3.1. Multi-generational reproductive effects of TTAC and TTAB
Results showed that TTAC caused significant stimulation on the total reproduction in F1, inhibition in F2, stimulation again in F3 and inhibition in F4 (Fig. 1(A)). Moreover, the effects of TTAC on the initial reproduction were generally similar to those on the total reproduction. Notably, the effects of TTAC on the reproduction duration showed inhibition in F1 and stimulation in F2 to F4. The stimulation on the reproduction duration in F2 and F4 spared more time for reproduction but it was not enough to compensate the inhibition on initial reproduction, and therefore resulted in the inhibition in the total reproduction. Summing up, the multi-generational reproductive effects of TTAC showed oscillatory changes between stimulation and inhibition over generations. Moreover, the effects were mainly resulted from the influences on the initial reproduction which was not compensated by the prolonged reproduction duration.
(Fig. 1 around here)
In the aspect of TTAB, it showed stimulation on the total reproduction in all generations with the greatest stimulation in F2 (Fig. 1(B)). It showed stimulation on the initial reproduction in F1, F3 and F4, but inhibition in F2. It also commonly stimulated the reproduction duration in all generations. In other words, the reproductive increases by TTAC in F1, F3 and F4 were resulted from both initial reproduction and reproduction duration. Meanwhile, the reproductive increases in F2 were mainly resulted from longer reproduction duration instead of the initial reproduction. The different results of TTAC and TTAB showed the influences of anions on the reproductive toxicities of QACs.
3.2. Multi-generational effects of TTAC and TTAB on essential reproduction proteins
Multi-generational effects of TTAC on essential reproduction proteins are showed in Fig. 2(A). In F1, TTAC inhibited MSP and Vg, and stimulated VAB-1, SPE9 and SPE8. In F2, it stimulated MSP and SPE8, and inhibited SPE9, Vg and MAPK. In F3, it inhibited MSP, VAB-1, SPE9 and Vn, and stimulated Vg and MAPK. In F4, it stimulated MSP and Vn, and inhibited VAB-1 and Vg. Summing up, effects of TTAC oscillated between stimulation and inhibition on all proteins over generations. Combining the biochemical effects, the IBR values were 2.21, 2.17, 2.10 and 2.34 in F1 to F4, respectively. Compared with the IBR value in the control (2.60), the overall effects of TTAC commonly showed inhibition Fig. 2(C).
Effects of TTAB on the proteins also showed oscillation between stimulation and inhibition over generations (Fig. 2(B)). The IBR values were 2.43, 2.12, 2.18 and 2.34 in F1 to F4, respectively. The overall effects of TTAB also commonly inhibition.
(Fig. 2 around here)
3.3. Multi-generational effects of TTAC and TTAB on genetic regulations
In F1, TTAC upregulated all gene expressions (Fig. 3(A)). In F2, it upregulated the expressions of set-2, met-2, mes-4 and vab-1 and downregulated those of ceh-18. In F3, it upregulated the expressions of set-2, mes-4 and vab-1, and downregulated those of ceh-18 and gsa-1. In F4, it upregulated expressions of set-2, met-2, mes-4, vab-1 and gsa-1, and downregulated those of ceh-18. The IBR values were 13.4, 3.72, 2.43 and 2.60 in F1 to F4, respectively. Compared with the IBR value of the control (2.74), the overall effects of TTAC on gene expressions were stimulatory in F1 and F2, and inhibitory in F3 and F4 (Fig. 3(C)).
(Fig. 3 around here)
In F1, TTAB did not show significant influences on all gene expressions (Fig. 3(B)). In F2, it upregulated the expressions of set-2, met-2, mes-4, vab-1 and gsa-1, and downregulated those of ceh-18. In F3, it upregulated the expressions of set-2, mes-4, vab-1 and gsa-1, and downregulated those of ceh-18. In F4, it upregulated expressions of set-2, mes-4, vab-1 and gsa-1, and downregulated those of met-2 and ceh-18. Collectively, the expression levels showed oscillation between upregulation and downregulation over generations. The IBR values were 2.33, 9.51, 2.86 and 2.60 in F1 to F4, respectively (Fig. 3(C)). The overall effects of TTAB on gene expressions were inhibitory in F1 and F4 and stimulatory in F2 and F3.
3.4. Overall analysis on multi-generational effects of TTAC and TTAB
In the HCA results, the effects of TTAC on reproduction (including initial reproduction, total reproduction and reproduction duration) and reproduction-related proteins (including MSP, VAB-1, SPE9, SPE8, Vg and Vn) in F1 were closed clustered showing close connection (Fig. 4(A)). Interestingly, the effects of TTAC on the gene expressions in F1 were more closely connected with the effects on reproduction in F2. Moreover, the effects on expressions of vab-1, ceh-18 and gsa-1 in F2 were also more closely connected with those on reproduction in F3. In addition, the effects on SPE-8, Vg, Vn and MAPK and those on the gene regulation in F3 were also more closely connected with the effects on reproduction in F4. Summing up, the effects of TTAC on parents were closely connected with those on the offspring. The effects of TTAB in parent generations were also closely related with those on the offspring (Fig. 4B). Moreover, the effects of TTAC in F1 were even connected with those in F3 and F4, and the effects of TTAB in F1 and F2 also showed close connection with those in F4. That is to say, the close connection among indicators expanded over adjacent generations.
