The studied specimen is most similar to material described as species Equisetites lyellii (Mantell) Morris from the English Wealden, published by Watson and Batten (1990). The species was revised and lectotype designated by Watson and Batten (1990). The present material is particularly similar in showing similar stomata that are surrounded by microscopic ornamentation, much like the beaded sculpture characteristic for E. lyellii (Watson and Batten 1990). The presently described material differs from E. lyellii in a smaller number (12–14) of leaf segments (scars) per node instead of 18 in younger axes of E. lyellii, and similar in this respect to the genus Equisetum. We did not observe any crater pits, as are described in Equisetum subg. Hippochaete (Watson and Batten 1990). Additionally, we follow the reasons stated by Watson and Batten (1990) in studying the better-preserved material of E. lyellii from the English Wealden, where they retained the species in the genus Equisetites.
The present specimen differs from Equisetites beanii (Bunbury) Seward from the Jurassic of Yorkshire (Seward 1898, Harris 1960) in having ornamented stomata. Equisetites columnaris (Brongn.) Sternb. and E. laterale (J. Phillips ex Lindl. et Hutton) Morris differ in having a higher number of leaf segments per sheath and node. Younger axes of both columnaris and laterale show about 25 segments per node.
The genus Neocalamites differs from the studied material in having leaves free, not forming a sheath, smooth stem, and in having typically larger stems (Harris 1960).
The horsetail was most likely transported from nearby land to a submarine environment. The plant represents a rare find, and beside the fern Cladophlebis sp. previously described (Michalík et al. 2012: Fig. 7; Michalík et al. 2013), there are no more plant fossils recorded from the Mráznica Formation. Equisetites axis cannot float a long distance (in contrast to some seeds which are, in some cases, transported by sea currents thousands of kilometres). The rarity of plant fossils in the sediment and its comparatively large size indicate the land was in distance of tenth or first hundreds of kilometres. Palaeoecological requirements of Equisetites indicate moist, even swampy environments (Pott et al. 2008) in this unknown dryland. A transport from an isolated unknown small island(s) in the vicinity (emerged parts of the Fatricum or other nearby tectonic units as Tatricum or Veporicum) could be a plausible candidate. Another probable candidate (of an unknown distance) appears to be the Vindelician-Bohemian Massif (Dill and Klosa 2011, also called the Bohemian Massif with the Vindelician Land, see, e.g., Galasso et al. 2022). The Vindelician-Bohemian Massif was active as a dryland in Central Europe for the entire period of time from the Triassic through the Late Cretaceous (Dill and Klosa 2011). Interestingly, the genus Cladophlebis is also known from slightly younger, the mid-Cretaceous Peruc-Korycany Formation in the Czech Republic (the Bohemian Massif remained as one of the islands in a shallow epicontinental sea that flooded middle Europe at that time; see e.g. Kvaček and Dilcher 2000). Despite the paleogeographic position of the Fatricum in the Western Carpathian area during the Mesozoic is relatively well constrained, its position in relation to Vindelician Land is not entirely clear and remains debated (e.g., Rakús et al. 1988; Vašíček et al. 1994; Plašienka 2000; Chlupáč et al. 2002; Michalík 2007, 2011). Therefore, an exact area of the origin of the plants from the Mráznica Formation is only hypothetical and all these interpretations need to be met with caution. In any case, the Mráznica Formation indicates a more humid climate on land (associated with climate instability) at the time of its deposition – a conclusion supported mainly by the presence of a fine clastic admixture (silty quartz grains and muscovite leaflets), and by occasional terrestrial plant remains (Michalík et al. 2012).