3.1 Ingredient Analysis and Identification
The total ion chromatography (TIC) of ET in positive and negative ion modes was shown in Fig. 1. A total of 42 chemical constituents (shown in Table 2) were identified in ET by comparing to the reference standard, chromatographic elution behaviors, mass fragment patterns, and mass spectral data in Pubchem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Scifinder (https://sso.cas.org/), and CNKI (https://www.cnki.net/).
Table 2
Chemical constituents of ET
NO. | Adduct / Charge | Component Name | Retention Time | Formula | Found At Mass | Mass Error (ppm) |
---|
1 | [M-H]- | Quinic acid | 1.166 | C7H12O6 | 191.0559 | -1.1 |
2 | [M-H]- | L-Malic acid | 1.310 | C4H6O5 | 133.0140 | -1.6 |
3 | [M-H]- | Maleic acid | 1.311 | C4H4O4 | 115.0039 | 1.5 |
4 | [M + H]+ | Piceatannol | 1.737 | C14H12O4 | 245.0774 | -14.0 |
5 | [M-H]- | 2-Hydroxyadenosine | 2.314 | C10H13N5O5 | 282.0856 | 4.2 |
6 | [M-H]- | Guanosine | 2.314 | C10H13N5O5 | 282.0856 | 4.2 |
7 | [M-H]- | Protocatechuic acid | 3.675 | C7H6O4 | 153.0200 | 4.4 |
8 | [M-H]- | Neochlorogenic acid | 4.052 | C16H18O9 | 353.0874 | -1.1 |
9 | [M + H]+ | Daphnetin | 4.584 | C9H6O4 | 179.0345 | 3.2 |
10 | [M-H]- | Protocatechuic Aldehyde | 4.600 | C7H6O3 | 137.0246 | 1.3 |
11 | [M-H]- | Chlorogenic acid | 5.326 | C16H18O9 | 353.0872 | -1.7 |
12 | [M-H]- | Esculetin | 5.583 | C9H6O4 | 177.0195 | 0.9 |
13 | [M-H]- | Cryptochlorogenic acid | 5.589 | C16H18O9 | 353.0873 | -1.5 |
14 | [M + H]+ | 7-Hydroxycoumarine | 5.593 | C9H6O3 | 163.0389 | -0.3 |
15 | [M-H]- | Caffeic acid | 5.834 | C9H8O4 | 179.0351 | 0.9 |
16 | [M-H]- | Schaftoside | 7.196 | C26H28O14 | 563.1406 | 0.0 |
17 | [M-H]- | Isochlorogenic acid B | 7.684 | C25H24O12 | 515.1186 | -1.8 |
18 | [M-H]- | Isochlorogenic acid A | 7.970 | C25H24O12 | 515.1186 | -1.8 |
19 | [M + H]+ | Aempferol-3-O-rutinoside | 8.089 | C27H30O15 | 595.1655 | -0.5 |
20 | [M-H]- | Luteolin-7-O-β-D-glucuronide | 8.121 | C21H18O12 | 461.0728 | 0.6 |
21 | [M-H]- | (-)-Syringaresinol 4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | 8.245 | C28H36O13 | 579.2086 | 2.4 |
22 | [M-H]- | Isoquercitrin | 8.316 | C21H20O12 | 463.0886 | 3.2 |
23 | [M-H]- | Isochlorogenic acid C | 8.685 | C25H24O12 | 515.1186 | -1.8 |
24 | [M-H]- | Ferulic acid | 8.722 | C10H10O4 | 193.0514 | 9.8 |
25 | [M + H]+ | Rhoifolin | 8.731 | C27H30O14 | 579.1726 | 3.0 |
26 | [M-H]- | Apigenin 7-O-beta-D-glucuronide | 8.843 | C21H18O11 | 445.0778 | 0.3 |
27 | [M + H]+ | Sophoricoside | 8.848 | C21H20O10 | 433.1143 | 3.3 |
28 | [M-H]- | Cosmosiin | 8.850 | C21H20O10 | 431.0995 | 2.7 |
29 | [M-H]- | Luteoloside | 9.050 | C21H20O11 | 447.0934 | 0.2 |
30 | [M + H]+ | Elephantopin | 9.291 | C19H20O7 | 361.1291 | 2.4 |
31 | [M-H]- | Apigenin | 9.967 | C15H10O5 | 269.0463 | 2.8 |
32 | [M + H]+ | Deoxyelephantopin | 10.310 | C19H20O6 | 345.1343 | 2.9 |
33 | [M + H]+ | Quercetin | 10.424 | C15H10O7 | 303.0504 | 1.5 |
34 | [M-H]- | Molephantin | 10.621 | C19H22O6 | 345.2259 | 8.2 |
35 | [M + H]+ | Isodeoxyelephantopin | 10.658 | C19H20O6 | 345.1339 | 1.7 |
36 | [M-H]- | Luteolin | 10.960 | C15H10O6 | 285.0399 | -2.0 |
37 | [M-H]- | Molephantinin | 11.909 | C20H24O6 | 359.1513 | 6.8 |
