Search result
We carried out searches sequentially using the three primary outcomes (symptoms of depression, physical activity level and social participation) in the search strategy. The initial search yielded 3530 potential citations of which thirteen publications (43, 50-61) were considered eligible to be included in the review. (Figure 1) review. This review included five publications on depression (43, 50, 53, 56, 60), seven publications on social participation/functioning (51, 52, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61) and two publications on PAL (54, 57). All the studies included in this review were conducted in the post-HAART era. Altogether, a total of 779 participants were involved across the thirteen studies included in this review.
Reasons for exclusion
Reasons for the exclusion of eight studies following full-text screening included: a pilot study (n =2), non-randomized control trials (n=1), had missing data whose author(s) failed to provide the missing data on request (n=1), questionnaire bias (n=1), included seronegative patients (n=1), used aerobic exercise training as control (n=1) and did not study any of the outcome measures of interest (n=1) (Figure 1).
Included studies
Table 1 presents the study characteristics of the thirteen publications included in this review, and further details are provided below –
i. Depression: Five studies (43, 50, 53, 56, 60) reported on the effect of an exercise intervention on depression. The duration of the interventions ranged from 6 weeks to 16 weeks, exercise session was from 15 to 60 min, and the sessions per week were from 2 to 3 times per week. All the five included studies (43, 50, 53, 56, 60) did not provide any follow-up data. Three studies (43, 53, 56) involved supervised aerobic and resistance exercise programme. Two studies (50, 60) involved supervised aerobic exercises only. For aerobic and resistance exercises: One study: Dianatinasab, Fararouei (53) had a “behavioural disease counselling and treatment” control group while Oliveira, Rosa (56) had a “recreational session consisting of stretches, gaming and dancing” for the control group. For aerobic exercises: Neidig, Smith (60) had a “usual activity” control, while Aweto, Aiyegbusi (50) had a control group who received “only counselling”.
ii. Social Participation: Seven studies (51, 52, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61) reported on the effects of an exercise intervention on social participation/functioning. The duration of the interventions ranged from 8 to 24 weeks, exercise session was from 10 to 60 min, and the sessions per week were from 1 to 5 times per week. None of the included studies provided any follow-up data. Four studies (52, 55, 56, 58) involved supervised aerobic and resistance/strengthening exercise programme. One study: Ogalha, Luz (55) involved supervised aerobic exercise-gym class and monthly nutritional counselling only. Another study: Maharaj and Chetty (61) involved aerobic exercises administered once per week and home programme (brisk walking, squatting and jogging), which was given twice per week. One study: Baigis, Korniewicz (51) involved a home-based workout programme using FM 340 Fitness Master Ski machine at 75-85% Maximum Heart Rate thrice per week. For aerobic and resistance/strengthening exercises, one study: Jaggers, Hand (43) had a control group that engaged in unsupervised exercises; another study: Dianatinasab, Fararouei (53) had a “no exercise” control group. For aerobic exercises plus home programme (brisk walking, squatting and jogging): Maharaj and Chetty (61) had a control group that received heat therapy and shortwave diathermy and also, read magazines at home. For supervised gym plus monthly dieting counselling: Ogalha, Luz (55) had a control group that engaged in a discussion on dietary needs and recommendations, and received orientation on the importance of the regular physical activity. One study: Baigis, Korniewicz (51) had a control group that received usual care once a week.
iii. Physical activity Level: Only two studies (54, 57) reported the effects of an exercise intervention on PAL. One study: McDermott, Zaporojan (54) utilised aerobic exercises only and involved two supervised sessions and one unsupervised session. The aerobic exercises were given three times per week and had a “no intervention” control. Another study: Roos, Myezwa (57) utilised the pedometer-based walking programme and activity diary that included education material and documents for self-monitoring. However, the control group received only standard clinical management.
