Forests around the world are becoming more vulnerable to dieback due to the combined effects of temperature and drought-induced physiological stress, which are often accompanied by increase in the population of forest pests (McDowell et al., 2008; Allen et al., 2010; Kolb et al., 2016). The combination of recurring summer drought events and rising temperatures are believed to be a significant contributor to bark beetle outbreaks having direct effects on insect population dynamics and indirect effects on the growth and defense mechanisms of host plants (Jactel et al., 2012; Weed et al., 2013; Bentz and Jönsson, 2015; Raffa et al., 2015).
Typically, outbreaks are preceded by windthrow events since windfalls provide a development substrate for large numbers of pest beetles (Hanewinkel et al., 2008). The susceptibility of the forest ecosystem to wind damage depends on various factors, such as the attributes of individual trees, the composition of the overall stand, and the site characteristics (Mezei et al., 2014b). Spruce stands become susceptible to wind damage after reaching a certain age, with unstable trees being the first to be eliminated. Initially, individual trees fell down without showing a domino effect, but subsequent wind events or damage caused by bark beetles can lead to further individual damage (Schütz et al., 2006; Mezei et al., 2014b). Only after some dissipation of the main networking framework, from so-called "skeleton-trees" (the most stable ones), are gaps created, followed by a total dissolution of stands when wind events continue. These larger gaps act as forest edges and are shown to be attractive sites for initiating bark beetle infestations (Marešová et al., 2020; Střibrská et al., 2022). The small canopy opening serves as interspace gaps (Zabihi et al., 2021); however, the presence of larger gaps or forest edges likely induces destabilization by wind (Schütz et al., 2006) or by a combination of wind and bark beetle-caused damage (Jakuš, 1998; Mezei et al., 2014a). Fragmented open-canopy forests with lower density tend to have higher solar radiation loads on individual stands than close-canopy forests (Emmel et al., 2013; Vanderhoof et al., 2014), fostering beetle-favorable microclimate (Hroššo et al., 2020). Abrupt changes in microclimatic conditions, such as elevated temperatures, increased solar radiation, reduced humidity, increased vapor-pressure demands, and wind exposure, can have significant impacts on species composition (Kautz et al., 2013) and affect the physiological responses of trees, including sap flow (Herbst et al., 2007; Marešová et al., 2020; Özçelik et al., 2022).
The ecosystem response to changes in resource availability and competition is still a persisting challenge in ecology (Gleason et al., 2017). The phytosociological structure of the forest, determined by the number and size of individual trees, regulates how much light, water, and soil nutrients are available to each tree (Kholdaenko et al., 2022). Several studies have shown that reduced forest density increases the productivity of the remaining trees by increasing average resource availability while reducing the vulnerability of forests to wildfires and insect infestations (Latham and Tappeiner, 2002; Fettig et al., 2014). In contrast, others have shown that thinning can increase drought vulnerability due to evaporative demands (Aussenac, 2000; Lagergren et al., 2008; Brooks and Mitchell, 2011), as well as increased competition for soil moisture (Nilsen et al., 2001).
Tree growth and its ability to respond to environmental abiotic and biotic drivers are significantly affected by the density of trees in a given area and the competition for resources (Bello et al., 2019; Steckel et al., 2020). For instance, when the number of trees per unit area increases, it leads to greater competition for resources, such as water, nutrients, and sunlight, affecting photosynthesis and sap flow. In contrast, when tree density is lower, there is more space between the trees, allowing increased solar radiation exposure and heat loads on tree canopies and forest grounds, leading to increased evapotranspiration (Zabihi et al., 2023). Previous research has explored the effect of tree density on water stress (Eastham et al., 1990; D'Amato et al., 2013), resistance towards pathogens (Zausen et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2013), and scarcity of nutrients (Latham and Tappeiner, 2002; Perevalova, 2019). However, it remains unclear how the transpiration rate is influenced by the competition effect caused by its surrounding tree populations. Therefore, understanding the interplay between tree density and transpiration patterns is of paramount importance in shaping forest management practices toward the establishment of a sustainable ecosystem, particularly in the context of prevailing occurrences of extreme climatic events.
Given the changing climatic scenario and limited evidence elaborating the interplay between tree stress and competition effects exerted by neighboring tree density, the first goal of the presented research was to analyze the effect of neighboring tree density on the sap flow rates of spruce stands. Additionally, we examined how temporal solar radiation influences sap flow rates during the day. We combined sun positioning data, sap flow measurements from selected hot days of the 2019 summer, and neighboring tree density around each target tree recorded using airplane-acquired imagery to understand the relationship between these variables.