Given the severity of Lassa fever (LF) and lack of preventative countermeasures against it, there is a great need to develop a safe and effective LASV vaccine. We showed previously that an inactivated RABV-based vaccine targeting LASV-GPC, LASSARAB, was protective in a guinea pig LF challenge model and induced strong humoral responses in nonhuman primates (NHPs) up to one-year postimmunization28,34. This study aimed to determine the protective efficacy of LASSARAB in NHPs. We demonstrated that LASSARAB could protect against severe disease and death in a lethal NHP model of LF.
Here, we showed induction of neutralizing-antibody responses against LASV Josiah in 6/6 LASSARAB-vaccinated NHPs by day 10 postchallenge (pc). Neutralizing antibodies are known to protect NHPs from lethal LASV when administered as a cocktail via intravenous infusion as late as day 8 postchallenge12. In vaccinated NHPs, we did not detect neutralizing antibodies prior to day 10. However, we observed neutralizing antibodies starting at day 10 that peaked between days 14 to 21 pc. This response persisted at varying levels through day 28 pc in all LASSARAB vaccinates. Based on these results, it appears that neutralizing antibodies are only produced as a result of LASV challenge, not vaccination with LASSARAB, and thus are not playing a main role in vaccine-mediated protection against LASV challenge.
All LASSARAB-immunized NHPs survived challenge, with only one NHP demonstrating minor outward clinical symptoms and four NHPs showing transient viremia. One of the main targets of LASV infection is the liver, as indicated by a dramatic increase in liver enzymes43,44. LASSARAB immunized NHPs all maintained normal blood chemistry levels compared to controls, indicating that these NHPs were protected from liver dysfunction. NHPs in the control group developed severe and widespread histological lesions consistent with fatal LF infection as previously described for the cynomolgus macaque model43. Despite the positive clinical outcome and lack of CBC and blood chemistry changes in the vaccinated NHPs, pathologic analysis revealed significant lesions in lymphoid tissue as well as smooth muscle layer of arteries in multiple organ systems that stained positive for LASV antigen. This resembles a systemic auto-immune vasculitis that has been previously described in NHPs and guinea pigs that survive LASV infection46,47. The disease process for LASV in NHPs is somewhat protracted compared to other hemorrhagic fever viruses in which NHPs become morbid and require euthanasia 5–7 days after exposure. This study’s endpoint was 28 days after virus exposure. It is unknown if the pathology that was observed in vaccinated survivors at day 28 would have resolved or become less prevalent if the study endpoint was longer. Additional studies may shed light on this.
Other vaccine platforms targeting LASV-GPC have also shown protection in lethal NHP challenge models. These include a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing LASV-GPC48, recombinant22 and modified49 VSVs expressing LASV-GPC, recombinant measles virus (MeV) expressing LASV-GPC and nucleoprotein (NP)15, attenuated Mopeia virus expressing LASV-GPC19, and a DNA vaccine of LASV-GPC14,23,24. Although not sterilizing, the protective efficacy of LASSARAB is comparable to many of these other vaccine platforms15,22,48,49, with 100% of LASSARAB-vaccinated NHPs surviving challenge and showing minimal clinical symptoms. While these other platforms are protective, the inactivated RABV platform has some advantages over these platforms. As mentioned above, the rabies vaccine has been in use for decades and is safe to administer to a variety of patient populations, including both immunocompromised and pregnant patients30. The rabies vaccine has been shown to elicit long-term immunity in humans50 and appears to confer this longevity to foreign antigens34,51,52, although further studies are required to determine the full extent of the durability of immune responses against foreign antigens. The areas in which LASV is endemic have warm climates and limited access to cold-chain storage. While most of the other vaccine platforms mentioned above require cold-chain storage to remain stable over time, the inactivated RABV platform has been shown to remain stable over a variety of temperatures for extended periods of time31. The areas where LASV is endemic are also endemic to RABV, and thus LASSARAB can provide protection against both viruses. Importantly given the presence of RABV in these areas, we have shown that vector pre-immunity does not impact the ability of this platform to elicit immune responses against a foreign antigen52, although this will need to be confirmed with LASSARAB. Finally, the rabies vaccine is already commercially available, which means that infrastructure already exists for large-scale production of medical grade material53.
