Globally, since the discovery of HIV over 40 years ago, sub-Saharan African countries have seen a ravaging effects of HIV infections among the general population and this accounts for more than two thirds of the world’s HIV infections (World Health Organisation, 2021; Joint United Nations Programme for HIV and AIDS, 2016; Khasarny, 2016). Proportionately, Southern Africa remains the region most severely affected by the HIV infections. In this region, literature highlights that women are severely affected by the HIV epidemic with young women affected almost ten years earlier compared to their male counterparts (UN Women, 2021; HSRC, 2019; Ramjee and Daniels, 2013).
Evidence from epidemiological studies, suggests that there is a high proportionate of young women between the ages of 25-30 living with HIV (UN, 2021; UN Women, 2020). This is because this age group of young women are at the height of their reproductive age and compounded with little or no education, chances of having unprotected sex with older working men are prevalent (Mabaso, Mlangeni, Makola, Oladimeji, Naidoo, Naidoo, Chibi, Zuma and Simbayi, 2021). Relevantly, it is further argued that because of multiple factors that increases women’s vulnerability to HIV infection such as the structural drivers that include the biological, behavioural, socioeconomic, cultural and structural risks (Psaros, Milford, Smit, Greener, Mosery, Matthews, Harrison, Gordon, Mimiaga, Bangsberg, and Safren, 2019), women are proportionately at risk of acquiring HIV more than men of their age group.
Progressively in the HIV prevention continuum, the biomedical prevention and management of HIV infection have made positive strides globally with the introduction of Anti-Retroviral (ARVs) to people living with HIV over a period of time. ARVs are scientifically proven to alter the speedy progression of HIV disease to Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) which in many respects is fatal (World health Organisation, 2021; Günthard, Saag, Benson, del Rio, Eron, Gallan, Mugavero, Sax, Thompson, Gandhi, Landovitz, Smith, Jacobsen and Volberding, 2016).
However, despite that there has been considerable progress made in the biomedical prevention and management of HIV, gaps in the socioeconomic and behavioural interventions still remains. It is argued that the development of appropriate HIV prevention strategies which encapsulate the socioeconomic and cultural factors can be beneficial as these are seen to be contributing much to predisposing women particularly in rural contexts to HIV infections (Vermund, Tique, Cassell, Pask, Ciampa and Audet, 2013).
Contextually, an abundance of literature report that South Africa is faced with a debilitating health crisis resulting from HIV infections and this remains a major health problem for the country even after two decades since the introduction of ART (HSRC, 2019Allinder and Fleichsman, 2019; Masquillier, Wouters, Campbell, Delport, Sematlane, Dube and Knight, 2020; Global Health Policy, 2021). Some studies highlight that people living with HIV (PLHIV), inclusive of those enrolled on ART, are exposed to a diverse set of disabilities (Myezwa, Hanass-Hancock, Ajidahun and Carpenter, 2018; Khasarny and Karim, 2016; Banks, Zuurmond, Ferrand and Kuper, 2015; Hanass- Hancock, Regondi, Van Egeraat, and Nixon, 2013; Health Canada, 2009; Myezwa, Stewart, Musenge and Nesara, 2009; Myezwa, Buchalla, Jelsma and Stewart, 2011).
Despite that the provision of ARVs have a profound importance to enabling PLHIV to live longer and productive lives, (De Paoli, 2012) notes that it is important for one to understand the myriad of factors that constrain and shape life beyond the biomedical problem or solution framework. What compounds this is that long-term survival with HIV is associated with new health-related issues and a risk of functional limitation or disability (Myezwa, Hanass-Hancock, Ajidahun & Capenter, 2018). Amidst these challenges, studies have shown that young women in rural areas remain deeply affected than men of their age group. Disabilities have potential to limit one to contribute effectively to the daily needs especially for people living with HIV and enrolled on ART.
Infection with HIV especially for young women in rural areas remain a threat to their livelihoods and socioeconomic needs. Studies have shown that treatment of PLHIV must be accompanied with other social measures to enhance their physical, mental, and social wellbeing (Ramjee and Daniels, 2013). PLHIV face many developmental challenges such as poverty, affecting particularly women and young people. Weakened family and societal support systems, decreased participation in formal education of young women as a result of AIDS in the family, along with depleted family income due to loss of work, and poor disease management present additional vulnerabilities compounded by HIV induced disabilities (Taraphdar, Guha, Haldar, Chatterjee, Dasgupta, Saha and Mallik, 2011)
Around the world, people living with HIV and enrolled on ART have been seen to be struggling with treatment adherence where the socioeconomic challenges are prevalent (Moomba and van Wyk, 2019). Adherence to ART is identified to be tied to food security, transport to access wellness clinics and other socioeconomic amenities (Weiser, Tuller, Frongillo, Senkungu, Mukiibi and Bangsberg, 2010). Therefore, in the absence of this supplementary needs to treatment adherence due to decreased productivity resulting from inactive participation in the economy due to HIV induced disabilities, risks of not adhering effectively to treatment and lost to follow-ups for clinic reviews may emerge (Tuller, Bangsberg, Senkungu, Ware, Emenyonu and Weiser, 2010). To cushion this financial loss resulting from disabilities and other forms of vulnerabilities, the South African government introduced the social security system which is regarded as one of the world’s largest non-contributory social security systems.
