Ethnobotanical Data
About 213 medicinal plant species that are classified in 184 genera and 80 families were known to be used by Yem people (Appendix 1) for treating human ailments. Among ailments freelisted, abdominal pain was the highest cited, 130 (7.59%) followed by acute febrile illness 129 (7.53%) and feet swelling disease (‘dani furutu’/’awachifebe?u’) 69 (4.03%) were the highest cited ones (Table 2). Herbaceous life forms were the most cited i.e. 97 (45%) followed by shrubs 54 (25%) and trees 33 (15%). About 56 (70%) of the families treated a single ailment health condition while 24 (30%) of them treat more than a single ailment. Families that contain species that are used to treat multiple of human ailments include Asteraceae, Alliaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Rutaceae and Solanaceae. Asteraceae was the medicinal species richest family with 26 taxa followed by Lamiaceae 18, Fabaceae 19 and Euphorbiaceae 8. About 177 (83%) of medicinal species are known to be harvested from wild and 28 (15%) of them are cultivated. The medicinal species are known to be distributed in 13 different habitats. Forest constituted highest of 68 (32%) species followed by home garden 30 (14%) and living fence and fallow 24 (11%) (Fig. 2).
Human ailments freelisted
There were about 117 ailments freelisted during interview with informants. The top 10 ailments with informant consensus are given in Table 2. Abdominal pain was the highest cited ailment with 130 (7.59%) followed by acute febrile illness 129 (7.53%) and anthrax 69 (4.03%)
Table 2. Top ten most cited human ailments in Yem
Ailment
|
Yem name
|
no. of citations
|
%
|
Abdominal pain
|
konu sato
|
130
|
7.59
|
Acute Febrile illness
|
nekelebe?u
|
129
|
7.53
|
Anthrax
|
kemar
|
69
|
4.03
|
Earth breath disease
|
awachife be?u
|
65
|
3.79
|
Hepatitis
|
amshisho
|
58
|
3.39
|
Gonorrhea
|
ameba
|
53
|
3.09
|
Amoebiasis
|
ameba
|
45
|
2.63
|
Diarrhea
|
kenicha
|
44
|
2.57
|
Fresh wound
|
adis maza
|
44
|
2.57
|
Malaria
|
koksa
|
41
|
2.39
|
Parts, methods of preparation, routes and mode of application of medicinal plants
The results showed that leaf was the highest cited part for 197 (45%) preparations followed by root 83 (19%). About 10 different methods of preparation of plant remedies were reported among which maceration was the most used method with 201 (46%) remedies followed by
decoction 85 (19%) and infusion 64 (15%). About 296 (68%) remedies were taken via oral route followed by 71 (16%) dermal and 20 (5%) nasal. Drink was the most cited mode of application for the highest of 310 (71%) remedies followed by paint 26 (6%), inhale 25 (6%) and chew & swallow 20 (5%).
Informant Consensus Factor (ICF)
The results of ICF calculated depicted largest ICF value of 0.82 (Table 4) for Gastrointestinal & Visceral organs ailments category (GIV) (being treated with 91 species, 506 use reports). The GIV was also highest with regard to number of taxa used treat and number of uses reported. This category contained 15 ailments such as abdominal pain (treated by 14 species), amoebiasis (by 13 species), child diarrhea & hepatitis (treated by 10 species each), nephritis (by 8 species), diarrhea (by 7 species), hemorrhoids (by 5 species), taeniasis (by 4 species), ascariasis (by 3 species), dysentery, dyspepsia, constipation, poor appetite, vomiting and sudden abdominal pain each treated by a single medicinal species.