38 | [M + H]+ | ST | 11.942 | C20H22O6 | 359.1495 | 1.5 |
39 | [M + H]+ | IsoST | 12.441 | C20H22O6 | 359.1499 | 2.6 |
40 | [M-H]- | Tricin | 12.590 | C17H14O7 | 329.0675 | 5.7 |
41 | [M-H]- | Diosmetin | 12.654 | C16H12O6 | 299.0569 | 2.7 |
42 | [M + H]+ | Linderane | 15.030 | C15H16O4 | 261.1127 | 2.1 |
3.2 Quantification of 5 compounds in AT by UPLC
ST, chlorogenic acid, Isochlorogenic acid B, Isochlorogenic acid A and Isochlorogenic acid C were identified by reference standard and the content were determined by UPLC. UPLC (Fig. 2) exerted a good specificity between the mixed calibration solution and the sample solution. The results of the calibration curve (Supplement Table 1) also exhibited a good linearity with correlation coefficient (R2) more than 0.999 and a wide concentration range. The precision, stability, repeatability and recovery represented as RSD values (Supplement Table 2) were all less than 5.00%. All of the methodological validation results suggested that this method was accurate, reliable, sensitive, and considered suitable for accurately measuring the main compounds’ content in ET. The content of ST, chlorogenic acid, isochlorogenic acid B, isochlorogenic acid A, and isochlorogenic acid C in ET was measured as 0.426%、0.457%、0.159%、0.701%, and 0.103% respectively.
3.3 Screening of the Active compounds
A total of 15 compounds showed high pharmacokinetic properties and drug likeness in SwissADME or OB ≥ 30% and DL ≥ 0.18 in TCMSP. These components were selected as the active components of ET. The detailed information of 15 active compounds was listed in Table 3.
Table 3
15 active compounds of ET
NO. | Name | NO. | Name |
---|
1 | Tricin | 9 | Diosmetin |
2 | ST | 10 | Esculetin |
3 | Quercetin | 11 | L-Malic |
4 | molephantinin | 12 | Maleic acid |
5 | Luteolin | 13 | Protocatechuic Aldehyde |
6 | Isodeoxyelephantopin | 14 | Protocatechuic acid |
7 | elephantopin | 15 | 7-Hydroxycoumarine |
8 | Apigenin | | |
3.4 Compounds-targets Network and PPI-network Analysis
Compounds-targets Network and PPI-network Analysis were carried out to enrich the nuclear ingredients and nuclear targets. In this study, a total of 532 targets of the active ingredients were collected from TCMSP, HIT, and Swiss Target Prediction databases. Meanwhile, 19091 target of liver cancer from GeneCards, DisGenet, and OMIM databases were obtained by searching with the key word “Liver cancer”. Then, 520 overlapping targets (Supplementary Tables 3) of compound targets liver cancer related targets were analyzed by screened by Vene analysis (Fig. 3A) and the overlapping targets were regarded as hub targets. Compounds-targets Network was established (Fig. 3B). 7 nuclear compounds, including Quercetin, ST, Luteolin, Isodeoxyelephantopin, 7-Hydroxycoumarine, Elephantopin, and Esculetin were obtained by analyzing the top 10 parameter of Betweenness, Closeness, Information, and Degree (Fig. 3C). Meanwhile, 520 overlapping targets were submitted to STRING to conduct PPI-network (Fig. 3D). AKT1, TP53, TNF, IL6, ALB, SRC, EGFR, IL1B, BCL2, and CASP3 were the top 10 nuclear genes (Fig. 3E) based on the parameter of degree.