Participants of the included studies
The thirteen studies in this review involved 779 participants with the following gender distribution: males were 378 (48.52%), females were 310 (39.79%), while the gender of 91 participants (11.68%) was undisclosed (Table 1). The male/female ratio across the studies is approximately 1.2:1. Only 596 (76.51%) participants completed the studies while 183 (23.49%) of them withdrew. The participants’ age range was 18 years and above. Ten studies included participants on antiretroviral therapy (43, 50, 52, 55-61). However, Neidig, Smith (60) and Jaggers, Hand (43) reported that only 75% (35 out of 60) and 38.71% (36 out of 93) of the participants in their respective studies, were on ART. Nevertheless, four studies (51, 53, 54) did not report the ART status of the participants. Similarly, ten studies did not report the staging of HIV in the participants (43, 52-59, 61). In contrast, two studies (50, 60) reported that the participants’ disease staging was category A and B" according to the US Centre for Disease Control classification of HIV infection or "asymptomatic, non-AIDS and symptomatic, non-AIDS stages’, respectively. Similarly, one study (51), reported that all the participants were in the “category A" or "non-AIDS defining condition.” However, one study (43) reported that the participants‘ HIV staging varied from "asymptomatic” (63%), symptomatic (10%), AIDS (25%), and undisclosed staging (2%)." Further details on the participants' characteristics in this review are provided below:
i. Depression: A total of 279 participants were included in the five publications (43, 50, 53, 56, 60) that investigated the effects of physical exercises on depression (Table 1). On completion of the study, only 205 (73.48%) participants were retained while 74 (26.52%) participants withdrew. Participants were within the age range of 18 – 65 years and comprised of 175 males, 60 females and 44 participants with an undisclosed gender. There is a male to female ratio of 3:1 in the review participants. None of the studies reported on whether the participants were on any form of antidepressants. The location of the studies varied as two studies were located in the USA (43, 60) while the rest were located in developing countries including Nigeria (50), Iran (53), and Brazil (56).
ii. Physical activity level: Two RCTs (54, 57) were included for studies that investigated the effects of physical exercise training on PAL in PLWHA and involved 97 participants, aged 18-65 years. They included 26 males, 69 females and 2 participants with an undisclosed gender. There is a male to female ratio of 1:2. On completion of the study, only 62 participants were retained while 35 participants withdrew. (Table 1).
iii. Social participation: Eight RCTs (43, 51, 52, 55, 56, 58-61) were included for social participation and involved 447 participants, aged 18-86 years. They included 236 males, 166 females and 45 participants with an undisclosed gender. The male/female gender ratio is 1.4:1. On completion of the study, only 373 (83.45%) participants were retained while 79 (17.67%) participants withdrew. Two studies (51, 55, 56, 58) were located in Brazil, while two other studies (51, 58) were located in the USA. One study each was located in Hong Kong (52), South Arica (61), and Rwanda (59). (Table 1)
Outcome of intervention
Primary outcome:
i. Depression: The five included studies (Table 1) for depression assessed the participants using different measuring tools, namely: the profile of mood state questionnaire - POMS-30 (43, 60), General Health Questionnaire-28 - GHQ-28 (53), Beck’s Depression Inventory-BDI (50, 56, 60), and Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (60).
Secondary outcomes:
ii. Social participation: Seven studies (Table 1) included in our review for social participation/functioning assessed social participation/functioning using different measuring tools including 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) (52, 55, 58, 61), The Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) (51), Duke Activity Status Index [DASI]) (51), and The World Health Organization's Quality of Life HIV instrument-Brief (WHOQOL-HIV-BREF) (56, 59).
iii. Physical activity level: The two studies on PAL (Table 1) used different measuring tools. One study assessed physical activity using Actigraph GT3X+Tri Axis Accelerometer (54), while another assessed the same variable using The Yamax SW200 Pedometer (57).
Quality appraisal and risk of bias assessment
The risk of bias within the included studies is provided in Table 2. The major sources of bias in the included studies were performance bias (absence of subject and therapist blinding) in all the studies. Overall, based on the PEDro scale, ten studies (76.92%) were judged as fair/moderate quality studies (43, 50-55, 58 – 60). Two studies (15.38%) were judged as a high-quality study (57, 61) and one study (7.69%) was judged as low quality (56). Further details are provided below:
i. Eligibility criteria: The authors from the thirteen (13) studies included in our review reported on the Inclusion and Exclusion criteria used in recruiting and screening participants for their respective studies. Hence, the low risk of bias in this regard was evident in the whole studies.
ii. Random allocation: All the thirteen studies reported on using the randomization process to allocate their eligible participants to the different groups. Thus, they are free of selective reporting bias.