Our previous study demonstrated that LASSARAB protects through non-neutralizing antibodies28. We confirmed that pre-challenge, NHPs immunized with LASSARAB also develop non-neutralizing antibodies with Fcg-receptor mediated functions, but not neutralizing antibodies. The dispensability of neutralizing antibodies for protection against LASV is in line with other vaccine strategies17,22,32 and is likely a result of the LASV glycoprotein glycan shield blocking antibodies from binding to neutralizing epitopes 33. However, non-neutralizing antibodies acting as the mechanism of protection contrasts other vaccine strategies targeting GPC, in which vaccine-mediated cellular immunity was protective17,32. Additionally, a gamma-irradiated whole LASV virion vaccine elicited strong antibody responses, but could not protect NHPs from LASV challenge54. These disparities in protective mechanism are likely attributed to the type of platform used, given that our platform is an inactivated RABV, while the two that require cellular immunity are live viral vectors (Vaccinia and Mopeia viruses)17,32, and the non-protective vaccine was inactivated LASV virions54. Overall, this suggests that there is not one specific mechanism of protection for LASV vaccines, and the mechanism will have to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
We are currently setting up a phase I clinical trial of LASSARAB in the US. Nevertheless, other studies should be performed to support the use of LASSARAB in the clinic. An ideal vaccine candidate should be cross-protective against a variety of LASV strains. Three LASV vaccine candidates, the MeV-, VSV-, and modified VSV-based vaccines, have demonstrated cross-protection against heterologous strains of LASV in NHPs49,55,56. These vaccines target LASV-GPC, demonstrating that immune responses against LASV-GPC are protective against various strains of LASV. LASSARAB also targets LASV-GPC, indicating that this vaccine has the potential for cross-protection; however, further studies are required to investigate this. In addition to a vaccine that can protect against various strains of LASV, another focus has been the development of vaccines that only require a single dose and provide rapid protection. All live viral-vectored LASV vaccines showed protection in NHPs after a single dose15,19,22,48,49. Additionally, a VSV-based LASV vaccine was able to protect NHPs that were challenged either 3- or 7-days postimmunization56. Given the advantage of a single dose vaccine regimen, additional studies should be conducted to determine whether LASSARAB can protect NHPs after a single dose immunization and how rapidly LASSARAB confers protection postimmunization.
Our study contains some limitations. Most notably, as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there was limited availability of NHPs at the time of this study. The NHPs we acquired for this study were young and small in size, which limited the amount of blood we were able to collect. Thus, we were unable to perform assays looking at cellular immunity elicited by LASSARAB or whether these responses play a role in LASSARAB-mediated protection. We previously showed that Fcg-receptor knockout mice immunized with LASSARAB were not protected from challenge with a VSV-based LASV surrogate challenge virus28. While this indicates that the strong non-neutralizing antibody responses may play a role in the protection conferred by LASSARAB, we cannot exclude the possibility that neutralizing antibodies, as well as T cells, play a role in protection, especially given that these mechanistic studies have not yet been repeated in a challenge model with wildtype LASV. Future studies must determine whether LASSARAB induces a cellular response and what role (if any) these responses play in vaccine-mediated protection. LASSARAB is administered in a prime/boost immunization regimen, which is a significant limitation of this platform compared to other platforms that have shown protection after a single dose15,19,22,48,49. As mentioned above, studies testing the protective efficacy of LASSARAB after immunization with a single dose are required to determine the extent of this limitation. It should also be noted that the vaccine did not prevent the development of systemic, immune-mediated, proliferative, and necrotizing vasculitis in NHPs surviving to day 28 postchallenge. An additional study with a longer endpoint may be warranted to observe whether these pathologic lesions will resolve over time.