3.5 GO and KEGG Pathway Enrichment
GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the overlapping targets was carried out using Metascape. GO enrichment analysis suggested that a total of 166 molecular function (MF) terms (Supplementary Table 4), 1033 biological process (BP) terms (Supplementary Table 5), and 106 cellular component (CC) terms (Supplementary Table 6) were obtained. The GO functions related to the treatment of liver cancer included execution phase of apoptosis (GO:0097194), regulation of reactive oxygen species biosynthetic process (GO:1903426), oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491), positive regulation of programmed cell death (GO:0043068), positive regulation of programmed cell death (GO:0043068), negative regulation of cell population proliferation (GO:0008285), response to oxygen levels (GO:0070482), response to decreased oxygen levels (GO:0036293), cellular response to oxygen levels (GO:0071453), cellular response to decreased oxygen levels (GO:0036294), mostly related to promote apoptosis, inhibit proliferation, and regulate oxidative levels. The top 20 entries were respectively selected from MF, BP, and CC, in order of -lg p value (Fig. 4A-C).
KEGG analysis explored 188 signaling pathways (Supplementary Tables 7) related to the 520 overlapping targets. The top 50 entries were selected depending on the -lg p value and showed in Fig. 4D. Among them, pathway in cancer (hsa05200) was significantly enriched in top 1, indicating the potential for anti-cancer activity of ET. Meanwhile, promoting apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation related signaling pathways, such as p53 signaling pathway (hsa04115) and MAPK signaling pathway (hsa04010) also collected.
3.6 Molecular Docking results
According to the result of quantitative analysis, ST is one of the main chemical compounds of ET. Moreover, ST is a nuclear compound in anti-liver cancer network pharmacology analysis of ET, which has been reported to show anti-cancer effect in vitro 11,12. Therefore, ST was chose for further anti-cancer mechanical study. TGFBR1 is a membrane receptor for TGF-β1. Coincidentally, the activity of TGFBR1 is closely related to p38 MAPK/P53 signaling pathway. To further explored the relationship between the nuclear compounds and p38 MAPK/P53 signaling pathway. Molecular docking was used to present the binding affinities of ST and TGFBR1. The result was showed that ST had good binding affinities to TGFBR1, with the binding affinity energy as -9.3 kcal/mol, suggesting ST may mediate p38 MAPK/P53 signaling pathway by binding to TGFBR1.
3.7 ST promote the apoptosis of HepG2
The anti-liver cancer effect on HepG2 was validated in this study. The date revealed that ST at a concentration of 10 µM significantly caused changes in cell morphology (Fig. 5). CCK-8 result also indicated that ST notably inhibited the cell viability of HepG2 when compared with control group (Fig. 5F) and the concentration of 5 µM was chose for further mechanical study in HepG2. Cell morphology changing and cell viability decreasing indicated that ST showed anti-liver cancer effect by inducing cell apoptosis.
(0 µM). (B) Cell morphology in 1.25 µM. (C) Cell morphology in 2.50 µM. (D) Cell morphology in 5.00 µM. (E) Cell morphology in 10.00 µM. (F) Cell viability of different doses of ET after treatment for 24. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 versus the control.
3.8 ST regulated apoptosis related nuclear genes’ expression in mRNA level
Previous study indicated that abnormal expression of CASP3 13, TNF-α 14, IL6 15, IL1β 16, BCL2 17, and TP53 18 in mRNA level closely related to the proliferation or apoptosis of cancer cells. Quantitative Real-Time PCR result reveal that ST downregulated BCL2, IL6, TNF-α, IL1β, and EGFR while upregulated CASP3 and TP53 in mRNA level when compared with control group (Fig. 6).
3.9 ST promote apoptosis of HepG2 via p38 MAPK/p53 signaling pathway
Core proteins of p38 MAPK/p53 signaling pathway in HepG2 were detected by western blotting (Fig. 7). The result indicated that ST notably promoted the protein expression level of p-p38/p38 (p < 0.05) and p-p53/p53 (p < 0.05), indicating ST significantly active p38 MAPK/p53 signaling pathway in HepG2. Meanwhile, BCL-2 and CASP3, core targets of network pharmacology, closely related to cell apoptosis were inhibited and promoted respectively, indicating ST promote apoptosis of HepG2.