Table 4. ICF values of Mps for human uses
(UR = no. of use reports, spp.= # of species used for treating ailments, BVI = Blood Vascular & Infectious, DR = Dermatological ailments, GIV = Gastrointestinal & Visceral organs ailments, MISc = Miscellaneous ailments, MSK= Musculoskeletal ailments, RS = Respiratory System ailments, PS = Psychospiritual & cultural ailments, RUG = Reproductive & Urogenital ailments, SH = Sensorial ailments & Headache)
Category
|
UR
|
Spp.
|
ICF
|
BVI
|
211
|
70
|
0.67
|
DR
|
207
|
59
|
0.72
|
GIV
|
506
|
91
|
0.82
|
MISc
|
277
|
54
|
0.81
|
MSK
|
114
|
31
|
0.73
|
PS
|
67
|
18
|
0.74
|
RUG
|
97
|
32
|
0.68
|
RS
|
143
|
30
|
0.80
|
SH
|
106
|
28
|
0.74
|
Table 5. Species with large FL(%) values
Species
|
ailment
|
Ip
|
Iu
|
FL(%)
|
Haplocarpha rueppellii
|
abdominal pain
|
40
|
40
|
100
|
Carduus schimperi
|
acute febrile illness
|
25
|
25
|
100
|
Inula confortiflora
|
sudden ailment
|
17
|
17
|
100
|
Maesa lanceolata
|
abdominal worms
|
13
|
16
|
80
|
Embelia schimperi
|
abdominal worms
|
12
|
16
|
75
|
Rumex abyssinicus
|
hepatitis
|
24
|
32
|
75
|
Verbena officinalis
|
child diarrhea
|
12
|
18
|
65
|
Brucea antidysentrica
|
sudden abdominal pain
|
9
|
14
|
64
|
Hagenia abyssinica
|
taeniasis
|
17
|
28
|
60
|
Fidelity level, FL(%) of selected medicinal species
Species that scored large FL values include Haplocarpha rueppellii (for abdominal pain) 100%, Carduus schimperi (for acute febrile illness) and Inula confortiflora (for sudden ailment) each 100%, Maesa lanceolata (for abdominal worms) 80%, Rumex abyssinicus (for hepatitis) 75%, Verbena officinalis (for child diarrhea) 65%, Brucea antidysenterica (for abdominal pain & diarrhea) 65% and Hagenia abyssinica (for taeniasis) 60% (Table 5).
Indigenous medicinal plant knowledge (mpk) and socio-economic variables
The proportion of informants based on socio-economic (predictor variables)are given in (Table 7). Accordingly, based on gender, about 38 (55%) of the informants were males and 31 (45%) females; agewise 38 (55%) were old agers, 19 (28%) middle agers and 12 (17%) young agers; by religion 53 (77%) of them were Christians and 16 (23%) Muslims; by level of education 36 (52%) were uneducated, 28 (41%) elementary and 5 (7%) high school and above, and 47 (68%) general informants and 22 (32%) key informants.
Table 7. Proportion of informants by socioeconomic variables
Variable
|
Category
|
no.
|
%
|
Gender
|
male
|
38
|
55
|
|
female
|
31
|
45
|
Age
|
young (18-35)
|
12
|
17
|
|
middle (36-50)
|
19
|
28
|
|
old (>50)
|
38
|
55
|
Religion
|
Orthodox
|
51
|
74
|
|
Muslim
|
16
|
23
|
Education
|
noneducated
|
36
|
52
|
|
elementary (1-8)
|
28
|
41
|
|
highschool & above
|
5
|
7
|
Informant proficiency
|
general
|
47
|
68
|
|
key
|
22
|
32
|
Analysis of multiple linear regression showed that 31.10% of the variance was explained by the model (Table 8) with modest correlation of 0.56 between the outcome and predictor variables. The model was a significant predictor of medicinal plant knowledge, F(5,63) =5.69, p < 0.001(Table 9). Only, gender (B = -6.13, p = 0.025) and informant proficiency (B = 10.08, p < 0.001) significantly contributed to the model while age (B = -0.28, p = 0.88), religion (B = -4.50, p = 0.09) and education (B = -0.36, p = 0.87) did not (Table 10). Based on the model, there was a modest positive correlation between informant proficiency r = .46 (p < 0.001), and a modest negative correlation between gender and mpk, r = -.36 (p=0.001).
