PUFA’s are crucial for plasma membrane synthesis in rapidly dividing cancer cells of mammary gland tissue and dietary sources alone are insufficient to accomplish this [27]. Therefore, cancer cells must take over an alternative fatty acid synthesis pathway and HIF-1α helps them to adapt this [28]. Previous studies have reported that HIF-1α acts in a very smart way and modify the tumor microenvironment in such a way that indirectly enhances the fatty acid synthesis, required for the synthesis of plasma membrane and to furnish other purposes in cancer cells [29]. Considering, the role of HIF-1α and FASN, the present study was undertaken to downregulate HIF-1α by activating PHD-2 with natural drugs VOA alone and in combination with VIN.
Cardiac toxicity is very common risk factor in mammary gland carcinoma patient. For the analysis of cardiac toxicity, hemodynamic profile of animals was performed (Fig. 1B, Table 1). Normal ECG and HRV was recorded in case of NC groups when administered vehicle for 3 months. DMSO is a universal solvent for hydrophobic drugs and its cardio toxic affect is well established [30]. DMSO administration decreased the heart rate, S, ST and T interval and increased the RR and P amplitude in DMSO control group. Decrease in HRV after VIN treatment is already reported in previous studies [31] and the same was also reflected in the present study. A large perturbation in ECG and HRV parameters were observed with both low and high dose of combination therapy. Hence, the concomitant administration of VOA with VIN/DMSO would have further exacerbated the cardiotoxic effect (Fig. 1C).
Hypoxia in solid tumors plays important role in angiogenesis which is necessary to accomplish increasing demand of oxygen and other nutrients. Various studies have already reported that increased level of HIF-1α stimulates angiogenesis in tumor cells [32, 33]. In the present study, results of the carmine staining manifest an increase in the AB count and lobules in the toxic control group which clearly depicts the formation of neovascularization (Fig. 2A- A1-G1). But treatment with monotherapy and combination therapy of VOA and VIN reduced the AB count and no of lobules in the experimental animals which indicates suppression of angiogenesis after initiation of therapy. Therapy with VOA and VIN might have regulated HIF-1α pathway to abolish angiogenesis.
Histopatology of mammary gland tissue of carcinogen treated rats have shown extensive damage to the lactiferous duct (LD), adipocytes (AD), ductal epithelium (DE) and myoepithelium as reported in the previous studies [34]. Extensive damage to the micro architecture of mammary tissue like LD, AD, DE and myoepithelium was observed after DMBA administration in TC control (Fig. 2A- A2-G2). A revert effect upon the same was exhibited with VOA and VIN treatment. This indicates VOA and VIN would be working at cellular level to stop tumor progression. Histopathological examination of mammary gland tissue further witnesses the protective action of therapy.
Liver and kidney is the vital and sensitive organ in the body which are responsible for the detoxification and excretion of drugs. Continuous detoxification and excretion of harmful drug molecules specially those which belongs to the anticancer class, can cause harm to these organs and ultimately becomes the reason of nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity if dose is not monitored adequately. Most of the anticancer drugs are reported to have varying degree of nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in patients taking them [35]. Nephrotoxicities due to chemotherapy is marked by the necrosis of the proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), distal convoluted tubule (DCT) epithelial cells and injury to the Bowman’s capsule, ultimately kidney failure [36]. Histopathological examination of mammary glands of treated rats revealed the same type of damage to the microarchitecture of kidney after DMBA administration (Fig. 2B). Subsequent treatment with VIN monotherapy further exacerbated the renal toxicity as evidenced by the greater damage to the PCT, DCT and Bowmans capsule as its nephorotoxicity is already reported [37]. It would be pertinent to mention that no renal toxicity was noted in rats treated with monotherapy of VOA which confirms its safety in renal failure. Even more damage to kidney was exhibited by both low and high dose of combination therapy marked by the necrosis of the renal tubular epithelial cell, loop of Henle, and glomerulus attributed to the high drug accumulation, either of the two. Since, VOA is already known to have Pgp (efflux pump) inhibitory effect [38], it might have helped intracellular pooling of VIN in the nephron of experimental animals, can be the one possible cause of nephrotoxicity (Fig. 2B).
