2.1 Culture of HT22 cell line and PTX treatment
The HT22 cell line, derived from immortalized mouse hippocampal neurons, was acquired from Bluefbio Biology Technology Development Co., Ltd (cat. no. BNF60808571, Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in high-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator [28]. When the HT22 cells in culture reached the logarithmic phase with a confluence of 60–80%, the culture media was fully changed with new DMEM/F12 mixture containing 10% FBS. PTX (P1632, TCI, Shanghai, China) was solubilized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to provide a 1 mM stock solution. The PTX was diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium to the designated concentrations employed in each individual experiment. The control group was administered with a solution of PBS containing 0.1% DMSO. The compound Nec-1 (11658, Cayman Chemical Company, Kentucky, USA) was dissolved in PBS and made into a 1mM stock solution. This stock solution was then diluted into Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium to achieve the desired final concentrations for each experiment. In the studies, the cells in the experimental group were subjected to pretreatment with Nec-1 for a duration of 2 hours. Following this, the cells were treated with or without PTX (10 µM) for a period of 24 hours.
2.2 Cell viability assay
HT22 cells treated with PTX were seeded onto 24-well culture plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/1 mL/well. Various doses of PTX ranging from 1 to 20 µM were used [29]. The HT22 cell shape and growth status were examined using a TS100 inverted microscope (model BH2-RFCA, manufactured by OLYMPUS in Japan) at intervals of 2–4 hours following treatment with PTX. Cell proliferation and survival were assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, cat. no. K009, ZETA, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were placed in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 hours. Afterwards, PTX was introduced into the growth medium at the specified doses. The cells were subsequently incubated for an additional 24 hours. Subsequently, 10 µl of CCK-8 working solution were introduced into each well and subjected to incubation at a temperature of 37°C for a duration of 0.5 hours. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a Spectra Max Absorbance Reader (Molecular Devices, China).
2.3 Lactate Dehydrogenase Assay
The levels of the cytoplasmic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured using the Cytotoxicity LDH test kits (JL-T1070, Shanghai Jianglai Industrial Limited By Share Ltd) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Concisely, the cells were ruptured and the liquid above them, as well as the liquid in which they were growing, were gathered to measure LDH concentrations. The absorbance readings were monitored using a SpectraMax absorbance reader (Molecular Devices, China) at a wavelength of 450 nm. Subsequently, the percentage of LDH release was determined.
2.4 Flow cytometry analysis
The technique of flow cytometry was employed to ascertain the alterations in the morphological characteristics of cells undergoing apoptosis and necrosis. In summary, the cells were placed in the 12-well plate with a confluency of 40% and exposed to certain treatments. Subsequently, the cells were collected, rinsed with PBS on two occasions, and subjected to staining using the FITC Annexin V apoptosis detection kit (AT101-100-kit, MULTISCIENCES), following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. The stained cells were examined by flow cytometry (E97501093, BD Biosciences) with the use of the Flow jo software. Apoptotic cells were detected using Annexin V labeling, whereas necrotic cells were detected with PI staining.
2.5 Microscopic imaging of cell death
In order to evaluate cell death, HT22 cells were introduced onto a 24-well plate with a concentration of 1x105 cells per well. The assessment of cell necrosis was conducted using Hoechst 33258/PI staining, following the manufacturer's procedure. Cells were washed twice with PBS before being incubated with Hoechst 33258/PI reagents (94403, Sigma, Germany) at 37°C for 5 minutes in the dark. The cell pictures were obtained using fluorescent microscopy (BH2-RFCA, OLYMPUS, Japan).
2.6 Western blot analysis
A Western blot was conducted using established protocols. HT22 cells were lysed using ice-cold RIPA buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The protein produced from the lysate was divided into equal quantities and subjected to 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently, the protein was transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The membranes were exposed to primary antibodies specific to several proteins, including anti-RIPK1 (Arigo, Shanghai, China), anti-RIPK3 (Arigo, Shanghai, China), anti-MLKL (Abcam, Shanghai, China), anti-phosphorylation MLKL (Abcam, Shanghai, China), and anti-GAPDH (Abcam, Shanghai, China). Subsequently, the appropriate alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used to see the bands. The bands were scanned and shown utilizing the Epson Perfection V39 Scanner system (EPSON, Japan). The band signals' strength was assessed utilizing the Image J program. The internal control utilized in this study was GAPDH.
2.7 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
The TEM (Fan and Fan, 2017) was used to view and study the ultrastructure of HT22 cells. The cells were grown in a 6-well plate, treated with 10 µM PTX, and collected at 24 hr following treatment. Subsequently, the cells were immobilized using a PBS solution containing 4% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide. They were then dried, embedded in epoxy resin, and visualized using a H700 TEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
2.8 Estimation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration
The Fluo-4 AM Kit (KGAF024, Keygen Biotech) was used to measure the concentration of Ca2+ inside the cells, following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. In summary, HT22 cells were placed in a 6-well plate and left to incubate overnight. Subsequently, the manufacturer's loading buffer was used to replace the culture medium. Following a 1-hour incubation at a temperature of 37°C, the buffer solution was substituted with a recording buffer that included Fluo-4 AM. The fluorescence intensity was evaluated by measuring the absorbance at the peak excitation wavelength of 340/380 nm and the peak emission wavelength of 510 nm.
