Low handgrip strength is associated with worse functional outcomes in long-Covid

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3695556/v1

Download PDF

Article

Low handgrip strength is associated with worse functional outcomes in long-Covid

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3695556/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 24 Jan, 2024

Read the published version in Scientific Reports →

You are reading this latest preprint version

The diagnosis of long-Covid is troublesome, even when functional limitations are present. Dynapenia is a decrease in muscle strength and power production and may explain in part these limitations. This study aimed to identify the distribution and possible association of dynapenia with functional assessment in patients with long-Covid. A total of 113 inpatients with COVID-19 were evaluated by functional assessment 120 days post-acute severe disease. Body composition, respiratory muscle strength, spirometry, six-minute walk test (6MWT) and hand-grip strength (HGS) were assessed. Dynapenia was defined as HGS < 30kg/f (men), and < 20kg/f (women). Twenty-five (22%) participants were dynapenic, presenting lower muscle mass (p < 0.001), worse forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁) (p = 0.0001), lower forced vital capacity (p < 0.001), and inspiratory (p = 0.007) and expiratory (p = 0.002) peek pressures, as well as worse 6MWT performance (p < 0.001). Dynapenia was associated with worse FEV₁, MEP, and 6MWT, independent of age (p < 0.001). Patients with dynapenia had higher ICU admission rates (p = 0.01) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (p = 0.007) during hospitalization. The HGS is a simple, reliable, and low-cost measurement that can be performed in outpatient clinics in low- and middle-income countries. Thus, HGS may be used as a proxy indicator of functional impairment in this population.

Health sciences/Health care

Health sciences/Health care/Diagnosis

Health sciences/Diseases

Health sciences/Diseases/Infectious diseases/Viral infection

SARS-CoV-2

COVID-19

grip-strength

post-acute covid syndrome

Most people recover completely without further complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection(1). Nonetheless, a significant subset of individuals develops unexpected symptoms weeks after infection that may persist for years (2, 3). The most reported are post-exertional malaise, fatigue, brain fog, neurocognitive impairment, dizziness, and gastrointestinal symptoms (4). This myriad of symptoms has been collectively termed long-Covid. It has become a public health problem once it is debilitating and restricts individuals from returning to daily activities, including work (5, 6). Although there is no consensus on its definition and there is no tool or biomarker that measures the condition, it is becoming increasingly well known. A global prevalence of 43% of long COVID-19 is estimated, with a prevalence of 54% in hospitalized individuals and 34% in non-hospitalized (7). Middle-aged, females, Hispanic and/or Latino, and economically constrained populations are at increased risk of developing long-Covid (7). The extent to which it is underdiagnosed in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) is poorly understood (8).

Handgrip strength (HGS) is a well-documented proxy for muscle strength and is associated with all-cause and disease-specific mortality, as well as functional health, bone mineral density, cognitive disabilities, and depression (9). It has also been linked to premature death in older and middle-aged individuals (10) and young people (11). In COVID-19 acute disease, decreased HGS has been shown to be a risk factor independent of disease severity (12) and correlates with longer hospitalization (13).

The use of a simple and low-cost tool for the prediction of functional impairment only verified by more complex assessments, i.e., spirometry, cardiopulmonary test, and plethysmography, could be of great importance, especially in LMICs, as these tools are unavailable for most of the population. HGS, therefore, may possibly indicate the need for further clinical investigation, specialized treatment and rehabilitation in this population. We hypothesized that patients who experience a persistent decline in peripheral muscle strength evidenced by low grip strength, after hospital discharge have greater alterations in respiratory function and functional capacity. Thus, this study aims to verify whether HGS is associated with functional impairment at 120 days posthospital discharge in unvaccinated individuals who had developed severe Covid-19 by early 2020. The association between HGS, respiratory function, and distance walked in the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) is therefore investigated.

Study design and population

This was a longitudinal study conducted between April and October 2020 at the Hospital e Pronto-Socorro Delphina Rinaldi Abdel Aziz, in Manaus, Western Brazilian Amazon. Hospitalized. COVID-19 patients were followed-up after hospitalization and performed pulmonary function and physical capacity tests at 120-day after discharge. Individuals aged 18 years or older, of both sexes and positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR at hospitalization were included in this analysis.

Procedures performed at the follow-up visit (D120)

The D120 visit consisted of assessing body composition, HGS, respiratory function, with a pulmonary function test (spirometry), respiratory muscle strength (RMS), and functional capacity using the 6MWT. Test details are presented below. All data were recorded online in an electronic medical recording system (Medview version 710801 and Esthor) and then registered in an electronic database (REDCap). All procedures were performed by harmonized and protocol-trained study staff.

