5.1 Set-up of IPC spinning instrument
A customized instrument was designed for fiber collection in accordance with the methods described in the previous study (Supplementary Fig. S1A) 34. The primary component was a 75 cm x 33 cm x 32 cm modified metal cabinet, offering ample sealing to minimize contamination, while allowing real-time observation of the spinning process through a transparent front panel. The device was equipped with a motor featuring a speed control mechanism, meticulously configured to facilitate a consistent and uninterrupted spinning process (Oriental Motor, Japan). The speed control unit managed all speed control gear motors of the apparatus to regulate the respective movements for each step, including fiber production and spinning(3-45mm/s), fusion (2.5-40r/min), and collection (0.25-40r/min). The fiber bundle collector was assembled with a circular plate and stainless-steel rods. To maintain an appropriate humidity environment conducive for the IPC reaction, we housed a humidifier and hygrometer inside the metal chamber. In addition, a twisting device was self-designed to facilitate the fiber twisting process (Supplementary Fig. S1B). It included an acrylic plate, a metal shaft, and copper plates to secure the fiber bundles. The acrylic backboard could be adjusted to accommodate varying fiber lengths during weaving, ranging from 20 to 100 mm in length.
5.2 Fabrication and characterization of ligament-like scaffolds
The IPC spinning process was conducted according to the methodology outlined in the previous study 35. In brief, 2% (w/v) Pectin (Taiwan Gum, Arabic) and 2% (w/v) Poly-D-lysine hydrobromide (Mw = 84kDa, Alamanda-Polymers, USA) were separately dissolved in deionized (DI) water to prepare the polyanion and polycation solutions. Five pairs of polyanion-polycation solutions were placed onto the loading plate to form a core-sheath structure. Fibers were produced through a controlled fiber formation platform, allowing the polyanion and polycation solutions to generate an interface in between. Once fibers were formed and reached 5 cm in length, the loading plate was rotated to create an intersection point for fiber fusion into a primary fiber bundle. Pectin solution was used again as fusion solution and applied to ensure the merging fibers properly successfully fused. Secondary fiber bundles were gathered using a specifically-designed fiber bundle collector. The final diameter of the secondary fiber bundle was determined by the number of collection repetitions. To create the ligament-like scaffold, five of these secondary fiber bundles were stacked together and then arranged on a fiber-twisting device. The dimensions of the resulting scaffold were adjusted according to the requirement. For material characterization and in vitro testing, the scaffold was prepared with a length of 20 mm and a diameter of 0.5 mm.
After configuring the ligament-like scaffold, a crosslinking solution containing 5% (w/v) N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N’-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 2% (w/v) N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS; Fluka, Switzerland) in a 0.1M MES buffer (pH = 6.5, 0.3 M NaCl) was used for a preliminary crosslinking step. This was to ensure initial mechanical stability of the scaffold. The crosslinked scaffold was further immersed in a fresh crosslinking solution for 4 hours, followed by rinsing with DI water to remove residual crosslinking agents. The modified chemical bonds were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (Bruker, Vertex 80v).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to observe the morphology and structure of the ligament-like scaffold. High-resolution micrographs were taken using a thermal field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL, JSM-7610F) operating at 15keV and under a vacuum of 9.6×10-5 Pa. For overall structure observation, the ligament-like scaffold underwent lyophilization, while for morphology analysis during the IPC spinning process, sample were entailed sequential dehydration procedures and critical point drying (CPD). Prior to SEM imaging, specimens were coated with gold using an auto fine coater (JOEL, JEC-3000FC). Image J analysis was then used to quantify the porosity of the samples from the captured micrographs.
To visualize the distribution of pectin and PDL in individual IPC fibers, pectin was labeled with Fluorescent Dye 645-A Amine (Abnova, Taiwan) via an EDC/NHS crosslinking process. Concurrently, PDL was labeled with Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC, Fluka, Switzerland). The fluorescently-labeled IPC fiber was then created, embedded in an optimum cutting temperature compound (OCT; Sigma), and sectioned into 15 µm-thin slices using a Cryostat Microtome (Leica, CM1950). The OCT was subsequently removed with methanol. Finally, the fiber cross-sections were examined using confocal microscopy (ZEISS LSM 800 & Axio Observer Z1 TIRF).
