-
Plant materials
The four herbal medicines were screened individually. AR (Batch NO. 140304), G. Pentaphyllum (Batch NO. 140305) and CR (Batch NO. 140211) were purchased from the Xiamen YanLaiFu Pharmaceutical Co., LTD., Fujian, China. Selenium- rich green tea (Batch NO. 140316) was purchased from Enshi ChunGui tea industry Co., LTD, Hubei, China. They were authenticated carefully by one of the authors (Professor Yiqi Huang). The voucher specimens (AR NO. Q1-20140526, G. Pentaphyllum NO. Q2-20140526, CR NO. Q3-20140526, selenium- rich green tea NO. Q4-20140526) were deposited at the herbarium of the Xiamen Medicine Research Institute, Fujian, China.
-
Extraction and identification of Qilan preparation
In brief, the four herbs (740 g) were chopped into pieces and decocted with 8-fold volume of distilled water three times for 1 h each. After combination, the filtered and mixed suspensions from three decoctions were concentrated at 740 mg/mL under reduced pressure. Finally, the concentrated solution was diluted to a 100 mg/mL stock solution in basic medium and stored at 4°C after filtered through 0.45 μm and 0.22 μm filters. Fresh working drugs were prepared at the following concentrations in basic medium: (1) 1.56 mg/mL, (2) 3.12 mg/mL, (3) 6.25 mg/mL, (4) 12.5 mg/mL and (5) 25 mg/mL. The same volume of basic medium was used as control or for the 0 mg/mL group.
The quality of Qilan preparation was measured by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Briefly, solution of the extracts was spotted on TLC plate using appropriate spray reagents and UV absorbances according to procedures described by the Chinese Pharmacopeia 2005 (National Pharmacopoeia Committee, 2005). The standards of astragaloside A, ginsenoside Rb1 and CR contrast material were used as positive references.
-
Cell culture and transfection
Human TSCC cell line Tca8113 was purchased from the ShangHai SBO Medical Biotechnology Co., LTD. (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI1640 (Hyclone, Logan, Utah, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. For functional analyses, Tca8113 cells were transfected with miR-21 mimics or the negative control RNA (NC RNA, which had the same number of basic groups but a different sequence compared with the miR-21 mimic) (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) using the Lipofectamine®3000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, after incubating the cells overnight at 70% confluency, the cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in antibiotic-free medium. For each well in the 6-well plate, miR-21 mimic (60 nmol/L), NC (60 nmol/L) and 7.5 µL of the Lipofectamine®3000 transfection reagent was separately added to 125 µL of Opti-MEM®I medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and then mixed together to form the transfection complexes. The transfection complexes were added to the cells and incubated for 6 h before adding fresh medium. According to the optimum reagent amount, the multiplication factor (determined by the area ratio) was used to determine the amount of reagent needed for new plate formats. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were exposed to Qilan preparation at a concentration of 6.25mg/mL or 0mg/mL for an additional 24h and then harvested for the following experiments. All of the experiments were repeated independently at least three times.
-
Cell viability assay
Cells were seeded onto 96-well plates (Nunc, Denmark) at a density of 1×104 cells per well, incubated overnight, and then exposed to different concentrations of Qilan preparation in triplicate for 12, 24 or 48 h, respectively. Cell viability was quantified using CCK-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). The results represent the average of three independent experiments. Cell viability was calculated using the following formula: cell viability = [(ODtreatment-ODblank)/ (ODcontrol-ODblank)] ×100%.
-
Cell cycle analysis
Cells were seeded onto 6-well plates (Nunc, Denmark) with 1 ×106 cells per well and treated with various concentrations of Qilan preparation (1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, or 25mg/mL) for 12h. The cells were then collected and washed twice with cold PBS. After fixing the cell in cold 70% ethanol at 4°C overnight, the cells were washed twice with cold PBS and then resuspended gently in propidium iodide (PI) staining solution (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), which consisted of 10µL RNase A, 25µL PI staining solution and 0.5mL buffer, and then incubated at 37°C for 30 min in the dark. The samples were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6, San Diego, CA, USA) within 1h of staining, and the percentage of cells in the G0/G1, S and G2/M phases were determined using FCS Express 4 plus.
-
Cell apoptosis assay
Apoptosis analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Transfected or non-transfected Tca8113 cells were cultured in 6-well plates and were exposed to different concentrations of Qilan preparation for 24 h. Then, the cells were harvested with 0.25% Trypsin without EDTA (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), washed twice with cold PBS and resuspended in 100 µL of binding buffer containing 5 µL of FITC Annexin V and 5 µL of PI working solution at a concentration of 1×106 cells/mL. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min in the dark, 400 µL of the binding buffer was added to each sample. Apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6, San Diego, CA, USA) for at least 10,000 events within 1h of staining.
-
RNA isolation, reverse transcription and TaqMan real-time PCR.
Transfected or non-transfected Tca8113 cells were cultured in 6-well plates and exposed to different concentrations of Qilan preparation for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A TaqMan stem-loop real-time PCR method was used to assess miR-21 expression using kits from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). For each sample, we calculated the ΔCT value (target-reference). The fold change between the treated sample and the normal miR-21 control was calculated with the 2-ΔΔCt method, where ΔΔCT = ΔCT (target-reference, in treated samples) - ΔCT (target-reference, in control samples). Real-time PCR was repeated in triplicate for each sample in the independent experiments. The mature miR-21 expression levels were quantified using an ABI Prism 7300 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with RNU44 as the normalization control [16, 17].
-
Western blot
Transfected or non-transfected Tca8113 cells were cultured in 60-mm dishes and were exposed to different concentrations of Qilan preparation for 24 h. The cells were lysed in cell lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerrophosphate, 1mM NaVO4, 1 μg/mL leupeptin, and 1 mM PMSF) for 5 min at 4°C and centrifuged at 12,000 g (Sigma 1-15 PK, German) for 30 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined with a BCA kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Equal amounts of each sample protein were then subjected to a 12% SDS-PAGE gel for electrophoresis and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. After blocking for 1 h at room temperature with a 5% skim milk solution, the membranes were prepared with Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) and exposed to primary antibodies against PDCD4 and PTEN (all diluted 1:1000, Proteintech, Wuhan, China) at 4°C overnight. After washing three times with TBST for 5 min each, the membranes were incubated with the secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (all diluted 1:5000, Proteintech, Wuhan, China). After the membranes were washed three more times with TBST for 5 min each and then the proteins were detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western Blot Detection Kit. Band intensities were measured with the AlphaView SA software (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA). Relative PDCD4 and PTEN protein expression was calculated relative to GAPDH.
-
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s test or one-way ANOVA followed by the LSD or Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test assuming homogeneity of variances or non-assumed homogeneity of variances using the SPSS 19.0 software. Descriptive and variance homogeneity tests were also performed. *, #, and ^ indicate statistical significance with P< 0.05.