Handgrip strength and dynapenia case definition

Three measurements were performed using a digital hand-held dynamometer (Instrutherm®, Brazil), standing position for each hand, 1-minute interval, with the elbow straight and fully extended, alternating between dominant and non-dominant sides. The maximum value was derived for each arm, while HGS was defined as the highest value of the six attempts. Dynapenia was considered when participants presented cut-off values of < 30 kg/f for men and < 20 kg/f for women (16). Handgrip measurement has the advantage of being simple and easy and of being used as an index of whole-body muscular strength (17).

Pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength (RMS)

Spirometry (Cosmed®, Italy) was performed to determine pulmonary function. The predicted values were calculated according to the ERS Eq. (18). The RMS was evaluated using a digital manometer (MDI, MVD300, Brazil). Both tests were performed according to the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) was obtained after the individual expired to residual volume and performed a maximal effort inspiration against a closed valve, during which the pressure was measured. For the assessment of maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) assessment, patients underwent an inspiration up to full lung capacity, followed by a maximal effort expiration against a closed valve for two seconds, after which the valve is opened. Those who presented altered blood pressure levels and those with poor-quality spirometry were not included in the analysis.

Functional capacity and body composition

For the 6MWT, subjects were instructed and encouraged (standardized verbal encouragement) to walk the longest possible distance in six minutes on a 30-meter-long flat corridor. The test was performed according to the American Thoracic Society recommendations (19). The assessment of body composition was performed using a previously calibrated scale (OMROM®, Japan) and was carried out with the participants standing barefoot and upright. Weight, body mass index (BMI), muscle mass (Kg), and fat mass (Kg) variables were extracted. The height of the participants was collected using a standard measuring tape divided into centimeters, keeping them barefoot and with their body upright.

Statistical analysis

Participants were grouped according to the HGS test and further stratified into dynapenic and non-dynapenic to verify whether HGS was associated with functional impairment in long-Covid. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the distribution of the data. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated when distributions were confirmed as normal. Descriptive data are shown as a mean and standard deviation, or median and interquartile range (IQR), when applicable. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the groups (i.e., Dynapenia vs. non-dynapenia). For categorical variables, the chi-square test was applied. Correlation analysis was performed with Spearman´s test. A regression model was used to determine the influence of age associated with dynapenia on functional and clinical variables. All tests were performed using R software version 4.3.0 and p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical Aspects

The Brazilian Committee on Ethics in Human Research approved the study (CAAE 30615920.2.0000.0005). This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki principles and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization. All hospitalized patients were informed about study objectives and risks, after which they were invited to participate. All individuals were given time to carefully read and sign an informed consent form.

A total of 113 participants were included in this analysis, with a medium age of 48 years old (IQR: 41–58). Sixty-one (54%) individuals were female. A total of 25/113 (22%) had dynapenia (Table 1).

The baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings of study population at first day of hospitalization during acute severe COVID-19 is presented in table 2. Those with dynapenia presented significantly lower muscle mass compared to the non-dynapenic group, 20.6kgs (IQR:16-23.2) and 26.1kgs (IQR:20-29.7) (p < 0,001), respectively, at D120 follow-up visit. As expected, the HGS was significantly lower in the dynapenia group compared to the non-dynapenic group, 18.5 (IQR:15.0-26.8) and 34.0 (IQR:26.6–43.7) (p < 0.001), respectively, at D120. Patients with dynapenia at D120 follow-up visit had higher ICU admission rates (19% vs 2.9%, p = 0.010) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (16% vs 2.3%, p = 0.007) than patients without dynapenia. The BMI (p = 0.04), the proportion of individuals with a smoking history (p < 0.01), and diabetes (p = 0.01) were higher in the dynapenia group (Table 2).

When comparing muscle mass (kg) on D1 versus D120 in dynapenic versus non-dynapenic groups, we found a significant reduction after 120 days in the dynapenic group [D1 dynapenia: 30.7 (37 − 23) versus D120 dynapenia: 19.9 (22 − 17) p < 0.001].

Dynapenic individuals presented worse forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁, liters) (p < 0.001) and forced vital capacity (FVC, liters) (p < 0.001), reduced MIP (p = 0.007) and MEP (p = 0.002) pressures, significantly reduced walking distance (p < 0.001) and percentage of predicted walking distance (p = 0.001) on the 6MWT compared to non-dynapenic patients (Table 3).

The correlation analysis revealed significance between HGS, and distance walked for all participants (rho = 0.450, p < 0.001), which also remained significant among both groups separately (Fig. 1). Regression analyses revealed a significant association between HGS and FEV₁ (p < 0.001, CI 95% -0.0728 -0.0377), MEP (p < 0.001 CI 95% -0.0016 -0.008), and 6MWT (p < 0.001 CI 95% -0.0017 -0.0015), even after controlling for age (Table 4).

