5.1. Tracking the Cusco fault below the CCC
The velocity model (Fig. 8a) is in good agreement with the results of the electrical resistivity survey carried out previously in the south of the CCC (INDECI-PNUD, 2003). Their authors estimated the contact between soft sediments and more compact rocks belonging to the San Jeronimo Group (Eocene) at a depth of around 50-60m. Our results for the CCC indicate a similar structure: several horizons of the San Sebastian formation, at least 40m thick and constituting the basin infill, overlie Eocene formations visible to the south of the basin and/or Cretaceous formations outcropping to the north of the basin (Yuncaypata Group; Carlotto et al., 2011). In any case, based on Vs values, the EB would consist of significantly altered sandstone or limestone formations. Aside from this simplified geological model, the data from this geophysical survey highlights some particular features.
As pointed out in the previous section, the variations of natural frequencies seem to be strongly correlated with the geometry and depth of the first impedance contrast (Fig. 8b), referred to as the EB. In other terms, the quick and strong decrease of the f0 that we observe in the southern part of the CCC suggests a sudden steepening of the EB close to the Santo Domingo sector (Fig. 7). The sudden thickening of the sediment cover in that area is hard to explain without the existence of geological structures or discontinuities. Several studies have provided evidence of the existence of a blind fault, named hereafter the Cusco fault, running parallel to the basin (Benavente Escobar et al., 2013; Carlotto et al., 2011; Wimpenny et al., 2020). While field observations report the presence of deformed Quaternary sediments within the basin (Benavente Escobar et al., 2013), electrical resistivity profiles reveal colluvial wedges (Benavente Escobar et al., 2013). Since then, magnetotelluric profiles carried out by Antayhua et al. (2021) have confirmed the tectonic origin of the Cusco Basin, and then suggest a branched structure with several fault segments connected at depth.
Our findings seem to attest to the presence of at least one fault segment beneath the CCC and thus offer interesting avenues for research into the influence of tectonic structures in modifying the local ambient noise wave-field. We base our analysis on the recent work of Garcia et al (in prep.), who mapped soil gas radon anomalies in the Cusco area and matched them to the active faults in the area. The authors found several well localized anomalies distributed linearly and parallel throughout the Cusco Basin (Garcia et al., pers. comm.). The authors therefore support the existence of several parallel fault segments, oriented NW-SE across the basin. It turns out that among the areas showing anomalous soil gas radon concentrations, several are located in the Santo Domingo sector and at the confluence of the Huatanay and Chunchullmayo rivers (Pumacchupan). The presence of a normal fault in the Santo Domingo sector is perfectly consistent with the results of this work. As shown in Fig. 7, the area of sudden deepening of the EB to the south of Santo Domingo agrees very well with the fault line proposed by Garcia et al (pers.comm.). The map also highlights the strong spatial agreement between the variations in amplitude of the MHVSR peak (A0) and the breaks in slope of the EB. Given the influence of the impedance contrast’s geometry in the amplitude in the microtremor measurements (reflection, refraction, complex surface wave field; Irikura and Kawanaka, 1980), it is likely that a geological discontinuity, i.e. a fault zone, could affect locally the MHVSR peak (D’Amico et al., 2008; Mucciarelli et al., 1999; Tarabusi and Caputo, 2017). Indeed, it is in this zone of lower amplitude that most of the MHVSR curves for which no f0 value could be picked are located. Regarding the higher uncertainty of the MHVSR measurements at these points, we should point out that the large standard deviation cannot be solely explained by the relatively short recording period (~ 20 min) and the non-stationary nature of the ambient vibrations. At various measurement points, a longer recording duration (40 min) gave similar results.