Liver is the site where most of the drugs undergoes their first pass metabolism (except from those administered through parenteral route [39]. Normal functioning of the liver affected due to continuous exposure to high concentration of cytotoxic substances which then leads to liver failure in some patients. Liver toxicity is marked by dilation of central vein, damages to hepatocytes (He), distorted sinusoids (Sn), and lobules (Lo) which is very well evident in DMBA treated animals (Fig. 2C). Monotherapy of VOA and VIN worked well to stop further damage to liver of experimental animals which documents the liver safety of both drugs at the given dose. But histology of combination therapy treated rat’s depicted large damage to the liver organ which again proves the VIN /VOA accumulation, or either of two into the hepatocytes and consequently resultant hepatotoxicity.
Various studies have reported the role of ROS in development of cancer manifested by the increase in TBARs, PC and reduction in the activity of SOD, GSH and Catalase [40, 41]. Same type of manifestations in the antioxidant markers were also noted in DMBA treated rats. Interestingly, both, monotherapy as well as combination therapy effectively restored the TBARs, SOD and other associated antioxidant markers. From this we can expect, restoration of antioxidant activity could be the one possible mechanism behind the anticancer potential of the drug (Table 2).
Numerous studies have reported that myriad changes occur in a biological system under diseases condition which can be detected in the biological fluids like blood serum. With this goal serum metabolic study was carried out to extract biomarkers and to understand the interplay between molecular and cellular components (Fig. 3A,B,C) [42, 43]. Previous studies have demonstrated that a hypoxic tumor cells utilize more and more glucose to meet its energy and for biomass accumulation [44, 45]. Several studies have reported that tumor cells produce high amount of lactate and glutamate that impart benefit to the tumor cells in various ways like fatty acid biosynthesis, immune protection, angiogenesis and invasiveness [46]. The metabolic profile of DMBA treated rats have shown high level of lactate and glutamate and that of PUFAs which is in accordance to the previous studies i.e excess lactate/glutamate is converted into fatty acids. Decreased level of glucose further affirms the above findings. Interestingly, reveres chronological order of above metabolites were observed with VOA and VIN (monotherapy as well as with combination therapy) i.e. decreased level of lacate, glutamate and PUFAs were noted all in the treatment groups. It would be pertinent to mention that monotherapy with VOA and high dose combination therapy of VOA(1 mg/kg) and VIN(1 mg/kg) provided much better fatty acid synthesis inhibitory action compared to the VIN monotherapy and combination low dose. Serum metabolomics analysis of present clearly established a relationship between glycolysis, lactate, glutamate and fatty acid synthesis production (Table 3).