The South African social security system provides social grants which are administered by the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA). Some of the grants awarded by SASSA include the old-age pension, disability, war veterans, care dependency, foster child, child support, grant-in-aid and social relief of distress (SASSA, 2010). It is reported that by 2023, over 18 million South Africans received social grants. The disability grant in South Africa is one of the social relief measures amongst others provided for people living with disabilities including people living with HIV whose functionality is impaired due to the biological determinations of HIV infections. To access this grant, one must satisfy certain criteria as it is means tested (SASSA, 2010). For people living with HIV, the qualifying criteria during the period when this study was conducted was 500 CD4 cell count and below and having some form of disability that constrain one to be productive or be fully disabled.
One of the challenges that rural women living with HIV face today is the continued developmental trajectory of the apartheid years which still concentrates economic development in the provinces of Gauteng and the Western Cape. Rural provinces such as Limpopo in South Africa remain underdeveloped which is a major concern for the developmental trajectory of South Africa as espoused in the National Development Plan Vision 2030 (Stas SA, 2019). Underdevelopment in the rural parts of South Africa as in the Vhembe District has negative ramifications for the young women and girls to find employment opportunities and sound educational outcomes (Wilkinson, Pettifor, Rosenberg, Halpern, Thirumurthy, Collinson and Kahn, 2017). Uneven developmental trajectory between the urban and rural areas has a potential to project people to uneven human developmental outcomes. Literature on the uneven human developmental outcomes in the realm of HIV risk behaviour, has established that this forces people living in rural areas to migratory labour systems (Camlin and Charlebois, 2019).
Literature has found that the migratory labour system has profound effect on family incomes as when men work in the urban areas, send remittances to their families in the rural areas. On the other side, this has shown to have its own challenges when one considers how HIV is spread and also considering the rural women vulnerabilities to HIV infections (Rai, Lambert and Ward, 2017). Poverty often projects women particularly young women living in the rural areas at the receiving end of human developmental initiatives (World Bank, 2014; ILO, 2019; Department of Women, 2015). That said, there has been a noticeable trend over a period of time that young rural women find themselves in precarious financial conditions that subjects them to have sexual relationships with older working men who might have been infected with HIV (Schaefer, Gregson, Eaton, Mugurungi, Rhead, Takaruza, Maswera, and Nyamukapa, 2017).
Compounding these challenges, are the high levels of little or no education among these rural young women which exposes them to dire situation to make informed decisions about their sexual preferences resulting from their vulnerability to coercion (Motsa, 2018; The World Bank, 2015, p. 33). The result of these vulnerabilities has been noted in literature to have negative implications for these young rural women to HIV infection and further exacerbate the levels of poverty among them (UN Women, 2020; Pascoe, Langhaug, Mavhu, Hargreaves, Jaffar, Hayes and Cowan, 2015).
1.2 Problem Statement
Literature suggests that the nature of the qualifying criteria for the disability grant may incentivise non-adherence to ARVs among the PLHIV that may further subjects them to various vulnerabilities such as AIDS. Studies have shown that PLHIV are vulnerable to disabilities as result of non-adherence to ARVs. This is compounded by the lack of nutritional support to adhere to ARVs intake as the disability grant is terminated. In this regard, young women living with HIV in the Vhembe District are not spared from this global phenomena considering their unemployable statuses and the poverty as propelled by the current economic climate and lack of employment opportunities in South Africa specifically in the rural areas (Govender, Fried, Birch, Chimbindi and Cleary, 2015; Knight, Hoosegood and Timaeus, 2013; de Paoli, Mills and Grønningsæter, 2012) .
Poverty remain one of the human developmental challenges especially for young women living with HIV between the ages of 25-30 in the District of Vhembe in Limpopo Province. One can attribute these challenges to the developmental quagmire of the District as studies have shown that the District falls under socioeconomic quintile 2 (HST, 2015). In the absence of employment opportunities and deteriorating health status of young women living with HIV in the rural areas such as Vhembe District, the disability grant becomes a modest form of socioeconomic relief measure (Kagee, 2014). .
However, when this grant is terminated upon improved health status of these young women living with HIV in the Vhembe District, their livelihoods become interrupted. Also, this has a profound impact on adherence on ARVs. Against this challenge, the study sought to explore and examine how the termination of the disability grant affects the livelihoods of young women between the ages of 25-30 living in Vhembe District in Limpopo Province.
1.3 Study Aims
The aim of our study was to explore and examine the effects of disability grant termination on the livelihoods of rural women living with HIV aged between 25-30 attending a Wellness Clinic in Vhembe District. The study was guided by the following objectives:
➢ To explore and examine the extent of the disability grant on the livelihoods of young rural women aged between 25-30 living with HIV attending a Wellness Clinic in Vhembe District.
➢ To explore how the disability grant termination interferes with treatment adherence among young rural women living with HIV attending a Wellness Clinic in Vhembe District.
1.4 The study was guided by the following question:
➢ To what extent does the terminations of the disability grant interfere with the livelihoods of the rural women aged 25-30 living with HIV attending a Wellness Clinic in Vhembe District?
1.4.1 Sub-questions
➢ Why is it that the disability grant is so important for the livelihoods of young rural women aged 25-30 living with HIV attending a Wellness Clinic in Vhembe District?
➢ How does the termination of the disability grant upon improved health outcomes interferes with the treatment adherence among young rural women aged 25-30 living with HIV attending a Wellness Clinic in Vhembe District?