5.3 In situ deposition and characterization of HAp gradient
HAp gradient was synthesized using a wet chemical synthesis method. The HAp coating solution was prepared by dissolving 0.5M Ca(OH)2 (Fluka, Switzerland) and 0.3M (NH4)2HPO4 (Showa Chemical, Japan) separately in DI water at 37°C. Equal volume of (NH4)2HPO4 solution was slowly added to the Ca(OH)2 solution at 37°C under stirring at 300 rpm. The edge of scaffold was immediately immersed in the HAp coating solution. For material characterization and in vitro study, each end was immersed to a depth of 0.5 cm. The scaffold was maintained in the HAp solution at 37°C for 12 hours to allow HAp deposition. When the solution was evaporated, it resulted in the formation of graded mineralization. The chemical equation is as follows:
$$10Ca{\left(OH\right)}_{2}+{\left({NH}_{4}\right)}_{2}\bullet HP{O}_{4}\to {Ca}_{10}{\left({PO}_{4}\right)}_{6}{\left(OH\right)}_{2}+18{H}_{2}O+12{NH}_{3}$$
The crystalline structure of HAp was identified using X-ray diffraction (Bruker, D2 Phaser), and its characteristic diffraction pattern was cross-referenced with the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) No. 09-0432 (HAp) data card. The morphology of HAp nanocrystalline on the scaffold surface was visualized with a thermal field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL, JSM-7610F), and the elemental composition, including the crucial calcium and phosphorus contents, was analyzed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The mineralization gradient on the scaffold was plotted using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (ULVAC, PHI PHI 5000 Versaprobe II), which provided insights into the calcium to carbon ratio.
5.4 PCN synthesis and CTGF loading
A 0.6 mg/mL chitosan solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and a 1.2 mg/mL heparan sulfate solution (YickVic, Hong Kong) were prepared in a 0.1 M acetic acid solution at pH 5.0. Both solutions were purified using 0.22 µm MCE syringe filters. The purified chitosan solution was mixed with the heparan sulfate solution at a 1:6 volume ratio. The reaction proceeded for 3 hours with stirring at 800 rpm in the dark. Afterward, the resulting polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles (PCNs) were dialyzed against DI water using an 8000 Da MWCO membrane for 24 hours. The dialyzed PCN was then lyophilized and stored for subsequent CTGF conjugation. CTGF and PCNs were mixed in DI water at a mass ratio of 100 ng/mg (CTGF/PCNs). The mixture was vortexed to ensure thorough mixing and allowed to react for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the product was subjected to lyophilization to remove water and preserve it for future use.
5.5 Coating of collagen sheath
SurgiAid® collagen (Maxigen Biotech Inc., Taiwan) was dissolved in a 1.5% (v/v) acetic acid solution and stirred overnight to prepare a 2% (w/v) collagen solution. A V-shaped PDMS mold was created using SYLGARD™ 184, and the scaffold was coated with 40ul of collagen solution containing 2% (w/v) EDC and 200ng CTGF. The coated scaffold was air-dried in a laminar flow hood to stabilize the collagen coating.
5.6 Mechanical properties analyses
The mechanical properties of the ligament-like scaffold were extensively characterized. Prior to each test, the samples were kept hydrated by storing them in PBS and the diameter was ascertained using a Vertical Fluorescence Microscope (Zeiss, Axiostar scope. A1) and analyzed using Image J. For the preparation of native tissue, porcine ACL tissues were prepared from fresh porcine knees. Femur and tibia regions were sliced into 1cm-thin rectangular planks for secure fastening during testing. Mechanical testing was conducted using a Universal Tester (Shimadzu, Autograph AGS-X) along with the software TRAPEZIUM LITE X for parameter calculations. The tensile tests assessed the strength, strain at break, and Young's modulus at a constant strain rate of 10%/min. For creep tests, samples were initially subjected to stress of 6 MPa at a stress rate of 30 MPa/min, which was held constant for 300 seconds. Then, the stress was slowly decreased to 0 MPa at a stress rate of 1.2 MPa/min. The initial strain (𝜺0, %), peak strain (𝜺Max, %), permanent strain (𝜺min, %) were subsequently determined. Following these measurements, the recovery ratio and creep deformation were calculated using the following formulas:
$$Recovery ratio=\frac{{\epsilon }_{Max}-{\epsilon }_{Min}}{{\epsilon }_{Max}}\times 100\%$$
$$Creep deformation={\epsilon }_{0}-{\epsilon }_{Max}$$
For stress relaxation, samples were subjected to a deformation of 10% strain at a strain rate of 10%/min, with this deformation kept constant for 1000 seconds. The stress values were normalized by the initial stress when the strain reached 10%. For cyclic loading-unloading tests, the process involved a loading rate of 6MPa and 100 cycles of unloading at a constant stress rate of 30MPa/min. Parameters including maximum strain, minimum strain, loading modulus, and unloading modulus were calculated for each cycle.
