Our study found an influence of the PRODET® program in one of the companies on job capacity, job satisfaction and trait anxiety. Within the broad spectrum of wellbeing programs at work, a good way forward to reduce business and health costs related to absenteeism and presenteeism can be precisely to direct these programs towards their impact on mental health (33) approaches can be reinforced from the concept of global health indicators to measure the success of such interventions. Our results have not corroborated findings in previous research on absenteeism, according to which programs or follow-ups based on physical activity in the workplace significantly reduced sick leave (34). A possible explanation may lie in the high experimental death that occurred in our study. However, the improvement of other variables related to absenteeism, such as the enhancement of physical condition or health in general according to age, gender, work function, chronic conditions, sedentary lifestyle and smoking, make us think that such relationships could be corroborated in future empirical work, as has already been seen in graduate workers in Spain considered sedentary (35). However, despite these promising results, based on the information reported by other recent studies, we agree on the need to continue conducting more rigorous studies on this variable. In view are the first studies that focused on locating the possible effects of physical activity aimed at reducing sensitivity to anxiety from low and also higher intensity physical exercise programs (36). The association of the effects according to the type of sector can contribute to the elimination of this heterogeneity found in previous studies regarding the type of program and instrument used, especially if the localized effects are concentrated on the understanding of a cultural, social and political reality associated with the territories in which the program has been implemented, as already pointed out by Jiménez Díaz-Benito, Vanderhaegen and Barriopedro (2020) (37). In this study, the authors started from the work of Rongen et al. (2013) and reported on statistical heterogeneity, coinciding with other findings from previous studies (38). Designing a model that could address these elements based on global health indicators, such as VO2 max or focusing on the effects related to mental health with easily implemented and far-reaching programs, could contribute to providing more empirical evidence and focusing on the future development of interventions. While work areas that provide treadmills increase productivity, they appear to have an impact on the performance of tasks involving computer use (34, 39, 35, 40) to this variability in finding effects from physical or mental variables, the scientific literature suggests developing alternative designs since there are difficulties related to blinding and outcome measurement (36). Within these alternative studies, it would be desirable that the effects could be attributed to the program and not to external factors. Less than half of the randomized clinical trials show effects (most of them small) on variables such as capacity for work, which must also be added to the low level of participation, experimental death and organizational barriers (41, 42) the approach to new fieldwork through multicomponent methods on unhealthy behaviors and interventions consider working conditions can be effective in combination with the use of fitness devices and applications (38). Moreover, physical factors are associated with responses in psychosocial parameters. In this respect, the duration of the program must be duly controlled, four-month periods seem insufficient according to a recent study; however, the ability to work improves after 12 months of intervention (43). Based on the clinical findings, our results suggest that our intervention was largely ineffective because the duration of the program was insufficient. Despite this, the results are still unclear, as effective programs with interventions of smaller methodological scope, and of only 9 weeks, have been found in the literature (41). These findings coincide with the results reported by other authors (44, 45) while studies with lower methodological quality found greater effects. Also, recent investigations have focused their interventions on graduate employees, given the presumed ease of access in these organizational contexts. This suggests the existence of considerable barriers for conducting quality interventions in the field of physical activity in the workplace (46). In this regard, it can be assumed that there were more facilities for access to the sample. These interventions can be a relatively simple way to connect findings on large and small companies, but also comparatively, based on the public or private ownership of such institutions. The results that researchers in future fieldwork aim to find cannot exist without understanding this reality in order to corroborate a methodological design that organizationally addresses these working conditions, as has been referred to in the existing literature, and to find greater effects of interventions to benefit as many people as possible in today's society. Many of the programs implemented do not address the elements of occupational risk as they should, and that too is a limiting factor for favoring sustainable employability (44). However, evidence remains scarce on this point in Europe and similar studies that comparatively address this theoretical framework should be replicated to outline the organizational approach to programs in the future. These observations have also been reported in critical and narrative review studies. In this respect, the frequency that interventions should have to achieve a cost-benefit compensation is not clear in the literature, tending to be around three hours per week. The authors highlight the importance of developing programs based on relevant results that are related to work performance and cognitive improvement (47, 48, 49, 50).