Looking at a N-S profile (Figs. 3 and 9), some of the MHVSR curves (2 and 4) show very local shrinkage (reduction of A0) and/or broadening (plateau) of the peak, which makes more difficult to estimate the f0. Strikingly, the areas in which these two points are located correspond to the assumed traces of two fault segments based on radon measurements (Figs. 7 and 9). The sectors between points 1 and 3 and between 3 and 5 also show a more or less sudden drop of f0. The MHVSR method is not meant to identify faults. Although MHVSR surveys have already been used to identify and locate tectonic structures, the discussion was limited to sudden variations in f0 (D’Amico et al., 2008; Khalili and Mirzakurdeh, 2019; Stanko et al., 2017; Tarabusi and Caputo, 2017) and wave polarization in the horizontal components (Lombardo and Rigano, 2006; Pischiutta et al., 2013). To our knowledge, no work has ever addressed a potential disturbance of the wave field in the vicinity of an active fault that would significantly affect the MHVSR curves, excluding the preliminary observation made by Mucciarelli et al. (1999) in Italy. In short, the microtremor measurements, combined with the inverted velocity model, reveal a geological discontinuity, consistent with the trace of one segment of the Cusco fault. The concordance of areas without a MHVSR peak with the sudden deepening of the bedrock argues for an effect of this structure on the mechanical properties of the sediments in these areas, potentially generating disturbances in the wave field. This fault with a normal component and dipping towards the south would displace the compact Eocene or Cretaceous formations but could also affect the overlying sediments, as evidenced by the disturbances in the MHVSR curves close to the discontinuity (colluvial wedge, fault gouge?).
5.2. Urban environment: a masking effect for soil response evaluation?
Several studies have demonstrated that the MHVSR technique tends to underestimate the amplitude of frequency peaks (Lebrun et al., 2001; Pilz et al., 2009; Rong et al., 2017) and might only be regarded as a lower bond of the actual site amplification (Bard, 1999; Bonnefoy-Claudet et al., 2008, 2006). Furthermore, the challenging nature of ambient vibrations-based surveys in urban environments (Pacheco et al., 2022) and the non-linear response of the ground during strong transient shaking should not be overlooked. Nevertheless, as the frequency of the MHVSR secondary peaks falls within the frequency range of engineering interest (~ 3–10 Hz), it is necessary to examine the distribution and amplitude of these peaks in order to identify potential soil-structure interaction phenomena. Because of the wide variability of the f1 frequencies identified during the MHVSR survey, it is difficult to establish the origin of these peaks. They might be harmonics of the fundamental frequency f0 or a shallow seismic interface within the Quaternary sediments of the San Sebastian Formation. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the results of the joint inversion support the existence of a first (moderate) velocity contrast at a depth of around 30m compatible with the lowest f1 (~ 5 Hz).
Given the densely urbanized environment in which the MHVSR measurements were carried out and the relatively small number of recordings showing an identifiable second peak (54, i.e., 1/3 of the total; Table S1), we are inclined to consider the role of shallow velocity inversions detailed by Castellaro and Mulargia, (2009). The authors highlight the dramatic effect that very thin and stiff artificial layers (concrete/pavements) can have on the MHVSR curves, lowering the peaks down to relative low frequencies (~ 2Hz). These shallow velocity inversions are frequently accompanied by MHVSR curves with an amplitude below 1 over a wide range of frequencies. We observe this phenomenon on some curves, such as P90 (Fig. 5b) and curve 2 in Fig. 9. However, as the measurements were all carried out on paved areas, we should expect a generalized alteration in the MHVSR curves throughout the entire CCC. Actually, the f1 distribution does not seem to be random and the amplitudes (A1) do not seem to be damped out homogeneously. There is a clustering of the lowest values of f1 (≤ 5 Hz) on the margins of the city center, while most of the frequencies between 5 and 15 Hz are located in the core of the city (between the Tullumayo and Huatanay rivers). It should also be noted that the f1 > 5 Hz generally has higher amplitudes than the f1 ≤ 5 Hz, which are characterized by very low amplitudes (< 2). In addition, the highest amplitudes (> 3) are confined to two sectors of the CCC: Plaza de Armas (Fig. 5c-d) and Santo Domingo. These two areas exhibit the two largest open spaces in the CCC. With regard to this singular f1 distribution, we formulate two hypotheses, not mutually exclusive:
