Incidence of abnormal ejaculation is a typical adverse reaction of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists (Michel, 2007). This class of drugs induces relaxations of prostate, urethra and bladder neck smooth muscle (Andersson, 2000), reducing the resistance of the prostatic urethra and bladder neck to the ejaculate coming from the vas deferens, thus allowing retrograde ejaculation to occur (van Dijk et al., 2006). However, in healthy volunteers treated for 5 days with either tamsulosin or alfuzosin, few individuals (95%) had increased post-ejaculate in the urine, indicating that α1-adrenoceptor antagonists may cause anejaculation rather than retrograde ejaculation (Hellstrom et al., 2005); Thus, evaluation of the effect of these compounds in human vas deferens and seminal vesicles may provide useful information on the mechanism(s) involved.
Silodosin (KMD-3213; Shibata et al., 1995) has an increased affinity to adrenoceptor α1A (0.039 nM) compared to α1B (6.5 nM) and α1D (2.2 nM; Tatemichi et al., 2006) in the lower urinary tract. In comparison to the α1-adrenoceptor antagonists alfuzosin (Ramsay et al., 1988), doxazosin (Elliott et al., 1982; Wilt and MacDonald, 2006), tamsulosin (Lepor et al., 1988; Dunn et al., 2002), terazosin (Frishman et al., 1988; O'Leary 2001), and prazosin (U'Prichard et al., 1978), silodosin was the most potent antagonist on the contractions induced by noradrenaline in the rat epididymal vas deferens (Britto-Júnior et al., 2022c). As shown here, silodosin was also more potent than tamsulosin, doxazosin and prazosin to inhibit noradrenaline-induced HEVD contractions. Interestingly, silodosin was the only α1-adrenoceptor antagonist that was more potent to inhibit HEVD contractions induced by noradrenaline, as compared to those induced by 6-ND. Since tamsulosin and silodosin are the α1-adrenoceptor antagonists more associated with abnormal ejaculation (Cui et al., 2012), selectivity for the α1A-adrenoceptor subtype could be the mechanism involved in this adverse reaction. Indeed, incidence of abnormal ejaculation in patients treated with prazosin is rare, and in the rat isolated vas deferens, prazosin presents low potency on α1A- and high potency at α1D-adrenoceptor (Docherty, 2013).
6-Nitrodopamine concentration-dependently contract both rat (Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b) and human (Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a) vas deferens, but more importantly, potentiates the contractile action of the dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline in rat epididymal vas deferens at a very low concentration such as 10 pM (Britto-Júnior et al., 2023a). Although this mechanism is not clear, the potentiation is abolished when the vas deferens is pre-treated with the voltage-gated sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin, suggesting that may be due to activation of adrenergic terminals (Britto-Júnior et al., 2023a). A similar potentiation of 6-ND on the increased atrial frequency induced by dopamine, noradrenaline and adrenaline was observed in the rat isolated atria (Britto-Júnior et al., 2023b). The blockade of α1A adrenoceptors in the rat vas deferens could lead to infertility (Michel et al., 2007); however, in α1-adrenoceptor subtype-selective knockout mice (α1A-, α1B- and α1D-adrenoceptor knockout), the contractions of the vas deferens induced by electric-field stimulation was reduced by 60–70%, but not abolished (Sanbe et al., 2007), indicating the presence of another receptor responsible for the observed contractions. This receptor could be the 6-ND receptor. Our finding that silodosin, at a concentration (100 pM) that caused marked reductions in noradrenaline-induced contractions, did not affect the contractions induced by EFS, reinforces the concept that 6-ND is a major modulator of human vas deferens contractility (Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a). Indeed, inhibition of the EFS-induced HEVD contractions was only observed when the α1-adrenoceptor antagonists were used at concentrations that inhibited those induced by 6-ND.
Inconsistencies in the interactions of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists and ejaculatory function have been observed in mouse, rat and human data (Michel, 2007), and as summarized in Table 5, they are also present in the pharmacology of 6-ND in rat and human vas deferens. The remarkable synergism between 6-ND and the classical catecholamines (dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline) has been described so far only on the rat epididymal vas deferens (Britto-Júnior et al., 2023a) and rat isolated right atrium (Britto-Júnior et al., 2023b). Thus, it would be important to confirm the synergism in HEVD. Furthermore, purification and sequence of the 6-ND receptor from human vas deferens should help to deep our understanding on the physiological processes involved in the ejaculation.
Table 5
6-ND pharmacology in rat and human vas deferens
| Rat | Ref | Human | Ref |
6-ND release (ng/mL) | 1.4±0.4 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | 1.9±0.8 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
Noradrenaline (ng/mL) | 0.4±0.2 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | 0.5±0.2 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
Dopamine release (ng/mL) | - | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | 0.3±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
Adrenaline release (ng/mL) | - | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | 0.2±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
6-ND contractile (pEC50) | 5.2±0.2 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2023a | 4.6±0.1 | this manuscript |
Abolished by TTX | + | Lima et al., 2022 | ? | |
L-NAME on 6-ND release | ↓ | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | ↓ | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
L-NAME on EFS contraction | - | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | ↓ | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
b1 and b1/b2 antagonists | + | Lima et al., 2022 | ? | |
Potentiates DA, NA and ADR | + | Britto-Júnior et al., 2023a | ? | |
Tricyclic compounds (pA2): | | | | |
Amitriptyline | 7.7±0.5 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | 8.9±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
Desipramine | 8.2±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | 9.5±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
Carbamazepine | 7.7±0.4 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021b | 8.8±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2022a |
α1 antagonists (pA2): | | | | |
Doxazosin | 9.1±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021c | 10.3±0.2 | this manuscript |
Tamsulosin | 9.7±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021c | 9.3±0.1 | this manuscript |
Silodosin | 8.8±0.1 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021c | 9.8±0.1 | this manuscript |
Prazosin | 7.7±0.2 | Britto-Júnior et al., 2021c | 8.2±0.5 | this manuscript |