iii. Concealment of allocation: There was lack of concealed allocation in eleven (43, 50, 52-56, 58-61), detection bias for not reporting or providing enough information about blinding of the assessor in eleven studies (43, 50-56, 58-60) and no Intention to treat analysis in ten (43, 50, 52-56, 58-60).
iv. Baseline comparability: There was baseline comparability in all the included studies except in two (15.38%) studies by Chung, Lou (52) and Oliveira, Rosa (56). The two studies had study groups that were non-equivalent at baseline and were judged to have a high risk of bias in this regard.
v. Bias on blinding: Only two studies reported on the assessor and personnel blinding (57, 61) and were thus judged to have a low risk of bias in this regard.
vi. The bias of outcome measurement from <85% of initial participants (incomplete outcome data): Four (30.77%) studies reported adequate follow-up (52, 54, 55, 59) (Table 1). Overall, 183 out of 779 participants at baseline withdrew from the included studies accounting for 23.49% of the total number of participants. Withdrawal rates within individual studies ranged from 4.76% (52) to 60.7% (57) (Table 1). However, a moderate risk of attrition bias exists as eight (43, 50, 51, 53, 56-58, 61) of the thirteen included studies (61.54%) reported withdrawal rates of >15%. However, one study (59) reported that only three participants withdrew from the trials. Three (23.08%) studies (52, 55, 59) had a retention rate ranging from 90% to 97% due to low attrition, and therefore have a low risk of incomplete outcome bias. The withdrawal rate between comparison groups was similar in the included studies. Almost all the included studies cited participant(s) who did not comply with their exercise intervention or withdrew from the study. Eight studies (51, 52, 54-56, 58, 59, 61), gave information on adherence of participants to the exercise prescription, and which ranged from 60% (54) to 96.3% (52).
Meta-analyses – Effects of interventions
This review conducted three meta-analyses for studies on depression, PAL and social participation.
Depression:
Four (43, 50, 53, 56) (i.e. 80%) of the five studies (43, 50, 53, 56, 60) included in this review, reported that physical exercise training significantly reduced the symptoms of depression in PLWHA. (Table 3). However, none of the studies provided information on whether the participants were on antidepressant medications or not. The physical exercise training prescriptions that ameliorated the symptoms of depression in the four studies were:
i. Combined exercise training (aerobic exercise: 40-45% Maximum Heart Rate for 45mins) plus (Strength training exercise: 3 sets of 8 repetitions on 50-55% Repetitive Maximum for 15 mins); 3x per week (53)
ii. Aerobic exercise training on a cycle ergometer at 50-60% Heart Rate Reserve for 40 mins per session; 3X per week for 6 weeks (50)
iii. Combined exercise training: aerobic exercise (30 mins on treadmill at 50-70% Maximum Heart Rate) and resistance exercise (upper and lower-body resistance training: 1 set of 12 repetitions each on plate-loaded Hammer Strength Machines; upper anterior and posterior legs on Life Circuit Machines; free weights), 50 mins/session; 2X/week for 6 weeks (43) and
iv. Combined exercise training (CET): aerobic exercise (15-20 mins of moderate-intensity at 50%-65% HRR), and strength training (15-20 mins of 8-15 MHR of 2-3 sets), 3 sessions per week for 16 weeks (56).
For the post-intervention analysis, we found a moderate standardized mean difference (SMD=-0.63, 95%CI: -0.96, -0.30) in favour of the exercise group in the random-effect model, for all the five studies included for depression (43, 50, 53, 56, 60). Thus, physical exercise training had an overall significant effect (Z =3.73, p=<0.0002; 5 studies; 205 participants) on symptoms of depression compared to the control group (Figure 2). The results demonstrate a significant trend towards a decrease in depressive symptoms for participants in the exercise compared to no exercise group; aerobic exercise compared to normal routine activity group; aerobic and resistance exercise compared to other control groups. Measuring tools used from the included studies were: GHQ-28; BDI; POMS-D; CES-D. (Table 1).
