We report here a large cohort of very elderly patients who underwent a native KB and show that the adverse events were not frequent and that the result of KB led to a specific therapeutic strategy in half of patients. In patients for whom no specific treatment was indicated, KB may have prevented the initiation of a potentially harmful treatment (such as corticosteroids). This work shows that for some patients, even if they are very old, the KB remains a useful procedure with therapeutic implications, especially in case of AKI and/or NS.
In the present cohort, the bleeding risk of KB was significant but not prohibitive (3% requiring transfusion), without KB-related death. The same level of complication was identified in other series of elderly patients (13). Even if lower rates of adverse events were reported in younger populations (14), several studies from the literature comparing the bleeding risks of KB in patients of different ages showed bleeding rates similar to the present cohort (15,16). In previous studies, the baseline serum creatinine level has been reported to predict bleeding complications after KB (15). Indeed, in the present cohort, all the patients with bleeding complications displayed AKI, and 3/7 were on dialysis. Halimi et al (17), in a large national French retrospective cohort study published in 2020, reported a major bleeding after native KB in 2,765 of 52,138 (5%) patients (blood transfusions: 5%; angiographic intervention: 0.4%; and nephrectomy: 0.1%). Independent predictors of bleeding in this cohort were gender, frailty index, anemia, and altered kidney function. Advanced age was not an independent risk factor for bleeding in this large cohort.
However, selection bias is likely in very elderly subjects, as clinicians may have refrained from performing a KB in the frailest patients. The question of the futility of performing an invasive procedure such as KB in very old patients, whose life expectancy is probably limited, may arise. Yet, although their median age was 87 years, only 16.7% (16/96) of patients died within 6 months after KB. For comparison purposes, the 1-year survival rate for incident patients on dialysis is 68% in France (4).
The diagnostic benefit of KB in the very elderly has been reported before (18, 19). Moutzouris et al (20) in an American cohort of 235 patients over 80 years of age, reported a therapeutic impact of KB in 67% of patients, particularly in those with AKI or NS. In the present cohort, the therapeutic impact of KB also depended on the indication for KB, patients with NS and/or AKI being the most likely to display a treatable condition, compared to patients with proteinuria alone.
AKI is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly subjects: the in-hospital mortality of elderly patients with AKI ranges from 15 to 40% (20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Pre-renal AKI, essentially due to volume depletion, and obstructive renal failure are the most common cause of AKI in elderly patients (23). Shock, nephrotoxic drugs and rhabdomyolysis are also frequent causes of AKI. But when the clinical context is far from obvious, or when a glomerulonephritis is suspected, a KB may be useful even in elderly patients to guide the therapeutic strategy (24). In the present cohort, as in other European cohorts (19,26), AKI was the most common indication for KB in elderly patients. On the contrary, NS was the main indication for KB in different series of elderly patients from Asia (50% of patients aged ≥ 80 in Japan (27) 69% of patients aged > 80 years in China (6)).
Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) was the second most frequent diagnosis after hypertensive nephropathy in this cohort. Most AIN were immuno-allergic, related to the prescription of proton pump inhibitors, vitamin K antagonist or antibiotics, which are often prescribed in the elderly. In this condition, KB allows the withdrawal of the drug, and sometimes the prescription of corticosteroids.
Pauci-immune crescentic GN was the third most frequent diagnosis in this cohort. A high frequency of crescentic GN in elderly patients was also reported in several studies from different countries (10% here, 14% in Spain (26) 11% in Japan (27) 13% in Italy (28)). KB is not always required for the diagnostic of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Yet, it can confirm the diagnosis in patients without ANCA or with atypical clinical presentation and indicate the presence of active proliferative lesions likely to benefit from immunosuppressive treatment. Indeed, immunosuppressive therapy can improve kidney function and systemic disease in ANCA-associated vasculitis, even in elderly patients (29). In an American cohort of 78 patients over 80 years of age with biopsy-proven pauci-immune GN published in 2011 (9), the use of immunosuppressive therapy was associated with significantly lower risk of ESKD, death, and the combined outcome of ESKD or death.
KB can also be valuable for the diagnosis of haematological malignancies. In particular, AL amyloidosis without myeloma is not always detected on extra-renal tissue (such as minor salivary glands), and the detection of light chain amyloid deposits in a patient with NS can lead to the initiation of a chemotherapy which was not indicated on haematological parameters only. This was the case for 5 patients with hematological diseases from the present cohort.
There are some limitations to this study, in addition to its retrospective design. First, no data was available on the evaluation of frailty, autonomy and quality of life of the elderly patients included here. Second, no data was gathered on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients with AKI and/or NS who were not proposed a KB. This hampers the evaluation of the “right indications for KB” and of the benefit of KB in the global population of elderly patients.
Yet, the focus of this work on very elderly patients (≥ 85 years), and the comprehensive analysis of KB indications, results, and therapeutic impact, together with the information on patients’ outcomes, brings new information to the field.
In conclusion, this study provides detailed information on the benefits and risks of KB in a population of very elderly patients in France. The reasonable bleeding risk and the high proportion of pathological diagnoses with a therapeutic impact, especially in patients with AKI and/or NS, pleads for the interest of this invasive procedure in some very elderly patients, irrespective of their age.