This study showed that an important proportion of individuals with long-Covid have decreased HGS. In addition, dynapenia was associated with worse lung function test scores and lower respiratory muscle strength, which ultimately had a negative impact on the distance walked on the 6MWT after 120 days from hospital discharge. Despite a significant and expected higher age in the dynapenic group, the HGS was associated with lower FEV₁, MEP, and 6MWT, even when controlling for age. HGS was correlated significantly with distance walked on the 6MWT and with worse pulmonary function in these individuals.

After 120 days, 22% of the participants still had a loss of muscle strength, which was reflected in decreased muscle functioning. The skeletal muscle’s ability to produce strength (i.e., maximal voluntary force) and power (strength vs speed) affects health outcomes and is associated with increased disability, becoming an important component of health and disease for all ages. The consequences of reduced grip strength are increased risk for physical disability (20, 21), poor physical performance and death from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes, and stroke (22–24).

The current literature shows that most of the symptoms of long-Covid occur in individuals who have been hospitalized, but also in non-hospitalized individuals, or severe and non-severe COVID-19 (25), with the more severe individuals having worse outcomes six months after hospital discharge. Given the number of individuals who recovered from acute COVID-19, regardless of the acute disease phenotype, long-Covid is a problem that is far from being fully grasped. Most sequelae seem to resolve within six months (26), but in some individuals, it may persist for years (27). The individuals from this study demonstrated a worrying functional outcome after four months of acute disease, which probably limit their day-to-day activities. Further studies are needed to see if these alterations persist for longer periods.

A significant proportion of individuals with diabetes, previous smoking habits, lower BMI, older age, and in need for ICU and IMV at hospital admission presented reduced grip strength 120 days after hospital discharge. It is important to emphasize that a 1% loss of lean mass is equivalent to a 3% reduction in muscle strength in the elderly, which may have an impact on physical performance and function (30). To what extent does the interplay between hospitalization (disuse, hypoxaemia, malnutrition, sedation, pharmacological therapy, etc.), past medical history and lifestyle habits, and inflammation and immune activation from SARS-CoV-2 acute infection induces muscle wasting, further reducing muscle function acutely and chronically are not completely understood and merit future investigation.

Studies on respiratory muscle have also shown negative outcomes. Formenti et al. (31) evidenced significantly reduced echogenicity in right and left intercostal and diaphragm muscles at 24h at ICU in deceased COVID-19 patients in comparison to those who survived, indicating loss of muscle mass (31). Regmi and cols. reported persistence of diaphragm muscle weakness 15 months after hospitalization for Covid-19 (32). In this study spirometry parameters, RMS, and 6MWT were all reduced among those with reduced grip-strength several months after hospital discharge, corroborating these previous findings.

Furthermore, chronic fatigue, post-exertional malaise, exercise intolerance, and other functional abnormalities increasingly observed in long-Covid remain poorly understood. A study on the histopathological changes in 16 long-Covid individuals presenting fatigue more than a year after the acute infection showed muscle fiber atrophy and regeneration in 38% and 56%, respectively (33). Also, 62% of these individuals presented loss of cytochrome c oxidase activity and other alterations compatible with mitochondrial changes, together with T lymphocytes and/or muscle fiber human leukocyte antigen ABC expression and capillary basal lamina injury, which, according to the authors, may be involved in reduced energy supply and fatigue (33).

Research on causes for long-Covid has narrowed some hypotheses for such conditions, which include the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 reservoirs, presence of microthrombi, induction, and persistence of autoantibodies, hyperreactive immune activation, reactivation of other latent viral coinfections such as Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), mitochondrial dysfunction, and gut dysfunction/dysbiosis, that may act individually or collectively, producing this syndrome (34).

Recently, it has been reported that acute inflammation, associated with COVID-19, is a potent detrimental stimulus for the development of reduced muscle strength and mass (35, 36). Of the various deleterious influences of inflammation, elevated c-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 have been strongly correlated with reduced muscle strength and frailty (35, 36). We found that patients with long-Covid with dynapenia had reduced muscle mass, which was reflected in the grip strength, exercise capacity by the 6MWT, and respiratory muscle strength. Therefore, reduced muscle mass and the ability to produce strength, as seen in the dynapenic group, reflected on muscle function systemically, as seen in the reduced RMS and spirometry tests, which may reflect a multifactorial origin to decreased muscle functional features globally, highlighting the possible multifactorial aspect of chronic disability in this population. One of the hypotheses is that these patients present dynapenia at hospitalization and chronically due to an imbalance between muscle protein synthesis and muscle protein breakdown maintained during the follow-up period of 120 days.