The CCC is located on the exact place where the capital of the Inca Empire was settled in the 15th and 16th centuries, of which many remains can still be admired. At that time, the city's residential sectors were mainly confined between the Tullumayo and Huatanay rivers (Bauer, 2018; Beltrán-Caballero, 2013; Vranich et al., 2014), while an extensive network of agricultural terraces and canals structured the surrounding area (Fig. 10). The plaza de Armas then represented half of a large open space known as Hawcaypata, while the sector of Santo Domingo consisted of a plaza to the north (Intipampa) and a terraced garden to the west, bordering the Huatanay river. Given the long period of occupation of the city of Cusco (at least since the 11th century; Bauer, 2018) and the great capacity of the Incas to transform their landscape (e.g., Wright, 2006), it seems very likely that the Inca city of Cusco was made up of a large number of man-made earthworks. These embankments and terracing projects, which were potentially more extensive and thicker in the residential area, are also documented by Spanish sources describing the large quantities of sand brought in from other regions of the Empire to prepare the Hawcaypata square (de Ondegardo, 1916). The higher frequencies observed in the city core would therefore indicate the persistence of significant anthropogenic backfills, while on the periphery the absence of such deposits sometimes highlights a deeper impedance contrast (f1 < 5Hz) between natural Quaternary horizons (Fig. 10). The pre-Columbian urban planning and the past cultural practices could therefore be related, at least partially, with the f1 distribution pattern. This hypothesis will have to be confirmed by further analysis of the archaeological data and stratigraphy.
A second hypothesis concerns the influence of the current urban layout on the site response. It has been established that buildings and their interaction with the ground can have a significant impact on nearby free-field measurements (Gallipoli et al., 2004). At the scale of an urban context, this "site-city seismic interaction" might significantly affect the site response in case of an earthquake. For Gueguen et al., (2002), the urban environment should not only be considered as a vulnerable entity but also as an active component of the seismic hazard. During an earthquake, building vibrations can be transferred back to the ground through the foundations (inertial soil-structure interactions), amplifying and prolonging the ground motion. In the case of the Mw 7.3 earthquake in Mexico (1995), the authors demonstrated that a high building-to-soil kinematic energy ratio usually implies high buildings, a high urban density and a correspondence between the site response and the building resonance frequencies. Although the previous work focuses on the “site-city interaction” during earthquakes, we can question the role of the urban layout of Cusco in contaminating the response of the site during a passive survey using MHVSR measurements. As proposed by Brûlé et al. (2017), cities can be regarded as metamaterials. In geophysics, such concept implies that the urban fabric might behave like a group of “Above-Surface resonators” (Brûlé et al., 2020), modifying thus the response of individual structures and acting as surface wave filters (Colombi et al., 2016; Gueguen and Colombi, 2016). It is striking that, despite the relative coherence of the frequencies of the secondary peak within the core of the city, the strongest amplitudes are restricted to the largest open spaces and therefore to the areas furthest away from the buildings (Fig. 10). In Cusco, most of the buildings that make up the historic center are large colonial complexes with patios, connected to each other and subdivided over time into multiple flats and lots. Clustering effects and interactions between the structures are therefore likely to be high, and the data collected so far as part of our research suggests that modes specific to an entire residential block could be identified. The long-period vibrations of these ‘meta-structures' could thus alter the apparent response of the ground (Fig.S1).
In short, the clustered distributions of f1 and A1 do not seem to be explained solely by a velocity inversion at very shallow depths. They also point to a decisive role for the urban layout (past and present) in the response of the site. Although these hypotheses remain to be ascertained, the strong contrast in frequency between the core and the periphery could be due to differences in the nature and thickness of the surface sediments. The higher frequencies in the urban core could be associated with anthropogenic deposits dating from the pre-Columbian period, which are absent from the outskirts. In parallel, the strong contrast in A1 between the open spaces and the rest of the city suggests a significant influence of the city's buildings on MHVSR measurements at medium and high frequencies (> 3 Hz). If confirmed, the influence of these two parameters should be taken into account in a future microzonation of Cusco.