Physical activity level:
One (57) of the two (54, 57) studies included in this review showed that exercises significantly improved the PAL in PLWHA between 0 - 6 months but not between 6 - 12 months (Table 4). For both studies, a large standardized mean difference (SMD = 0.98, 95%CI: -0.25, 2.17) in favour of the control group was found in the random-effect model for post-intervention values. Thus, physical exercise training had no overall significant effect (Z=1.61, p=0.11; 2 studies; 62 participants) on PAL in the experimental group compared to the control group. (Figure 3). Nevertheless, there was a consistent trend whereby the experimental groups recorded increased post-intervention PAL compared to the baseline values and vice versa in the control groups. The between-group comparison also showed that the post-intervention PAL was increased mainly in the experimental groups compared to the controls across the studies. Measuring tools used from the included studies were: Actigraph GT3X+Tri Axis Accelerometer; Yamax SW200 Pedometer. (Table 1).
Social participation
Only three (42.86%) papers (52, 59, 61) out of the seven included studies found a significant improvement in social participation in PLWHA due to physical exercise training (Table 5). In contrast, one paper (55) reported a significant decrease in social participation due to physical exercise training. The exercise training prescriptions that improved social participation in the three studies were:
i. Supervised combined aerobic and resistance training each at a moderate intensity of 50-70% MHR, for 45mins per session, 2 sessions per week, for 8 weeks. (52)
ii. Brisk walking for 15mins plus supervised aerobic and strengthening exercises at 45-75% of MHR for 45-60mins per session, (a total exercise duration of 1hr 30mins), 3 times per week, for 6 months. (59)
iii. Supervised aerobic exercise on a cycle ergometer and treadmill for 20mins each with a rest period of 20min once a week for 12 weeks, plus home programme: 10mins of brisk walking, squatting and jogging 3 times per week for 12 weeks. (61)
The only exercise training prescription that showed significantly lower values for social participation than control was:
iv. Supervised gym class, for one hour, 3 times per week for 24 weeks plus monthly nutritional counselling. (55). However, the baseline data indicated that the intervention group also had significantly lower mean value for social participation compared to control.
Data from one paper by Baigis, Korniewicz (51) was not pooled for the meta-analysis because the standard deviation values were not provided by the journal editorial team (as the authors’ contacts/email addresses were not provided in the publication) even after several correspondences. The six studies pooled for meta-analysis for social participation (52, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61), showed a small standardized mean difference (SMD = 0.04, 95%CI: -0.65, 0.73) in favour of the control group in the random-effect model. Thus, physical exercise training had no significant effect (Z=0.11, p=0.91; 6 studies; 368 participants) on social participation (Figure 4) among participants: in the exercise-group compared to no exercise group; aerobic exercise compared to normal routine activity group; aerobic gym class plus nutritional counselling to discussion on nutritional needs, and resistance exercise compared to other control groups. Measuring tools used in the included studies were: SF – 36 MOS, WHOQOL-HIV-BREF, WHOQOL-HIV, MOS HIV DASI. (Table 1).
Heterogeneity
There is moderate/medium heterogeneity in the data from the primary meta-analysis for depression (I2 = 47%, X2= 11.35, df = 6, p=0.08) (Figure 2 - forest plot). In contrast, there is a substantial/high heterogeneity from the data included in the meta-analysis for PAL (I2=82%; X2=1.61, df=3, p<0.0008) (Figure 3) and social participation (I2=90%, X2=50.28, df=5, p<0.00001) (Figure 4), respectively.
Sensitivity analysis
Depression
After the primary meta-analysis, the first sensitivity analysis was done for depression that excluded trials by Oliveira, Rosa [61] because the control and exercise groups were non-equivalent at baseline. A significant effect was found (Figure 5) for exercise intervention (SMD= 0.74 [95% CI: -1.01, -0.48], Z = 5.55; p =0.00001), and the statistical heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0%, X2 = 4.60, df = 5, p= 0.47).
Social participation
After the primary meta-analysis (Figure 6), the sensitivity analysis was done for social participation that excluded three clinical trials in which the attrition rate was greater than 15% (56, 58, 61). No significant effect was found for physical exercise training (SMD= 0.65 [95% CI: -0.22, 1.51], Z = 1.47; p= 0.14), and the statistical heterogeneity was high (I2 = 85%, X2 = 13.07, df = 2, p =0.001).