Table 8. Model Summary of regression
|
Model
|
R
|
R Square
|
Adjusted R Square
|
Std. Error of the Estimate
|
1
|
.558a
|
.311
|
.257
|
10.259
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), informant, religion, education, gender, age
|
Table 9. ANOVA of Regression model
ANOVAa
|
Model
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
1
|
Regression
|
2997.071
|
5
|
599.414
|
5.696
|
.000b
|
Residual
|
6630.176
|
63
|
105.241
|
|
|
Total
|
9627.246
|
68
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: mpk
|
b. Predictors: (Constant), informant, religion, education, gender, age
|
Table 10. Regression model coefficients
|
Model
|
Unstandardized Coefficients
|
Standardized Coefficients
|
t
|
Sig.
|
B
|
Std. Error
|
Beta
|
1
|
(Constant)
|
21.240
|
10.58
|
|
2.006
|
.049
|
gender
|
-6.131
|
2.670
|
-.258
|
-2.296
|
.025
|
age
|
-.279
|
1.790
|
-.018
|
-.156
|
.877
|
religion
|
-4.500
|
2.648
|
-.179
|
-1.699
|
.094
|
education
|
-.363
|
2.233
|
-.019
|
-.163
|
.871
|
Informant proficiency
|
10.078
|
2.764
|
.398
|
3.646
|
.001
|
a. Dependent Variable: mpk
|
The regression model was:
Medicinal plant knowledge (mpk) = 21.24 - 6.13*gender - 0.28*age - 4.50*religion - 0.36*education + 10.07*informant proficiency.
Diversity, abundance and richness of medicinal plants in the plant communities studied
Three plant communities identified in Yem are highlighted in Table 11. The synoptic values of dominant species are given in Appendix 3. The proportion of Mps that were enlisted during interview and encountered in the study quadrats were highest 113 (47%) species. The analysis diversity of Mps in study quadrats showed diversity and evenness of 2.11 and 0.45, respectively (Table 11).
Table 11. Shannon’s diversity, evenness and quantitative information of community clusters (H’ = Shannon’s Diversity index, J’ = Shannon’s evenness index, A = community no., B = quadrat no., C = altitude range, D = overall species richness)
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
H'
|
J'
|
1
|
1,2,11 - 17
|
2485-2559
|
161
|
4.56
|
0.89
|
2
|
3-10
|
2505-2554
|
151
|
4.56
|
0.91
|
3
|
18 - 30
|
1677-1881
|
184
|
4.89
|
0.94
|
Community 1. Juniperus procera-Syzygiumguineense subsp. guineense-Podocarpus falcatus type
This community consisted of 9 quadrats and its elevation range was between 2485 - 2559 m. Its overall species richness, Shannon’s diversity (H’) and evenness (J) were 161, 4.56 and 0.89, respectively (Table 11). This community is rich with 37 mps. The medicinal species with the highest synoptic values under this community in descending order are Juniperus procera (6.22), Syzygium guineense subsp. guineense (4.00), Podocarpus falcatus (3.44), Osyris quadripartita (2.44), Olinia rochetiana (2.22), Myrsine africana (2.11) and Ilex mitis (2.00).
Community 2. Ficus sur-Hagenia abyssinicaVernonia myriantha type
This community had 8 quadrats and its altitudinal range varied between 2545 - 2555 m and its overall species richness, Shannon’s diversity (H’) and evenness (J’) were 151, 4.56 and 0.91, respectively (Table 11). This community had 33 mps. The medicinal species that highest synoptic values of this community were Ficus sur and Hagenia abyssinica each (2.75), Vernonia myriantha (2.63), Erythrina brucei (2.50), Croton macrostachyus (2.25) and Arundinaria alpina (2.13).
Community 3. Combretum molle -Acanthus polystachius-Sapium ellipticum type
This community included 13 quadrats and its altitudinal range varied between 1677-1881 m along Gibe River valley. Its overall species richness, Shannon’s diversity (H’) and evenness (J’) were 184, 4.89 and 0.94, respectively (Table 11). The community consisted of MP richness of 35 species. The medicinal species with the highest synoptic values in this community were Combretum molle (2.33), Acanthus polystachius (2.15), Syzygium guineense subsp. guineense (2.08) and Sapium ellipticum (1.92). HH H hhhhhhhkkklllll