In this study, 18F-FDG PET/CT images of 29 patients who were older than 50 years of age that showed FDG uptake in the BAT were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the associations between FDG uptake in the BAT in eight anatomic regions and the history of β3-AR agonist treatment. Our results showed that in the seven cases who were under β3-AR agonist treatment, the pharmacological effects of β3-AR agonists may have led to the FDG uptake in the BAT. FDG uptake was particularly high in the paraspinal and perirenal regions, but only the uptake in the BAT of the perirenal region was statistically significantly different between the patients who were and were not receiving β3-AR agonist treatment at the time of the PET examination.
Among the patients whose images showed 18F-FDG uptake in BAT, patients who were under β3-AR agonist treatment at the time of the PET examination showed significantly higher FDG uptake in the BAT of the perirenal regions. This finding suggests that the observation of 18F-FDG uptake in the BAT of the perirenal regions in daily practice may reflect hypermetabolism induced by β3-AR agonist treatment. However, before determining that the 18F-FDG uptake in the BAT of the perirenal regions may be drug-induced, it is necessary to exclude physiologic uptake by the adrenal glands and pathologic uptake by conditions such as adrenal metastases. It is necessary to refer to the attenuation-corrected CT images to differentiate the BAT uptake from adrenal gland uptake.
On the other hand, while FDG uptake was observed in the BAT of the other regions, including the cervical, periclavicular, axillary, mediastinal, and paraspinal regions in both the patients groups that were and were not receiving β3-AR agonist treatment at the time of the PET examination, no significant differences in the 18F-FDG uptakes in these regions were observed between the two groups. This finding is consistent with previous reports [20, 21] suggesting that factors such as cold stimulation, besides β3-AR agonist treatment, could enhance FDG uptake by BAT, as described above. The mean outside temperature recorded in the patient group that was receiving β3-AR agonist treatment at the time of the PET examination was 7 degrees Celsius lower as compared with that in the group that was not receiving β3-AR agonist treatment at the time of the PET examination, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.052). It is possible that the level of cold stimulation was not significantly different among the patients in this study, because factors (e.g., clothing and climate) other than the difference between the outdoor temperature and room temperature are also considered to influence the degree of cold stimulation. Increased glucose metabolism of BAT in the six regions other than the perirenal and perisplenic regions appeared to be a common finding in both patients who were and were not receiving β3-AR agonist treatment at the time of the PET examination. On the other hand, it would appear that the BAT in the perirenal and perisplenic regions may be activated to a lesser degree at the room temperatures prevailing in 18F-FDG PET scanning facilities [22].
In a previous study, Cypess AM et al. demonstrated FDG uptake in many BAT areas throughout the body, from the neck and mediastinum, including the perirenal region, to the perirenal, paraspinal, and perihepatic areas, in patients under β3-AR agonist treatment [19]. Our results were consistent with the finding of FDG uptake in the BAT of the perirenal region, but not with the finding of significant FDG uptake observed in the BAT of the spleen and liver areas. This discrepancy could be attributable to differences in the β3-AR agonist doses used between our two studies: 200 mg mirabegron was the mean reported dose from the previous study, which is four times the dose of 50 mg used in clinical practice. The 200-mg dose appears to be sufficient to stimulate BAT in various regions of the body, while the 50-mg dose used for the treatment of OAB can probably only stimulate the BAT in the cervical, axillary, paraspinal, and perirenal regions, but is insufficient to stimulate the BAT in the perihepatic region. The maximum dose of β3-AR agonists in daily practice is 50 mg/day. Clinically, BAT uptake is usually low, so that 18F-FDG uptake in the spleen and liver regions may not pose a problem.
There were some limitations in this study. First, a total of only 29 patients were included in the study, which is a small number. The reason for the small number of cases is that the presence of FDG uptake in BAT is generally considered undesirable in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies, and care is always taken to avoid cold stimulation. Second, because the present study was based on a retrospective review of cases that showed FDG uptake in the BAT, not all patients taking the β3-AR agonists may have been extracted. There could have been patients who were under β3-AR agonist treatment at the time of the 18F-FDG PET/CT examination who did not show BAT uptake.