The HGS was associated with respiratory function, respiratory muscle pressure, and physical capacity measured in the 6MWT in this study. Several studies have demonstrated the association between the severity of acute COVID-19 and functional outcomes, such as 6MWT, lung diffusion capacity, and spirometry months later (37, 38), which are interesting tools for assessing the detrimental consequences of this disease (39). Nonetheless, the association between HGS and these parameters has important practical implications in long-Covid diagnosis and care once a great number of individuals do not have access to complex functional assessments and remain without proper functional diagnosis and quantitative assessments for exercise prescription on an individual basis and, therefore, being withheld of efficient rehabilitation. Additionally, it would be of great importance to establish cut-off points for such tests, enabling healthcare practitioners to better assess and manage this population, as occurs in other diseases, since HGS is quick, safe, and cheaper (17).

Early evidence of corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19 showed positive effects on mortality outcomes(40), but optimal dosing is still under research(41). However, indistinct use of corticosteroids, acute or chronically, may lead to several adverse events, one of them being myopathy, which could be difficult to distinguish from COVID-19‐related critical illness neuropathy and myopathy (42), or post-ICU syndrome and ICU-acquired weakness, which are well-recognized conditions (43). Corticosteroid therapy is a common cause of non-inflammatory myopathy, ultimately causing muscle weakness, which may last from weeks to months if use is persistent (44). Also, in humans, corticosteroids are known to affect both respiratory and limb muscles, causing loss of muscle cross-sectional area, inducing weakness, and wasting, and ultimately leading to loss of function (44). Nonetheless, these factors altogether may likely explain to some extent acute weakness and fatigue in severe and hospitalized COVID-19 individuals. Their association with persistent long-term outcomes needs further research.

The present study demonstrates the association of a simple tool, such as HGS, with other functional outcomes that demand more trained personnel and robust equipment, such as spirometry and 6MWT, in individuals who had severe COVID-19 in the early 2020s, when the predominant SARS-CoV-2 lineages were B.1.195, B1.1.33 and B.1.1.28, before P.1, Delta and Omicron (28). Also, these individuals were not vaccinated, which likely worsened acute disease and long-term outcomes, as increasing evidence shows the association between prior vaccination and the reduction of long-Covid (29). Nonetheless, the individual characteristics of the population of this study represent an important proportion of the population lingering with symptoms from the COVID-19 infection back then and still suffering from long-Covid.

This study has some limitations. The sample is relatively small and there is a short-term follow-up. There was no assessment of HGS and other functional outcomes at hospitalization, or at hospital discharge, which impair longitudinal comparisons between these variables. This is a single-center study with individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 in the early 2020s, so the results presented here may not directly be extrapolated to the long-term health functional outcomes of those individuals infected with more recent variants of the virus.

Low grip strength represents poor health and carries a poor prognosis. We demonstrated in patients with long-Covid that dynapenia is associated with changes in lung function, respiratory muscle strength, and exercise capacity, and that in-hospital outcomes might be directly related to muscle strength months later. HGS is a simple, reliable, and low-cost measurement that can be performed as a proxy for functional impairment in outpatient clinics and primary care facilities. Acknowledging the importance of recognizing this condition promptly could help in patient stratification and risk prevention of patients with long-Covid, which may reduce the development of comorbidities, delay the functional decline, improve the prognosis and survival of these patients, and accelerate the return to daily activities, including work. This is of interest for low and middle-income countries, which suffer from economic constraints in general, with a great part of the population without proper access to healthcare. Demonstrating the importance of identifying such functional impairments easily enables healthcare providers to properly refer patients to rehabilitation services with a focus on improving muscle strength, pulmonary function, and functional capacity. This could be one simple, yet robust, primary healthcare practice tool for timely screening and better managing long-Covid patients.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article shall be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

FUNDING

Financial support was provided by grants from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) under the Resolutions # 002/2008, 007/2018, 005/2019 and 005/2022, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior scholarships (CAPES). We disclose that ML, WM, and GM to be CNPq productivity level research fellows. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Contribution

CA, CG, GA, and FV conceived the study concept. CA, JV and AR performed the data acquisition. CA, CG, BS, VS, GA and FV analyzed and interpreted the data, and did data visualization. VS, GA and FV advised on the data analysis and interpretation. CA, CG and FV wrote the manuscript. CA, CG, JV, EF, NCV, MGSB, VS, WM, GC, ML, GA and FV critically revised the manuscript and results. MGSB, WM, GC, ML and FV provided administrative, technical, and material support and supervised the study.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CA, BS, JV, AR, EF, WM, GC and ML are recipients of the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) or Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) scholarships. WM, ML and GC are research fellows from CNPq. We give special thanks to the director and staff of Hospital e Pronto Socorro Delphina Rinaldi Abdel Aziz and FMT-HVD as well as the many members of the MetCOVID Study Team for their outstanding support.