(Fig. 4 around here)
(Tables 1 & 2 around here)
Table 1 Pearson’s correlation between reproduction and biochemicals, between reproduction and gene expressions, and between biochemicals and gene expressions in the toxicities of tetradecyltrimethylammonium chloride (TTAC).
TTAC
|
IR
|
TR
|
MSP
|
VAB-1
|
SPE-9
|
SPE-8
|
Vg
|
Vn
|
MAPK
|
set-2
|
met-2
|
mes-4
|
vab-1
|
ceh-18
|
gsa-1
|
IR
|
-
|
1.000
|
0.612
|
0.733
|
0.741
|
0.740
|
0.758
|
0.651
|
0.813
|
0.695
|
0.701
|
0.751
|
0.756
|
0.836
|
0.718
|
TR
|
|
-
|
0.618
|
0.739
|
0.746
|
0.747
|
0.763
|
0.656
|
0.815
|
0.698
|
0.704
|
0.756
|
0.762
|
0.838
|
0.721
|
MSP
|
|
|
-
|
0.964*
|
0.948*
|
0.973*
|
0.976*
|
0.988*
|
0.941*
|
0.539
|
0.585
|
0.724
|
0.766
|
0.553
|
0.413
|
VAB-1
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.992*
|
0.998*
|
0.964*
|
0.980*
|
0.959*
|
0.737
|
0.770
|
0.876
|
0.907*
|
0.751
|
0.638
|
SPE-9
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.985*
|
0.949*
|
0.980*
|
0.969*
|
0.771
|
0.808
|
0.900*
|
0.918*
|
0.779
|
0.670
|
SPE-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.978*
|
0.981*
|
0.964*
|
0.699
|
0.733
|
0.849
|
0.884*
|
0.725
|
0.602
|
Vg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.968*
|
0.978*
|
0.567
|
0.608
|
0.744
|
0.783
|
0.627
|
0.471
|
Vn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.964*
|
0.636
|
0.683
|
0.800
|
0.828
|
0.640
|
0.512
|
MAPK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.660
|
0.704
|
0.810
|
0.828
|
0.715
|
0.570
|
set-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.997
|
0.971*
|
0.950*
|
0.973*
|
0.982*
|
met-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.981*
|
0.959*
|
0.967*
|
0.966*
|
mes-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.994*
|
0.956*
|
0.922*
|
vab-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.940*
|
0.897*
|
ceh-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.978*
|
gsa-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
*, at 0.05 level.
Table 2 Pearson’s correlation between reproduction and biochemicals, between reproduction and gene expressions, and between biochemicals and gene expressions in the toxicities of tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (TTAB).
TTAB
|
IR
|
TR
|
MSP
|
VAB-1
|
SPE-9
|
SPE-8
|
Vg
|
Vn
|
MAPK
|
set-2
|
met-2
|
mes-4
|
vab-1
|
ceh-18
|
gsa-1
|
IR
|
-
|
0.846
|
0.968*
|
0.990*
|
0.980*
|
0.972*
|
0.976*
|
0.983*
|
0.980*
|
0.635
|
0.628
|
0.431
|
0.801
|
0.929*
|
0.717
|
TR
|
|
-
|
0.940*
|
0.895*
|
0.922*
|
0.945*
|
0.926*
|
0.926*
|
0.911*
|
0.931*
|
0.946*
|
0.836
|
0.980*
|
0.856
|
0.616
|
MSP
|
|
|
-
|
0.990*
|
0.982*
|
0.998*
|
0.996*
|
0.996*
|
0.982*
|
0.806
|
0.780
|
0.637
|
0.925*
|
0.893*
|
0.774
|
VAB-1
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.990*
|
0.991*
|
0.996*
|
0.997*
|
0.994*
|
0.718
|
0.702
|
0.531
|
0.867
|
0.919*
|
0.756
|
SPE-9
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.992*
|
0.991*
|
0.994*
|
0.997*
|
0.735
|
0.753
|
0.565
|
0.875
|
0.960*
|
0.664
|
SPE-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.997*
|
0.998*
|
0.990*
|
0.796
|
0.788
|
0.630
|
0.918*
|
0.921*
|
0.730
|
Vg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.998*
|
0.994*
|
0.771
|
0.756
|
0.599
|
0.905*
|
0.913*
|
0.756
|
Vn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.994*
|
0.762
|
0.753
|
0.586
|
0.896*
|
0.927*
|
0.735
|
MAPK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.727
|
0.735
|
0.555
|
0.873
|
0.946*
|
0.697
|
set-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.966*
|
0.967*
|
0.968*
|
0.609
|
0.622
|
met-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.951*
|
0.937*
|
0.697
|
0.440
|
mes-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.881*
|
0.455
|
0.451
|
vab-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.758
|
0.717
|
ceh-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
0.436
|
gsa-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
*, at 0.05 level.
In the Pearson’s correlation results, the biochemical effects of TTAC (e.g., on MSP, VAB-1, SPE-9, SPE-8, Vg, Vn and MAPK) were well correlated with themselves and also occasionally with those on mes-4 and vab-1 expressions (Table 1). Meanwhile, the biochemical effects of TTAB showed correlations with themselves, but also with reproduction, and commonly with those on vab-1 and ceh-18 expressions (Table 2). The results demonstrated the connection among indicators and also the differences between TTAC and TTAB.