katkin ES, Reed SD, Deroo C. A Methodological Analysis of 3 Techniques for the Assessment of Individual-Differences in Heartbeat Detection. Psychophysiology 1983; 20(4): 452–452.
Whitehead WE, Drescher VM, Heiman P, Blackwell B. Realtion of heart rate control to heartbeat perception. Biofeedback and self-regulation 1977; 2(4): 317–392.
Gard T, Noggle JJ, Park CL, Vago DR, Wilson A. Potential self-regulatory mechanisms of yoga for psychological health. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 770.
Lee K, Noda Y, Nakano Y, Ogawa S, Kinoshita Y, Funayama T et al. Interoceptive hypersensitivity and interoceptive exposure in patients with panic disorder: specificity and effectiveness. BMC psychiatry 2006; 6: 32.
Craske MG, Wolitzky-Taylor KB, Labus J, Wu S, Frese M, Mayer EA et al. A cognitive-behavioral treatment for irritable bowel syndrome using interoceptive exposure to visceral sensations. Behaviour research and therapy 2011; 49(6–7): 413–421.
Harrel. FE. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer: Switzerland, 2015.
Garfinkel SN, Seth AK, Barrett AB, Suzuki K, Critchley HD. Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological psychology 2015; 104: 65–74.
Schandry R. Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 1981; 18(4): 483–488.
Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R, Vagg P, Jacobs G. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, 1983.
Nakazato K, Mizuguchi T. How to use STAI. Sankyoubou Corp.: Kyoto, 1982.
Kaiya Hisanobu, Kanai Toahihiro, Kumano Hiroaki, Sakano Yuji, Tomifusa. K. Development and Validationof the Tokyo UniversitySocialAnxiety Scale (TSAS). Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine 2004; 44(4): 279–287.
Costa P, McCrae R. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL, 1989.
Yoshiko Shiinonaka, Katsuharu Nakazato, Yasuyuki Gondo, Takayama. M. Construction and factorial validity of the Japanes NEO – PI – R. The Japanese Journal of Personality 1998; 6(2): 138–147.
Rosellini AJ, Brown TA. The NEO Five-Factor Inventory: latent structure and relationships with dimensions of anxiety and depressive disorders in a large clinical sample. Assessment 2011; 18(1): 27–38.
Main CJ. The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ). Journal of psychosomatic research 1983; 27(6): 503–514.
Hoddes E, Zarcone V, Smythe H, Phillips R, Dement WC. Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach. Psychophysiology 1973; 10(4): 431–436.
Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 29(6): 1310–1320.
Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect 2012; 2(3): 125–141.
Garfinkel SN, Critchley HD. Interoception, emotion and brain: new insights link internal physiology to social behaviour. Commentary on:: "Anterior insular cortex mediates bodily sensibility and social anxiety" by Terasawa et al. (2012). Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 2013; 8(3): 231–234.
Domschke K, Stevens S, Pfleiderer B, Gerlach AL. Interoceptive sensitivity in anxiety and anxiety disorders: an overview and integration of neurobiological findings. Clinical psychology review 2010; 30(1): 1–11.
Prescott SL, Liberles SD. Internal senses of the vagus nerve. Neuron 2022; 110(4): 579–599.
Ran C, Boettcher JC, Kaye JA, Gallori CE, Liberles SD. A brainstem map for visceral sensations. Nature 2022; 609(7926): 320–326.
Gan Q, Ding N, Bi G, Liu R, Zhao X, Zhong J et al. Enhanced Resting-State Functional Connectivity With Decreased Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations of the Salience Network in Mindfulness Novices. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16: 838123.
Datko M, Lutz J, Gawande R, Comeau A, To MN, Desel T et al. Increased insula response to interoceptive attention following mindfulness training is associated with increased body trusting among patients with depression. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2022; 327: 111559.
Cole MW, Schneider W. The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions. NeuroImage 2007; 37(1): 343–360.
Uddin LQ, Yeo BTT, Spreng RN. Towards a Universal Taxonomy of Macro-scale Functional Human Brain Networks. Brain Topogr 2019; 32(6): 926–942.
Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci 2011; 15(10): 483–506.
Niendam TA, Laird AR, Ray KL, Dean YM, Glahn DC, Carter CS. Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2012; 12(2): 241–268.
Li W, Yang P, Ngetich RK, Zhang J, Jin Z, Li L. Differential involvement of frontoparietal network and insula cortex in emotion regulation. Neuropsychologia 2021; 161: 107991.
Kohn N, Eickhoff SB, Scheller M, Laird AR, Fox PT, Habel U. Neural network of cognitive emotion regulation–an ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis. NeuroImage 2014; 87: 345–355.
Wang M, Yu B, Luo C, Fogelson N, Zhang J, Jin Z et al. Evaluating the causal contribution of fronto-parietal cortices to the control of the bottom-up and top-down visual attention using fMRI-guided TMS. Cortex 2020; 126: 200–212.
Wu Q, Chang CF, Xi S, Huang IW, Liu Z, Juan CH et al. A critical role of temporoparietal junction in the integration of top-down and bottom-up attentional control. Human brain mapping 2015; 36(11): 4317–4333.
Segal ZV, Walsh KM. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for residual depressive symptoms and relapse prophylaxis. Current opinion in psychiatry 2016; 29(1): 7–12.
Wiebking C, Bauer A, de Greck M, Duncan NW, Tempelmann C, Northoff G. Abnormal body perception and neural activity in the insula in depression: an fMRI study of the depressed "material me". World J Biol Psychiatry 2010; 11(3): 538–549.
Northoff G, Wiebking C, Feinberg T, Panksepp J. The 'resting-state hypothesis' of major depressive disorder-a translational subcortical-cortical framework for a system disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011; 35(9): 1929–1945.
Corneille O, Desmedt O, Zamariola G, Luminet O, Maurage P. A heartfelt response to Zimprich et al. (2020), and Ainley et al. (2020)'s commentaries: Acknowledging issues with the HCT would benefit interoception research. Biological psychology 2020; 152: 107869.
Ring C, Brener J. Heartbeat counting is unrelated to heartbeat detection: A comparison of methods to quantify interoception. Psychophysiology 2018; 55(9): e13084.

The authors have declared there is NO conflict of interest to disclose

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 23 May, 2024

Read the published version in Translational Psychiatry →

Editorial decision: revise
04 Dec, 2023
Review #1 received at journal
16 Oct, 2023
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
03 Oct, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
25 Sep, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
07 Aug, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
07 Aug, 2023
First submitted to journal
07 Aug, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

Interoceptive training impacts the neural circuit of the anterior insula cortex.

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

Author contributions

Competing interests

Data availability

Acknowledgments

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1