Soriano JB, Murthy S, Marshall JC, Relan P, Diaz J V. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis (2022) 22:e102–e107. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9
Martin C, Luteijn M, Letton W, Robertson J, McDonald S. A model framework for projecting the prevalence and impact of Long-COVID in the UK. PLoS One (2021) 16:e0260843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260843
Dennis A, Cuthbertson DJ, Wootton D, Crooks M, Gabbay M, Eichert N, Mouchti S, Pansini M, Roca-Fernandez A, Thomaides-Brears H, et al. Multi-organ impairment and long COVID: a 1-year prospective, longitudinal cohort study. J R Soc Med (2023) 116:97–112. doi: 10.1177/01410768231154703
Thaweethai T, Jolley SE, Karlson EW, Levitan EB, Levy B, McComsey GA, McCorkell L, Nadkarni GN, Parthasarathy S, Singh U, et al. Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA (2023) doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8823
Surapaneni KM, Singhal M, Saggu SR, Bhatt A, Shunmathy P, Joshi A. A Scoping Review on Long COVID-19: Physiological and Psychological Symptoms Post-Acute, Long-Post and Persistent Post COVID-19. Healthcare (2022) 10:2418. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122418
Korompoki E, Gavriatopoulou M, Hicklen RS, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Kastritis E, Fotiou D, Stamatelopoulos K, Terpos E, Kotanidou A, Hagberg CA, et al. Epidemiology and organ specific sequelae of post-acute COVID19: A narrative review. Journal of Infection (2021) 83:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.004
Chen C, Haupert SR, Zimmermann L, Shi X, Fritsche LG, Mukherjee B. Global Prevalence of Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Infect Dis (2022) 226:1593–1607. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac136
Groff D, Sun A, Ssentongo AE, Ba DM, Parsons N, Poudel GR, Lekoubou A, Oh JS, Ericson JE, Ssentongo P, et al. Short-term and Long-term Rates of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA Netw Open (2021) 4:e2128568. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28568
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing (2019) 48:601–601. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz046
Bohannon RW. Hand-Grip Dynamometry Predicts Future Outcomes in Aging Adults. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy (2008) 31:3–10. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200831010-00002
Ortega FB, Silventoinen K, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F. Muscular strength in male adolescents and premature death: cohort study of one million participants. BMJ (2012) 345:e7279–e7279. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7279
Cheval B, Sieber S, Maltagliati S, Millet GP, Formánek T, Chalabaev A, Cullati S, Boisgontier MP. Muscle strength is associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in adults 50 years of age or older. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle (2021) 12:1136–1143. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12738
Gil S, Jacob Filho W, Shinjo SK, Ferriolli E, Busse AL, Avelino-Silva TJ, Longobardi I, Oliveira Júnior GN, Swinton P, Gualano B, et al. Muscle strength and muscle mass as predictors of hospital length of stay in patients with moderate to severe COVID‐19: a prospective observational study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle (2021) 12:1871–1878. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12789
Jeronimo CMP, Farias MEL, Val FFA, Sampaio VS, Alexandre MAA, Melo GC, Safe IP, Borba MGS, Netto RLA, Maciel ABS, et al. Methylprednisolone as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19; Metcovid): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase IIb, Placebo-controlled Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases (2021) 72:e373–e381. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1177
Barros CMSS, Freire RS, Frota E, Rezende Santos AG, Farias MEL, Rodrigues MGA, Silva BM, Prado Jeronimo CM, Netto RLA, Silva Borba MG, et al. Short-Course of Methylprednisolone Improves Respiratory Functional Parameters After 120 Days in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients (Metcovid Trial): A Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) (2021) 8: doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.758405
Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A, Corsi AM, Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol (1985) (2003) 95:1851–60. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003
Mansour KMK, Goulart C da L, Carvalho-Junior LCS de, Trimer R, Borghi-Silva A, Silva ALG da. Pontos de corte da função pulmonar e capacidade funcional determinantes para sarcopenia e dinapenia em pacientes com DPOC. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (2019) 45: doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20180252
Laveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A, Babb T, Barreiro E, Dres M, Dubé B-P, Fauroux B, Gea J, Guenette JA, et al. ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise. European Respiratory Journal (2019) 53:1801214. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01214-2018
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS Statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2002) 166:111–117. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
Xue Q-L. Prediction of Risk of Falling, Physical Disability, and Frailty by Rate of Decline in Grip Strength: The Women’s Health and Aging Study. Arch Intern Med (2011) 171:1119. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.252
Rantanen T. Midlife Hand Grip Strength as a Predictor of Old Age Disability. JAMA (1999) 281:558. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.558
Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M, Park SW, Conroy MB, Velasquez-Mieyer P, Boudreau R, Manini TM, Nevitt M, Newman AB, et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr (2009) 90:1579–1585. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28047
Ploutz-Snyder LL, Manini T, Ploutz-Snyder RJ, Wolf DA. Functionally Relevant Thresholds of Quadriceps Femoris Strength. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci (2002) 57:B144–B152. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.4.B144
Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, Simonsick EM, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB, Tylavsky FA, Rubin SM, Harris TB. Strength, But Not Muscle Mass, Is Associated With Mortality in the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study Cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci (2006) 61:72–77. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.1.72
Thaweethai T, Jolley SE, Karlson EW, Levitan EB, Levy B, McComsey GA, McCorkell L, Nadkarni GN, Parthasarathy S, Singh U, et al. Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA (2023) 329:1934. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8823
Bretas DC, Leite AS, Mancuzo EV, Prata TA, Andrade BH, Oliveira J das GF, Batista AP, Machado-Coelho GLL, Augusto VM, Marinho CC. Lung function six months after severe COVID-19: Does time, in fact, heal all wounds? The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases (2022) 26:102352. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102352
Huang L, Li X, Gu X, Zhang H, Ren L, Guo L, Liu M, Wang Y, Cui D, Wang Y, et al. Health outcomes in people 2 years after surviving hospitalisation with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Respir Med (2022) 10:863–876. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00126-6
Naveca FG, Nascimento V, de Souza VC, Corado A de L, Nascimento F, Silva G, Costa Á, Duarte D, Pessoa K, Mejía M, et al. COVID-19 in Amazonas, Brazil, was driven by the persistence of endemic lineages and P.1 emergence. Nat Med (2021) 27:1230–1238. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01378-7
Zisis SN, Durieux JC, Mouchati C, Perez JA, McComsey GA. The Protective Effect of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination on Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19: A Multicenter Study From a Large National Health Research Network. Open Forum Infect Dis (2022) 9: doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac228
Dourado VZ, Vidotto MC, Ricardo LFG. Reference equations for the performance of healthy adults on field walking tests. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry (2011) 37:607–614.
Formenti P, Umbrello M, Castagna V, Cenci S, Bichi F, Pozzi T, Bonifazi M, Coppola S, Chiumello D. Respiratory and peripheral muscular ultrasound characteristics in ICU COVID 19 ARDS patients. J Crit Care (2022) 67:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.09.007
Regmi B, Friedrich J, Jörn B, Senol M, Giannoni A, Boentert M, Daher A, Dreher M, Spiesshoefer J. Diaphragm Muscle Weakness Might Explain Exertional Dyspnea 15 Months after Hospitalization for COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2023) 207:1012–1021. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202206-1243OC
Hejbøl EK, Harbo T, Agergaard J, Madsen LB, Pedersen TH, Østergaard LJ, Andersen H, Schrøder HD, Tankisi H. Myopathy as a cause of fatigue in long-term < scp > post‐COVID</scp> ‐19 symptoms: Evidence of skeletal muscle histopathology. Eur J Neurol (2022) 29:2832–2841. doi: 10.1111/ene.15435
Peluso MJ, Deeks SG. Early clues regarding the pathogenesis of long-COVID. Trends Immunol (2022) 43:268–270. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2022.02.008
Piotrowicz K, Gąsowski J, Michel J-P, Veronese N. Post-COVID-19 acute sarcopenia: physiopathology and management. Aging Clin Exp Res (2021) 33:2887–2898. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01942-8
Piotrowicz K, Gąsowski J. “Risk Factors for Frailty and Cardiovascular Diseases: Are They the Same?,” (2020). p. 39–50 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33330-0_5
Sirayder U, Inal-Ince D, Kepenek-Varol B, Acik C. Long-Term Characteristics of Severe COVID-19: Respiratory Function, Functional Capacity, and Quality of Life. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2022) 19:6304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106304
Kersten J, Wolf A, Hoyo L, Hüll E, Tadic M, Andreß S, d’Almeida S, Scharnbeck D, Roder E, Beschoner P, et al. Symptom burden correlates to impairment of diffusion capacity and exercise intolerance in long COVID patients. Sci Rep (2022) 12:8801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12839-5
Pini L, Montori R, Giordani J, Guerini M, Orzes N, Ciarfaglia M, Arici M, Cappelli C, Piva S, Latronico N, et al. Assessment of respiratory function and exercise tolerance at 4–6 months after COVID-19 infection in patients with pneumonia of different severity. Intern Med J (2023) 53:202–208. doi: 10.1111/imj.15935
Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine (2021) 384:693–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
Kim JH, Na YS, Lee S-I, Moon YY, Hwang BS, Baek A-R, Kim W-Y, Lee BY, Seong GM, Baek MS. Corticosteroid outcome may be dependent of duration of use in severe COVID-19. Korean J Intern Med (2023) 38:382–392. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.201
Karn M, Yonghang S, Ghimire S. Corticosteroids in COVID-19: We Should Be Mindful of Their Acute Toxicities. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2021) 61:1301–1302. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1936
Fazzini B, Märkl T, Costas C, Blobner M, Schaller SJ, Prowle J, Puthucheary Z, Wackerhage H. The rate and assessment of muscle wasting during critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care (2023) 27:2. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04253-0
Bodine SC, Furlow JD. “Glucocorticoids and Skeletal Muscle.,” (2015). p. 145–176 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_7