Table 3
List of cross analyzed metabolites
S.No | Metabolites | ppm Values | NC vs TC | NC vs T1 | NC vs T2 | NC vs T3 | NC vs T4 |
1 | Isoleucine | 0.93 (t), 1.01 (d) | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ |
2 | Leucine | 0.95 (d), 0.96 (d) | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ |
3 | Valine | 0.98 (d), 1.04 (d) | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ |
4 | Lactate | 1.33 (d), 4.12 (q) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
5 | Alanine | 1.46(d) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
6 | Acetate | 1.91 (s) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
7 | NAG | 2.04 (m) | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
8 | Glutamate | 2.07(m), 2.34(m) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ |
9 | Glutamine | 2.11(m), 2.43(m) | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ |
10 | Citrate | 2.53 (d), 2.69 (d) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
11 | Proline | 2.01(m), 1.99(m) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
12 | Choline | 3.20 (s), 4.02(m) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ |
13 | GPC | 3.228(s), 4.34(m) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
14 | Glycine | 3.55 (s) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
15 | Glycerol | 3.56, 3.65 (d) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ |
16 | Betaine | 3.268 | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ |
17 | Glucose | 3.24(t), 3.53(q) 3.49(t), 3.71(t) 3.40(t), 3.41(t) 3.46(m), 3.83(m) 3.72(q), 3.76(q), 3.84(q), 3.90(q) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
18 | α-Glucose | 4.65(d) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
19 | β-Glucose | 5.23(d) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
20 | Serine | 3.94, 3.98 (tt) | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ |
21 | PUFA | 5.29 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
22 | Urea | 5.80 | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
23 | Tyrosine | 6.89 (d), 7.18 (d) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
24 | Phenylalanine | 7.32(d), 7.35(t) 7.42 (d) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
25 | Histidine | 7.05 (s), 7.76 (s) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | NA |
26 | Formate | 8.45 (s) | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
27 | LDL/VLDL | 0.88, 0.91, | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
The list of metabolites responsible for variation and class separation between normal control vs toxic control and Normal control vs treatment groups (T1, T2, T3 and T4). The metabolic biomarkers were screened based upon the VIP score values > 1.0 (derived from PLS-DA modeling, showing discrimination significance) and then tested (using univariate and student t-test) for statistical significance based on p-value < 0.05. The up (↑) and down (↓) arrows represent, respectively, increased and decreased metabolite levels within the groups compared to controls. |
We further performed the FAME analysis of mammary gland tissue to affirm the raised level of fatty acids after DMBA, VOA and VIN treatment. Similar story was also observed in the FAME analysis of mammary gland tissue i.e high level PUFAs were detected toxic control and very low level of PUFAS were noted in the treatment groups (Fig. 4). Results of FAME analysis further evidences that excess lactate was utilized in fatty acid synthesis. No PUFAs like toxic control were observed in FAME analysis of treated animals which clearly indicates VOA and VIN have an inhibitory action on fatty acid synthesis.
Immunoblotting were further performed to investigate the effect of therapy on the proteins of hypoxic and fatty acid synthetic pathway. Several studies have confirmed that the expression of HIF-1α increase in oxygen scarcity which enhances the expression of other genes that indirectly benefits the tumor cells in various ways [47, 48]. A study conducted by P.Maxwell et al on the wild type (wt) Hepa-1 cells and derivatives c4,c31 and Rc4 proved that HIF-1α plays crucial role in GLUT one transporter and VEGF [48]. Another study conducted by Wendi Sun et al on HeLa, HCT116 and on cultured human primary epithelial cells showed that HIF-1α increased the level of SREBP-1c and FASN [49]. Intriguingly, similar type of trend was also observed in the present study i.e. the level of HIF-1α, SREBP and FASN expression was up regulated while PHD2 expression was down regulated after DMBA treatment (Fig. 5A). An, opposite effect on the same was observed after the initiation of VOA/VIN therapy. It is already reported that PHD2 is negative regulator of HIF-1α and activation of PHD2 alone can downregulate all its downstream effects [50]. This affirms that VOA and VIN might have activated PHD2 and subsequently the level of HIF-1α along with FASN proteins would have dwindled as it was hypothesized.
Several studies have reported that failure of apoptosis in normal cells is an indication of cancer transformation [51–53]. Decrease in anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-XL and Bcl-2) and increase in pro-apoptotic proteins (BAD,BAX) indicates normal functioning mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [7]. Result of immunoblotting shows increase in expression of Bcl-XL and decrease in BAX and BAD proteins in toxic control after DMBA administration. Furthermore, expression of VDAC, Apaf-1 and caspase9 were also found elevated which proves the failure of mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Treatment with monotherapy as well as with combination therapy of VOA and VIN restored the apoptotic pathway in treatment groups which is evidenced by the increase level of cytochrome-c as well (Fig. 5B).