5.7 Degradation kinetics and CTGF release behavior
Lyophilized ligament-like scaffolds and collagen-coated ligament-like scaffolds were weighed and divided into 30 mg portions per 2 mL tube. These samples were then incubated in either 1.5 mL PBS or 1.5 mL PBS containing 50 IU/mL type I collagenase (Gibco, USA). The degradation buffers were changed every other day to maintain the enzymatic activity. At different time point, the samples were collected and washed with DI to remove residual buffer, following by lyophilization to measure the dry weight of materials.
To evaluate the CTGF release kinetics, two different methodologies were tested with each sample consisting of 200 ng of CTGF in a 500 µl release buffer containing 0.1% (w/v) BSA in PBS. The first test entailed the integration of CTGF by premixing it with pectin solution prior to scaffold fabrication. This approach targeted the achievement of a core-sheath pattern and uniform encapsulation of CTGF within the scaffold. The second test involved the loading of CTGF post-scaffold synthesis as kind of collagen sheath coating. Specifically, this approach was divided into three conditions: CTGF mixed with uncrosslinked collagen, CTGF mixed with 2% EDC-crosslinked collagen, and CTGF bound to PCNs and then mixed with 2% EDC crosslinked collagen. Subsequently, CTGF release was monitored and samples were collected at predetermined time intervals. Quantification was performed using a CTGF ELISA kit (BioVendor, Czech Republic).
5.8 In vitro cell culture
The human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) utilized in the in vitro study were acquired from the Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Taiwan. The culture medium for MSCs consisted of Gibco™ MEM non-essential amino acids (MEM-NEAA; Gibco, USA) supplemented with 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA), 4 ng/mL Human-bFGF (Gibco, USA), and 100 U/mL Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco, USA). Cell cultures were maintained in a controlled environment at 37°C with 5% CO2. The culture medium was refreshed every 3 days to ensure optimal cell growth and viability. For the subsequent experiments, MSCs at passages 3–5 were utilized.
5.9 Biocompatibility of ligament-like scaffold
Biocompatibility of the scaffolds was tested using an LDH Assay. 2×104 MSCs were co-cultured with sterilized scaffolds in 48-well culture plate and cytotoxicity was evaluated at 1, 3, and 5 days. The LDH assay was conducted according to the manufacture’s guidelines. Absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, SpectraMaxPlus384). Cytotoxicity was determined based on a formula by comparing the absorbance values from the sample and negative control against the positive control, Triton X-100-induced cell lysis. The cytotoxicity percentage was calculated as follows:
$$Cytotoxicity \left(\%\right)=\frac{{OD}_{Sample}-{OD}_{Negative}}{{OD}_{Positive}-{OD}_{Negative}}\times 100\%$$
where OD represents the absorbance obtained from the samples, negative control, and positive control, respectively.
5.10 Cell adhesion and proliferation on ligament-like scaffold
To validate the suitability of the ligament-like scaffold as a cell carrier for stem cell therapy, evaluation of cell adhesion and proliferation on the ligament-like scaffold was performed using a Cell Counting Kit 8 (WST-8/CCK8 Assay; Abcam, USA). In brief, scaffolds were positioned in V-shaped PDMS molds within a 6-well culture plate and seeded with 2x105 MSCs in 0.2 mL of medium. Due to the inherent hydrophobicity of PDMS and the effects of gravity, MSCs were able to adhere and accumulate on the scaffold. After a 24-hour period, cell-laden scaffolds were transferred to a fresh 12-well plate to facilitate cell growth. Cell count quantification was achieved by measuring absorbance at 450 nm after scaffold incubation with CCK8 solution at designated time points. The number of cells in the samples was calculated using interpolation from a standard curve, generated under identical conditions with the same cell passages.