Table 1. Characterization at D120 of the total sample and non-Dynapenia vs Dynapenia in long-Covid patients
Variables	Total (n=113)	Non-Dynapenia (n=88)	Dynapenia (n=25)	P value
Age, years, median (IQR)	48 (41-58)	47 (40-54)	57 (51-63)	0.002
Gender, woman, n (%)	61 (54)	50 (56.8)	11 (44.2)	0.26
Allocation at hospitalization, IMP, n (%)	55 (48.7)	42 (47.7)	13 (52)	0.71
BMI (kg/m²), medium (IQR)	33.2 (31.9-34.4)	33.7 (32.3-35.0)	31.4 (28.5-34.3)	0.09
Muscle Mass (kg), medium (IQR)	23.9 (18.2-29.3)	26.1 (20.0-29.7)	20.6 (16.0-23.2)	<0.001
Fat Mass, (Kg) medium (IQR)	31.9 (25.4-41.7)	32.7 (26.7-42.5)	28.9 (20.5-38.7)	0.202
HGS (Kg), medium (IQR)	30.2 (24.0-39.8)	34.0 (26.6-43.7)	18.5 (15.0-26.8)	<0.001
Cough, n/N (%)	99/112 (88.4%)	79/88 (89.8%)	20/24 (83.3%)	0.38
Myalgia, n/N (%)				0.07
No	27/112 (24.1%)	18/88 (20.5%)	9/24 (37.5%)
Yes	84/112 (75.0%)	69/88 (78.4%)	15/24 (62.5%)
Unknown	1/112 (0.9%)	1/88 (1.1%)	0/24 (0.0%)
Fatigue, n (%)	101/112 (90.2%)	81/88 (92.0%)	20/24 (83.3%)	0.20
Nausea, n (%)	62/112 (55.4%)	51/88 (58.0%)	11/24 (45.8%)	0.29
Vomiting, n (%)	44/112 (39.3%)	38/88 (43.2%)	6/24 (25.0%)	0.11
Diarrhea, n (%)	71/112 (63.4%)	56/88 (63.6%)	15/24 (62.5%)	0.92
Anosmia, n (%)	91/112 (81.3%)	75/88 (85.2%)	16/24 (66.7%)	0.03
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; HGS, Handgrip strength; Kg, kilograms; Applied Mann-Whitney test.

