Clinical characteristics of all the individuals
Firstly, we collected 109 individuals, including 51 HAPE patients and 58 non-HAPE people. Among these cases, 2 HAPE cases were removed because of the poor-quality DNA levels. Then, a total of 49 HAPE patients and 58 non-HAPE individuals were further analyzed. They were male Han Chinese without the history of smoking, drinking and other diseases associated with mtDNA variants. They ascended into the same altitude and suffered similar environments. The detailed clinical information is listed in Table 1 and Additional file 1.
As shown in Table 1, the age distribution was consistent between the HAPE patients and non-HAPE individuals. Except for red blood cell (RBC), all the routine blood indexes such as systolic arterial blood pressure (SBP), white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in HAPE cases were significantly different from non-HAPE (p < 0.05), which was probably related to the adaption of high environments [1, 29, 30].
Data summary of sequencing and quality control
The mtDNA of 107 human blood samples was isolated and sequenced using Illumina platform to study the base changes in HAPE and non-HAPE groups. Nearly 92% of total data generated a Q > 30 Phred score, and the mean sequence depth of 8400x was observed after removing the duplications, which accounted for 24.6% on average. For all the samples, the whole mitochondrial genome region was covered. All the variants of HAPE and non-HAPE patients are listed in Additional file 2 and file 3. After processing these variants, the detailed and summarized results are shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.
Compared to non-HAPE group, the mean numbers of variants in HAPE patients were higher; however, the difference between non-HAPE and HAPE groups was not significant (P = 0.799) (Fig. 1a). In HAPE group, a total of 1945 mutations were distributed in non-coding region (602, 30.95%), tRNA region (20, 1.03%), rRNA region (255, 13.11%), complex I (527, 27.10%), complex III (237, 12.19%), complex IV (173, 8.89%), and complex V (131, 6.74%) (Fig. 1b). On the contrary, there were 2284 mutations in non-HAPE individuals, which were located in non-coding region (767, 33.58%), tRNA region (18, 0.79%), rRNA region (299, 13.09%), complex I (581, 25.44%), complex III (260, 11.38%), complex IV (214, 9.37%), and complex V (145, 6.35%) (Fig. 1b). Unfortunately, the two randomly corresponding regions did not show significant differences (Additional file 4). Then, we analyzed the numbers of variants of coding and non-coding regions in HAPE and non-HAPE groups. The results indicated that the differences between HAPE and non-HAPE groups were not significant (Fig. 1c). However, the average variants between coding region and non-coding region in HAPE patients were significantly different, the similar findings were found in non-HAPE group (Fig. 1c), which may be related to the length of coding regions and non-coding regions in the sequence.
To further explore the variants’ distributions characteristics of mitochondrial genome in HAPE and non-HAPE patients, we used the mutation densities (mutation number in a region/region bp length) to describe the variants distributions in coding regions and non-coding regions. The results indicated that the mutation densities in coding regions or non-coding regions were consistent between HAPE and non-HAPE groups (Fig. 2a). However, within the same group (HAPE or non-HAPE group), the mutation densities in the non-coding regions were higher than those in the coding regions (Fig. 2a). This suggested the sequences of non-coding regions were inclined to mutations. In all the variants, the top three molecular consequences in both HAPE group and non-HAPE group were 44.06% upstream gene, 31.36% synonymous and 23.55% missense variants (Fig. 2b), and there was no significant difference between both groups (Additional file 5). Interestingly, a few of positions in the mitochondrial genome had very high mutation rates (variants number/samples number), such as 73th position (1.0), 2706th position (1.0), 8860th position (1.0) in HAPE patients (Fig. 2c and Additional file 6). On the contrary, these positions in non-HAPE group also showed the similar results and the difference between HAPE and non-HAPE groups was not significant (Fig. 2c and Additional file 6). The result suggested that the mitochondrial genome had some high frequency mutation sites that were not associated with HAPE.
Association of mtDNA variants with HAPE susceptibility
In this study, a total of 1945 mutations and 2284 mutations were observed in HAPE and non-HAPE groups, respectively, which were located in 483 variants’ sites and 530 variants’ sites (combined with 742 variants’ sites) , respectively (Additional file 6). There were 14 different and typical mutations in Table 2, including 5 variants sites (A263G, T310N, (310-311) insC, T16172C and T16519C) with significant differences between both groups, 6 variants sites (A8459G, C8684T, C14067T, T14470C and A16164G) only found in HAPE group, and 3 variants sites (C194T, C6960T and G16390A) only found in non-HAPE group (Table 2). After Bonferroni correction, only 4 mutations (T310N, (310-311) insC, T16172C and T16519C) were statistically significant between HAPE and non-HAPE groups (P < 0.05), and they were located in the D-loop of mtDNA non-coding regions. Since 310th site was short repeats sequences C bases, this site was removed in the further analysis. Our results showed that the frequencies of T16172C in HAPE group (20.41%) were higher than those in the non-HAPE group (5.17%, p-adjust = 0.035, OR=4.701, and 95%CI = 1.214 – 18.204). In contrast, the frequencies of T16519C in HAPE individuals (34.69%) were significantly lower than those in non-HAPE individuals (67.24%, p-adjust = 0.002, OR=0.259, and 95%CI = 0.116 – 0.578) (Table 2). The two mutations were previously reported in other studies, but not in high-altitude diseases [31-33].
Haplogroup comparison between HAPE and non-HAPE patients
A total of 107 complete mtDNA sequences were analyzed using MitoTool software according to the PhyloTree Build 17 criteria (GenBank J01415.2) [26-28]. We found that all the mtDNA sequences were mapped to the single initial haplogroup L3, which originated from Africa and composed of two macrohaplogroups, M and N (Table 3). All the 107 subjects belonged to 16 haplogroups. No differences were observed in the haplogroups between the HAPE and non-HAPE groups (P > 0.05, Table 3). These haplogroups were further divided into next level haplogroups, which were not statistically significant (P > 0.05, Additional file 7).
Validation of two mutations (T16172C and T16519C)
In order to validate the association between two mutations (T16172C and T16519C) and HAPE susceptibility, we collected samples from 259 people, including 132 HAPE patients and 127 non-HAPE individuals according to the above screening criteria (Additional file 1). The basic clinical information is listed in Additional file 8. The PCR results of these variants are shown in Table 4. The frequencies of T16172C in HAPE patients (44, 33.33%) were higher than those in non-HAPE individuals (27, 21.26%, p-adjust = 0.042, OR=1.852, and 95%CI = 1.060 – 3.236). The frequencies of the mutation T16519C in HAPE group (52, 39.39%) were lower than the non-HAPE group (67, 52.76%, p-adjust = 0.042, OR=0.582, and 95%CI = 0.355–0.953). The above results indicated that the T16172C mutation increased the HAPE susceptibility and the T16519C mutant decreased the impact from HAPE.