Study Design and Patients
In this case-control study, patients diagnosed with acute ON were evaluated for findings consistent with demyelination disorders at the Feiz Hospital, a referral ophthalmology center affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. The study group was divided into two subgroups after systemic and neurological evaluation: idiopathic ON and demyelinating ON; the latter including Multiple sclerosis (MS-ON), Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO-ON), and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). The healthy control group was equivalent to the patient group regarding age and gender, and it was selected from healthy subjects as candidates for refractive surgery.
The ethics committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol (Registration number: IR.MUI.MED.REC.1399.1120). This study abides by the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration, and subjects were provided with written informed consent to participate in the study.
Patients aged between 18-50 years, regardless of gender, diagnosed with acute ON of one eye in the setting of clinical examinations and MRI; in the absence of a known diagnosis of demyelination disorder were recruited.
The excluding criteria were defined as 1) any progressive known neurological disorder, medical condition, or limiting psychiatric disease that may impair the subject's capacity to participate and adhere to study; 2) other causes of optic neuropathy (e.g., intrinsic or extrinsic compression anywhere along the optic nerve, infections, ischemia, toxic and nutritional neuropathies); 3) medical comorbidities that may alter serum ACE level (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal parenchymal diseases, sarcoidosis, chronic liver diseases, moderate or severe cardiopulmonary disorders, and taking any medicines that may affect the RAS function); 4) inability to acquire magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from the subject; 5) contraindications to MRI such as glomerular filtration rates less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2, cardiac pacemaker, metal implants, and claustrophobia. This clinical report follows Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for case-control studies.
Ocular examination
The diagnosis of ON was clinically determined for each eligible patient by a detailed history of periorbital pain with eye movement, subacute monocular vision loss developed over several days and confirmed by dyschromatopsia and relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) findings upon examination; accompanied by any pattern of visual field loss with or without disc oedema.
All patients had a thorough ophthalmological examination, including assessment of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), pupillary response to light stimuli, Ishihara color blindness test, extraocular muscle function testing, ocular tonometry to define intraocular pressure (IOP), and dilated-pupil fundus examination using 78D lens and binocular slit-lamp examination of anterior segments. BCVA was converted to a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis.
Neurological examination
All the subjects underwent brain and orbital MRI, and a lumbar puncture was performed on any suspected individual. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected to assess for MS or NMOSD. AQP4-IgG was measured by a live cell-based assay method. MS diagnosis was established according to the 2017 Mcdonald’s criteria (26).
Sample Storage and Biomarker Assessment
Venous blood samples of all participants were obtained from the cubital vein to measure the serum ACE level. Coagulated samples were centrifuged, and the sera were then frozen at -20°C. A standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method for ACE was used to quantify ACE concentration in the blood (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). Healthy controls had their serum ACE levels measured using the same method as the ON subjects. The normal ACE reference range was considered 8–65 units.
Statistical Analysis
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 26 SPSS, USA) was used to analyze the data. Means, standard deviations, medians, interquartile ranges, and box plots were utilized to explain and illustrate the numerical variables. Qualitative characteristics were quantified using numbers and percentages. Where appropriate, the Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to determine the normality of the distribution of numerical variables. Due to non-normal distribution of variables, comparisons between groups were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Pairwise post-hoc testing with Bonferroni correction was used to make comparisons. The adjusted associations were assessed using a multinominal logistic regression model and reported as adjusted odds ratios. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.