Table 2. Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings of study population at firstt day of hospitalization during acute COVID-19.
	Total (n=113)	Non-Dynapenia (n=88)	Dynapenia (n=25)	p-value
BMI, kg/m², median (IQR)	30.7 (27.1-35.5)	31.4 (27.9-35.7)	28.7 (23.8-34.2)	0.04
Smoking history, n (%)	30/108 (27.8%)	16/83 (19.3%)	14/25 (56.0%)	<0.01
Alcohol use disorder, n (%)	31/113 (27.4%)	25/88 (28.4%)	6/25 (24.0%)	0.66
Diabetes, n (%)	27/113 (23.9%)	16/88 (18.2%)	11/25 (44.0%)	0.01
COPD, n (%)	8/108 (7.4%)	6/83 (7.2%)	2/25 (8.0%)	0.90
Hypertension, n (%)	39/113 (34.5%)	28/88 (31.8%)	11/25 (44.0%)	0.26
ICU on admission, n (%)	6/89 (6.7%)	2/68 (2.9%)	4/21 (19.0%)	0.01
IMV on admission, n (%)	6/113 (5.3%)	2/88 (2.3%)	4/25 (16.0%)	0.01
Oxygen saturation (SpO₂), n (%)	97.0 (95.0-98.0)	96.5 (95.0-98.0)	97.0 (95.0-98.0)	0.91
Creatine kinase, U/L, median (IQR)	76.3 (39.9-144.1)	84.5 (40.1-142.3)	73.4 (38.4-174.5)	0.76
Creatine kinase MB, U/L, median (IQR)	18.3 (12.0-23.1)	17.7 (12.0-21.7)	20.4 (17.5-23.6)	0.37
LDH, U/L, median (IQR)	572.0 (293.0-892.0)	494.5 (302.5-858.5)	773.0 (254.0-992.0)	0.77
D-dimer, ng/mL, median (IQR)	641.3 (458.0-1576.2)	593.4 (456.9-1141.5)	1576.2 (571.6-4066.0)	0.13
C-reactive protein, mg/L, median (IQR)	66.7 (33.6-87.3)	66.6 (27.9-92.2)	67.7 (45.9-75.2)	0.63
IL-6, pg/mL, median (IQR)	33.7 (8.3-82.2)	27.6 (6.3-81.0)	46.8 (23.3-105.9)	0.06
Ground-glass opacity infiltration, n (%)	80/85 (94.1%)	60/64 (93.8%)	20/21 (95.2%)	0.80
Consolidation, n (%)	75/85 (88.2%)	56/64 (87.5%)	19/21 (90.5%)	0.71
Unilateral consolidation, n (%)	7/85 (8.2%)	5/64 (7.8%)	2/21 (9.5%)	0.80
Bilateral consolidation, n (%)	68/85 (80.0%)	51/64 (79.7%)	17/21 (81.0%)	0.90
Hematocrit, %, median (IQR)	40.6 (38.3-43.1)	40.7 (38.6-43.4)	39.6 (35.2-42.5)	0.10
Hemoglobin, g/dL, median (IQR)	12.6 (11.8-13.4)	12.8 (11.9-13.5)	12.6 (11.0-13.3)	0.20
qSOFA score >=2, N (%)	16/113 (14.2%)	10/88 (11.4%)	6/25 (24.0%)	0.11
Pleural effusion, n (%)	18/85 (21.2%)	12/64 (18.8%)	6/21 (28.6%)	0.34
IMP, intravenous methylprednisolone; COPD, Chronic pulmonary obstructive disease; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase; SD, standard deviation; ICU, intensive care unit; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; BMI, body mass index; BFM, body fat mass; BMM, body muscle mass; kg, kilogram; m, meter; IQR, interquartile range; IL, interleukin.

