Figures 1 and 2 depict scenarios with 200 and 75 nodes, respectively. They travel around a predetermined area, passing data and packets moving from one mobile node to another. Figures 3, 4, and 5 compare the performance of AQRMR and QRMR for a number of parameters, including throughput in kbps, packet delivery ratio in percentage, and end-to-end delay in seconds, for fifty to two hundred nodes in the simulation region. After 0.06 seconds, when the UDP application begins transmitting packets, the performance of each protocol is evaluated.
9.1 END-TO-END DELAY
Two routing protocols' delay graphs are compared. There are five possible numbers of movable nodes in the simulation environment: 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200. The end-to-end delay of the both routing protocols is shown in Fig. 3. In comparison to QRMR protocols, the AQRMR protocol has a lower overall delay. As a result, when analyzing end-to-end delay, the AQRMR protocol outperforms the QRMR protocol.
9.2 PACKET DELIVERY RATIO
Graph showing comparisons between both routing protocols and packet delivery ratio. Five distinct numbers of mobile nodes—50, 75, 100, 150, and 200—make up the simulation environment. Figure 4 displays the performance of the packet delivery ratio.
In terms of packet delivery ratio, AQRMR routing protocols perform better than QRMR routing protocols at nodes 50, 100, 150, and 200, whereas at node 75, QRMR routing methods perform better than AQRMR routing protocols. The AQRMR protocol has a higher ratio of packets delivery than the QRMR protocol.
9.3 Throughput
Graph showing throughput comparisons between both routing protocols. The throughput performance is shown in Fig. 5.
We might therefore say that a routing protocol performs better than other routing protocols when its throughput is high. The graph clearly illustrates that the AQRMR protocol's throughput performance is superior to the QRMR protocol at all 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 nodes. This graph illustrates how throughput performance improves as node density rises. As a result, in terms of throughput, AQRMR performs better than QRMR protocol.
9.4 Encryption-Decryption
We conclude from the comparison that the AQRMR protocol performs better than the QRMR protocol. There is currently a scenario for the ECC algorithm, which gives the message privacy. Sometime data is very private like bank accounts data, military force details, etc. so we will require keeping in mind that security is very important part. So it is very important to implement security in the protocols like QRMR and AQRMR. The encryption-decryption techniques developed for wireless wired systems cannot be applied to remote systems, and especially not to remote sensing systems. This is basically used in every routing protocol. Show the process of encryption and decryption in Fig. 6.