2.9 Animals and behavioral tests
The behavioral tests were conducted in accordance with the standards and regulations set out by the National Institute of Health. The experimental procedures were authorized by the Experimental Animal Welfare Ethics Committee of Hebei Medical University (Approval No. IACUC-Hebmu-2020009). Male C57BL/6N mice, aged six to eight weeks and weighing 20–25 grams, were acquired from Beijing Huafukang Biotechnology Co., LTD in Beijing, China. The mice were kept in a controlled laboratory environment. Thirty mice were randomized to three groups using random assignment (n = 30). (1) Control: The mice in this group were given the same amount of Nec-1 vehicle (DMSO) and Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (1:10), as well as PTX vehicle (anhydrous ethanol) and Cremophor EL (1:1). (2) PTX: The mice in this group were given the same amount of Nec-1 vehicle (DMSO) and Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (1:10), and then injected with PTX 10 mg/kg, 2 hours later [30]. (3) PTX + Nec-1: The mice in this group were injected with Nec-1 6.5 mg/kg and PTX 10 mg/kg, with a 2-hour interval, every other day [31]. Figure 5A illustrates the experimental procedure. The weight of the mice was measured and recorded daily.
2.10 Open field test (OFT)
The OFT is a behavioral test that evaluates general exploration by monitoring locomotor and anxiety-like behaviors [32]. The OFT apparatus, manufactured by Anhui Zheng-Hua Instrument in China, has four chambers, each measuring 50 × 50 × 50 cm. It is equipped with an automated data gathering system and a camera for monitoring the chambers. A mouse was positioned at the middle of the room, and the locomotion of the mice was observed for a duration of 5 minutes following a 1-hour period of adaptation, as described previously [33]. The analytical program autonomously partitions each chamber into nine squares and monitors the mouse motions. Each test, the instrument was cleaned with ethanol for removing any odor. The mice's average velocity and overall distance covered were calculated and then compared.
2.11 Novel Object recognition test (NOR)
The novel object recognition (NOR) task was conducted using a 45 x 45 cm open-field apparatus, following the method reported by Rosa et al.[34]. Prior to the trial, the mice were provided with a familiarity period during which they were allowed to freely explore the open space without any items for 10 minutes, 24 hr before the trial. Following that, several items were employed, including A1, A2, B, and C. Notably, A1 and A2 were indistinguishable blue rectangles, whereas the object labeled "B" was a yellow cube, and the object labeled "C" was a red cylinder. Following a 24-hour period of habituation, a training trial was carried out by placing each mouse in an open field containing A1 and A2 items. These objects were positioned in two neighboring corners, 10 cm apart from the walls. The assessment of short-term memory involved observing the exploratory preference towards a familiar (A) and a novel (B) object 1.5 hours following the train track. Long-term memory was assessed by substituting the "B" item with the "C" object using the identical approach 24 hours after conducting short-term memory tests. The duration of exploration was measured for a period of 5 minutes and was defined as the act of smelling or touching the object using the nose and/or forepaws. After each testing, the plastic items were cleaned using a 40% ethanol solution. The exploratory preference was determined by dividing the time spent with the new item by the sum of the time spent with the familiar object and the time spent with the novel object.
2.12 The Morris Water Maze (MWM)
The MWM test was employed to evaluate spatial learning and memory [35]. The apparatus consisted of a circular tank with a diameter of 136 cm and a height of 60 cm. The tank was painted black on the inside. It contained water that was 30 cm deep and had a temperature of 24 ± 1°C. The circular tank was partitioned into four identical quadrants, each occupying one-fourth of the tank's area. A concealed circular platform with a diameter of 10 cm was positioned in the middle of a single quadrant, buried 1.5 cm beneath the surface of the water. Visual markers were strategically placed at many areas throughout the tank. A video tracking system was used to capture the mouse's movement in order to assess the distance it traveled and the time it took to discover the platform. The mice underwent four daily trials for six consecutive days, with the disguised circular platform consistently positioned at the same location. Each day, the release points were allocated to each animal in a random manner. The trial concluded either when the mouse successfully reached the secret platform or after 60 seconds had passed. The mice were permitted to remain on the platform for a duration of 15 seconds. Subsequently, the subsequent experiment commenced following a 20-minute interval. If the mice failed to locate the platform within a 60-second timeframe, they were manually placed on the platform and given a score of 60 seconds. Following the conclusion of the last trial, the mice were provided with a warm and dry environment for one hour before being returned to their original cage. The computer software was used to determine the traveling distance and escape delay of a mouse in reaching the hiding platform. The daily score per mouse was calculated as the mean of the 4 trials conducted on that day. On the seventh day, a 60-second probe trial was conducted without the presence of the platform in the tank. The computer program was used to calculate the amount of time spent in the target quadrant during the probe trial.
2.13 Statistical Analysis
The statistical analyses were conducted on data collected from three separate studies using the SPSS 20.0 statistical program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). The data was presented as means ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey’s tests was used to compare data between multiple groups.The data between two groups was compared using the Student's t-test. Statistical differences were deemed significant with a level of confidence (alpha value) of P < 0.05.