5.11 Live/Dead assay
To corroborate the quantified results and observe cell morphology, a LIVE/DEAD assay was employed after an auto-fluorescence quenching process via Sudan Black-B (SBB, Abcam, USA). The samples were initially immersed in a quenching buffer of 0.1% SBB in 70% ethanol overnight at 37°C followed by washing thrice with 70% ethanol and PBS. MSCs were then seeded onto these scaffolds and then placed on a PDMS mold for 24 hours for cell attachment. Next, scaffolds were transferred to a new 12-well culture plate and rinsed thrice with PBS to discard unattached cells. Subsequently, Live/Dead staining (Invitrogen, USA) was performed 7 day after cell seeding, with live cells marked by 2 µM calcein AM (Green) and dead cells with 4 µM Ethidium Homodimer-1 (Red) in DPBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. These stained cells were visualized using fluorescence inverted microscopy (Axiovert 40 CFL, Carl Zeiss).
5.12 Animal and surgical procedures of ACL reconstruction model
The experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Laboratory Animals Center in National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan (IACUC Protocol No. 111049). The in vivo model utilized 3kg female New Zealand White Rabbits, sourced from Livestock Research Institute, Taiwan. Prior to surgery, morphine (2-5mg/kg) was administered for analgesia followed by 5mg/kg xylazine and 28.4mg/kg pentobarbital for anesthesia. The surgical site on the right knee was shaved and disinfected. After skin incision, a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy was utilized to expose the ACL, which was subsequently segmentally excised using a surgical blade. Bone tunnels in the tibia and femur were established using a 3.0-mm drill. The size of the proposed graft is 70 mm in length and 3 mm in diameter. The graft was passed proximally through the femoral tunnel and distally through the tibial tunnel, followed by fixation to the femoral and tibial periosteum using 3 − 0 PDS sutures in figure-of-eight fashion. The joint capsule and skin were then repaired using 4 − 0 PDS sutures and 4 − 0 nylon sutures respectively. Postoperatively, cefazolin (0.5 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly, and the surgical site was managed with antibiotic ointment and sterile dressings. A plaster cast was applied to immobilize the hindlimb.
Rabbit bone marrow derived MSCs, procured from Cell Biologics (USA), were cultivated in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Medium (ScienCell, USA) at 37°C with 5% CO2. The culture medium was replaced every other day to maintain cell growth and vitality. MSCs from passages 3–5 were employed in the ensuing experiments.
The control group consisted of autologous grafts and commercial grafts (LARS), denoted as Autograft and LARS, respectively. The autologous graft (70 mm in length and 3 mm in diameter) was harvested from the Achilles tendon of the same hindlimb, and was prepared and rinsed with normal saline before ACL reconstruction. The LARS graft was reformed into grafts measuring 70 mm in length and 3 mm in diameter. The experimental groups included: a ligament-like scaffold with collagen coating and HAp deposition (Scaffold), the same scaffold incorporated with 200ng CTGF (Scaffold/CTGF), and the scaffold incorporated with 200ng CTGF and 2×106 rabbit MSCs, (Scaffold/CTGF/MSCs). For in vivo studies, the grafts in all groups had a length of 70 mm and a diameter of 3 mm. A description of the experimental setup in more details was provided in Supplementary Table S1. The in vivo assessments comprised of histological and immunohistochemical analyses at 4- and 10-weeks after implantation, with the addition of micro-CT evaluations and biomechanical testing performed at the 10-week point post-surgery (Supplementary Fig. S2).