Table 3. Spirometry, RMS, and functional capacity in Long COVID-19 Patients
Variables	Total (n=113)	Non-Dynapenia (n=88)	Dynapenia (n=25)	p-value
Spirometry
FVC (L)	3.1 (2.4-3.5)	3.3 (2.5-3.7)	2.3 (2.0-3.0)	<0.001
FVC % of predicted	89 (85-92)	88 (83-92)	90 (81-99)	0.911
FEV₁ (L)	2.5 (1.9-3.0)	2.7 (2.0-3.1)	2.0 (1.6-2.4)	<0.001
FEV₁ % of predicted	87 (83-90)	85 (81-90)	88 (80-97)	0.691
FEV₁/FVC (%)	82.7 (77.5-85.3)	83.4 (77.1-85.5)	80.5 (77.5-83.4)	0.24
Respiratory muscle strength
MIP (cmH₂O)	91.0 (73.0-113.0)	92.5 (79.0-115.5)	73.0 (51.0-105.0)	0.007
MEP (cmH₂O)	108.0 (82.0-132.0)	111.0 (88.0-138.0)	87.0 (67.0-108.0)	0.002
Functional capacity
6MWD (m)	395.0 (330.0-456.0)	417.0 (353.0-468.0)	336.0 (275.0-370.0)	<0.001
6MWD (%)	542.9 (471.7-596.2)	557.5 (503.3-604.5)	471.7 (432.6-531.9)	<0.001
Notes: FVC: Forced Capacity Vital; FEV₁: Forced expiratory volume in the first second; MIP: Maximum inspiratory pressure; MEP: Maximum expiratory pressure; 6MWD: six minutes walking test. Applied Mann-Whitney test.

Table 4. Regression analyses between HGS and functional outcomes, with age.
Dynapenia	Coef.	P>z	95% CI
FEV₁(%)	-.05	0.00	-.07	-.03
MIP (cmH₂O)	.00	0.62	-.00	.00
MEP (cmH₂O)	-.00	0.00	-.00	-.00
6MWT (D)	-.00	0.00	-.00	-.00

FEV₁: Forced expiratory volume in the first second; MIP: Maximum inspiratory pressure; MEP: Maximum expiratory pressure; 6MWT: six minutes walking test distance.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 24 Jan, 2024

Read the published version in Scientific Reports →

Reviews received at journal
27 Dec, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
09 Dec, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
07 Dec, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
07 Dec, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
07 Dec, 2023
Editor invited by journal
03 Dec, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
03 Dec, 2023
First submitted to journal
01 Dec, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

Low handgrip strength is associated with worse functional outcomes in long-Covid

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

INTRODUCTION

METHODS

Study design and population

Procedures performed at the follow-up visit (D120)

Statistical analysis

Ethical Aspects

RESULTS

DISCUSSION

CONCLUSIONS

Declarations

FUNDING

Author Contribution

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

References

Tables

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1