5.13 Osseointegration analysis by micro-CT
The knee joint was subjected to a 3-day formalin fixation prior to scanning using a 3D micro-CT system (SkyScan 1276, Bruker). The scanning process employed an isotropic resolution of 36 um in thickness. CT Analyzer software (v 1.20.8, Bruker) was utilized for subsequent analyses, specifically for evaluating the characteristics of the bone tunnel. For this purpose, a cylindrical volume of interest (VOI) with a width of 4.0 mm was selected to assess the 3.0-mm drilled bone tunnel. Within the VOI, various parameters such as bone mineral density (BMD), bone volume fraction (BV/TV, %), and trabecular number (Tb.N, 1/mm) were quantified. Additionally, the area of the bone tunnel (measured in mm2) was determined at a depth of 5 mm from the joint surface.
5.14 Histological and immunohistochemical analyses
In the histological analysis, H&E and Masson’s Trichrome staining techniques were employed to visualize tissue repair in both the ligament tissue and bone insertion regions. After micro-CT analysis, decalcification of samples was carried out using Leica Rapid Decalcifier II (Leica, Germany) for a week, with replacement of the solution every two days. After decalcification, the surrounding soft tissue was excised, and the femur-ligament-tibia complex was segmented into small portions. This included longitudinal sections for observing the intra-articular graft and transverse sections for bone insertion site examination.
Post decalcification, the tissue sections underwent a manual dehydration process comprising serial immersions in graded ethanol and xylene solutions, then embedded in paraffin using an Embedding Workstation (Thermal Fisher Scientific, HistoStar). The process encompassed stages in 70%, 80%, and 95% ethanol for specified durations followed by two rounds of each sample in 100% ethanol and xylene, and an overnight incubation in 65℃ paraffin. Thin sections of 7 µm thickness were obtained using a rotary microtome (Thermal Fisher Scientific, HM 315) after paraffin embedding. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E; Abcam, USA) staining was employed as per Abcam's protocol to elucidate cell nuclei (hematoxylin) and cytoplasm (eosin), enabling an evaluation of tissue morphology and cell organization. Masson's Trichrome staining (Abcam, USA), also guided by Abcam's instructions, was used to stain cell nuclei with Weigert's iron hematoxylin, muscle fibers and collagen with Biebrich Scarlet-Acid Fuchsin, differentiating with a phosphomolybdic/phosphotungstic acid solution, and counterstaining collagen fibers with Aniline Blue. This staining technique rendered details about tissue fibrosis and collagen deposition.
For immunohistochemistry (IHC), sections were rehydrated and treated with proteinase K for antigen retrieval at 37°C for 20 min followed by a 10-min hydrogen peroxide block and a 10-min protein block using an Abcam ABC IHC kit. When using primary antibodies sourced from rabbits, a rabbit-to-rabbit blocking reagent (ScyTek, USA) was applied for 2 hours at room temperature to prevent non-specific binding. Histological sections were then incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C followed by a secondary antibody for 1 hour. For rabbit primary antibodies, biotinylated goat anti-polyvalent (Abcam, USA) was added for 10 min. The chromogenic reaction involved a 10-min streptavidin peroxidase and a 2-min DAB solution. Counterstaining was done using hematoxylin. The antibody dilution factors used were as follows: primary rabbit anti- Tenomodulin antibody, 1:100 (Bioss, USA); primary mouse anti- Tenascin C antibody, 1:70 (Cloud-clone, USA); primary guinea pig anti-osteocalcin antibody, 1:40 (Cloud-clone, USA); secondary biotinylated anti-mouse antibody, 1:100 (Arigo, Taiwan); and secondary biotinylated anti-guinea pig antibody, 1:1000 (Genetex, USA).
5.15 Biomechanical analysis
Biomechanical investigations were conducted using a Universal Tester (Shimadzu, AGS-X). Knee specimens were harvested and prepared as femur-graft-tibia complex immediately after sacrifice, with removal of other connective tissues except for the ACL replacement. The mechanical failure test was performed at an elongation rate of 1 mm/min to determine the ultimate tensile strength and generate a load-elongation curve. The breaking condition was recorded to evaluate the integration between the replacement and the surrounding tissue.
5.16 Statistical analysis
The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) of the mean. Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and T-test. The following notations were used to indicate the significance level: N.S. for no significant difference, * for p ≤ 0.05, ** for p ≤ 0.01, *** for p ≤ 0.001, and **** for p ≤ 0.0001.